Please help support CiteULike by taking part in our marketing survey.
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Forcing in Proof Theory

The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, Vol. 10, No. 3. (2004), pp. 305-333.

X Abstract

Paul Cohen's method of forcing, together with Saul Kripke's related semantics for modal and intuitionistic logic, has had profound effects on a number of branches of mathematical logic, from set theory and model theory to constructive and categorical logic. Here, I argue that forcing also has a place in traditional Hilbert-style proof theory, where the goal is to formalize portions of ordinary mathematics in restricted axiomatic theories, and study those theories in constructive or syntactic terms. I will discuss the aspects of forcing that are useful in this respect, and some sample applications. The latter include ways of obtaining conservation results for classical and intuitionistic theories, interpreting classical theories in constructive ones, and constructivizing model-theoretic arguments.

View the full article here:

DOI, JSTOR

This article has been bookmarked 4 times, initially on 2005-03-13.

2008-09-30 User yoriyuki
2005-03-14 User rzach
Group LogicPhilMath
2005-03-13 User greg_restall
Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.