Please help support CiteULike by taking part in our marketing survey.
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback

(1997), pp. 355-364.

View the full article here:

ACM

This article has been bookmarked 14 times, initially on 2005-04-19.

2009-09-21 User katherinerozo
2009-01-13 Group ilps
User ejmeij
2008-09-05 User baaic
2008-02-18 User diogomartins
2007-12-27 User abellogin , 1 note

A study of the previously mentioned parallel processing application reveals that the relevance feedback process is easily implemented by using windowing and information display techniques to establish communications between system and users. In particular, ranked lists of retrieved documents can be graphically displayed for the user, and screen pointers can be used to designate certain listed items as relevant to the user’s needs. These relevance indications are then further used by the system to construct modified feedback queries.

It includes probabilistic feedback and vector processing models.

Twelve different relevance feedback methods are used for evaluation purposes with the six sample collections.

2008-01-02 11:54:15
2007-10-30 User pprett
2007-05-04 User creswick
2007-04-06 User krisjack
2007-04-03 User dvallet
Group NETS-UAM
2005-11-06 User elainelally
2005-09-08 User k12u
2005-04-19 User aliku , 1 note

The advantage of all probabilistic feedback models compared with the conventional vector modification methods, is that the feedback process is directly related to the derivation of a weight for query terms. Indeed, the document similarity function of expression (8) increases by a weighting factor of log[p,(l - u,)/u,(l - pi)] for each query term i that matches a document, and this term weight is optimal under the assumed conditions of term independence and binary document indexing. residual collection

2005-04-19 02:42:49
Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.