Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback
|
View the full article here:
ACM
This article has been bookmarked 14 times, initially on 2005-04-19.
| 2009-09-21 |
User katherinerozo
|
|
|
| 2009-01-13 |
Group ilps
|
|
|
|
User ejmeij
|
|
|
| 2008-09-05 |
User baaic
|
|
|
| 2008-02-18 |
User diogomartins
|
|
|
| 2007-12-27 |
User abellogin
, 1 note
|
|
A study of the previously mentioned parallel processing application reveals that the relevance feedback process is easily implemented by using windowing and information display techniques to establish communications between
system and users. In particular, ranked lists of retrieved documents can be graphically displayed for the user, and screen pointers can be used to designate certain listed items as relevant to the user’s needs. These relevance indications are then further used by the system to construct modified feedback queries.
It includes probabilistic feedback and vector processing models.
Twelve different relevance feedback methods are used for evaluation purposes with the six sample collections.
2008-01-02 11:54:15
|
| 2007-10-30 |
User pprett
|
|
|
| 2007-05-04 |
User creswick
|
|
|
| 2007-04-06 |
User krisjack
|
|
|
| 2007-04-03 |
User dvallet
|
|
|
|
Group NETS-UAM
|
|
|
| 2005-11-06 |
User elainelally
|
|
|
| 2005-09-08 |
User k12u
|
|
|
| 2005-04-19 |
User aliku
, 1 note
|
|
The advantage of all probabilistic feedback models compared with the conventional vector modification methods,
is that the feedback process is directly related to the derivation of a weight for query terms. Indeed, the document
similarity function of expression (8) increases by a weighting factor of log[p,(l - u,)/u,(l - pi)] for each query
term i that matches a document, and this term weight is optimal under the assumed conditions of term independence and binary document indexing.
residual collection
2005-04-19 02:42:49
|
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic
(which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments.
It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions.
The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager
like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.