CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Extracting Trust from Domain Analysis: A Case Study on the Wikipedia Project

Autonomic and Trusted Computing (2006), pp. 362-373.

X Abstract

The problem of identifying trustworthy information on the World Wide Web is becoming increasingly acute as new tools such as wikis and blogs simplify and democratize publications. Wikipedia is the most extraordinary example of this phenomenon and, although a few mechanisms have been put in place to improve contributions quality, trust in Wikipedia content quality has been seriously questioned. We thought that a deeper understanding of what in general defines high-standard and expertise in domains related to Wikipedia – i.e. content quality in a collaborative environment – mapped onto Wikipedia elements would lead to a complete set of mechanisms to sustain trust in Wikipedia context. Our evaluation, conducted on about 8,000 articles representing 65% of the overall Wikipedia editing activity, shows that the new trust evidence that we extracted from Wikipedia allows us to transparently and automatically compute trust values to isolate articles of great or low quality.

View the full article here:

DOI, SpringerLink

This article has been bookmarked 8 times, initially on 2007-10-30.

2009-11-23 User AlisonBabeu
2009-04-27 User burt
2009-04-17 User tlucassen , 1 note

Automatic trust value generation to distinguish quality. Example of negative trust. Suggestion for generalization of trust methodology. Zeer uitgebreide trust definitie. Trust evidence extracted from Wikipedia. This evidence may overlap with our findings. Several (computational) trust models are listed, but all are unsuitable for Wikipedia. Three aspects of information quality: objectivity, completeness, pluralism (Alexander). Two domains distinguished: Content Quality and Collaborative Editing (?). Very elaborate model, covering 10 aspects of trustworthiness. Combinations of trust factors are used to indicate warnings. No random sample used (FA and most visited). No representation to the user.

2009-04-21 08:20:37
2008-05-16 User dartar
2008-03-22 Group Social Web
2008-02-10 User aarontaycheehsien
2007-12-12 User qili
2007-10-30 User jfelipe
Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.