The quest for quality tags
In GROUP '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work (2007), pp. 361-370.
|
View the full article here:
ACM, DOI
This article has been bookmarked 9 times, initially on 2007-12-20.
| 2008-10-20 |
User susanhuynh
|
|
|
| 2008-10-11 |
User vanesam
|
|
|
| 2008-09-10 |
User harperf
|
|
|
| 2008-05-27 |
User iansimon
, 1 note
|
|
Experiments on MovieLens with tag rating interfaces -- what happens when users can rate the tag submissions of other users?
1. Allowing just negative ratings, or positive and negative, works better than allowing just positive ratings, or not allowing ratings.
2. Normalizing by user avoids issues with a single user overusing a tag.
3. Using a tag as a search query is also an indicator of its quality.
4. Usually "bad" tag instances imply "bad" tags.
2008-08-05 22:36:21
|
| 2008-05-23 |
User macle
|
|
|
| 2008-03-31 |
User cherhan
|
|
|
| 2008-01-15 |
User intrect
|
|
|
| 2008-01-02 |
User AlisonBabeu
|
|
|
| 2007-12-20 |
User bde
|
|
|
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic
(which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments.
It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions.
The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager
like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.
Search
