The Uses of Argument

"Books are like children.They leave home, make new friends, but rarely call home, even collect.Y ou find out what they have been up to only by chance.A man at a party turns out to be one of those new friends.‘So you are George’s father? – Imagine that!’ So has been the relation between The Uses of Argument and its author. When I wrote it, my aim was strictly philosophical: to criticize the assumption, made by most Anglo-American academic philosophers, that any significant argument can be put in formal terms: not just as a syllogism, since for Aristotle himself any inference can be called a ‘syllogism’ or ‘linking of statements’, but a rigidly demonstrative deduction of the kind to be found in Euclidean geometry.Thus was created the Platonic tradition that, some two millennia later, was revived by Ren´ e Descartes.Readers of Cosmopolis, ormy more recent Return to Reason, will be familiar with this general view of mine. In no way had I set out to expound a theory of rhetoric or argumentation: my concern was with twentieth-century epistemology, not informal logic.Still less had I in mind an analytical model like that which, among scholars of Communication, came to be called ‘the Toulmin model’. Many readers in fact gave me an historical background that consigned me to a premature death.When my fianc´ ee was reading Law, for instance, a fellow-student remarked on her unusual surname: his girlfriend [he explained] had come across it in one of her textbooks, but when he reported that Donna was marrying the author, she replied, ‘That’s impossible: He’s dead!’"