CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Google Scholar revisited

Online Information Review, Vol. 32, No. 1. (2008), pp. 102-114.

X Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to revisit Google Scholar. Design/methodology/approach - This paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of Google Scholar. Findings - The Google Books project has given a massive and valuable boost to the already rich and diverse content of Google Scholar. The dark side of the growth is that significant gaps remain for top ranking journals and serials, and the number of duplicate, triplicate and quadruplicate records for the same source documents (which Google Scholar cannot detect reliably) has increased. Originality/value - This paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of Google Scholar.

View the full article here:

DOI, Scopus

This article has been bookmarked 4 times, initially on 2008-07-02.

2008-12-31 User rrbarb
2008-12-03 User amarois
2008-09-29 User kguris
2008-07-02 User dullhunk
Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.