Commentary on the Acheson report.
Health economics, Vol. 8, No. 4. (June 1999), pp. 297-299.
|
This article has been bookmarked once, on 2008-10-08.
| 2008-10-08 |
User mpgrayer
, 1 note
|
|
Sceptical commentary on the Acheson report. Criticises the choice of indicators used to measure health --- argues that some form of quality-adjusted life expectancy should have been used. Questions to what extent health inequalities are immoral --- relating the concept of a chance at a ``fair innings'' with lifestyle choices that ``throw this opportunity away''. Smoking habits are used to make this point, though the argument is limited as it doesn't take into account the addictive nature of smoking, simply assuming that lifestyle choices are the person's own fault.
2008-10-09 16:11:30
|
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic
(which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments.
It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions.
The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager
like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.