CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Ten Simple Rules for Getting Grants

PLoS Comput Biol, Vol. 2, No. 2. (24 February 2006), e12.

View the full article here:

DOI, Pubmed, Hubmed

This article has been bookmarked 27 times, initially on 2006-03-03.

2009-11-23 User danilov
2009-11-18 User tminze
2009-11-10 User aaltenburger
2009-06-13 User daforerog
2008-10-23 User guhjy
2008-10-21 User pengchy
2008-10-11 User monkare
2008-09-23 User schlady
2008-09-19 User stancari
2008-09-17 User abellogin , 1 note

Rule 1: Be Novel, but Not Too Novel Rule 2: Include the Appropriate Background and Preliminary Data as Required Rule 3: Find the Appropriate Funding Mechanism, Read the Associated Request for Applications Very Carefully, and Respond Specifically to the Request Rule 4: Follow the Guidelines for Submission Very Carefully and Comply Rule 5: Obey the Three Cs—Concise, Clear, and Complete Rule 6: Remember, Reviewers Are People, Too Rule 7: Timing and Internal Review Are Important Rule 8: Know Your Grant Administrator at the Institution Funding Your Grant Rule 9: Become a Grant Reviewer Early in Your Career Rule 10: Accept Rejection and Deal with It Appropriately

2008-09-22 09:41:43
2008-09-10 Group Roswell Cancer Crosstalk , 1 note

Excerpt: This piece follows an earlier Editorial, “Ten Simple Rules for Getting Published” [1], which has generated significant interest, is well read, and continues to generate a variety of positive comments. That Editorial was aimed at students in the early stages of a life of scientific paper writing. This interest has prompted us to try to help scientists in making the next academic career step—becoming a young principal investigator. Leo Chalupa has joined us in putting together ten simple rules for getting grants, based on our many collective years of writing both successful and unsuccessful grants. While our grant writing efforts have been aimed mainly at United States government funding agencies, we believe the rules presented here are generic, transcending funding institutions and national boundaries.

At the present time, US funding is frequently below 10% for a given grant program. Today, more than ever, we need all the help we can get in writing successful grant proposals. We hope you find these rules useful in reaching your research career goals.

2008-09-10 19:28:13
2008-09-09 User Zephyrus , 1 note

Excerpt: This piece follows an earlier Editorial, “Ten Simple Rules for Getting Published” [1], which has generated significant interest, is well read, and continues to generate a variety of positive comments. That Editorial was aimed at students in the early stages of a life of scientific paper writing. This interest has prompted us to try to help scientists in making the next academic career step—becoming a young principal investigator. Leo Chalupa has joined us in putting together ten simple rules for getting grants, based on our many collective years of writing both successful and unsuccessful grants. While our grant writing efforts have been aimed mainly at United States government funding agencies, we believe the rules presented here are generic, transcending funding institutions and national boundaries.

At the present time, US funding is frequently below 10% for a given grant program. Today, more than ever, we need all the help we can get in writing successful grant proposals. We hope you find these rules useful in reaching your research career goals.

2008-09-09 18:16:03
2008-08-11 User fgibson
2007-12-17 User elvinado
2007-11-30 User Torsten_Holmer
2007-10-18 User dullhunk
2007-05-07 User rodney
Group Kopelman_Group
2006-06-22 User ucbcjbm
2006-04-03 User nickluscombe
Group EBI-regulation
2006-03-28 User cmm
Group FAB-lab
User eweaver
2006-03-03 User marcius
Group BioinfoCIPF
Group SGU-CIPF
Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.