Ten Simple Rules for Getting Grants
PLoS Comput Biol, Vol. 2, No. 2. (24 February 2006), e12.
|
This article has been bookmarked 27 times, initially on 2006-03-03.
| 2009-11-23 |
User danilov
|
|
|
| 2009-11-18 |
User tminze
|
|
|
| 2009-11-10 |
User aaltenburger
|
|
|
| 2009-06-13 |
User daforerog
|
|
|
| 2008-10-23 |
User guhjy
|
|
|
| 2008-10-21 |
User pengchy
|
|
|
| 2008-10-11 |
User monkare
|
|
|
| 2008-09-23 |
User schlady
|
|
|
| 2008-09-19 |
User stancari
|
|
|
| 2008-09-17 |
User abellogin
, 1 note
|
|
Rule 1: Be Novel, but Not Too Novel
Rule 2: Include the Appropriate Background and Preliminary Data as Required
Rule 3: Find the Appropriate Funding Mechanism, Read the Associated Request for Applications Very Carefully, and Respond Specifically to the Request
Rule 4: Follow the Guidelines for Submission Very Carefully and Comply
Rule 5: Obey the Three Cs—Concise, Clear, and Complete
Rule 6: Remember, Reviewers Are People, Too
Rule 7: Timing and Internal Review Are Important
Rule 8: Know Your Grant Administrator at the Institution Funding Your Grant
Rule 9: Become a Grant Reviewer Early in Your Career
Rule 10: Accept Rejection and Deal with It Appropriately
2008-09-22 09:41:43
|
| 2008-09-10 |
Group Roswell Cancer Crosstalk
, 1 note
|
|
Excerpt: This piece follows an earlier Editorial, “Ten Simple Rules for Getting Published” [1], which has generated significant interest, is well read, and continues to generate a variety of positive comments. That Editorial was aimed at students in the early stages of a life of scientific paper writing. This interest has prompted us to try to help scientists in making the next academic career step—becoming a young principal investigator. Leo Chalupa has joined us in putting together ten simple rules for getting grants, based on our many collective years of writing both successful and unsuccessful grants. While our grant writing efforts have been aimed mainly at United States government funding agencies, we believe the rules presented here are generic, transcending funding institutions and national boundaries.
At the present time, US funding is frequently below 10% for a given grant program. Today, more than ever, we need all the help we can get in writing successful grant proposals. We hope you find these rules useful in reaching your research career goals.
2008-09-10 19:28:13
|
| 2008-09-09 |
User Zephyrus
, 1 note
|
|
Excerpt:
This piece follows an earlier Editorial, “Ten Simple Rules for Getting Published” [1], which has generated significant interest, is well read, and continues to generate a variety of positive comments. That Editorial was aimed at students in the early stages of a life of scientific paper writing. This interest has prompted us to try to help scientists in making the next academic career step—becoming a young principal investigator. Leo Chalupa has joined us in putting together ten simple rules for getting grants, based on our many collective years of writing both successful and unsuccessful grants. While our grant writing efforts have been aimed mainly at United States government funding agencies, we believe the rules presented here are generic, transcending funding institutions and national boundaries.
At the present time, US funding is frequently below 10% for a given grant program. Today, more than ever, we need all the help we can get in writing successful grant proposals. We hope you find these rules useful in reaching your research career goals.
2008-09-09 18:16:03
|
| 2008-08-11 |
User fgibson
|
|
|
| 2007-12-17 |
User elvinado
|
|
|
| 2007-11-30 |
User Torsten_Holmer
|
|
|
| 2007-10-18 |
User dullhunk
|
|
|
| 2007-05-07 |
User rodney
|
|
|
|
Group Kopelman_Group
|
|
|
| 2006-06-22 |
User ucbcjbm
|
|
|
| 2006-04-03 |
User nickluscombe
|
|
|
|
Group EBI-regulation
|
|
|
| 2006-03-28 |
User cmm
|
|
|
|
Group FAB-lab
|
|
|
|
User eweaver
|
|
|
| 2006-03-03 |
User marcius
|
|
|
|
Group BioinfoCIPF
|
|
|
|
Group SGU-CIPF
|
|
|
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic
(which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments.
It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions.
The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager
like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.