The elements of computer credibility
In CHI '99: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (1999), pp. 80-87.
|
View the full article here:
ACM, DOI
This article has been bookmarked 13 times, initially on 2006-07-01.
| 2009-05-08 |
User tlucassen
, 5 notes
|
|
credibility = believability (seen this before...). credibility = perceived quality. key elements of credibility: trustworthiness and expertise. Very nice definitions on the first page.
2009-05-14 11:06:40
trust = dependability, trust in information = credibility. familiarity causes less credibility (contrast with other papers!).
2009-05-14 11:24:04
newly proposed framework (1999): presumed credibility, reputed credibility, surface credibility and experienced credibility. Three models of evaluation.
2009-05-14 11:27:34
when users assess credibility, they assess:
1. device credibility
2. interface credibility
3. functional credibility (closest to trust)
4. information credibility
psychological targets:
1. on-screen characters
2. computer qua computer
3. brand
4. expert creator
2009-05-14 11:31:09
very good paper
2009-05-14 11:31:53
|
| 2008-02-05 |
User christiand
|
|
|
| 2007-10-29 |
User ransofodo
|
|
|
| 2007-09-12 |
User divyalalitha
|
|
|
| 2007-01-15 |
User dartar
|
|
|
| 2006-11-05 |
User starchaser
|
|
|
| 2006-11-02 |
User Hoenikker
|
|
|
| 2006-07-13 |
User ericw
, 1 note
|
|
Good semantic distinction between trust and credibility. various phrases that really refer to credibility: "trust in the information", "accept the advice", "believe the output". trust is more about dependability.
notes on credibility:
== small errors have a disproportionately large impact on credibility
== four kinds of credbility: device, interface, functional, information-credibility
2006-07-13 01:25:20
|
| 2006-07-06 |
User karin
|
|
|
| 2006-07-01 |
User alexanderljung
|
|
|
|
Group Semantic-Social-Networks
|
|
|
|
Group Web2
|
|
|
|
Group Trustmojo
|
|
|
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic
(which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments.
It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions.
The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager
like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.