Appearance-Based Politics: Sex-Typed Facial Cues Communicate Political Party Affiliation

Consequential political judgments often rely on facial appearance, yet the facial cues that compel such judgments remain unspecified. We predicted that judgments of political party affiliation, and by extension their accuracy, rely on the sex-typicality of facial cues (i.e., the degree of facial masculinity and femininity). In Study 1, we found that among Republicans/Conservatives in the 111th U.S. House of Representatives, women were significantly more sex-typical than men. This was not true for Democrats/Liberals. In Study 2, we examined the relationship between sex-typicality of facial cues and social judgments. We found that the accuracy of Republican categorizations was positively related to feminine cues in women but negatively related to masculine cues in men. In contrast, the opposite pattern was true for Democratic categorizations. Facial sex-typicality mediated the interaction between politician sex and party and perceiver party affiliation judgments. We discuss the implications that these findings have for electoral politics. ⺠We examine the influence of appearance-based cues on judgments of party affiliation ⺠We find that facial cues associated with political party affiliation are sex-typed ⺠Female Republicans are significantly more sex-typical than female Democrats ⺠Accuracy of party judgments varies by sex-typicality and politician party ⺠Facial sex-typicality mediates the influence of politician sex and party on perceiver party judgments