CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Quantifying amino acid conformational preferences and side-chain–side-chain interactions in β-hairpins Export

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 102, No. 39. (27 September 2005), pp. 13737-13742.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


structural_bioinformatics's tags for this article

beta-hairpin beta-strand conformation sequence-structure

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

10.1073/pnas.0506646102 The intrinsic conformational biases of individual amino acids and their interstrand side-chain–side-chain (SC–SC) interactions both contribute to the stability of β-sheets. The relative magnitudes of these effects have been difficult to assess in the context of folded proteins, where tertiary contacts complicate the quantitative analysis of local effects. We now report the results of such an analysis in a much simpler system, a short, stabilized β-hairpin structure where intrastrand (conformational) and interstrand (SC–SC) influences can be distinguished in the absence of competing protein tertiary interactions. A comprehensive comparison of all pairwise combinations of 11 N-terminal and 7 C-terminal amino acids within an 8-residue, @-tide-stabilized [in which @ denotes the 1,2-dihydro-3(6)-pyridinyl unit] β-hairpin reveals distinct differences between the various pairings and shows that the intrastrand and interstrand effects are of comparable magnitude in contributing to the stability of the folded forms over the unfolded forms.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.