Register | Log in | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Recommended | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

The myth of non-overlapping channels: interference measurements in IEEE 802.11

Wireless on Demand Network Systems and Services, 2007. WONS '07. Fourth Annual Conference on (2007), pp. 1-8.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

It has become a widely accepted assumption that multiple IEEE 802.11b/g transmissions in physical proximity can coexist without interfering each other. This is claimed to be the case when using separate channels with a minimum distance of 25 MHz, e.g. channel 1 and 6, which are often referred to as non-overlapping. In contrast we show that in practice cross-channel interference can be present also between non-overlapping channels if the interfering transmitter is in the proximity of the receiver. This phenomenon is known as the "near-far effect" in wireless communications. On IEEE 802.11 this has two main effects: frame corruption due to increased interference noise and channel blocking due to spurious carrier detection. The problem can be particularly serious when using IEEE 802.11 technology to build multi-hop mesh networks. Through an extensive set of experiments with off-the-shelf certified WiFi chipsets we demonstrate the presence and the detrimental effects of cross-channel interference between non-overlapping channels. We adopt an incremental approach: we first consider the case of unacknowledged broadcast packets, then we extend to regular UDP streams, finally we provide preliminary results for multi-hop TCP flows


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.