CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Quantitative assessment of the contribution of high resolution mass spectrometric analysis to the reliability of compound confirmation

by: Georgi Stoev, Yue Xuan, Milena Peycheva, Michaela Scigelova
Talanta, Vol. 98 (August 2012), pp. 19-27, doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2012.06.026  Key: citeulike:10851693

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Applications of high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) in food safety and residue analysis have increased remarkably over the last few years. The high resolution detection of ions reportedly enhances the assay selectivity but quantitative assessment of HRMS contribution to the assay selectivity has not yet been undertaken. We devised a method to assess the impact of instrument resolution on the probability that a spectral assignment to a given compound was made in error. The method allows for evaluating the quality of a spectral assignment based on resolution and the number of fragmentation stages. It thus provides a firm basis for comparing analytical methods performed on very different mass spectrometric instrumental platforms as well as in the context of the current regulatory framework. ⺠High mass resolution impacts positively on the confidence of confirmation. ⺠Method quantifies the contribution of the resolution to assay selectivity. ⺠Method allows evaluation of regulatory framework identification criteria


HRMS's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.