![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
Group: Microfinance-E-Services | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Information Systems and NonGovernmental Development Organizations: Advocacy, Organisational Learning, and Accountabilityby: David Lewis, Shirin Madon
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Notes for this articleArgues that features of the NGO sector warrant special attention. Definition of NGO as "self-governing, private, not-for-profit organizations that are geared to improving the quality of life for disadvantaged people" (Vakil, 1997)
Contains some statistics on size and growth of the NGO sector.
Argues that NGOs suffer from too much accountability upwards, not enough downwards.
Argues the in development NGOs have limited capacity to learn (ref to Fowler 1997 for that). Monitoring and management of work in NGOs is generally weak. There is also a defensiveness that can result in reluctance to undertake research that might challenge existing assumptions and values. NGOs are often reluctant to confront less successful activities and initiatives, thus reducing organisational learning. A case study of a Bangladeshi NGO is used to illustrate the problem.
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
BibTeX record
RIS record