CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

The Evolutionary Landscape of Alternative Splicing in Vertebrate Species

by: Nuno L. Barbosa-Morais, Manuel Irimia, Qun Pan, Hui Y. Xiong, Serge Gueroussov, Leo J. Lee, Valentina Slobodeniuc, Claudia Kutter, Stephen Watt, Recep Çolak, TaeHyung Kim, Christine M. Misquitta-Ali, Michael D. Wilson, Philip M. Kim, Duncan T. Odom, Brendan J. Frey, Benjamin J. Blencowe
Science, Vol. 338, No. 6114. (21 December 2012), pp. 1587-1593, doi:10.1126/science.1230612  Key: citeulike:11851909

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

How species with similar repertoires of protein-coding genes differ so markedly at the phenotypic level is poorly understood. By comparing organ transcriptomes from vertebrate species spanning ~350 million years of evolution, we observed significant differences in alternative splicing complexity between vertebrate lineages, with the highest complexity in primates. Within 6 million years, the splicing profiles of physiologically equivalent organs diverged such that they are more strongly related to the identity of a species than they are to organ type. Most vertebrate species-specific splicing patterns are cis-directed. However, a subset of pronounced splicing changes are predicted to remodel protein interactions involving trans-acting regulators. These events likely further contributed to the diversification of splicing and other transcriptomic changes that underlie phenotypic differences among vertebrate species.


Galaxy's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.