CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment

by: F. Baret, G. Guyot
Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 35, No. 2-3. (February 1991), pp. 161-173, doi:10.1016/0034-4257(91)90009-u  Key: citeulike:7278233

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Most vegetation indices (VI) combine information contained in two spectral bands: red and near-infrared. These indices are established in order to minimize the effect of external factors on spectral data and to derive canopy characteristics such as leaf area index (LAI) and fraction of absorbed photosynthetic active radiation (P). The potentials and limits of different vegetation indices are discussed in this paper using the normalized difference (NDVI), perpendicular vegetation index (PVI), soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), and transformed soil adjusted vegetation index (TSAVI). The discussion is based on a sensitivity analysis in which the effect of canopy geometry (LAI and leaf inclination) and soil background are analyzed. The calculation is performed on data derived from the SAIL reflectance model. General semiempirical models, describing the relations between VI and LAI or P, are elaborated and used to derive the relative equivalent noise (REN) for the determination of LAI and P. The performances of VIs are discussed on the basis of the REN concept.


Testumgebung's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.