CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Development of pro- and antisaccades in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and healthy controls. Export

Psychophysiology, Vol. 40, No. 1. (January 2003), pp. 17-28.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


ReadingLab's tags for this article

adhd antisaccade child express_saccade saccade

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

To date, the investigation of the antisaccade task, a simple test of "executive functions," in children with ADHD has yielded inconsistent results. The present study aimed at contributing to this issue by (a) the investigation of a large sample of carefully diagnosed ADHD patients aged 7-15 years, and (b) the analyses of differential age effects in patients and controls. Healthy control children were pairwise matched with patients (N = 46; age = 136 +/- 24 months) for age and gender, and did not significantly differ in IQ. Horizontal pro- and antisaccades were elicited under the 200-ms gap and overlap conditions (blocks of 100 trials each). Overall, patients exhibited (a) augmented pro- and antisaccadic reaction times, (b) augmented error rates (antitasks), (c) augmented proportions of early responses (all conditions), and (d) reduced proportions of express saccades under the prosaccadic gap condition. The greater decline in anti- as compared to pro-SRT with increasing age that characterized controls was missing in patients. Confirming Barkley's (1997) neuropsychological theory of ADHD, these results altogether point to alterations in "executive functions" in ADHD patients that are presumably supported by frontal lobe structures, in particular the lateral prefrontal cortex and the frontal eye fields.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.