The development of interpersonal strategy: Autism, theory-of-mind, cooperation and fairness

@article{citeulike:528276, abstract = {Mentalising is assumed to be involved in decision-making that is necessary to social interaction. We investigated the relationship between mentalising and three types of strategic games - Prisoners' Dilemma, Dictator and Ultimatum - in children with and without autistic spectrum disorders. Overall, the results revealed less dramatic differences than expected among the normally developing age groups and the children with autism, suggesting that in these laboratory tasks, mentalising skills are not always necessary. There were, nonetheless, some important findings. Young children were more cautious about initiating cooperation than their older peers and, in bargaining situations, they were less generous in their opening unilateral grants and over-solicitous of an empowered receiver. Participants with autism did have a harder time shifting strategy between versions of the Prisoners' Dilemma, and they were much more likely to accept low initial offers in the Ultimatum game and to refuse fair proposals. In addition, participants' measured mentalising abilities explain intentional and strategic behaviour within the prisoners' dilemma and the avoidance of unsuccessful ultimatum proposals.}, author = {Sally, David and Hill, Elisabeth}, booktitle = {Economic Socialization}, citeulike-article-id = {528276}, doi = {10.1016/j.joep.2005.06.015}, journal = {Journal of Economic Psychology}, keywords = {autism, cooperation, economy, game\_theory, social\_psychology, theory\_of\_mind}, month = {February}, number = {1}, pages = {73--97}, posted-at = {2006-03-06 20:21:35}, priority = {4}, title = {The development of interpersonal strategy: Autism, theory-of-mind, cooperation and fairness}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2005.06.015}, volume = {27}, year = {2006} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:528276 L3 - citeulike-article-id:528276 N2 - Mentalising is assumed to be involved in decision-making that is necessary to social interaction. We investigated the relationship between mentalising and three types of strategic games - Prisoners' Dilemma, Dictator and Ultimatum - in children with and without autistic spectrum disorders. Overall, the results revealed less dramatic differences than expected among the normally developing age groups and the children with autism, suggesting that in these laboratory tasks, mentalising skills are not always necessary. There were, nonetheless, some important findings. Young children were more cautious about initiating cooperation than their older peers and, in bargaining situations, they were less generous in their opening unilateral grants and over-solicitous of an empowered receiver. Participants with autism did have a harder time shifting strategy between versions of the Prisoners' Dilemma, and they were much more likely to accept low initial offers in the Ultimatum game and to refuse fair proposals. In addition, participants' measured mentalising abilities explain intentional and strategic behaviour within the prisoners' dilemma and the avoidance of unsuccessful ultimatum proposals. IS - 1 JF - Journal of Economic Psychology EP - 97 TI - The development of interpersonal strategy: Autism, theory-of-mind, cooperation and fairness VL - 27 T2 - Economic Socialization SP - 73 KW - autism KW - cooperation KW - economy KW - game_theory KW - social_psychology KW - theory_of_mind AU - Sally, David AU - Hill, Elisabeth PY - 2006/02// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2005.06.015 ER -