![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
Group: Global_biodiversity_model | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Options for including land use in a climate agreement post-2012: improving the Kyoto Protocol approachby: Bernhard Schlamadinger, Tracy Johns, Lorenzo Ciccarese, Matthias Braun, Atsushi Sato, Ahmet Senyaz, Peter Stephens, Masamichi Takahashi, Xiaoquan Zhang
Environmental Science & Policy In Options for including agriculture and forestry activities in a post-2012 international climate agreement, Vol. 10, No. 4. (June 2007), pp. 295-305.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractMany pathways have been proposed for including land use in a post-2012 climate agreement. Several involve new accounting structures which are quite different from the rules established in the Marrakech Accords and related decisions. However, a mechanism based largely on the structure agreed for the first commitment period also has its benefits. This paper discusses the weaknesses of the current system of land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) accounting in the Kyoto Protocol's first commitment period, and proposes a mechanism based on that existing structure, but with modifications to address the weaknesses.
BibTeX record
RIS record