![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
Group: Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerweite... | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
What Should Education Research Do, and How Should It Do It?by: Dylan Wiliam
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractIn this article, three theoretical perspectives are used to extend Bulterman-Bos's (2008) argument regarding a clinical approach to education research. First, three intellectual virtues identified by Aristotle--episteme, techne, and phronesis--are related to the requirements of the "pure" education researcher, the skilled practitioner, and the clinical researcher, respectively. Second, Churchman's typology of inquiry systems--based on whether the primary source of evidence is logic, observation, representation, dialectic, or values--is offered as a way of conceptualizing different kinds of inquiry in education. Third, recognizing that much practitioner knowledge is tacit, Nonaka and Takeuchi's model of knowledge conversion is suggested as a tool with which knowledge gained through different methods of inquiry might be brought into productive dialogue. 10.3102/0013189X08325678
BibTeX record
RIS record