Conception does not require proof to a scientific certainty Export

@article{citeulike:6058507, abstract = {Proof of a scientific certainty is not always required in order to demonstrate conception of an invention. 10.1093/jiplp/jpp176}, author = {Gerstenblith, Bart A.}, citeulike-article-id = {6058507}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpp176}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://jiplp.oxfordjournals.org/content/jpp176v1/.abstract}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://jiplp.oxfordjournals.org/content/jpp176v1/.full.pdf}, day = {27}, doi = {10.1093/jiplp/jpp176}, journal = {Journal of Intellectual Property Law Practice}, keywords = {innovation, invention, ipr}, month = {October}, pages = {jpp176+}, posted-at = {2009-11-03 08:01:15}, priority = {2}, title = {Conception does not require proof to a scientific certainty}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpp176}, year = {2009} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:6058507 L3 - citeulike-article-id:6058507 N2 - Proof of a scientific certainty is not always required in order to demonstrate conception of an invention. 10.1093/jiplp/jpp176 JF - Journal of Intellectual Property Law Practice TI - Conception does not require proof to a scientific certainty SP - jpp176 KW - innovation KW - invention KW - ipr AU - Gerstenblith, Bart PY - 2009/10/27/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpp176 ER -