![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
Group: Blog_and_Wiki_Research | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Copied citations create renowned papers? |
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractRecently we discovered (<a href="/abs/cond-mat/0212043">cond-mat/0212043</a>) that the majority of scientific citations are copied from the lists of references used in other papers. Here we show that a model, in which a scientist picks three random papers, cites them,and also copies a quarter of their references accounts quantitatively for empirically observed citation distribution. Simple mathematical probability, not genius, can explain why some papers are cited a lot more than the other.
BibTeX record
RIS record