![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
Group: P2P | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
The impact of DHT routing geometry on resilience and proximityIn SIGCOMM '03: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications (2003), pp. 381-394.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractThe various proposed DHT routing algorithms embody several different underlying routing geometries . These geometries include hypercubes, rings, tree-like structures, and butterfly networks. In this paper we focus on how these basic geometric approaches affect the resilience and proximity properties of DHTs. One factor that distinguishes these geometries is the degree of flexibility they provide in the selection of neighbors and routes. Flexibility is an important factor in achieving good static resilience and effective proximity neighbor and route selection. Our basic finding is that, despite our initial preference for more complex geometries, the ring geometry allows the greatest flexibility, and hence achieves the best resilience and proximity performance.
BibTeX record
RIS record