CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Clinical efficacy and safety of the new cardioverter defibrillator systems. Export

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, Vol. 16, No. 1 Pt 2. (January 1993), pp. 153-158.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


TulaneCEP's tags for this article

bidomainunpinning

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Clinical efficacy and safety of two new third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) were studied in 38 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). There were 31 patients with coronary disease, three patients with right ventricular dysplasia, one patient with dilated cardiomyopathy, and three patients with valvular disease. Twenty-four patients (group I) received an ICD with monophasic (Ventak PRx 1700, CPI) and 14 patients (group II) with biphasic shocks (Cadence V 100, Ventritex). Intraoperatively, the mean defibrillation threshold was significantly lower in group II than in group I, both in patients with induced VT (group I 11.0 +/- 6.3 joules; group II 5.8 +/- 1.3 joules) (P < 0.01) and induced VF (group I 17.5 +/- 4.6 joules; group II 9.6 +/- 5.2 joules) (P < 0.01). During the mean follow-up of 12 +/- 7 months four patients (11%) died. 865 arrhythmia events (AE) occurred and were terminated by ATP (671 VTs, 78%). Acceleration of VTs was observed in 28 AE (3%) and ATP was unable to interrupt 58 AE (7%). ICD shocks were delivered as a first therapy in 108 AE (13%).


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.