Of Humean Bondage Export

@article{citeulike:6086644, abstract = {There are many ways of attaching two objects together: for example, they can be connected, linked, tied or bound together; and the connection, link, tie or bind can be made of chain, rope, or cement. Every one of these binding methods has been used as a metaphor for causation. What is the real significance of these metaphors? They express a commitment to a certain way of thinking about causation, summarized in the following thesis: In any concrete situation, there is an objective fact of the matter as to whether two events are in fact bound by the causal relation. It is the aim of philosophical inquiry to analyze this objective relation.' Through a variety of examples, I hope to cast doubt on this seemingly innocuous thesis. The problem lies not with the word objective', but with the word the'. The goal of a philosophical account of causation should not be to capture the causal relation, but rather to capture the many ways in which the events of the world can be bound together. 1 The metaphors 2 Unpacking the metaphors 3 Theories of causation 4 The two assassins 5 The birth control pills 6 The smoker-protector gene 7 The bicycle thief 8 Further examples 8.1 Indeterminism 8.2 Probability-lowering causes 8.3 Parts vs wholes 8.4 Symmetric overdetermination 8.5 Delayers 8.6 Causation by omission 8.7 Double prevention/disconnection 8.8 Preemptive prevention 8.9 Quantitative variables 9 Conclusion 10.1093/bjps/54.1.1}, author = {Hitchcock, Christopher}, citeulike-article-id = {6086644}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjps/54.1.1}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://bjps.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/1/1.abstract}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://bjps.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/1/1.full.pdf}, day = {1}, doi = {10.1093/bjps/54.1.1}, journal = {Br J Philos Sci}, keywords = {causality, metaphysics, philosophy}, month = {March}, number = {1}, pages = {1--25}, posted-at = {2009-11-08 20:31:35}, priority = {2}, title = {Of Humean Bondage}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjps/54.1.1}, volume = {54}, year = {2003} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:6086644 L3 - citeulike-article-id:6086644 N2 - There are many ways of attaching two objects together: for example, they can be connected, linked, tied or bound together; and the connection, link, tie or bind can be made of chain, rope, or cement. Every one of these binding methods has been used as a metaphor for causation. What is the real significance of these metaphors? They express a commitment to a certain way of thinking about causation, summarized in the following thesis: In any concrete situation, there is an objective fact of the matter as to whether two events are in fact bound by the causal relation. It is the aim of philosophical inquiry to analyze this objective relation.' Through a variety of examples, I hope to cast doubt on this seemingly innocuous thesis. The problem lies not with the word objective', but with the word the'. The goal of a philosophical account of causation should not be to capture the causal relation, but rather to capture the many ways in which the events of the world can be bound together. 1 The metaphors 2 Unpacking the metaphors 3 Theories of causation 4 The two assassins 5 The birth control pills 6 The smoker-protector gene 7 The bicycle thief 8 Further examples 8.1 Indeterminism 8.2 Probability-lowering causes 8.3 Parts vs wholes 8.4 Symmetric overdetermination 8.5 Delayers 8.6 Causation by omission 8.7 Double prevention/disconnection 8.8 Preemptive prevention 8.9 Quantitative variables 9 Conclusion 10.1093/bjps/54.1.1 IS - 1 JF - Br J Philos Sci EP - 25 TI - Of Humean Bondage VL - 54 SP - 1 KW - causality KW - metaphysics KW - philosophy AU - Hitchcock, Christopher PY - 2003/03/01/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjps/54.1.1 ER -