Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Export

@article{citeulike:2501078, abstract = {OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the geometric accuracy of scans obtained with a newly developed cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) device in comparison with a multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) scanner. STUDY DESIGN: Cone-beam scans were obtained with the preretail version of a newly developed compact size device with a scan volume of 15 x 15 x 15 cm. Conventional CT scans for comparison were performed with a 6-detector row CT scanner. To determine distance accuracy, 100 measurements were performed on radiopaque markers on a dry human skull. To determine volume accuracy, 25 measurements were carried out on a geometric phantom. Commercially available software was used for three-dimensional visualization and measurements on imaging data. RESULTS: Mean absolute measurement error (AME) for linear distances was 0.26 mm (+/-0.18 mm) for the CBCT device and 0.18 mm (+/-0.17 mm) for the MDCT device (P = .196 in paired t test). The average absolute percentage error (APE) was 0.98\% (+/-0.73\%) and 1.26\% (+/-1.50\%), respectively (P = .485 in paired t test). Linear regression analysis showed a positive correlation between AME and distance length (R = 0.628; P = .004) for CBCT-based measurements. Average AME in volume measurements was 1.78 mL (+/-0.99 mL) for the CBCT device and 1.23 mL (+/-0.93 mL) for the MDCT device. The average APE was 6.01\% (+/-1.49\%) and 4.42\% (+/-1.99\%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the evaluated cone-beam device provides satisfactory information about linear distances and volumes. Multidetector row computed tomography scans proved slightly more accurate in both measurement categories. The difference may be considered as not relevant for the majority of clinical applications.}, address = {Department of Craniomaxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. r.mischkowski@uni-koeln.de}, author = {Mischkowski, R. A. and Pulsfort, R. and Ritter, L. and Neugebauer, J. and Brochhagen, H. G. and Keeve, E. and Z\"{o}ller, J. E.}, citeulike-article-id = {2501078}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.02.021}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17613260}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=17613260}, doi = {10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.02.021}, issn = {1528-395X}, journal = {Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod}, keywords = {beam, cone, ct}, month = {October}, number = {4}, pages = {551--559}, posted-at = {2008-03-10 14:23:00}, priority = {2}, title = {Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging.}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.02.021}, volume = {104}, year = {2007} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:2501078 L3 - citeulike-article-id:2501078 N2 - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the geometric accuracy of scans obtained with a newly developed cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) device in comparison with a multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) scanner. STUDY DESIGN: Cone-beam scans were obtained with the preretail version of a newly developed compact size device with a scan volume of 15 x 15 x 15 cm. Conventional CT scans for comparison were performed with a 6-detector row CT scanner. To determine distance accuracy, 100 measurements were performed on radiopaque markers on a dry human skull. To determine volume accuracy, 25 measurements were carried out on a geometric phantom. Commercially available software was used for three-dimensional visualization and measurements on imaging data. RESULTS: Mean absolute measurement error (AME) for linear distances was 0.26 mm (+/-0.18 mm) for the CBCT device and 0.18 mm (+/-0.17 mm) for the MDCT device (P = .196 in paired t test). The average absolute percentage error (APE) was 0.98% (+/-0.73%) and 1.26% (+/-1.50%), respectively (P = .485 in paired t test). Linear regression analysis showed a positive correlation between AME and distance length (R = 0.628; P = .004) for CBCT-based measurements. Average AME in volume measurements was 1.78 mL (+/-0.99 mL) for the CBCT device and 1.23 mL (+/-0.93 mL) for the MDCT device. The average APE was 6.01% (+/-1.49%) and 4.42% (+/-1.99%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the evaluated cone-beam device provides satisfactory information about linear distances and volumes. Multidetector row computed tomography scans proved slightly more accurate in both measurement categories. The difference may be considered as not relevant for the majority of clinical applications. IS - 4 JF - Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod SN - 1528-395X AD - Department of Craniomaxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. r.mischkowski@uni-koeln.de EP - 559 TI - Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. VL - 104 SP - 551 KW - beam KW - cone KW - ct AU - Mischkowski, RA AU - Pulsfort, R AU - Ritter, L AU - Neugebauer, J AU - Brochhagen, HG AU - Keeve, E AU - Zöller, JE PY - 2007/10// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.02.021 ER -