CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

A prospective randomized comparison between small bowel enteroclysis and small bowel follow-through in Crohn's disease. Export

Gastroenterology, Vol. 113, No. 2. (August 1997), pp. 390-398.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


MEHTRadiology's tags for this article

barium bowel crohns enteroclysis follow small through

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Small bowel enteroclysis (SBE) has been suggested to be superior to the small bowel follow-through (SBFT) for diagnosing the presence and extent of Crohn's disease. The aim was to perform a prospective randomized study at a single university medical center comparing SBE with SBFT in patients with Crohn's disease. METHODS: Consecutive patients with known Crohn's disease were randomized to receive either SBE or SBFT as the initial study and had the alternate study performed within 2 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled. The mean time between studies was 8.7 +/- 0.8 days. Both studies were normal in 7 cases. The SBE was negative in 3 cases with positive findings of Crohn's disease by SBFT. One of these cases was a false-positive SBFT. The SBE and SBFT were both diagnostic of Crohn's disease in 15 cases; in 6 cases there was uniform agreement regarding disease pattern. The SBFT more accurately reported mucosal detail (n = 3) and a greater number of fistulas (n = 2). The SBE missed duodenal disease (n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: In known Crohn's disease, the SBFT is the procedure of choice. It is safer, preferred by patients, and will not miss gastroduodenal disease, and when the result is normal, there is no need to perform SBE.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.