![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Tried to submit doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2005.10.027 but got the following message:
* Could not determine a URL for this article. Please report this as a bug. % If this doesn't make sense, you need more help, or just can't see the point of all this, then you might like to read the FAQ page All about the Bookmarklet. % The page you submitted was: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B75H1-4JXS6XG-3&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=bd4cc5650441e32352c0a70944d6d259
Posted by robertjohnsimmons on 2009-07-02 19:40:07.
4 replies. Login or join this group to post to this thread.
Ouch! Crossref have changed their data format in a way that's incompatible with us.
We'll get this sorted as a priority.
Posted by thegoose on 2009-07-02 21:49:27.
Okay, thanks! Noticed it here as well, both for the page and for the doi
Posted by robertjohnsimmons on 2009-07-03 03:36:00.
The springerlink article posts as well. I didn't do anything but it seems to have sorted itself out. We occasionally get blacklisted by Springer (not "deliberately" but there's some sort of automatic anti-DoS thing we occasionally trigger). Unfortunately I didn't see what was going on while the problem persisted so it's a best-guess.
Posted by thegoose on 2009-07-03 11:22:54.
I think it (the original ScienceDirect problem) is sorted now. CrossRef was behaving very badly for a while - I'm guessing they had some sort of technical issue?
Posted by thegoose on 2009-07-03 10:50:00.