Group CiteULike-discussion
Group for discussion of CiteULike. Non-members can start new forum topics. There are specific forums for bug reports and feature requests.
http://www.citeulike.org/groupfunc/3124
CiteULike.org
en-gb
Copyright © 2004-2007 Oversity Limited
-
new forum message Bibshare
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/553
<p>
try endnotes its better /:::
</p>
2008-07-25T23:09:44+00:00
-
new forum message SSRN
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/582
<p>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1150417">http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1150417</a>
This article.
</p>
2008-07-25T19:27:51+00:00
-
new forum message SSRN
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/582
<p>
Please post the URL of the citation which failed.
</p>
2008-07-25T11:32:26+00:00
-
new forum thread SSRN
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/582
<p>
I found very useful to look through SSRN. But at last days I experience some difficulties. Today CiteUlike denied my attempts to save a citation. Maybe it is because of new design of SSRN? I wonder...
</p>
2008-07-25T11:29:48+00:00
-
new forum message pdf re-upload
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/581
<p>
It works perfectly for me, using Firefox 3 on a Mac. Maybe your browser is caching the previous version of the PDF?
</p>
2008-07-24T17:55:00+00:00
-
new forum thread pdf re-upload
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/581
<p>
Hi,
I uploaded by error the wrong pdf for an article. I tried to delete it (which worked)and to upload the correct one, but when I then tried to view what I just uploaded, it displayed the old wrong pdf...
</p>
<p>
Here is the link to the pdf:
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/pdf/user/dbikard/article/758737/mazel_integrons.pdf">http://www.citeulike.org/pdf/user/dbikard/article/758737/mazel_integrons.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>
thx for your help
</p>
2008-07-24T17:36:47+00:00
-
new forum message arXiv posts don't have correct journal attributes when they are available
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/556
<p>
As I recall, you can just type what you like in the (arXiv) Journal reference field; e.g. I usually do Journal VOL, PAGE (YEAR).
</p>
<p>
Why not get the info via the doi (if given)?
</p>
2008-07-24T14:23:08+00:00
-
new forum message arXiv posts don't have correct journal attributes when they are available
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/556
<p>
So, is this the management summary?
</p>
<ul>
<li>If there's a "Journal Reference: " entry in the arXiv page, use @ARTICLE rather than @MISC, and try to extract the journal name, year and pages as well</li>
</ul>
<p>
If so, does anyone know if the Journal reference field's format is reliably
</p>
<ul>
<li>JournalName (Year) Pages</li>
</ul>
<p>
Where Pages can look like NNNN or NNNN-NNNN ?
</p>
2008-07-24T09:37:55+00:00
-
new forum message Transposed position in author's name
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/580
<p>
You're absolutely correct - I'll try to fix this. In the meantime, you can beat CiteULike into submision by editing his name to be:
</p>
<pre>
=/Z. Gerald/Z/Liu/=
</pre>
2008-07-24T06:37:25+00:00
-
new forum thread Transposed position in author's name
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/580
<p>
This isn't exactly a pressing matter, but for these two articles ( <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/user/devinberg/article/3025294">http://www.citeulike.org/user/devinberg/article/3025294</a> and <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/user/devinberg/article/2874328">http://www.citeulike.org/user/devinberg/article/2874328</a> ), the first author's name should read "Z. Gerald Liu" instead of "Gerald Z. Liu". I am not sure whether the issue is with how citeulike reads the page or not but thought I would point it out. Thanks.
</p>
2008-07-23T19:08:54+00:00
-
new forum message Project MUSE importing needs changed
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/531
<p>
The Project MUSE plugin has been updated.
</p>
2008-07-23T14:21:58+00:00
-
new forum message arXiv posts don't have correct journal attributes when they are available
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/556
<p>
Good point, the arxiv is not the most rigid place in the world, and if I wanted to pretend that my article had made it into a journal then I could easily do that.
</p>
<br/>
<p>
On the other hand, you would hope that anyone building up a (decent) scientific library would either know about the authors they are including or not include fake articles. But in any case, let me explain what the problem is to see if there's a different solution.
</p>
<br/>
<p>
I hail from the world of theoretical physics, where (these days anyway) any article that is published <i>always</i> goes through the arxiv first (I know that this is not true in general for other scientific fields), consequently when people are referencing articles they generally only use the arxiv id, even when the article has actually been published in a respectable journal. This means that when we are searching for articles, we often use the arxiv.
</p>
<br/>
<p>
When it comes to a bibliography, you would want to print both the journal reference and an eprint arxiv reference (this means, when you view the article as an online pdf you just click the links and it takes you straight to the relevant article). This is the reason for my querry, which upon reflection, actually comes in two parts:
</p>
<ul>
<li>can we change the @MISC to @ARTICLE, so that bibtex correctly converts the url tabs to internet links</li>
<li>if it can be reconciled with the rest of the scientific community, can we find a way to include the journal refs and the arxiv refs (perhaps by a check box on the include page or any other mechanism you see fit) or some way that would easily allow one to add both bits of information to a bibliography</li>
</ul>
<br/>
<p>
Note that jabref already does both of these things.
</p>
<br/>
<p>
Thank you,
</p>
2008-07-23T11:44:29+00:00
-
new forum thread Importing data from "Drupal Scholar" content-type
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/578
<p>
Hello,
</p>
<p>
I'm testing some extensions of Drupal in order to buy a site that will have to deal a lot with bibliographic references. I'm also looking for connections with CiteUlike.
</p>
<p>
I have found an interesting extension called Bibliography module (a.k.a Drupal Scholar)
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://drupal.org/project/biblio">http://drupal.org/project/biblio</a>
that provides a content type with an exhaustive list of fields. It also generates exporting files (Tagged, EndNote7, BibTex), but does not export to Citeulike.
</p>
<p>
You can see an example at:
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.aprenderenred.net/drupal58/?q=node/1">http://www.aprenderenred.net/drupal58/?q=node/1</a>
</p>
<p>
I would be happy if users of my site could push their Citeulike button and import all the data to their new Citeulike reference. Has anybody explored this issue?
</p>
<p>
Many thanks 2 all,
R
</p>
2008-07-23T11:04:01+00:00
-
new forum message Private Blogs?
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/574
<p>
Could be done... but, why?
</p>
2008-07-23T09:14:17+00:00
-
new forum thread Private Blogs?
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/574
<p>
Is it possible to add a feature to make blogs private?
</p>
2008-07-23T07:03:20+00:00
-
new forum thread Printing a Ref with notes and abstract
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/573
<p>
wondering how it is done... I am not having any luck with Firefox
</p>
2008-07-22T18:53:49+00:00
-
new forum thread Pseudo tags
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/572
<p>
Hi,
</p>
<br/>
<p>
I usually use tags to indicate the publication year (2006, 2007, ...) and the publication type (_book, _journal, ...). It would be nice if this information could be generated automatically as pseudo tags (year:2006, year:2007, type:book, ...) by citeulike. So we could search for articles about networks published in 2004 using <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/user/camster/tag/year:2004,networks">www.citeulike.org/user/camster/tag/year:2004,networks</a> .
</p>
<br/>
<p>
Leonardo
</p>
2008-07-22T17:01:30+00:00
-
new forum message Full text links
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/568
<p>
Hi Bob,
</p>
<br/>
<p>
The data comes from a RSS feed and the gadget selects what is shown. Yes, most RSS readers only show standard data. If you want to customize RSS feeds you can using services such as <a rel="nofollow" href="http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/">yahoo pipes</a> . But a citeulike solution would be better.
</p>
<br/>
<p>
Leonardo
</p>
2008-07-22T16:41:00+00:00
-
new forum message abbreviated journal title
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/536
<p>
Interesting problem. I think this may have something to do with me See <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/352">this thread</a> for more info. I'll be honest - being a bibtex noob Im not that clear about what bst files contain..
</p>
<br/>
<p>
Perhaps slightly off-topic in that case: The problem I have had with abbrev titles is What do you choose for the abbreviation. Im guessing its the problem citeulike has too. (Or if they don't perhaps they should!). Some abbreviations seem to be different/overlapping - pubmed is typical at this..
</p>
<br/>
<p>
If its useful to anyone <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.library.uiuc.edu/biotech/j-abbrev.html">this page</a> seems useful
</p>
2008-07-22T15:48:20+00:00
-
new forum message Citations in MS Office 2007
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/540
<p>
Some ideas off the top of my head
1. Export your citations to bibtex: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/bibtex_options/user/ahe">http://www.citeulike.org/bibtex_options/user/ahe</a>
2. Use <a rel="nofollow" href="http://jabref.sourceforge.net/">JabRef</a> . Import that bibtex file then export as a rtf file with it correctly formatted. Insert your rtf file into your word document. (NB: If you are on a mac use bibdesk, papers or cloister for a nicer life)
</p>
<p>
Or.. Export as endnote - and then use from endnote..
</p>
<p>
Of course I do still wonder why citeulike don't better support this from within the webapp
</p>
<p>
hth
w
</p>
2008-07-22T15:35:19+00:00
-
new forum message arXiv posts don't have correct journal attributes when they are available
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/556
<p>
Maybe I misunderstand, but I'm not sure I agree with what you want.
</p>
<p>
Surely the journal-ref info from the arXiv field cannot necessarily
be trusted; as an arXiv author I could put anything I want in there,
and it's (to my knowledge) not checked.
</p>
<p>
With your scheme, articles posted on citeulike could gain a spurious
authority on the basis of inaccurate (or fake) journal info added to
arXiv.
</p>
<p>
Edit: I'm assuming here that the adding of journal-ref info from arXiv
is kept on citeulike's database; not just inserted at export to bibtex
</p>
2008-07-22T09:12:34+00:00
-
new forum message Multiple tag select
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/219
<p>
That's great! I was also waiting for a feature like this.
</p>
<p>
Any chance of adding a similar syntax for "or". e.g., ".../tag/physics+chemistry". Maybe a semi-colon as a separator?
</p>
2008-07-22T04:11:35+00:00
-
new forum message Capitals within author's names are lost in the BiBTeX record
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/320
<p>
Works!
Thanks :-)
</p>
2008-07-19T17:55:44+00:00
-
new forum message Capitals within author's names are lost in the BiBTeX record
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/320
<p>
I haven't checked this, but try:
</p>
<pre>
=/Victor/VA/McKusick/=
</pre>
2008-07-18T22:03:28+00:00
-
new forum message Capitals within author's names are lost in the BiBTeX record
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/320
<p>
I tried the
</p>
<p>
=/first-name/initials/last-name/=
</p>
<p>
hack on "Victor A. McKusick" (=/Victor/A/McKusick/=), in order to prevent it from being turned into "Victor A. Mckusick". With the hack, the last name is indeed correct, but instead the initial is dropped, producing just "Victor McKusick".
</p>
<p>
Here is the article:
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/user/winterschlaefer/article/1746908">http://www.citeulike.org/user/winterschlaefer/article/1746908</a>
</p>
2008-07-18T20:02:30+00:00
-
new forum message Capital letters are not protected in BibTeX export
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/191
<p>
cjhall, at least for me it is working well. Of course, I have other problems as kritgy said, with sub and superscripts, and with \~n for spanish authors, but perhaps it is not too solve them.
</p>
<p>
thank you very much for your great work!.
</p>
<p>
regards.
</p>
2008-07-18T10:47:45+00:00
-
new forum message Capital letters are not protected in BibTeX export
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/191
<p>
Bib{T}e{X} is driving me mad.
</p>
<br/>
<p>
I have added some code which tries to brace words with capitals other than their first letter. To enable this feature, please visit this URL:
</p>
<ul>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/feature/add/bibtex_brace_capitals">http://www.citeulike.org/feature/add/bibtex_brace_capitals</a></li>
</ul>
<p>
To turn the feature off (it's off by default) visit this URL:
</p>
<ul>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/feature/del/bibtex_brace_capitals">http://www.citeulike.org/feature/del/bibtex_brace_capitals</a></li>
</ul>
<p>
(these URLs just set and remove a cookie which lasts for the duration of your browser session). If everyone is happy that the change is OK, then I'll put it properly live.
</p>
2008-07-17T22:35:44+00:00
-
new forum message Can't post Inderscience articles
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/559
<p>
This situation was confusing and frustrating me a bit, so I wrote to MetaPress. I received a very polite and informative reply. Apparently, MetaPress isn't a publisher itself, but provides services to publishers who contract with it. Thus, I guess we can assume that the lack of a "download RIS/BibTeX link" is due to Inderscience not wanting one or there having been no demand for one from users. People who use Inderscience might wish to let Inderscience know that we would find RIS/BibTeX download useful.
</p>
<p>
By the way, any luck mending the pure Inderscience scraper? And/Or did you decide to go ahead and write a totally new scraper as you had threatened?
</p>
2008-07-17T13:13:03+00:00
-
new forum message overwrite of old entries when using browser button with unsupported sites
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/570
<p>
Thanks for letting me know.
</p>
2008-07-16T22:16:47+00:00
-
new forum message Import form IUCr Journals isn't very reliable
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/569
<p>
That's pretty much it. Re-fetching metadata is on my to-do list.
</p>
2008-07-16T22:16:14+00:00
-
new forum message overwrite of old entries when using browser button with unsupported sites
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/570
<p>
I was using the old non-popup button with the latest version of firefox. I just deleted the old browser button (bookmarked it about 16 months ago) and bookmarked the latest versions of both the popup and the non-popup buttons. They both work! Thanks cjhall!
</p>
2008-07-16T21:47:12+00:00
-
new forum message Import form IUCr Journals isn't very reliable
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/569
<p>
Are you saying that citeulike got the metadata from the RSS feed sometime prior to my importing the article? and therefore, when I clicked on my import bookmark, citeulike looked in database, found the incomplete metadata and then presented me with the incorrect data? If that's the case, then is there a way to tell citeulike: "No, you've got incorrect metadata, go get the correct info from the webpage?"
Thanks,
Dan
</p>
2008-07-16T20:59:06+00:00
-
new forum message overwrite of old entries when using browser button with unsupported sites
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/570
<p>
It works perfectly for me, using the popup browser button. Which browser button are you using - the popup or the non-popup. Do you have the most recent version (it hasn't changed for about a year)?
</p>
<br/>
<p>
Could you post the URL that you see in the URL bar at the point where you can enter tags? It looks to me like your Firefox is misbehaving - I know from experience that it can sometimes make a pigs ear of working out which window is which...
</p>
2008-07-16T20:26:58+00:00
-
new forum message overwrite of old entries when using browser button with unsupported sites
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/570
<p>
Yes, it does post as the article with URL "about:blank" and has ID 80546. It is very easy to trick citeulike into doing this.
</p>
<p>
Go to an entry from an unsupported journal or database, for instance
</p>
<p>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/71/9/5484">http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/71/9/5484</a>
</p>
<p>
or
</p>
<p>
select any entry from the results of a web of science search or your favorite unsupported database, for example csa illumina. Link below probably wont work.
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://csaweb113v.csa.com/ids70/view_record.php?id=2&recnum=1&log=from_res&SID=387ca11ba8c01260c9a63b46b762045e&mark_id=search%3A2%3A0%2C0%2C2">http://csaweb113v.csa.com/ids70/view_record.php?id=2&recnum=1&log=from_res&SID=387ca11ba8c01260c9a63b46b762045e&mark_id=search%3A2%3A0%2C0%2C2</a>
</p>
<p>
Post either entry using the browser buttton. It automatically classifies the url as about:blank and therefore the entry is 80546. I see 693 other people have done something similar.
</p>
<p>
Thank you cjhall for your help. I hope this can be resolved soon. Not sure if you'd call it a bug, but it is definitely an undesirable feature.
</p>
2008-07-16T20:03:10+00:00
-
new forum message exporting only a selection from the library
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/571
<p>
You can specify multiple tags by separating them with commas. There are other options that are discussed in <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/219">this thread</a>
</p>
2008-07-16T16:12:11+00:00
-
new forum message exporting only a selection from the library
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/571
<p>
You can export subsections like this:
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/user/achinerarias/tag/prophylaxis">http://www.citeulike.org/user/achinerarias/tag/prophylaxis</a> (there are orange export buttons at the bottom of the page).
</p>
2008-07-16T15:48:51+00:00
-
new forum thread exporting only a selection from the library
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/571
<p>
Hi
</p>
<p>
Could CiteULike export a narrow selection of references instead of the whole library. It would be useful if could tick only a selection the references that have a particular tag, or a combination of tags. It would also be useful to be able to tick all those references in one go, of course.
</p>
<p>
Thanks for taking wishes.
</p>
2008-07-16T13:54:17+00:00
-
new forum message Capital letters are not protected in BibTeX export
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/191
<p>
yes, this is really a problem.
Nevertheless, kristgy, if you add the curly braces in the title field from citeUlike, they are added to the bibtex item, and you still see the title in citeUlike well.
for instance take a look on this one <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/user/cjrosales/article/2910493.">http://www.citeulike.org/user/cjrosales/article/2910493.</a>
Of course, you have to edit it manually, but just once, and not everytime you export it.
</p>
<p>
Then i thought that subscripts and superscripts worked that way too, but they don't. The $ symbol is not recognized.
</p>
<p>
I hope this help a little bit.
</p>
<p>
Regards.
</p>
2008-07-16T10:07:06+00:00
-
new forum message Google Books Import
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/508
<p>
i second that.
</p>
2008-07-16T09:50:48+00:00
-
new forum message Multi-word author surname
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/563
<p>
That's sure good to know. Thanks!
</p>
2008-07-16T07:53:43+00:00
-
new forum message overwrite of old entries when using browser button with unsupported sites
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/570
<p>
I'm not sure exactly what you're doing, but I think that the article in question has an ID of 80546. This infamous article has the URL "about:blank". When you try to post that URL, CiteULike sees that it has already been posted (as article 80546, back in the dim and distant past) and assumes that you are just another person bookmarking that URL. I don't see what you are doing to get "about:blank" though - perhaps you could walk me through it step by step? I use Firefox on a Mac, so I should be able to replicate your steps exactly.
</p>
2008-07-16T07:27:42+00:00
-
new forum message Import form IUCr Journals isn't very reliable
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/569
<p>
I think the IUCr plugin is OK - the problem here is that the article's metadata was originally scraped from an RSS feed, and the data was incorrect/incomplete at that time.
</p>
2008-07-16T07:04:44+00:00
-
new forum thread overwrite of old entries when using browser button with unsupported sites
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/570
<p>
This is an extremely annoying bug.
</p>
<p>
Using
Debian Etch OS
Iceweasel (firefox) v 2.0.0.14
</p>
<p>
If I click my "post to citeulike" bookmark button while looking at a journal article which citeulike does not support, It brings up a blank post article form. After filling this form out I find that it always overwrites the entry which I made on 6/21/2007. It overwrites all of the contents of that old entry and then suggests the tags from the old entry after I submit. If I change the tags to the appropriate ones for the new entry and submit, the new entry is created but citeulike thinks I made it on 6/21/2007 and the previous entry is lost. boooooo
</p>
<p>
This does not happen when I go to my citeulike homepage and click post manually. But usually I try the browser button just to see if it works with that journal. This is very annoying. Please fix and please support CSA Illumina and/or ISI Web of Knowledge
</p>
2008-07-15T23:04:45+00:00
-
new forum thread Import form IUCr Journals isn't very reliable
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/569
<p>
The IUCr journals (www.iucr.org) use quite a few frames that tend to mess up citeULike import. Even if you get rid of the frames it still has a tough time picking up all the authors. Try this one:
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S0021889807016524">http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S0021889807016524</a>
</p>
<p>
Cheers for a great site!
Dan Hickstein
</p>
2008-07-15T22:47:04+00:00
-
new forum message Full text links
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/568
<p>
Thanks, leonardo. I wasn't aware of the gadget; it is quite nice. Does it pull the data via RSS?
I especially like that it can build a DOI link. Most RSS readers don't quite know how to do that!!!
</p>
<br/>
<p>
As you said, it's not exactly what I want -- I'm hoping to make it easier for my colleagues to work within CiteULike. However,
your widget will certainly be useful to people who just want to follow the library.
</p>
<br/>
<p>
Thanks again. I'm still hopeful that the CiteULike gang will eventually provide ways to customize the native interface.
</p>
<br/>
<p>
Bob
</p>
2008-07-15T20:38:13+00:00
-
new forum message ISI Web of Knowlege support
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/185
<p>
There is another thread about this as well. Please implement ISI Web of Knowledge support or just web of science. My school does not have a scopus subscription. Any idea on when this will be available? Most of my searching goes through ISI Web of Knowledge; support for it would save time for so many people.
</p>
2008-07-15T17:32:00+00:00
-
new forum message Please addd journal subscription
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/561
<p>
I agree.
</p>
<p>
Also, process the journal table of contents page like scirate.com
does; i.e. order the articles in terms of number of cites, and then
add a "cite!" button next to each one.
</p>
<p>
Or better still, just rewrite the journal's own RSS feed to add a "cite!"
link in the description text.
</p>
2008-07-15T14:05:27+00:00
-
new forum message Full text links
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/568
<p>
Hi,
</p>
<p>
You could use this <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.google.com/ig/directory?synd=open&url=http://rapadura.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/citeulike/citeulike.xml">iGoogle gadget</a> to display the items of your library. It is not exactly what you want but you can customize the page layout (abstract, doi, tags). See <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.gmodules.com/ig/creator?url=http://rapadura.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/citeulike/citeulike.xml&up_user=dougherb&up_tag=&up_items=10&up_tags=1&up_doi=1&up_abstract=1&synd=open&w=400&h=300&title=Search+CiteULike&border=%23ffffff%7C3px%2C1px+solid+%23999999">your library</a> .
</p>
2008-07-15T13:40:35+00:00
-
new forum thread Full text links
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/568
<p>
When I show CiteULike to my colleagues, they often have three complaints:
</p>
<br/>
<p>
1. Item links on a library page lead to information pages for the items, and not to the item itself. To get to the item, you must first load the information page.
</p>
<p>
2. The full text links on the information page are not very obvious.
</p>
<p>
3. The abstract is near the bottom of the information page, forcing the user to scroll down.
</p>
<br/>
<p>
To address these concerns, I have three suggestions for new features:
</p>
<p>
1. Display each item's full-text links on the library listing.
</p>
<p>
2. On the info page, display the full-text links in a larger font or brighter color.
</p>
<p>
3. On the info page, display the abstract directly below the citation. Most databases treat the abstract as part of the bibliographic record; why should CiteULike put it after the tags, priority, user notes, reviews, etc.?
</p>
<p>
4. I lied about only having three suggestions, but this one could encompass the others: Provide some way for the user to customize page layouts.
</p>
<br/>
<p>
Thanks!
</p>
2008-07-15T12:06:37+00:00
-
new forum thread formatting of references to author-date style
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/567
<p>
Hi
</p>
<p>
Would it be possible to produce formatted references from the citations we have collected on CiteULike? A Harvard style (author-date) would be enough for me personally:
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://asp.wlv.ac.uk/Level5.asp?UserType=6&Level5=500">http://asp.wlv.ac.uk/Level5.asp?UserType=6&Level5=500</a>
</p>
<p>
Many thanks for providing CiteULike.
</p>
2008-07-15T10:53:39+00:00
-
new forum message Multi-word author surname
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/563
<p>
Seeing the author as just "Organisation" is a display glitch. Have faith... copying the article dfoes the right thing.
</p>
2008-07-14T13:31:33+00:00
-
new forum message Multi-word author surname
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/563
<p>
Thanks for the quick response. The example linked to from that thread
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/user/marclijour/article/2052316">http://www.citeulike.org/user/marclijour/article/2052316</a>
looks fine until I try copying the reference,
whereupon the author is listed simply as "Organisation".
</p>
<p>
Incidentally, I think we need one or two twisty mazes of hacks to keep us honest.
</p>
2008-07-14T11:34:39+00:00
-
new forum thread Browser button does not capture page number from aps.org
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/566
<p>
My browser button in firefox 2.0.0.1 linux does not work for Physical Review articles. The page number is not captured and should be inserted manually. Here is one abstract but I have the same problem with others:
</p>
<p>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PRBMDO000076000021214404000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes">http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PRBMDO000076000021214404000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes</a>
</p>
2008-07-14T10:57:59+00:00
-
new forum message Search should include bibtex cite-key
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/564
<p>
Thanks for the fix - it works great!
</p>
2008-07-12T23:58:47+00:00
-
new forum message Search should include bibtex cite-key
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/564
<p>
Changing the search functionality is not straightforward. However, tinkering with the URL syntax of the main site can be quite simple, so I've added the ability to specify a key, in conjunction with a username, in a URL, like this:
</p>
<ul>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/user/DanHickstein/key/Whitten2006">http://www.citeulike.org/user/DanHickstein/key/Whitten2006</a></li>
</ul>
2008-07-12T20:25:00+00:00
-
new forum message Search should include bibtex cite-key
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/564
<p>
OK, fair point. I'll try to add something that helps.
</p>
2008-07-12T18:38:30+00:00
-
new forum message Multi-word author surname
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/563
<p>
OK - try <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/132">this one</a>
</p>
<br/>
<p>
Now I know this is starting to look like a twisty maze of hacks, but it <i>should</i> fix your immediate requirement. I'll make a note to try and get all this stuff straightened out and properly documented.
</p>
2008-07-12T18:37:02+00:00
-
new forum thread Search should include bibtex cite-key
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/564
<p>
I tried searching for one of my papers by the bibtex cite-key that I entered and it didn't work. This would be a useful feature because often I get error messages from latex saying thing like:
</p>
<p>
`pages' is a missing field, not a string, for entry Whitten2006
</p>
<p>
and I'd like to quickly go to CiteULike and search for the article by cite-key and add the missing or incorrect information.
</p>
<p>
Cheers,
Dan Hickstein
University of Cambridge
</p>
2008-07-12T13:14:30+00:00
-
new forum message Multi-word author surname
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/563
<p>
And how about this?:
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/320?highlight=4487#msg_4487">http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/320?highlight=4487#msg_4487</a>
</p>
2008-07-12T01:55:57+00:00
-
new forum message Multi-word author surname
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/563
<p>
Does <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/301">this</a> [citeulike] help in any way?
</p>
2008-07-11T22:09:23+00:00
-
new forum thread Multi-word author surname
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/563
<p>
I'm having problems with a four word Dutch surname (the first two hyphenated - as in "xxxx-xxx xx xxxxx, X X") not coming through into citations properly. With two citations it works correctly, but with five others I can find no way to make it work that same way. Even by copying and pasting the author name content from the citations where it works correctly. Usually all but the first half of the surname goes missing. Is there some sort of unbreaking space I should use in the breaks of the surname, perhaps?
</p>
2008-07-11T18:54:41+00:00
-
new forum message Amzon URL tags
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/562
<p>
Yes, you're right, books don't have urls, which was my confusion really, BUT, I don't want to deny you guys any money, so I'd rather you left them the way they are, and i'll write a script to remove the url links on books.
</p>
2008-07-11T17:15:05+00:00
-
new forum message APA Style Not Accurate
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/324
<p>
This one has an extra space after journal titles, just before the comma separating title from volume. Otherwise it's better.
</p>
2008-07-11T16:07:26+00:00
-
new forum message keywords to tags conversion
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/555
<p>
Yes, it does. Thanks :)
</p>
2008-07-11T10:10:41+00:00
-
new forum message Can't post Inderscience articles
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/559
<p>
Very weird. Looking around on the site, it seems that they have two entirely different routes to the same stuff. Thus, the article above is also available at:
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.metapress.com/content/k71lq31868673703/?p=a712a3824c744ccaa5147508c4d79ae5&pi=0">http://www.metapress.com/content/k71lq31868673703/?p=a712a3824c744ccaa5147508c4d79ae5&pi=0</a>
However, that now also gives a "Sorry. Can't do it." error message, so I guess they must have changed the URL format too!
</p>
<p>
It occurs to me that, if writing a new scraper is a lot of work, you might want to consider updating the www.metapress.com scraper, and then pop up a message whenever anyone tries to post from inderscience.metapress.com to the effect that they should relocate the content from www.metapress.com (which does have RIS export) and post again.
</p>
<p>
The above assumes of course that the sites are complete duplicates of each other. Can anyone throw any light on this?
</p>
2008-07-11T08:50:21+00:00
-
new forum message CiteULike and Zotero integration
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/98
<p>
neils: thanks for your comments on Connotea. The reason I stuck with CiteULike a while ago was precisely b/c it focuses on citations/publications rather than trying to be a general bookmarking tool. That's also a reason (not the only or main one) why I don't use Zotero as my local reference manager, because it tries to cover everything; I use JabRef instead. But JabRef has an awful/non-existent set of citation styles, no plug-in into Word or Open Office, and a fairly low-traffic user community.
</p>
<p>
I just saw the Zotero preview, too. Version 1.5 will import EndNote styles! I also saw that they're building a synchronization to their servers and possibly other tools. This is all going in the right direction. Between JabRef, Zotero and CiteULike, that's all I'd ever need. Though I'd be a bit more at ease if CiteULike was open source...
</p>
<p>
Anyways, I'm rambling.
</p>
2008-07-10T22:13:42+00:00
-
new forum message Can't post Inderscience articles
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/559
<p>
What a pain. inderscience.metapress.com seems to be in a completely different format from the articles at www.metapress.com, and they don't even have a "download RIS/BibTeX" link.
</p>
<br/>
<p>
I'll treat this as a completely new site and see if we can write a new scraper for it.
</p>
2008-07-10T19:26:19+00:00
-
new forum message Amzon URL tags
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/562
<p>
Every document in the system has a number of "linkouts", or links to places where the original document can be found. These might point to the document on the arXiv, a link to dx.doi.org, or a link to a particular publisher. When we do a BibTeX export, we pick a random link and put it in the record.
</p>
<p>
There are two issues here:
</p>
<ul>
<li>There's a creeping element of commercialism in that the Amazon link contains a key which gives us a microscopic amount of money if anyone happens to buy the book. That clearly has no place in a bibliography. I'm happy to remove this.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Books don't really have URLs anyway. Where <i>should</i> we link to? Amazon? Worldcat? CiteULike itself? An arbitrary country's national library. Maybe we just leave the field out?</li>
</ul>
2008-07-10T19:17:55+00:00
-
new forum thread Amzon URL tags
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/562
<p>
Dear CiteULike team,
</p>
<br/>
<p>
Thank you for your wonderful work, I have a quick question.
</p>
<br/>
<p>
If I post a book to my library form amazon it comes with a url containing citeulike information, but if I post to my library from, say, the arXiv, then the url specifies the location of the document. For example, the Neilsen and Chuang, "quantum computation and quantum information" book available here
</p>
<br/>
<p>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Quantum-Computation-Information-Cambridge-Sciences/dp/0521635039/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1215695202&sr=8-1">http://www.amazon.co.uk/Quantum-Computation-Information-Cambridge-Sciences/dp/0521635039/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1215695202&sr=8-1</a>
</p>
<br/>
<p>
has the following url in the bibtex of my library
</p>
<br/>
<p>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=citeulike09-20\&amp;path=ASIN/0521635039">http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=citeulike09-20\&amp;path=ASIN/0521635039</a>
</p>
<br/>
<p>
This url is now appearing in my bibliography, which it probably shouldn't, but that may be a function of my bibliography style rather than anything wrong with citeulike. But arXiv bibliography items have a much more relevant url tag. So, my question is, what are the amazon url's supposed to refer to?
</p>
<br/>
<p>
Feel free to tell me if I'm being excessively anal here.
</p>
2008-07-10T13:15:42+00:00
-
new forum message keywords to tags conversion
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/555
<p>
I've done that - you'll now see some tag-parsing options. The default should, I believe, do what you want.
</p>
2008-07-09T14:48:17+00:00
-
new forum thread Please addd journal subscription
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/561
<p>
Can you please add a journal subscription page? Nobody wants to search for a particular journal in the long list every time.
</p>
2008-07-09T13:54:31+00:00
-
new forum message Capitals within author's names are lost in the BiBTeX record
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/320
<p>
This is a very useful workaround, but I'm a bit stumped as to how to make it work when an organization is the author. I tried
=///New Media Consortium/=
and it looks fine in the "by: " line (i.e. author is listed as "New Media Consortium"), but in APA citation format it's still:
Consortium, N. M.
Here's what I mean:
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/user/rickl/article/2846067">http://www.citeulike.org/user/rickl/article/2846067</a>
</p>
2008-07-09T10:29:16+00:00
-
new forum message CiteULike and Zotero integration
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/98
<p>
I see that Zotero just released a preview version with (a) synchronisation to their own servers and (b) many more citation styles. So my original post here may not be relevant for much longer. It might make sense for the Zotero developers to build their own synchronisation framework, rather than try to integrate with multiple, existing solutions.
</p>
<p>
emayorga - I find Connotea slow, buggy, broken, ugly and more suited to general bookmarking than as a reference manager. CiteULike works better for me in all respects and has a larger, more responsive community.
</p>
2008-07-09T03:58:48+00:00
-
new forum message CiteULike and Zotero integration
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/98
<p>
I also think this would be very nice. My first thought is that the most useful way would be for CiteULike to import from Zotero rather than the other way round.
Ah, but I guess emayorga's comment is a good argument for prioritising the reverse.
</p>
2008-07-09T02:08:17+00:00
-
new forum thread Can't post Inderscience articles
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/559
<p>
It looks like Inderscience might have changed their URL formats yet again. I haven't been able today to post anything. An example URL:
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://inderscience.metapress.com/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,1,9;journal,1,15;linkingpublicationresults,1:112382,1">http://inderscience.metapress.com/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,1,9;journal,1,15;linkingpublicationresults,1:112382,1</a>
</p>
<p>
Thanks for looking into this.
</p>
2008-07-09T02:03:40+00:00
-
new forum message Importing RIS seems to have stopped working
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/557
<p>
Sorry it was a type 500 error when I tried on the PC (so probably the same error). I will email the files and see what you make of them.
</p>
2008-07-08T15:32:08+00:00
-
new forum thread Optional field 'type' as in BiBTeX techreports
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/558
<p>
It would be great if the field 'type' was added to the bibliography entries, so that it can be included when export to BIB. Actually, some BiBTeX styles make use of this field, as the ACM one.
</p>
2008-07-08T12:27:09+00:00
-
new forum message Importing RIS seems to have stopped working
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/557
<p>
I've just imported a RIS file successfully. If you can't get yours to work, could you email it to support at citeulike dot org (gzip it if it's huge), and I'll take a look.
</p>
2008-07-08T11:49:14+00:00
-
new forum message keywords to tags conversion
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/555
<p>
yes, because even bogus tags like: all, into, and, of, the, ... which would appear many times could be easily eliminated, and the frequency of really important tags like "tragedy" "commons" "competition" "complex" increases.
</p>
2008-07-08T10:54:07+00:00
-
new forum thread Importing RIS seems to have stopped working
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/557
<p>
I was able to import an RIS file three days ago but yesterday and today when I tried to do it on my PC and clicked on the import RIS button I got a 404, while on my Mac the same action gave me "Server Error. The requested URL cannot be accessed due to a system error on this server." Is anyone else encountering this?
</p>
<p>
It would be nice one day to be able to directly import Endnote records...
</p>
2008-07-08T10:09:00+00:00
-
new forum message arXiv posts don't have correct journal attributes when they are available
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/556
<p>
take for example this article
</p>
<p>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0009107">http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0009107</a>
</p>
<p>
which has a journal reference on the front page, the bibtex output from my library for this article is
</p>
<p>
@MISC{Acin2000Threequbit,
author = {Acin, A. and Andrianov, A. and Jane, E. and Tarrach, R. },
title = {Three-qubit pure-state canonical forms},
month = {Sep},
year = {2000},
abstract = {In this paper we analyze the canonical forms into which any pure three-qubit
state can be cast. The minimal forms, i.e. the ones with the minimal
number of product states built from local bases, are also presented
and lead to a complete classification of pure three-qubit states.
This classification is related to the values of the polynomial invariants
under local unitary transformations by a one-to-one correspondence.},
citeulike-article-id = {2341146},
eprint = {quant-ph/0009107},
keywords = {5\_parameter, invariants, qubits},
posted-at = {2008-02-06 12:39:39},
priority = {3},
url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0009107}
}
</p>
<p>
it would be really cool if it was actually,
</p>
<p>
@ARTICLE{Acin2000Threequbit,
author = {Acin, A. and Andrianov, A. and Jane, E. and Tarrach, R. },
title = {Three-qubit pure-state canonical forms},
journal = {J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.},
year = {2001},
volume = {34},
pages = {,6725},
</p>
<p>
abstract = {In this paper we analyze the canonical forms into which any pure three-qubit
state can be cast. The minimal forms, i.e. the ones with the minimal
number of product states built from local bases, are also presented
and lead to a complete classification of pure three-qubit states.
This classification is related to the values of the polynomial invariants
under local unitary transformations by a one-to-one correspondence.},
citeulike-article-id = {2341146},
eprint = {quant-ph/0009107},
keywords = {5\_parameter, invariants, qubits},
posted-at = {2008-02-06 12:39:39},
priority = {3},
url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0009107}
}
</p>
<p>
That way when you reference this article in latex, it shows up with the correct journal reference and a subsequent eprint reference.
</p>
<p>
Essentially, I'm saying that if there is journal reference information (which is not always) than this information should have primacy over any eprint information.
</p>
2008-07-08T09:38:48+00:00
-
new forum message keywords to tags conversion
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/555
<p>
If I add an option, something like "make all words into separate tags", would that do what you want?
</p>
2008-07-07T20:20:14+00:00
-
new forum message arXiv posts don't have correct journal attributes when they are available
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/556
<p>
Could you post an more information:
</p>
<ul>
<li>a link to a post</li>
<li>what you see now</li>
<li>what you'd like to see</li>
</ul>
2008-07-07T20:17:59+00:00
-
new forum message APA Style Not Accurate
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/324
<p>
You tell me - I've added that ".bst" style as "APA (Reed)" to the bottom of the drop-down list of styles.
</p>
2008-07-07T20:17:22+00:00
-
new forum message Amazon Link Bug
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/549
<p>
It works, thanks!!!
</p>
2008-07-07T19:35:15+00:00
-
new forum message APA Style Not Accurate
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/324
<p>
Just wanted to confirm this style problem. There is an APA .bst file available on this page that looks promising: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://web.reed.edu/cis/Help/LaTeX/bibtexstyles.html#reedsty">http://web.reed.edu/cis/Help/LaTeX/bibtexstyles.html#reedsty</a>
</p>
<p>
Does this help?
</p>
2008-07-07T19:34:24+00:00
-
new forum thread arXiv posts don't have correct journal attributes when they are available
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/556
<p>
Some arXiv e-posts also have a journal reference on the front page, it would be nice if this was added to the bibtex as @ARTICLE rather than @MISC with the appropriate journal entry.
</p>
<p>
Thank you,
</p>
2008-07-07T18:29:19+00:00
-
new forum thread keywords to tags conversion
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/555
<p>
When I import a bibtex file a list of keywords like:
</p>
<p>
word1, word2, two words, three words more, word3
</p>
<p>
becomes
</p>
<p>
word1, word2, two-words, three-words-more, word3
</p>
<p>
i.e. words separated by spaces become tied with dashes. I got funny tags like "tragedy-of-the-commons". I ussually copy keywords straight from the pdfs and other bibtex files, and many appear as phrases. This didn't happen before. This is really bad because the number of tags becomes huge and useless.
</p>
2008-07-07T16:55:54+00:00
-
new forum message Group RSS feed doesn't work properly
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/297
<p>
Fixed now. Thanks for reporting the problem.
</p>
2008-07-07T15:23:27+00:00
-
new forum message CiteULike and Zotero integration
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/98
<p>
Also, Zotero has a very nice and growing set of bibliographic styles for formatting reference lists (for publication). It also has plug-ins for MS Word and OpenOffice Writer. For these reasons alone, it'd be terrific if Zotero could read directly from one's CiteULike collection. But I wonder if that work would have be done on the Zotero end.... Anyways, thanks.
</p>
<p>
Off-topic to neils, if you're still checking this thread: can you tell me why you like CiteULike better than Connotea? I'm curious, that's all. I use CiteULike exclusively, but tried Connotea a few years ago. Thanks.
</p>
2008-07-07T14:00:33+00:00
-
new forum message CiteULike and Zotero integration
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/98
<p>
I'd also like to add my vote to this request ! That would be awesome.
</p>
2008-07-07T09:07:00+00:00
-
new forum message CiteULike and Zotero integration
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/98
<p>
I also support this request. Even limited integration (at least one way and possibly limited to just basic metadata, tags and pdfs) is going to be big help. Does anyone know if anything related to this is being done?
</p>
<p>
Related topics: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/336,">http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/336,</a> http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/126, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/451,">http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/451,</a> http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/92, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/110">http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/110</a>
</p>
2008-07-07T05:09:10+00:00
-
new forum message Group RSS feed doesn't work properly
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/297
<p>
Is this fix still operational? I can't see any items in my private group's RSS feed, or in your example feed.
</p>
<p>
Here's the xml data between the <channel> tags for your example feed:
</p>
<br/>
<p>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
</p>
<p>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 04:33:44 BST</pubDate>
</p>
<p>
<title>CiteULike: Group: RSS Key Test Group - library [1 article]</title>
</p>
<p>
<description>CiteULike: Group: RSS Key Test Group - library [1 article]</description>
</p>
<p>
<link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4640/library</link>
</p>
<p>
<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
</p>
<p>
<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
</p>
<p>
<dc:rights>Copyright © 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
</p>
<p>
<items>
</p>
<p>
<rdf:Seq />
</p>
<p>
</items>
</p>
<p>
</channel>
</p>
2008-07-07T03:39:47+00:00
-
new forum message CUP import bug for JFM Digital Archive articles
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/552
<p>
There's not much we can do about this - we use the RIS export from the CUP site. These are the details we get:
</p>
<pre>
TY - JOUR
AU - Cancelli,Claudio
AU - Pedley,T. J.
PY - 2006/Apr/20
TI - A separated-flow model for collapsible-tube oscillations
JF - Journal of Fluid Mechanics Digital Archive
KW -
SP - 375
EP - 404
VL - 157
IS - -1
M3 - 10.1017/S0022112085002427
ER -
</pre>
<p>
I can certainly get the import to discard issue numbers which are less than zero.
</p>
2008-07-04T11:24:24+00:00
-
new forum thread Bibshare
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/553
<p>
Does anyone have any experience of using Bibshare? Thanks
</p>
2008-07-04T11:01:13+00:00
-
new forum message CUP import bug for JFM Digital Archive articles
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/552
<p>
The imported Journal name is also incorrect. It Should be "Journal of Fluid Mechanics", rather than "Journal of Fluid Mechanics Digital Archive". This is probably a special case that would need to be programmed manually: JFM Online is split into two 'journals' in the CUP system: The "Digital Archive" is for older pre-1997 issues, the properly titles one contains newer articles.
</p>
2008-07-04T10:34:46+00:00
-
new forum thread CUP import bug for JFM Digital Archive articles
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/552
<p>
Using the bookmarklet, I tried to import the article at <a rel="nofollow" href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=402142">http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=402142</a>
</p>
<p>
This appeared to work (http://www.citeulike.org/user/rjw62/article/2963545), but on closer inspection some of the details were incorrect. In particular the imported year was 2006 (rather than 1985) and the imported issue number was -1 (when there shouldn't be an issue number at all). Note that the year has probably been taken from the "published online" date. This isn't appropriate to use in this case, since that records the date the archive was opened rather than the original publication date of the article. The issues number of "-1" seems to be used as a special placeholder value when each volume of a journal is published as a single issue.
</p>
2008-07-04T10:15:54+00:00
-
new forum message Post from IEEExplore grabs detail of the wrong article
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/551
<p>
Yes, it works now. Thanks!
</p>
2008-07-03T17:47:07+00:00
-
new forum message Post from IEEExplore grabs detail of the wrong article
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/551
<p>
The other article ("FPGA-accelerated seed...") has acquired the DOI for the article you were trying to post. I've untangled the mess, so your article should post properly now.
</p>
2008-07-03T16:28:30+00:00
-
new forum thread Post from IEEExplore grabs detail of the wrong article
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/551
<p>
citeUlike seems to be trying to import a different article from the one I am trying to post.
I am trying to post "Systolic Architecture for Computational Fluid Dynamics on FPGAs" from <a rel="nofollow" href="http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4297248">http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4297248</a>
Starting on that web page, I clicked on my "Post to CiteULike" bookmarklet. Somehow, it tries to import "FPGA-accelerated seed generation in Mercury BLASTP", which is a different article. It is from the same conference, but a different article nonetheless.
</p>
<p>
The result is at <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/user/peskin/article/1755297">http://www.citeulike.org/user/peskin/article/1755297</a>
From within this citeUlike entry, the DOI link points to the abstract for the article I was trying to post. However, the IEEExplore link points to the wrong article, and all the details within citeUlike pertain to that wrong article.
</p>
<p>
I am using Firefox 2.0.0.15 running on Windows XP SP2.
The "Post To CiteULike" bookmarklet I am using is defined as:
javascript:location.href='http://www.citeulike.org/posturl?username=peskin&url='+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+'&title='+encodeURIComponent(document.title)
</p>
2008-07-03T13:42:52+00:00
-
new forum thread Scholar Google search button?
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/550
<p>
I am searching for something in CiteULike, and 0 references come up. Hmm... I thought. JSTOR gives an immediate link to Scholar.Google.Com with identical search. I am sure those are three lines of code somewhere in the search engine output formatting to give a link to <a rel="nofollow" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar/?q=search%20terms">http://scholar.google.com/scholar/?q=search%20terms</a>
</p>
2008-07-02T21:44:35+00:00
-
new forum message Amazon Link Bug
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/549
<p>
Yes: try it now.
</p>
2008-07-02T09:58:14+00:00
-
new forum thread Amazon Link Bug
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/549
<p>
I wanted to bookmark this book, but citeulike created an error message:
</p>
<p>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.amazon.com/Thoughtless-Acts-Observations-Intuitive-Design/dp/B000W903YC/ref=pd_sim_b_1">http://www.amazon.com/Thoughtless-Acts-Observations-Intuitive-Design/dp/B000W903YC/ref=pd_sim_b_1</a>
</p>
<p>
Can you help me?
</p>
2008-07-02T08:59:40+00:00
-
new forum message Article entry using a DOI
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/372
<p>
A simple way to implement this could be using the "?noredirect" parameter (<a rel="nofollow" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/09531519950145896?noredirect">http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/09531519950145896?noredirect</a> ) to resolve the DOI number and then using CiteULike plugins to post the article.
</p>
2008-06-30T13:58:20+00:00
-
new forum message Article entry using a DOI
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/372
<p>
Ditto. Connotea already does this, it would be nice if citeulike did it too.
</p>
2008-06-30T09:40:04+00:00
-
new forum message Article entry using a DOI
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/372
<p>
I would like to second this motion.
</p>
<p>
I would love to be able to paste a DOI, or even a newline-separated list of DOIs, into a citeulike page and have them all added to my library (or a group library) at once. Ideally, I should also be able to set some of the parameters (tags, whether these are my papers, etc) for all of them, at once.
</p>
2008-06-29T00:24:57+00:00
-
new forum message Invitation page: Separating addresses by comma does not work
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/546
<p>
Fixed now - thanks for reporting it.
</p>
2008-06-28T14:28:05+00:00
-
new forum thread Tag Visualization
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/547
<p>
Hi everyone,
</p>
<br/>
<p>
I hope it's not inappropriate to post this message here :)
</p>
<br/>
<p>
I'm doing a study on Tag Visualizations (for my MSc. dissertation) and I extracted the user and tag data from CiteULike. These are the users I extracted my data from. For most of the users, I have only taken a subset of their tags and articles because the visualization currently can't handle too many... I hope they don't mind :)
</p>
<ul>
<li>aku8000</li>
<li>asilva</li>
<li>cmalek</li>
<li>katja</li>
<li>sgilliland</li>
<li>eaitken</li>
<li>kaarnak</li>
</ul>
<br/>
<p>
For anyone reading this, if you can spare 10 min or so, I'd like to invite you to visit <a rel="nofollow" href="http://leow0048.elementfx.com/tagvis.html">this webpage</a> to complete a short task & questionnaire. The task requires you to first select a topic ('Human-Computer Interaction' or 'Project Management'), and then to make use of a tag visualization to determine which users and tags are most relevant to your selected topic.
</p>
<br/>
<p>
I've received feedback that the task is difficult to follow, but I've really tried my best to make it more user-friendly. In any case, I apologize in advance for any frustration caused :)
</p>
<br/>
<p>
Thanks!
</p>
<br/>
<p>
PS: If your computer is (1) behind a firewall or proxy server and (2) Java 6 is installed, please do <i>not</i> use Firefox (Use IE instead. Unfortunately, I haven't tried it on Safari or Konqueror...)
</p>
2008-06-28T09:48:24+00:00
-
new forum message where are the already read articles?
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/355
<p>
I second that, I would really like a way to filter by articles I've already read
</p>
2008-06-27T18:34:24+00:00
-
new forum thread Invitation page: Separating addresses by comma does not work
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/546
<p>
When I try to invite people to CiteULike, it says, "Separate addresses by spaces or commas". However, when I add the following:
</p>
<br/>
<p>
user1@university.edu, user2@univerity.edu, user3@university.edu
</p>
<br/>
<p>
I get the following error message:
</p>
<br/>
<p>
1 or more email addresses didn't look correct
</p>
<p>
&nsbp; user1@university.edu, : missing .xx or .xxx ending part
</p>
<p>
&nsbp; user2@univerity.edu, : missing .xx or .xxx ending part
</p>
<br/>
<p>
If I just separate with newlines it works OK, so this could be just as simple as removing the words "or commas" from the help text at the top of the page.
</p>
2008-06-27T18:30:13+00:00
-
new forum message Conference Location
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/541
<p>
Fixed by the great citeulike support staff.
</p>
<p>
Thanks!
</p>
<p>
Daniel
</p>
2008-06-27T14:28:14+00:00
-
new forum message cited by and citations info
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/542
<p>
Hi,
</p>
<br/>
<p>
You can use <a rel="nofollow" href="http://gmodules.com/ig/creator?url=http://rapadura.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/citeulike/citeulike.xml&up_user=ckanich&up_tag=&up_items=10&up_tags=1&up_doi=1&up_abstract=1&synd=open&w=300&h=300&title=Search+CiteULike&border=%23ffffff%7C3px%2C1px+solid+%23999999">Search CiteULike for iGoogle</a> to view which articles are citing the articles of your library.
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
<p>
Leonardo
</p>
2008-06-27T11:22:53+00:00
-
new forum thread cited by and citations info
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/542
<p>
Is it possible to pull out/add "citations of" and "cited by" (similar to citeseer) for articles stored in citeulike? It would be very helpful for literature reviews.
</p>
2008-06-27T02:26:10+00:00
-
new forum thread Conference Location
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/541
<p>
Please, I think that a Conference Location field is necessary in the Conference Proceedings type in order to export it properly. Right now, all conference papers stored in citeulike can not be used without manual editing in others applications (e.g. endnote) for write the references of your paper.
</p>
<p>
Thank you very much,
</p>
<p>
Daniel
</p>
2008-06-26T17:33:46+00:00
-
new forum message add PDF icon in group libraries like in personal library?
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/506
<p>
Fixed now.
</p>
2008-06-26T16:22:22+00:00
-
new forum message Related tag browsing by group
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/537
<p>
That is the intended behaviour.
</p>
2008-06-26T16:11:42+00:00
-
new forum message Sorting publications
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/158
<p>
I've added this as an option to the RSS for article lists. To make it appear, you need to add an <i>ie7_sortable</i> parameter to the URLs, like this:
</p>
<ul>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/rss/user/qiuyl?ie7_sortable=yes">http://www.citeulike.org/rss/user/qiuyl?ie7_sortable=yes</a></li>
</ul>
2008-06-26T15:47:47+00:00
-
new forum thread Citations in MS Office 2007
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/540
<p>
Hi,
is there any way of exporting my bibliography in citeulike so I can directly import into MS Word 2007 reference/citation tool?
</p>
<p>
Thanks,
</p>
<p>
ahe
</p>
2008-06-25T16:37:44+00:00
-
new forum message Bibtex / library timestamp
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/533
<p>
Another alternative might be to have the CGI set the last-modified field of the HTTP header (for BibTeX, RIS, and PDFs). This would allow all HTTP-conforming tools to be able to download files only if they have been modified since the last download, which would hopefully also reduce the load on the server.
Time-stamping is supported by wget, for example, but it gets a 404 response from the server when this is turned on client-side (presumably because the server provides no last-modified?).
Cheers,
Chad
PS: I also have to praise the CUL people for always having been very responsive.
</p>
2008-06-25T11:32:00+00:00
-
new forum thread please add "pubDate" tag
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/539
<p>
A "pubDate" tag under Channel will be very helpful to determine the age of a RSS feed. I would like to request to add this tag. Thanks.
</p>
2008-06-25T03:23:13+00:00
-
new forum message Sorting publications
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/158
<p>
If you do not have IE 7.0 or Windows Vista, you may check the screenshot to see how the sorting and filter work by using RSS SLE:
</p>
<p>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://heep.geog.ufl.edu/courses/foundgis/sle_rss.jpg">http://heep.geog.ufl.edu/courses/foundgis/sle_rss.jpg</a>
</p>
2008-06-25T03:14:59+00:00
-
new forum message Sorting publications
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/158
<p>
Yes sorting filter are the most needed features!
</p>
<p>
I have written to Richard and Chris to recommend a quick solution by using Microsoft RSS Simple List Extensions. It will be benefit to all Internet Explorer 7.0 or Vista users. If you use Vista, or you have IE 7.0 installed in your computer, please visit this page:
</p>
<p>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://heep.geog.ufl.edu/courses/foundgis/FeedSLE_implementation_test.xml">http://heep.geog.ufl.edu/courses/foundgis/FeedSLE_implementation_test.xml</a>
</p>
<p>
This XML file is based on the RSS feed I saved from citeUlike. I added few lines of code then the feed can be sorted by list order, title, author, publication name, publication year and of course tag name; the feed can also be filter by Tag name, author, year and publication name (journal name).
</p>
<p>
Only few lines need to be added to the RSS feed. If you are interested to see how to implement it, please try it. You do not have to be a programmer to do this:
</p>
<p>
1. in the namespace definition part, add a new namespce:
</p>
<p>
xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005"
</p>
<p>
2. Under the Channel tag (before "</channel>"), add the following text. You can rename the
labels in the following text if you want.
</p>
<p>
<cf:treatAs>list</cf:treatAs>
<cf:listinfo>
<cf:sort element="title" label="Title" data-type="text" />
<cf:sort ns="" element="author" data-type="text" label="Author" />
<cf:sort ns="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
element="publicationName" label="Publication Name" data-type="text" />
<cf:sort ns="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
element="publicationYear" label="Publication Year" data-type="date" />
<cf:sort ns="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
element="category" label="Tag Name" />
</p>
<p>
<cf:group ns="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
element="category" label="Tag Name" />
<cf:group ns="" element="author" data-type="text" label="Author" />
<cf:group ns="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
element="publicationYear" label="Pub. Year" />
<cf:group ns="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
element="publicationName" label="Pub. Name" />
</cf:listinfo>
</p>
<p>
You can view my XML source. I hope my suggestion can be adopted very soon.
</p>
<p>
If you like this idea, please show your support!
</p>
<p>
Thank you.
</p>
2008-06-25T03:06:47+00:00
-
new forum thread Related tag browsing by group
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/537
<p>
Hi,
</p>
<p>
I have set up a group and have slowly amassed a number of papers in it.
</p>
<p>
When I view the group's library the "Group Tags" box on the right is useful in that it shows all the tags for articles in the library. Clicking on a tag show only those articles with the selected tag from the group's library.
</p>
<p>
However, when I then choose a "related tag" I get *all* articles in CiteULike with that tag rather than just those in my group's library.
</p>
<p>
Is this the intended behaviour? If so, maybe the heading could include some text saying that "clicking on a tag will return results from all articles".
</p>
2008-06-25T01:48:16+00:00
-
new forum message Abstract missing with post from PubMed
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/523
<p>
That was the reason I asked for, and was given, a line of, and the ability to view the whole abstract on the first posting page. Watch for that and what you are asking for is already there. BUT, if the abstract is not there, or perhaps other details are not arriving properly, like authors' names, there is problem in adding or correcting the details manually which I would love to see sorted. Which is that one cannot add or edit all the necessary details before the article is posted, and so, when one does, the groups the article has gone to have an incomplete version and need editing separately. If you accept a faulty direct posting this applies to all the incorrect details. If instead one goes back and posts entirely manually, the URL or DOI cannot be entered until afterwards. Could an ability to enter those be added to the first or second manual posting pages, please?
</p>
2008-06-24T21:47:48+00:00
-
new forum message Abstract missing with post from PubMed
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/523
<p>
As there are occasional problems with abstracts when importing from PubMed (Nature articles are frequent offenders, maybe for the same reason), would it be possible to have a quick way to visualize if an article has an abstract or not in the library list, with a " icon, in the same way there is a comment or a pdf icon next to the article title in the library list ? So we could check very rapidly if the abstract has been omitted when creating entries.
</p>
2008-06-24T17:28:47+00:00
-
new forum thread abbreviated journal title
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/536
<p>
When an article is post to the database using the browser button it fills the Journal field with the full Journal name not the abbreviated journal title. This looks reasonable since one can always abbreviate the tittle afterwards. However in bibtex this would have to be deal by a rather intelligent
style (.bst) file. Unfortunately the bst files are usually provided by the Journals and do not include this feature. They assume the journal field has the abbreviated Journal title. So this makes the bib file generated by citulike unusable (at least for me that use prsty.bst from APS). Does somebody know how to deal with this problem? Is there some bst code that can be somehow appended to the Journal bst code to do the job? Thanks.
</p>
2008-06-24T16:55:51+00:00
-
new forum thread Bibtex / library timestamp
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/533
<p>
Hi,
</p>
<p>
Sorry for the numerous feature requests, but to be honest, you guys are just too darn responsive to my requests! You know, give a mouse a cookie...
</p>
<p>
Anyway, here's my latest wish: similar to the ability to get an MD5 sum of a given user's library bibtex file using a URL GET parameter, i.e.
</p>
<p>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/bibtex/user/gjuggler/?md5=true">http://www.citeulike.org/bibtex/user/gjuggler/?md5=true</a>
</p>
<p>
I was wondering if it would be possible to also get a timestamp of the last-modified date of the library. Something along the lines of:
</p>
<p>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/bibtex/user/gjuggler/?timestamp=true">http://www.citeulike.org/bibtex/user/gjuggler/?timestamp=true</a>
</p>
<p>
that would simply return the timestamp of the date of the last modification to my library.
</p>
<p>
Cheers,
Greg
</p>
2008-06-24T09:11:57+00:00
-
new forum message 'My Publications' - rss?
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/463
<p>
adding another tag is pretty uncomfortable since it requires a lot of manual work (though this could be done automatically!). furthermore a functionality to export rss/bibtex directly from my publications would simply be consistent with the overall behaviour/exporting facility of citeulike
</p>
2008-06-23T20:17:25+00:00
-
new forum message 'My Publications' - rss?
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/463
<p>
yes, i think this would be very useful! see also here: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/464">http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/464</a>
</p>
2008-06-23T20:13:32+00:00
-
new forum thread Project MUSE importing needs changed
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/531
<p>
Project MUSE seems to have changed the page format for some (but maybe not all?) of their journals. So, the CiteULike coding to recognize the citation details probably needs to be updated.
</p>
<p>
Here's an example to try out: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/v011/11.2.kaufman-osborn.html">http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/v011/11.2.kaufman-osborn.html</a>
</p>
2008-06-23T18:39:17+00:00
-
new forum message please add "dc:year" tag in RSS export
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/526
<p>
Could we also have a tag with the publication's type (article, book, ...)?
</p>
2008-06-23T13:45:01+00:00
-
new forum message please add "dc:year" tag in RSS export
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/526
<p>
There's a <prism:publicationYear> tag which should do what you want.
</p>
2008-06-23T12:28:37+00:00
-
new forum message Abstract missing with post from PubMed
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/523
<p>
It's actually going wrong for a slightly different reason. That article was discovered by another scraper originally: the one for ingentaconnect.com. When we originally imported the details from them, the abstract wasn't available. Ingenta kindly told us what the article's PubMed ID was, so we can work out the connection between the version you found and the version we had already.
</p>
<br/>
<p>
So, although the PubMed record includes the abstract, we don't have code (yet) in CiteULike which does the intelligent thing and tries to merge the details from two different sources (Ingenta and PubMed). Consequently CiteULike plays dumb, and just sticks with the details it already had.
</p>
<br/>
<p>
One for us to definitely fix, but it's probably a reasonably involved piece of work to get this right.
</p>
2008-06-23T09:08:25+00:00
-
new forum message 'My Publications' - rss?
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/463
<p>
and the same for course teaching reading materials -- you may add a tag as "English101_Reading" then insert to your course website.
</p>
2008-06-21T17:41:18+00:00
-
new forum message 'My Publications' - rss?
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/463
<p>
I think it would be easily to go around. If the article is your own publication, you may add a tag as "myownpublication" then insert all articles under "myownpublication" tag into your own webpage.
</p>
2008-06-21T17:39:00+00:00
-
new forum thread please add "dc:year" tag in RSS export
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/526
<p>
I write a XSL file to transform the RSS file that I can get from my library. However, it is very difficult to get a publication year from RSS. Currently, the publication year is included in <dc:source> tag, but it requires many different ways to handle the year (for example, "3 January 2007" vs. "Feburary 2008"). It would be greatly appreciated if a "<dc:year>" tag is added in the exported RSS feed.
</p>
2008-06-21T17:35:11+00:00
-
new forum message Wiley InterScience article not importing properly
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/511
<p>
Thanks!
</p>
2008-06-20T21:34:18+00:00
-
new forum message Sorting publications
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/158
<p>
I vote for this too. Thanks for everything, cheers
</p>
2008-06-20T09:31:54+00:00
-
new forum thread Abstract missing with post from PubMed
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/523
<p>
Posting of some articles from pubmed using the bookmarklet seems to miss adding the abstract.
An example page where this is a problem is <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18377639?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18377639?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum</a>
</p>
<p>
This was not originally a problem when posting through PubMed, so I assume it's something that NCBI has decided to change in their page formatting.
</p>
2008-06-19T19:23:31+00:00
-
new forum message Sorting publications
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/158
<p>
Indeed, most needed feature here too.
</p>
2008-06-19T16:58:24+00:00
-
new forum message add PDF icon in group libraries like in personal library?
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/506
<p>
Thanks for the quick response. Knowing which articles have PDFs is great!
</p>
<p>
The url generated with the PDF icons in group libraries refers to the paper as though it were from the user library.
The PDF icon link does not work if the article is not in your personal library.
Mockup urls:
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/pdf/user/acj2109/article/2907934/somearticle.pdf">http://www.citeulike.org/pdf/user/acj2109/article/2907934/somearticle.pdf</a>
versus
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/pdf/user/group:5504/article/2907934/somearticle.pdf">http://www.citeulike.org/pdf/user/group:5504/article/2907934/somearticle.pdf</a>
</p>
2008-06-19T16:35:49+00:00
-
new forum message The 2nd page of search results not working
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/520
<p>
That's fixed now. Thanks very much for reporting it.
</p>
2008-06-18T15:50:11+00:00
-
new forum thread The 2nd page of search results not working
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/520
<p>
As I typed in "Second Life" with the quotation marks in the search field, the search returned 76 results, displaying 40 some articles on the first page, but the 2nd page of the search results is not working because it takes you back to the home page of this site.
</p>
<p>
This situation is replicated with login and without login.
</p>
2008-06-18T13:57:48+00:00
-
new forum message "This file doesn't appear to be a PDF" when it *is* a proper PDF
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/519
<p>
thank you!
</p>
2008-06-18T13:55:39+00:00
-
new forum message "This file doesn't appear to be a PDF" when it *is* a proper PDF
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/519
<p>
OK, done.
</p>
2008-06-18T09:24:30+00:00
-
new forum message "This file doesn't appear to be a PDF" when it *is* a proper PDF
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/519
<p>
This corresponds to <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/user/Borelli/article/2869965">http://www.citeulike.org/user/Borelli/article/2869965</a>
Thanks!
</p>
2008-06-18T07:04:51+00:00
-
new forum message "This file doesn't appear to be a PDF" when it *is* a proper PDF
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/519
<p>
Hmmm. How strange.
</p>
<pre>
$ file journal.pcbi.1000087.pdf
journal.pcbi.1000087.pdf: Minix filesystem, version 2
</pre>
<p>
But:
</p>
<pre>
$ od -c journal.pcbi.1000087.pdf | head -2
0000000 % P D F - 1 . 5 \r % 342 343 317 323 \r \n
0000020 1 0 o b j < < / C o n t e n
</pre>
<p>
Our server (my MacOS laptop, too) doesn't think it's a PDF. Let me know which article it's the PDF for, and I'll upload it for you.
</p>
2008-06-17T18:12:50+00:00
-
new forum thread "This file doesn't appear to be a PDF" when it *is* a proper PDF
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/519
<p>
I couldn't upload the pdf found at:
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1000087">http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1000087</a>
</p>
<p>
I've successfully uploaded pdfs from PLoS Comp. Bio. before but this one is not accepted.
The pdf in question looks fine on evince and acroread 8 and prints fine, which suggests that it is well-formed.
</p>
<p>
Thanks!
</p>
2008-06-17T15:41:02+00:00
-
new forum thread Canonicalise entries (via Pubmed, Collection of Computer Science Bibliographies etc)
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/516
<p>
I've used the Perl script at <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=515163">http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=515163</a> to canonicalise entries (it uses the Collection of Computer Science Bibliographies at <a rel="nofollow" href="http://liinwww.ira.uka.de).">http://liinwww.ira.uka.de).</a> This has to be done offline, and could be improved with access to a wider range of subjects - e.g. by accessing Pubmed as well.
</p>
<p>
I'd like to see a serverside version of this, set up to use multiple sources so I could canonicalise all my entries via a web interface, and automatically add missing abstracts etc. This should help find and merge duplicate entries too.
</p>
<p>
For me would be an absolute killer feature - fingers crossed.
</p>
2008-06-16T16:14:48+00:00
-
new forum message Tag visibility of private papers
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/512
<p>
The search problem's been fixed too.
</p>
2008-06-16T12:11:29+00:00
-
new forum message Searching for a particular article is broken
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/515
<p>
I appreciate you fixing that entry. Now I've found another that isn't indexed:
</p>
<p>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/user/fmccown/author/Rabin">http://www.citeulike.org/user/fmccown/author/Rabin</a>
</p>
<p>
Searching by the title of the paper or author name doesn't work:
</p>
<p>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/search/username?q=%22Efficient+dispersal+of+information+for+security%22&username=fmccown">http://www.citeulike.org/search/username?q=%22Efficient+dispersal+of+information+for+security%22&username=fmccown</a>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/search/username?q=rabin&username=fmccown">http://www.citeulike.org/search/username?q=rabin&username=fmccown</a>
</p>
<p>
I wonder if this is more of a system-wide problem?
</p>
2008-06-14T02:26:16+00:00
-
new forum message Searching for a particular article is broken
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/515
<p>
It looks like that article wasn't in the search index (or, at least, not with the correct data). I forced it to be indexed, and now the first of your example searches returns that article.
</p>
2008-06-13T18:22:55+00:00
-
new forum thread Searching for a particular article is broken
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/515
<p>
If I search for one of my articles authored by Karnin:
</p>
<p>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/search/username?q=karnin&username=fmccown">http://www.citeulike.org/search/username?q=karnin&username=fmccown</a>
</p>
<p>
I get 0 results. However I do have the article in my library:
</p>
<p>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/user/fmccown/author/Karnin">http://www.citeulike.org/user/fmccown/author/Karnin</a>
</p>
<p>
and I can see the author in my library:
</p>
<p>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/user/fmccown/authors">http://www.citeulike.org/user/fmccown/authors</a>
</p>
<p>
Searching for the title of this author's paper also yields no results:
</p>
<p>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/search/username?q=%22On+secret+sharing+systems%22&username=fmccown">http://www.citeulike.org/search/username?q=%22On+secret+sharing+systems%22&username=fmccown</a>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/search/username?q=Secret+AND+Sharing&username=fmccown">http://www.citeulike.org/search/username?q=Secret+AND+Sharing&username=fmccown</a>
</p>
<p>
Other authors and titles I search for are appearing, so this appears to be an isolated bug.
</p>
2008-06-13T17:44:35+00:00
-
new forum message add a "My Journals" tab
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/460
<p>
I add my vote to this one :-)
</p>
2008-06-13T16:00:50+00:00
-
new forum thread Couldn't post an article
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/514
<p>
I wasn't able to post from this url:
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cell.com/content/article/abstract?uid=PIIS0092867408006144">http://www.cell.com/content/article/abstract?uid=PIIS0092867408006144</a>
</p>
2008-06-13T15:52:50+00:00
-
new forum thread Tag suggestions
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/513
<p>
Hi,
when posting or copying an article to my library, I'd love to have tag suggestions. If it has already been posted by someone, suggestions could simply be the most commonly used tags for this article. Even more interesting, you could try too infer tags according to the authors of the paper, words in the title, tags frequency ... I don't now what would be the good formula, but it would sure be useful :-)
</p>
2008-06-13T13:53:05+00:00
-
new forum message Tag visibility of private papers
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/512
<p>
First issue (test_tag) is fixed now. If you spot anything else, let me know.
</p>
2008-06-12T22:36:06+00:00
-
new forum message add PDF icon in group libraries like in personal library?
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/506
<p>
That's done.
</p>
2008-06-12T20:32:28+00:00
-
new forum message Tag visibility of private papers
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/512
<p>
OK, great! Thanks to you for your quick replies!
</p>
2008-06-12T18:54:16+00:00
-
new forum message Tag visibility of private papers
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/512
<p>
Got it - thanks for your speedy reply. Added to the To-Do list.
</p>
2008-06-12T18:41:35+00:00
-
new forum message Tag visibility of private papers
http://www.citeulike.org/groupforum/512
<p>
I added a test tag for another paper in the group as well. Both are shown even if I'm logged out, though the private one is on grey background.
</p>
<p>
Private paper in a private group
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/search/all?q=test_abc">http://www.citeulike.org/search/all?q=test_abc</a>
</p>
<p>
Public paper in a private group
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citeulike.org/search/all?q=test_def">http://www.citeulike.org/search/all?q=test_def</a>
</p>
2008-06-12T17:56:20+00:00
-
new forum message Tag visibility of private papers
http://www.