<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:27:35 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: Group: ACS - library [46 articles]</title>
	<description>CiteULike: Group: ACS - library [46 articles]</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/library</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/163212"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/622787"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/363912"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1106150"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2952411"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/784319"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2775056"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2898885"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/546289"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2877809"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2877700"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2862577"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/141649"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2859600"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2854840"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2837959"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2686476"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/965343"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1101188"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1279898"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2776572"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2762005"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1087909"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2761989"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/608358"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2719604"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2719627"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2719593"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2714450"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2688302"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2688296"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2623697"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/996808"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1842810"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/658201"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/965334"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2552589"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2688285"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1560583"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2688272"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2567849"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/305755"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2620836"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/957865"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/950399"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/306015"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/163212">
    <title>How do people organize their desks?: Implications for the design of office information systems</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/163212</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., Vol. 1, No. 1. (January 1983), pp. 99-112.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>How do people organize their desks?: Implications for the design of office information systems</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Thomas Malone</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/357423.357430</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., Vol. 1, No. 1. (January 1983), pp. 99-112.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-04-17T23:19:37-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1983</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1046-8188</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>99</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>112</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>spatial-organization</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/622787">
    <title>Data mountain: using spatial memory for document management</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/622787</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(1998), pp. 153-162.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Data mountain: using spatial memory for document management</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>George Robertson</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mary Czerwinski</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Kevin Larson</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Robbins</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>David Thiel</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Maarten van Dantzich</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/288392.288596</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(1998), pp. 153-162.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-05-11T08:29:49-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1998</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>153</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>162</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>spatial-organization</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/363912">
    <title>The spatial metaphor for user interfaces: experimental tests of reference by location versus name</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/363912</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., Vol. 4, No. 1. (January 1986), pp. 42-63.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>The spatial metaphor for user interfaces: experimental tests of reference by location versus name</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>William Jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Susan Dumais</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/5401.5405</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., Vol. 4, No. 1. (January 1986), pp. 42-63.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-10-24T20:19:33-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1986</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1046-8188</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>42</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>63</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>spatial-organization</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1106150">
    <title>What do people recall about their documents?: implications for desktop search tools</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1106150</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2007), pp. 102-111.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>What do people recall about their documents?: implications for desktop search tools</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Tristan Blanc-Brude</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Dominique Scapin</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1216295.1216319</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2007), pp. 102-111.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-02-14T00:32:30-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>102</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>111</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>spatial-organization</prism:category>
    <prism:category>workspace</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2952411">
    <title>A comparison of symbolic and spatial filing</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2952411</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(1985), pp. 127-130.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>A comparison of symbolic and spatial filing</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Susan Dumais</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>William Jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/317456.317479</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(1985), pp. 127-130.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-07-02T15:36:40-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1985</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>127</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>130</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>spatial-organization</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/784319">
    <title>A comparison of spatial organization strategies in graphical and tangible user interfaces</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/784319</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2000), pp. 41-50.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>A comparison of spatial organization strategies in graphical and tangible user interfaces</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>James Patten</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hiroshi Ishii</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/354666.354671</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2000), pp. 41-50.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-08-03T10:03:00-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2000</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>41</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>50</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>spatial-organization</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tui</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2775056">
    <title>Investigating the Roles of Knowledge and Cognitive Abilities in Older Adult Information Seeking on the Web</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2775056</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., Vol. 15, No. 1. (May 2008), pp. 1-25.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Investigating the Roles of Knowledge and Cognitive Abilities in Older Adult Information Seeking on the Web</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Joseph Sharit</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mario Hern&#225;ndez</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Sara Czaja</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Peter Pirolli</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1352782.1352785</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., Vol. 15, No. 1. (May 2008), pp. 1-25.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-09T09:42:33-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1073-0516</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>25</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>aging</prism:category>
    <prism:category>information-seeking</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2898885">
    <title>Evidence accumulation in decision making: unifying the &#34;take the best&#34; and the &#34;rational&#34; models.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2898885</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Psychonomic bulletin &#38; review, Vol. 11, No. 2. (April 2004), pp. 343-352.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An evidence accumulation model of forced-choice decision making is proposed to unify the fast and frugal take the best (TTB) model and the alternative rational (RAT) model with which it is usually contrasted. The basic idea is to treat the TTB model as a sequential-sampling process that terminates as soon as any evidence in favor of a decision is found and the rational approach as a sequential-sampling process that terminates only when all available information has been assessed. The unified TTB and RAT models were tested in an experiment in which participants learned to make correct judgments for a set of real-world stimuli on the basis of feedback, and were then asked to make additional judgments without feedback for cases in which the TTB and the rational models made different predictions. The results show that, in both experiments, there was strong intraparticipant consistency in the use of either the TTB or the rational model but large interparticipant differences in which model was used. The unified model is shown to be able to capture the differences in decision making across participants in an interpretable way and is preferred by the minimum description length model selection criterion.</description>
    <dc:title>Evidence accumulation in decision making: unifying the &#34;take the best&#34; and the &#34;rational&#34; models.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>MD Lee</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>TD Cummins</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Psychonomic bulletin &#38; review, Vol. 11, No. 2. (April 2004), pp. 343-352.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-16T15:19:54-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Psychonomic bulletin &#38; review</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1069-9384</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>343</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>352</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>adaptive</prism:category>
    <prism:category>bounded-rationality</prism:category>
    <prism:category>decision-making</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/546289">
    <title>Re-visions of rationality?</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/546289</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Trends Cogn Sci, Vol. 9, No. 1. (January 2005), pp. 11-15.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The appeal of simple algorithms that take account of both the constraints of human cognitive capacity and the structure of environments has been an enduring theme in cognitive science. A novel version of such a boundedly rational perspective views the mind as containing an 'adaptive toolbox' of specialized cognitive heuristics suited to different problems. Although intuitively appealing, when this version was proposed, empirical evidence for the use of such heuristics was scant. I argue that in the light of empirical studies carried out since then, it is time this 'vision of rationality' was revised. An alternative view based on integrative models rather than collections of heuristics is proposed.</description>
    <dc:title>Re-visions of rationality?</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>BR Newell</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.005</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Trends Cogn Sci, Vol. 9, No. 1. (January 2005), pp. 11-15.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-03-10T16:12:06-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Trends Cogn Sci</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1364-6613</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>15</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>adaptive</prism:category>
    <prism:category>bounded-rationality</prism:category>
    <prism:category>decision-making</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2877809">
    <title>Making Good Decisions with Minimal Information: Simultaneous and Sequential Choice</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2877809</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journal of Bioeconomics, Vol. 3, No. 2. (16 May 2001), pp. 195-215.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Abstract&#160;&#160;The adaptive pressures facing humans and other animals to make decisions quickly can be met both by increasing internal information-processing speed and by minimizing the amount of information to be used. Here we focus on the latter effect and ask how, and how well, agents can make good decisions with a minimal amount of information, using two specific tasks as examples. When a choice must be made between simultaneously-available options, minimal information in the form of binary recognition (whether or not each item is recognized) can be used in the recognition heuristic to choose effectively. When options are encountered sequentially one at a time, minimal information as to whether or not each option is the best encountered so far is sufficient to guide agents using a simple search-cutoff rule to high performance along several choice criteria. Both of these examples have important economic as well as biological applications, and show the power of simple fast and frugal heuristics to produce good decisions with little information.</description>
    <dc:title>Making Good Decisions with Minimal Information: Simultaneous and Sequential Choice</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Thomas Dudey</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Peter Todd</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1023/A:1020542800376</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Journal of Bioeconomics, Vol. 3, No. 2. (16 May 2001), pp. 195-215.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-09T18:05:20-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journal of Bioeconomics</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>195</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>215</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>sequential-decision</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2877700">
    <title>Recognizing the Maximum of a Sequence</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2877700</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 61, No. 313. (1966), pp. 35-73.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The classical dowry, secretary, or beauty contest problem is extended in several directions. In trying to find sequentially the maximum of a random sequence of fixed length, the chooser can have one or several choices (section 2), no information about the distribution of the values (section 2), or at the other extreme, full information about the distribution and the value of the observation itself (section 3). He can have an opponent who alters the properties of the sequence (section 4). The payoff function may be 0 or 1 (sections 2-4), or it may be the value of the observation itself as in certain investment problems (section 5). Both theoretical and numerical results are given for optimum and near optimum play.</description>
    <dc:title>Recognizing the Maximum of a Sequence</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>John Gilbert</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Frederick Mosteller</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.2307/2283044</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 61, No. 313. (1966), pp. 35-73.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-09T17:29:00-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1966</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Statistical Association</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>61</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>313</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>35</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>73</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>American Statistical Association</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>sequential-decision</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2862577">
    <title>How our hands help us learn</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2862577</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 5. (May 2005), pp. 234-241.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When people talk they gesture, and those gestures often reflect thoughts not expressed in their words. In this sense, gesture and the speech it accompanies can mismatch. Gesture-speech [`]mismatches' are found when learners are on the verge of making progress on a task - when they are ready to learn. Moreover, mismatches provide insight into the mental processes that characterize learners when in this transitional state. Gesture is not just handwaving - it reflects how we think. However, evidence is mounting that gesture goes beyond reflecting our thoughts and can have a hand in changing those thoughts. We consider two ways in which gesture could change the course of learning: indirectly by influencing learning environments or directly by influencing learners themselves.</description>
    <dc:title>How our hands help us learn</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Susan Goldin-Meadow</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Susan Wagner</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.006</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 5. (May 2005), pp. 234-241.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-04T20:13:19-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Trends in Cognitive Sciences</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>234</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>241</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>embodiment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>gestures</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/141649">
    <title>Strategic behavior in monkeys</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/141649</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. In Press, Corrected Proof&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a recent paper, Lee et al. examined adaptive decision-making processes by training monkeys to play a competitive game against a computer programmed to play using various strategies. They found that the monkeys' responses were sensitive to the computer's strategies and consistent with reinforcement learning. Research such as this strongly complements current research in behavioral economics. We propose some potential future directions for this work, and put forward conjectures about what might be learned about decision-making in humans.</description>
    <dc:title>Strategic behavior in monkeys</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Amnon Rapoport</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Neil Bearden</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.002</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. In Press, Corrected Proof</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-03-27T02:30:42-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>Trends in Cognitive Sciences</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>In Press, Corrected Proof</prism:volume>
    <prism:category>decision-making</prism:category>
    <prism:category>games</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2859600">
    <title>What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2859600</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Psychological Research, Vol. 50, No. 4. (1 April 1989), pp. 243-250.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Classic work on interruptions by Zeigarnik showed that tasks that were interrupted were more likely to be recalled after a delay than tasks that were not interrupted. Much of the literature on interruptions has been devoted to examining this effect, although more recently interruptions have been used to choose between competing designs for interfaces to complex devices. However, none of this work looks at what makes some interruptions disruptive and some not. This series of experiments uses a novel computer-based adventure-game methodology to investigate the effects of the length of the interruption, the similarity of the interruption to the main task, and the complexity of processing demanded by the interruption. It is concluded that subjects make use of some form of non-articulatory memory which is not affected by the length of the interruption. It is affected by processing similar material however, and by a complex mentalarithmetic task which makes large demands on working memory.</description>
    <dc:title>What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Tony Gillie</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Donald Broadbent</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/BF00309260</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Psychological Research, Vol. 50, No. 4. (1 April 1989), pp. 243-250.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-03T17:18:03-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1989</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Psychological Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>50</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>243</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>250</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>interruption</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2854840">
    <title>Social tagging roles: publishers, evangelists, leaders</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2854840</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2008), pp. 1041-1044.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Social tagging roles: publishers, evangelists, leaders</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Jennifer Thom-Santelli</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Muller</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>David Millen</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1357054.1357215</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2008), pp. 1041-1044.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-01T13:57:07-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>1041</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1044</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>tagging</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2837959">
    <title>Focusing on the Forgone: How Value Can Appear so Different to Buyers and Sellers</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2837959</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;The Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 27, No. 3. (2000), pp. 360-370.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Focusing on the Forgone: How Value Can Appear so Different to Buyers and Sellers</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Ziv Carmon</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Dan Ariely</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.2307/254292</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>The Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 27, No. 3. (2000), pp. 360-370.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-27T17:21:37-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2000</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>The Journal of Consumer Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>360</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>370</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>The University of Chicago Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>decision-making</prism:category>
    <prism:category>endowment-effect</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2686476">
    <title>What drives content tagging: the case of photos on Flickr</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2686476</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2008), pp. 1097-1100.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>What drives content tagging: the case of photos on Flickr</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Oded Nov</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mor Naaman</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Chen Ye</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1357054.1357225</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2008), pp. 1097-1100.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-18T05:46:10-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>1097</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1100</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>socialpresence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tagging</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/965343">
    <title>What goes around comes around: an analysis of del.icio.us as social space</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/965343</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2006), pp. 191-194.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>What goes around comes around: an analysis of del.icio.us as social space</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Kathy Lee</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1180875.1180905</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2006), pp. 191-194.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-28T15:11:46-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>191</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>194</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>socialpresence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tagging</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1101188">
    <title>Encouraging participation in virtual communities</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1101188</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Commun. ACM, Vol. 50, No. 2. (February 2007), pp. 68-73.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Encouraging participation in virtual communities</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Joon Koh</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Young-Gul Kim</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Brian Butler</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Gee-Woo Bock</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1216016.1216023</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Commun. ACM, Vol. 50, No. 2. (February 2007), pp. 68-73.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-02-11T23:29:12-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Commun. ACM</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0001-0782</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>50</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>68</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>73</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>socialpresence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tagging</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1279898">
    <title>Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1279898</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2007), pp. 971-980.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Morgan Ames</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mor Naaman</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1240624.1240772</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2007), pp. 971-980.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-05-05T19:33:04-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>971</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>980</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>socialpresence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tagging</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2776572">
    <title>Looking and Weighting in Judgment and Choice,</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2776572</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 70, No. 1. (April 1997), pp. 41-64.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A sampling model was proposed in which the weight given to a piece of information corresponds to the amount of sampling of that information in either a continuous, discrete or strategic manner. These three sampling processes were related to process tracing measures of initial and additional time per acquisition and frequency of acquisition. The applicability of the sampling model was tested in three experiments in which students uncovered information corresponding to verbal and math aptitude scores of hypothetical applicants and either judged the likelihood of success in a designated major or chose which of a pair of applicants was more likely to succeed in the major. Task focus was manipulated by altering the designated major. In Experiment 1, analysis of judgment data demonstrated large effects of task focus on the weighting of verbal and math scores and corresponding increases in number of acquisitions and time per acquisition on the information receiving more weight. In Experiments 2 and 3, analyses of choice proportions revealed effects of task focus on weight and bias parameters. Looking data in choice provided strong support for two of the stages of processing described by Russo and Leclerc (1994). Initial looks reflected orientation and screening functions and additional looks reflected more evaluative processes. Experiment 3 also explored similarities and differences among groups of participants who were classified as following different identifiable choice strategies.</description>
    <dc:title>Looking and Weighting in Judgment and Choice,</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Douglas Wedell</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Stuart Senter</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1006/obhd.1997.2692</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 70, No. 1. (April 1997), pp. 41-64.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-09T20:25:05-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1997</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>41</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>64</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>decision-making</prism:category>
    <prism:category>judgment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>multi-attribute</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2762005">
    <title>Adaptationism and Optimality (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology)</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2762005</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(11 June 2001)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The theory of adaptationism argues that natural selection contains sufficient explanatory power in itself to account for all evolution. However, there are differing views about the efficiency, or optimality, of the adaptation model of explanation. If the adaptationism theory is applied, are energy and resources being used as optimally as possible? Adaptationism and Optimality combines contributions from biologists and philosophers, and offers a systematic treatment of foundational, conceptual, and methodological issues surrounding the theory of adaptationism.</description>
    <dc:title>Adaptationism and Optimality (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology)</dc:title>

    <dc:source>(11 June 2001)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-06T16:48:08-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publisher>Cambridge University Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>adaptive</prism:category>
    <prism:category>methdology</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1087909">
    <title>Diagrams in the Mind and in the World: Relations between Internal and External Visualizations</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1087909</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;: Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (2004), pp. 1-13.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Diagrams in the Mind and in the World: Relations between Internal and External Visualizations</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Mary Hegarty</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>: Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (2004), pp. 1-13.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-02-05T03:58:55-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>: Diagrammatic Representation and Inference</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>13</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>visualization</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2761989">
    <title>Connecting Internal and External Representations: Spatial Transformations of Scientific Visualizations</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2761989</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Foundations of Science, Vol. 10, No. 1. (26 March 2005), pp. 89-106.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many scientific discoveries have depended on external diagrams or visualizations. Many scientists also report to use an internal mental representation or mental imagery to help them solve problems and reason. How do scientists connect these internal and external representations? We examined working scientists as they worked on external scientific visualizations. We coded the number and type of spatial transformations (mental operations that scientists used on internal or external representations or images) and found that there were a very large number of comparisons, either between different visualizations or between a visualization and the scientists’ internal mental representation. We found that when scientists compared visualization to visualization, the comparisons were based primarily on features. However, when scientists compared a visualization to their mental representation, they were attempting to align the two representations. We suggest that this alignment process is how scientists connect internal and external representations.</description>
    <dc:title>Connecting Internal and External Representations: Spatial Transformations of Scientific Visualizations</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>J Trafton</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Susan Trickett</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Farilee Mintz</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/s10699-005-3007-4</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Foundations of Science, Vol. 10, No. 1. (26 March 2005), pp. 89-106.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-06T16:34:48-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Foundations of Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>89</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>106</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>visualization</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/608358">
    <title>Introduction</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/608358</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Commun. ACM, Vol. 49, No. 4. (April 2006), pp. 36-39.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Introduction</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Ryen White</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Bill Kules</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Steven Drucker</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Schraefel</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1121949.1121978</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Commun. ACM, Vol. 49, No. 4. (April 2006), pp. 36-39.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-05-01T00:08:36-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Commun. ACM</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0001-0782</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>36</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>39</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>exploratory-search</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2719604">
    <title>What to do when search fails: finding information by association</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2719604</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2008), pp. 999-1008.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>What to do when search fails: finding information by association</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Duen Chau</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Brad Myers</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Faulring</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1357054.1357208</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2008), pp. 999-1008.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-25T22:27:41-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>999</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1008</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>exploratory-search</prism:category>
    <prism:category>information-seeking</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2719627">
    <title>Large scale analysis of web revisitation patterns</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2719627</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2008), pp. 1197-1206.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Large scale analysis of web revisitation patterns</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Eytan Adar</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jaime Teevan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Susan Dumais</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1357054.1357241</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2008), pp. 1197-1206.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-25T22:33:40-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>1197</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1206</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>information-seeking</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2719593">
    <title>CiteSense: supporting sensemaking of research literature</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2719593</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2008), pp. 677-680.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>CiteSense: supporting sensemaking of research literature</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Xiaolong Zhang</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Yan Qu</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Lee Giles</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Piyou Song</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1357054.1357161</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2008), pp. 677-680.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-25T22:22:58-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>677</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>680</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>information-seeking</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sense-making</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2714450">
    <title>Knowledge in the head and on the web: using topic expertise to aid search</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2714450</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2008), pp. 39-48.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Knowledge in the head and on the web: using topic expertise to aid search</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Geoffrey Duggan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Stephen Payne</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1357054.1357062</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2008), pp. 39-48.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-24T21:49:56-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>39</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>48</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>expertise</prism:category>
    <prism:category>information-seeking</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2688302">
    <title>Information Foraging</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2688302</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Psychological Review, Vol. 106, No. 4. (1 October 1999), pp. 643-675.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Information foraging theory is an approach to understanding how strategies and technologies for information seeking, gathering, and consumption are adapted to the flux of information in the environment. The theory assumes that people, when possible, will modify their strategies or the structure of the environment to maximize their rate of gaining valuable information. The theory is developed by (a) adaptation (rational) analysis of information foraging problems and (b) a detailed process model (adaptive control of thought in information foraging [ACT-IF]). The adaptation analysis develops (a) information patch models, which deal with time allocation and information filtering and enrichment activities in environments in which information is encountered in clusters; (b) information scent models, which address the identification of information value from proximal cues; and (c) information diet models, which address decisions about the selection and pursuit of information items. ACT-IF is instantiated as a production system model of people interacting with complex information technology.</description>
    <dc:title>Information Foraging</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Peter Pirolli</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Stuart Card</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.643</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Psychological Review, Vol. 106, No. 4. (1 October 1999), pp. 643-675.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-18T16:23:09-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1999</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Psychological Review</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>106</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>643</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>675</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>adaptive</prism:category>
    <prism:category>information-seeking</prism:category>
    <prism:category>models</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2688296">
    <title>A Computational Theory of Executive Cognitive Processes and Multiple-Task Performance</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2688296</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Psychological Review, Vol. 104, No. 1. (1 January 1997), pp. 3-65.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A new theoretical framework, executive-process interactive control (EPIC), is introduced for characterizing human performance of concurrent perceptual-motor and cognitive tasks. On the basis of EPIC, computational models may be formulated to simulate multiple-task performance under a variety of circumstances. These models account well for reaction-time data from representative situations such as the psychological refractory-period procedure. EPIC's goodness of fit supports several key conclusions: (a) At a cognitive level, people can apply distinct sets of production rules simultaneously for executing the procedures of multiple tasks; (b) people's capacity to process information at “peripheral” perceptual-motor levels is limited; (c) to cope with such limits and to satisfy task priorities, flexible scheduling strategies are used; and (d) these strategies are mediated by executive cognitive processes that coordinate concurrent tasks adaptively.</description>
    <dc:title>A Computational Theory of Executive Cognitive Processes and Multiple-Task Performance</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>David Meyer</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>David Kieras</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.3</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Psychological Review, Vol. 104, No. 1. (1 January 1997), pp. 3-65.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-18T16:15:26-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1997</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Psychological Review</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>65</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>cognitive-architecture</prism:category>
    <prism:category>models</prism:category>
    <prism:category>multi-tasking</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2623697">
    <title>Routine evolution as the microgenetic basis of skill acquisition</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2623697</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Proceedings Cognitive Science Conference (1990), pp. 694-701.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Routine evolution as the microgenetic basis of skill acquisition</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>P Agre</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>J Shrager</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Proceedings Cognitive Science Conference (1990), pp. 694-701.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-02T15:13:47-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1990</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Proceedings Cognitive Science Conference</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:startingPage>694</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>701</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>plan</prism:category>
    <prism:category>situated-cognition</prism:category>
    <prism:category>skill-acquisition</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/996808">
    <title>A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/996808</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 69, No. 1. (1955), pp. 99-118.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Introduction, 99.--I. Some general features of rational choice, 100.--II. The essential simplifications, 103.--III. Existence and uniqueness of solutions, 111.--IV. Further comments on dynamics, 113.--V. Conclusion, 114.--Appendix, 115.</description>
    <dc:title>A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Herbert Simon</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.2307/1884852</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 69, No. 1. (1955), pp. 99-118.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-12-15T09:58:58-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1955</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>The Quarterly Journal of Economics</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>69</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>99</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>118</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>bounded-rationality</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1842810">
    <title>Social bookmarking and exploratory search</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1842810</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;ECSCW 2007 (2007), pp. 21-40.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this paper, we explore various search tasks that are supported by a social bookmarking service. These bookmarking services hold great potential to powerfully combine personal tagging of information sources with interactive browsing, resulting in better social navigation. While there has been considerable interest in social tagging systems in recent years, little is known about their actual usage. In this paper, we present the results of a field study of a social bookmarking service that has been deployed in a large enterprise. We present new qualitative and quantitative data on how a corporate social tagging system was used, through both event logs (click level analysis) and interviews. We observed three types of search activities: community browsing, personal search, and explicit search. Community browsing was the most frequently used, and confirms the value of the social aspects of the system. We conclude that social bookmarking services support various kinds of exploratory search, and provide better personal bookmark management and enhance social navigation.</description>
    <dc:title>Social bookmarking and exploratory search</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>David Millen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Meng Yang</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Steven Whittaker</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jonathan Feinberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/978-1-84800-031-5_2</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>ECSCW 2007 (2007), pp. 21-40.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-10-30T17:03:06-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>ECSCW 2007</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>40</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>exploratory-search</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tagging</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/658201">
    <title>Exploratory search: from finding to understanding</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/658201</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Commun. ACM, Vol. 49, No. 4. (April 2006), pp. 41-46.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Exploratory search: from finding to understanding</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Gary Marchionini</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1121949.1121979</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Commun. ACM, Vol. 49, No. 4. (April 2006), pp. 41-46.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-05-19T17:34:01-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Commun. ACM</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0001-0782</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>41</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>46</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>exploratory-search</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/965334">
    <title>Tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/965334</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2006, CSCW '06. 20th anniversary Conference on (2006), pp. 181-190.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A tagging community's vocabulary of tags forms the basis for social navigation and shared expression.We present a user-centric model of vocabulary evolution in tagging communities based on community influence and personal tendency. We evaluate our model in an emergent tagging system by introducing tagging features into the MovieLens recommender system.We explore four tag selection algorithms for displaying tags applied by other community members. We analyze the algorithms 'effect on vocabulary evolution, tag utility, tag adoption, and user satisfaction.</description>
    <dc:title>Tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Shilad Sen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Shyong Lam</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Al Rashid</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Dan Cosley</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Dan Frankowski</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jeremy Osterhouse</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Maxwell Harper</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>John Riedl</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1180875.1180904</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2006, CSCW '06. 20th anniversary Conference on (2006), pp. 181-190.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-28T14:55:38-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2006, CSCW '06. 20th anniversary Conference on</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:startingPage>181</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>190</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>recommender-system</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tagging</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2552589">
    <title>Comparing tagging vocabularies among four enterprise tag-based services</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2552589</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2007), pp. 341-350.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Comparing tagging vocabularies among four enterprise tag-based services</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Michael Muller</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1316624.1316676</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2007), pp. 341-350.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-03-18T19:37:06-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>341</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>350</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>tagging</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2688285">
    <title>The Tree of Life: Universal and Cultural Features of Folkbiological Taxonomies and Inductions</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2688285</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 3. (April 1997), pp. 251-295.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Two parallel studies were performed with members of very different cultures--industrialized American and traditional Itzaj-Mayan--to investigate potential universal and cultural features of folkbiological taxonomies and inductions. Specifically, we examined how individuals organize natural categories into taxonomies, and whether they readily use these taxonomies to make inductions about those categories. The results of the first study indicate that there is a cultural consensus both among Americans and the Itzaj in their taxonomies of local mammal species, and that these taxonomies resemble and depart from a corresponding scientific taxonomy in similar ways. However, cultural differences are also shown, such as a greater differentiation and more ecological considerations in Itzaj taxonomies. In a second study, Americans and the Itzaj used their taxonomies to guide similarity- and typicality-based inductions. These inductions converge and diverge crossculturally and regarding scientific inductions where their respective taxonomies do. These findings reveal some universal features of folkbiological inductions, but they also reveal some cultural features such as diversity-based inductions among Americans, and ecologically based inductions among the Itzaj. Overall, these studies suggest that while building folkbiological taxonomies and using them for folkbiological inductions is a universal competence of human cognition there are also important cultural constraints on that competence.</description>
    <dc:title>The Tree of Life: Universal and Cultural Features of Folkbiological Taxonomies and Inductions</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Alejandro López</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Scott Atran</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>John Coley</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Douglas Medin</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Edward Smith</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1006/cogp.1997.0651</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 3. (April 1997), pp. 251-295.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-18T16:08:49-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1997</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Cognitive Psychology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>251</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>295</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>categorization</prism:category>
    <prism:category>expertise</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1560583">
    <title>Feature centrality and conceptual coherence</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/1560583</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Cognitive Science, Vol. 22, No. 2. ( 1998), pp. 189-228.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conceptual features differ in how mentally tranformable they are. A robin that does not eat is harder to imagine than a robin that does not chirp. We argue that features are immutable to the extent that they are central in a network of dependency relations. The immutability of a feature reflects how much the internal structure of a concept depends on that feature; i.e., how much the feature contributes to the concept's coherence. Complementarily, mutability reflects the aspects in which a concept is flexible. We show that features can be reliably ordered according to their mutability using tasks that require people to conceive of objects missing a feature, and that mutability (conceptual centrality) can be distinguished from category centrality and from diagnosticity and salience. We test a model of mutability based on asymmetric, unlabeled, pairwise dependency relations. With no free parameters, the model provides reasonable fits to data. Qualitative tests of the model show that mutability judgments are unaffected by the type of dependency relation and that dependency structure influences judgments of variability.</description>
    <dc:title>Feature centrality and conceptual coherence</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Steven Sloman</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Bradley Love</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Woo-Kyoung Ahn</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80039-1</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Cognitive Science, Vol. 22, No. 2. ( 1998), pp. 189-228.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-08-14T15:21:45-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1998</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Cognitive Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>22</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>189</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>228</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>categorization</prism:category>
    <prism:category>conceptual-coherence</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2688272">
    <title>Resolving the paradox of the active user: stable suboptimal performance in interactive tasks</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2688272</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Cognitive Science, Vol. 28, No. 6. ( 2004), pp. 901-935.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This paper brings the intellectual tools of cognitive science to bear on resolving the &#34;paradox of the active user&#34; [Interfacing Thought: Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction, Cambridge, MIT Press, MA, USA]--the persistent use of inefficient procedures in interactive tasks by experienced or even expert users when demonstrably more efficient procedures exist. The goal of this paper is to understand the roots of this paradox by finding regularities in these inefficient procedures. We examine three very different data sets. For each data set, we first satisfy ourselves that the preferred procedures used by some subjects are indeed less efficient than the recommended procedures. We then amass evidence, for each set, and conclude that when a preferred procedure is used instead of a more efficient, recommended procedure, the preferred procedure tends to have two major characteristics: (1) the preferred procedure is a well-practiced, generic procedure that is applicable either within the same task environment in different contexts or across different task environments, and (2) the preferred procedure is composed of interactive components that bring fast, incremental feedback on the external problem states. The support amassed for these characteristics leads to a new understanding of the paradox. In interactive tasks, people are biased towards the use of general procedures that start with interactive actions. These actions require much less cognitive effort as each action results in an immediate change to the external display that, in turn, cues the next action. Unfortunately for the users, the bias to use interactive unit tasks leads to a path that requires more effort in the long run. Our data suggest that interactive behavior is composed of a series of distributed choices; that is, people seldom make a once-and-for-all decision on procedures. This series of biased selection of interactive unit tasks often leads to a stable suboptimal level of performance.</description>
    <dc:title>Resolving the paradox of the active user: stable suboptimal performance in interactive tasks</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Wai-Tat Fu</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Wayne Gray</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Cognitive Science, Vol. 28, No. 6. ( 2004), pp. 901-935.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-18T16:02:29-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Cognitive Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>6</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>901</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>935</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>interactive</prism:category>
    <prism:category>suboptimal</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2567849">
    <title>Model-driven formative evaluation of exploratory search: A study under a sensemaking framework</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2567849</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Inf. Process. Manage., Vol. 44, No. 2. (March 2008), pp. 534-555.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Model-driven formative evaluation of exploratory search: A study under a sensemaking framework</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Yan Qu</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>George Furnas</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.09.006</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Inf. Process. Manage., Vol. 44, No. 2. (March 2008), pp. 534-555.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-03-20T18:04:59-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Inf. Process. Manage.</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0306-4573</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>44</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>534</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>555</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Pergamon Press, Inc.</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>exploratory-search</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sense-making</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/305755">
    <title>The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/305755</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(18 Aug 2005)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Collaborative tagging describes the process by which many users add metadata in the form of keywords to shared content. Recently, collaborative tagging has grown in popularity on the web, on sites that allow users to tag bookmarks, photographs and other content. In this paper we analyze the structure of collaborative tagging systems as well as their dynamical aspects. Specifically, we discovered regularities in user activity, tag frequencies, kinds of tags used, bursts of popularity in bookmarking and a remarkable stability in the relative proportions of tags within a given url. We also present a dynamical model of collaborative tagging that predicts these stable patterns and relates them to imitation and shared knowledge.</description>
    <dc:title>The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Scott Golder</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Bernardo Huberman</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(18 Aug 2005)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-08-27T17:06:09-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:category>tagging</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2620836">
    <title>Semiotic dynamics in online social communities</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/2620836</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Eur. Phys. J. C, Vol. 46, No. s02. (2006), pp. 33-37.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A distributed classification paradigm known as collaborative tagging has been successfully deployed in large-scale web applications designed to manage and share diverse online resources. Users of these applications organize resources by associating with them freely chosen text labels, or tags. Here we regard tags as basic dynamical entities and study the semiotic dynamics underlying collaborative tagging. We collect data from a popular system and focus on tags associated with a given resource. We find that the frequencies of tags obey to a generalized Zipf's law and show that a Yule-Simon process with memory can be used to explain the observed frequency distributions in terms of a simple model of user behavior</description>
    <dc:title>Semiotic dynamics in online social communities</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Ciro Cattuto</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1140/epjcd/s2006-03-004-4</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Eur. Phys. J. C, Vol. 46, No. s02. (2006), pp. 33-37.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-01T19:22:15-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Eur. Phys. J. C</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>46</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>s02</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>37</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>tagging</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/957865">
    <title>Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/957865</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;The American Economic Review, Vol. 93, No. 5. (2003), pp. 1449-1475.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Daniel Kahneman</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>The American Economic Review, Vol. 93, No. 5. (2003), pp. 1449-1475.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-22T18:27:58-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2003</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>The American Economic Review</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>93</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1449</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1475</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>adaptive</prism:category>
    <prism:category>bounded-rationality</prism:category>
    <prism:category>decision-making</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/950399">
    <title>Beneath the Metadata: Some Philosophical Problems with Folksonomy</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/950399</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Dlib Magazine, Vol. 12, No. 11. (November 2006)&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Beneath the Metadata: Some Philosophical Problems with Folksonomy</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Elaine Peterson</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Dlib Magazine, Vol. 12, No. 11. (November 2006)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-17T18:08:57-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Dlib Magazine</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>11</prism:number>
    <prism:category>tagging</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/306015">
    <title>Computational models of collective behavior</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/4917/article/306015</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 9. (September 2005), pp. 424-430.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Computational models of human collective behavior offer promise in providing quantitative and empirically verifiable accounts of how individual decisions lead to the emergence of group-level organizations. Agent-based models (ABMs) describe interactions among individual agents and their environment, and provide a process-oriented alternative to descriptive mathematical models. Recent ABMs provide compelling accounts of group pattern formation, contagion and cooperation, and can be used to predict, manipulate and improve upon collective behavior. ABMs overcome an assumption that underlies much of cognitive science - that the individual is the crucial unit of cognition. The alternative advocated here is that individuals participate in collective organizations that they might not understand or even perceive, and that these organizations affect and are affected by individual behavior.</description>
    <dc:title>Computational models of collective behavior</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Robert Goldstone</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Marco Janssen</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.009</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 9. (September 2005), pp. 424-430.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-08-29T10:04:06-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Trends in Cognitive Sciences</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>9</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>424</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>430</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>group</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

