<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:07:21 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: Group: Glimcher_Lab - with tag macaques</title>
	<description>CiteULike: Group: Glimcher_Lab - with tag macaques</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/tag/macaques</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/1204783"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/1926491"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/472847"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/2188656"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/2188652"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/1981581"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/2188644"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/1454707"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/1204783">
    <title>Free-ranging rhesus monkeys spontaneously individuate and enumerate small numbers of non-solid portions.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/1204783</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Cognition (20 March 2007)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fundamental questions in cognitive science concern the origins and nature of the units that compose visual experience. Here, we investigate the capacity to individuate and store information about non-solid portions, asking in particular whether free-ranging rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) quantify portions of a non-solid substance presented in discrete pouring actions. When presented with portions of carrot pieces poured from a cup into opaque boxes, rhesus picked the box with the greatest number of portions for comparisons of 1 vs. 2, 2 vs. 3, and 3 vs. 4, but not for comparisons of 4 vs. 5 and 3 vs. 6. Additional experiments indicate that rhesus based their decisions on both the number of portions and the total amount of food. These results show that the capacity to individuate non-solid portions is not unique to humans, and does not depend on structures of natural language. Further, the fact that rhesus' ability to represent non-solid portions is constrained by the same 4-item limit typically ascribed to the system of parallel individuation that operates over solid objects suggests that the visual system recruits common working memory processes for retaining information about solid objects and non-solid portions. We discuss our results with respect to theories of visual processing, as well as to the role that the human language faculty may have played in both the evolution and development of quantification.</description>
    <dc:title>Free-ranging rhesus monkeys spontaneously individuate and enumerate small numbers of non-solid portions.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Justin N Wood</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Marc D Hauser</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>David D Glynn</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>David Barner</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.01.004</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Cognition (20 March 2007)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-04-03T16:00:10-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Cognition</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0010-0277</prism:issn>
    <prism:category>evolution</prism:category>
    <prism:category>language</prism:category>
    <prism:category>macaques</prism:category>
    <prism:category>number</prism:category>
    <prism:category>representation</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/1926491">
    <title>Differences in Cortical Serotonergic Innervation among Humans, Chimpanzees, and Macaque Monkeys: A Comparative Study</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/1926491</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Cereb. Cortex (22 June 2007), bhm089.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this study, we assess the possibility that the evolution of human intellectual capacities was supported by changes in the supply of serotonin to the frontal cortex. To this end, quantitative comparative analyses were performed among humans, chimpanzees, and macaques. Immunohistochemical methods were used to visualize serotonin transporter-immunoreactive (SERT-ir) axons within the cerebral cortex. Areas 9 and 32 were chosen for evaluation due to their roles in working memory and theory of mind, respectively. Primary motor cortex was also evaluated because it is not associated with higher cognitive functions. The findings revealed that humans do not display a quantitative increase in serotonin innervation. However, the results indicated region- and layer-specific differences among species in serotonergic innervation pattern. Compared with macaques, humans and chimpanzees together displayed a greater density of SERT-ir axons relative to neuron density in layers V/VI. This change was detected in cortical areas 9 and 32, but not in primary motor cortex. Further, morphological specializations, coils of axons, were observed in humans and chimpanzees that were absent in macaques. These features may represent a greater capacity for cortical plasticity exclusive to hominoids. Taken together, these results indicate a significant reorganization of cortical serotonergic transmission in humans and chimpanzees. 10.1093/cercor/bhm089</description>
    <dc:title>Differences in Cortical Serotonergic Innervation among Humans, Chimpanzees, and Macaque Monkeys: A Comparative Study</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Mary Raghanti</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Cheryl Stimpson</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Marcinkiewicz</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Joseph Erwin</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Patrick Hof</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Chet Sherwood</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm089</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Cereb. Cortex (22 June 2007), bhm089.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-11-16T13:58:07-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Cereb. Cortex</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:startingPage>bhm089</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:category>chimpanzees</prism:category>
    <prism:category>comparative</prism:category>
    <prism:category>cortex</prism:category>
    <prism:category>human</prism:category>
    <prism:category>macaques</prism:category>
    <prism:category>nonhuman</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pathway</prism:category>
    <prism:category>serotonin</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/472847">
    <title>The prefrontal cortex and cognitive control.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/472847</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Nat Rev Neurosci, Vol. 1, No. 1. (October 2000), pp. 59-65.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of the enduring mysteries of brain function concerns the process of cognitive control. How does complex and seemingly willful behaviour emerge from interactions between millions of neurons? This has long been suspected to depend on the prefrontal cortex--the neocortex at the anterior end of the brain--but now we are beginning to uncover its neural basis. Nearly all intended behaviour is learned and so depends on a cognitive system that can acquire and implement the 'rules of the game' needed to achieve a given goal in a given situation. Studies indicate that the prefrontal cortex is central in this process. It provides an infrastructure for synthesizing a diverse range of information that lays the foundation for the complex forms of behaviour observed in primates.</description>
    <dc:title>The prefrontal cortex and cognitive control.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>EK Miller</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Nat Rev Neurosci, Vol. 1, No. 1. (October 2000), pp. 59-65.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-01-20T19:33:26-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2000</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Nat Rev Neurosci</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1471-003X</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>59</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>65</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>cognitivecontrol</prism:category>
    <prism:category>macaques</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pfc</prism:category>
    <prism:category>review</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/2188656">
    <title>Representation of action sequence boundaries by macaque prefrontal cortical neurons.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/2188656</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Science, Vol. 301, No. 5637. (29 August 2003), pp. 1246-1249.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Complex biological systems such as human language and the genetic code are characterized by explicit markers at the beginning and end of functional sequences. We report here that macaque prefrontal cortical neurons exhibit phasic peaks of spike activity that occur at the beginning and endpoint of sequential oculomotor saccade performance and have the properties of dynamic start- and end-state encoders accompanying responses to sequential actions. Sequence bounding may thus reflect a general mechanism for encoding biological information.</description>
    <dc:title>Representation of action sequence boundaries by macaque prefrontal cortical neurons.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>N Fujii</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>AM Graybiel</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1126/science.1086872</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Science, Vol. 301, No. 5637. (29 August 2003), pp. 1246-1249.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-02T16:32:52-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2003</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1095-9203</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>301</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5637</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1246</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1249</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>action</prism:category>
    <prism:category>macaques</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pfc</prism:category>
    <prism:category>representation</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sequencce</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/2188652">
    <title>Tonically active neurons in the striatum encode motivational contexts of action.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/2188652</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Brain Dev, Vol. 25 Suppl 1 (December 2003)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In order to achieve a goal, one procures immediately available rewards, escape from aversive events or endures absence of rewards. The neuronal substrate for these goal-directed actions includes the limbic system and the basal ganglia. In the basal ganglia, classes of projection neurons in the striatum show activity with motivational as well as sensorimotor properties, such as expectation of reward and task schedule for obtaining reward. Tonically active neurons (TANs), presumed cholinergic interneurons in the striatum, respond to reward-associated stimuli, evolve their activity through learning and respond also to aversive event-associated stimuli such as airpuff on the face. A recent study showed that responses to visual cues are less selective to whether the cue instructs reward or no reward. To address this paradox, we asked macaque monkeys to perform a set of visual reaction time tasks while expecting the reward, aversive event or absence of reward. We found that TANs respond to instruction stimuli associated with motivational outcomes but not to unassociated ones, and that they mostly differentiate associated instructions. We also found that the higher percentage of TANs in the caudate nucleus respond to stimuli associated with motivational outcomes than in the putamen, whereas the higher percentage of TANs in the putamen respond to GO signals than in the caudate nucleus especially for an action anticipating a reward. These findings suggest a distinct, pivotal role played by TANs in the caudate nucleus and putamen in encoding instructed motivational contexts for goal-directed action selection and learning in the striatum.</description>
    <dc:title>Tonically active neurons in the striatum encode motivational contexts of action.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>M Kimura</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>H Yamada</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>N Matsumoto</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Brain Dev, Vol. 25 Suppl 1 (December 2003)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-02T16:32:00-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2003</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Brain Dev</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0387-7604</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>25 Suppl 1</prism:volume>
    <prism:category>goaldirected</prism:category>
    <prism:category>learning</prism:category>
    <prism:category>macaques</prism:category>
    <prism:category>reinforcement</prism:category>
    <prism:category>striatum</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tan</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/1981581">
    <title>Dissociating uncertainty responses and reinforcement signals in the comparative study of uncertainty monitoring.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/1981581</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;J Exp Psychol Gen, Vol. 135, No. 2. (May 2006), pp. 282-297.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Although researchers are exploring animals' capacity for monitoring their states of uncertainty, the use of some paradigms allows the criticism that animals map avoidance responses to error-causing stimuli not because of uncertainty monitored but because of feedback signals and stimulus aversion. The authors addressed this criticism with an uncertainty-monitoring task in which participants completed blocks of trials with feedback deferred so that they could not associate reinforcement signals to particular stimuli or stimulus-response pairs. Humans and 1 of 2 monkeys were able to make cognitive, decisional uncertainty responses that were independent of feedback or reinforcement history within a task. This finding unifies the comparative literature on uncertainty monitoring. The dissociation of performance from reinforcement has theoretical implications, and the deferred-feedback technique has many applications.</description>
    <dc:title>Dissociating uncertainty responses and reinforcement signals in the comparative study of uncertainty monitoring.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>JD Smith</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>MJ Beran</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>JS Redford</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>DA Washburn</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.282</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>J Exp Psychol Gen, Vol. 135, No. 2. (May 2006), pp. 282-297.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-11-25T17:18:54-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>J Exp Psychol Gen</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0096-3445</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>135</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>282</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>297</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>human</prism:category>
    <prism:category>macaques</prism:category>
    <prism:category>nonhuman</prism:category>
    <prism:category>reinforcement</prism:category>
    <prism:category>uncertainty</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/2188644">
    <title>Delay of gratification and delay maintenance by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/2188644</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;J Gen Psychol, Vol. 134, No. 2. (April 2007), pp. 199-216.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The authors tested the self-control of rhesus macaques by assessing if they could refrain from reaching into a food container to maximize the accumulation of sequentially delivered food items (a delay-maintenance task). Three different versions of the task varied the quantity and quality of available food items. In the first 2 versions, food items accumulated across the length of the trial until a monkey consumed the items. In the 3rd task, a single less-preferred food item preceded a single more-preferred food item. Some monkeys delayed gratification even with relatively long delays between deliveries of items. However, the data suggested that self-control, in the majority of tested individuals, was not significantly different across different task versions and that self-control by macaques was not as prevalent in these tasks as it is in chimpanzees and human children.</description>
    <dc:title>Delay of gratification and delay maintenance by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>TA Evans</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>MJ Beran</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>J Gen Psychol, Vol. 134, No. 2. (April 2007), pp. 199-216.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-02T16:26:43-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>J Gen Psychol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0022-1309</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>199</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>216</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>discounting</prism:category>
    <prism:category>macaques</prism:category>
    <prism:category>primate</prism:category>
    <prism:category>temporal</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/1454707">
    <title>Cognitive imitation in rhesus macaques.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/group/70/article/1454707</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Science, Vol. 305, No. 5682. (16 July 2004), pp. 407-410.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Experiments on imitation typically evaluate a student's ability to copy some feature of an expert's motor behavior. Here, we describe a type of observational learning in which a student copies a cognitive rule rather than a specific motor action. Two rhesus macaques were trained to respond, in a prescribed order, to different sets of photographs that were displayed on a touch-sensitive monitor. Because the position of the photographs varied randomly from trial to trial, sequences could not be learned by motor imitation. Both monkeys learned new sequences more rapidly after observing an expert execute those sequences than when they had to learn new sequences entirely by trial and error.</description>
    <dc:title>Cognitive imitation in rhesus macaques.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>F Subiaul</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>JF Cantlon</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>RL Holloway</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>HS Terrace</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1126/science.1099136</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Science, Vol. 305, No. 5682. (16 July 2004), pp. 407-410.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-07-13T18:55:23-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1095-9203</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>305</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5682</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>407</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>410</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>learning</prism:category>
    <prism:category>macaques</prism:category>
    <prism:category>observation</prism:category>
    <prism:category>primate</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

