<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:08:17 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: Tag ethics</title>
	<description>CiteULike: Tag ethics</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/tag/ethics</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/zephoria/article/158646"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/yardi/article/87135"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/xingxu/article/2600075"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/xico/article/55335"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/xc9da21/article/513434"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/xaa3goatcji/article/2546708"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/Wyn/article/896313"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/Wyn/article/695102"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/Wyn/article/695103"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wujastyk/article/1167902"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/willwade/article/225032"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/williamdwalker/article/2635416"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/1567"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/1551"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/1548"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/4115"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/1549"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/84906"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/20737"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/409350"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wgasman/article/2465872"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1168621"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1097904"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/2229217"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938262"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938255"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/2207651"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1123255"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/2207434"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/937925"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/waghsk/article/2442994"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/vera/article/226179"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/ucladrea/article/239262"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tystl/article/748235"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tsuomela/article/1194392"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tsuomela/article/435835"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tpoff/article/1725620"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tomisc/article/2924589"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/3036654"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/2998642"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/1932001"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/3032564"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/3036497"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/2191921"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/2862276"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tmarjeff/article/27441"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/TJ/article/2354320"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/timothee/article/222982"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tela1031/article/2602738"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/teenie0128/article/1238479"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/zephoria/article/158646">
    <title>The Ethics of Identity</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/zephoria/article/158646</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(28 December 2004)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, gender, sexuality: in the past couple of decades, a great deal of attention has been paid to such collective identities. They clamor for recognition and respect, sometimes at the expense of other things we value. But to what extent do &#34;identities&#34; constrain our freedom, our ability to make an individual life, and to what extent do they enable our individuality? In this beautifully written work, renowned philosopher and African Studies scholar Kwame Anthony Appiah draws on thinkers through the ages and across the globe to explore such questions. &#60;P&#62;&#60;i&#62;The Ethics of Identity&#60;/i&#62; takes seriously both the claims of individuality--the task of making a life---and the claims of identity, these large and often abstract social categories through which we define ourselves. &#60;P&#62;What sort of life one should lead is a subject that has preoccupied moral and political thinkers from Aristotle to Mill. Here, Appiah develops an account of ethics, in just this venerable sense--but an account that connects moral obligations with collective allegiances, our individuality with our identities. As he observes, the question &#60;i&#62;who&#60;/i&#62; we are has always been linked to the question &#60;i&#62;what&#60;/i&#62; we are. &#60;P&#62;Adopting a broadly interdisciplinary perspective, Appiah takes aim at the cliches and received ideas amid which talk of identity so often founders. Is &#34;culture&#34; a good? For that matter, does the concept of culture really explain anything? Is diversity of value in itself? Are moral obligations the only kind there are? Has the rhetoric of &#34;human rights&#34; been overstretched? In the end, Appiah's arguments make it harder to think of the world as divided between the West and the Rest; between locals and cosmopolitans; between Us and Them. The result is a new vision of liberal humanism--one that can accommodate the vagaries and variety that make us human.</description>
    <dc:title>The Ethics of Identity</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Kwame Appiah</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(28 December 2004)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-04-12T02:06:26-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publisher>Princeton University Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>identity</prism:category>
    <prism:category>philosophy</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/yardi/article/87135">
    <title>HCI professionalism: ethical concerns in usability engineering</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/yardi/article/87135</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2000), pp. 11-17.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>HCI professionalism: ethical concerns in usability engineering</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Oliver Burmeister</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(2000), pp. 11-17.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-02-03T22:36:18-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2000</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>17</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Australian Computer Society, Inc.</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>hci</prism:category>
    <prism:category>usability</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/xingxu/article/2600075">
    <title>Research Ethics Recommendations for Whole-Genome Research: Consensus Statement</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/xingxu/article/2600075</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;PLoS Biology, Vol. 6, No. 3. (1 March 2008), e73.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Research Ethics Recommendations for Whole-Genome Research: Consensus Statement</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Timothy Caulfield</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Amy Mcguire</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mildred Cho</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Janet Buchanan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Burgess</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ursula Danilczyk</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Christina Diaz</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Kelly Fryer-Edwards</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Shane Green</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Marc Hodosh</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Eric Juengst</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jane Kaye</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Laurence Kedes</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Bartha Knoppers</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Trudo Lemmens</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Eric Meslin</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Juli Murphy</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Robert Nussbaum</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Margaret Otlowski</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Daryl Pullman</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Peter Ray</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jeremy Sugarman</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Timmons</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.0060073</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>PLoS Biology, Vol. 6, No. 3. (1 March 2008), e73.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-03-27T00:11:47-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>PLoS Biology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>e73</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>gwa</prism:category>
    <prism:category>statement</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/xico/article/55335">
    <title>Human cloning action stalled</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/xico/article/55335</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Current Biology, Vol. 13, No. 24. (16 December 2003), pp. 937-939.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Human cloning action stalled</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>M Gross</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.cub.2003.11.031 </dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Current Biology, Vol. 13, No. 24. (16 December 2003), pp. 937-939.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2004-12-28T17:57:49-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2003</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Current Biology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0960-9822</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>13</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>24</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>937</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>939</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Elsevier Science</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>cell</prism:category>
    <prism:category>clone</prism:category>
    <prism:category>cloning</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>human</prism:category>
    <prism:category>stem</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/xc9da21/article/513434">
    <title>The ethics of World Bank lending</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/xc9da21/article/513434</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Accounting Forum, Vol. 30, No. 1. (March 2006), pp. 1-19.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Little attention has been given to the role of supranational organizations such as the World Bank in encouraging social responsibility. The current study examines the linkage among the social responsibility visions of the World Bank, the social responsibility requirements that are contained within Bank lending agreements, and what happens when these requirements are implemented. The analysis highlights not only the ways in which Bank practices facilitate social responsibility but also the ambiguities and tensions associated with these practices.</description>
    <dc:title>The ethics of World Bank lending</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Dean Neu</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Elizabeth Gomez</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2005.12.001</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Accounting Forum, Vol. 30, No. 1. (March 2006), pp. 1-19.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-02-20T16:09:54-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Accounting Forum</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>30</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>19</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>bank</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>world</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/xaa3goatcji/article/2546708">
    <title>Two main problems in the sociology of morality</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/xaa3goatcji/article/2546708</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Theory and Society, Vol. 37, No. 2. (April 2008), pp. 87-125.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Abstract&#160;&#160;Sociologists often ask why particular groups of people have the moral views that they do. I argue that sociology’s empirical research on morality relies, implicitly or explicitly, on unsophisticated and even obsolete ethical theories, and thus is based on inadequate conceptions of the ontology, epistemology, and semantics of morality. In this article I address the two main problems in the sociology of morality: (1) the problem of moral truth, and (2) the problem of value freedom. I identify two ideal–typical approaches. While the Weberian paradigm rejects the concept of moral truth, the Durkheimian paradigm accepts it. By contrast, I argue that sociology should be metaphysically agnostic, yet in practice it should proceed as though there were no moral truths. The Weberians claim that the sociology of morality can and should be value free; the Durkheimians claim that it cannot and it should not. My argument is that, while it is true that factual statements presuppose value judgments, it does not follow that sociologists are moral philosophers in disguise. Finally, I contend that in order for sociology to improve its understanding of morality, better conceptual, epistemological, and methodological foundations are needed.</description>
    <dc:title>Two main problems in the sociology of morality</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Gabriel Abend</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/s11186-007-9044-y</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Theory and Society, Vol. 37, No. 2. (April 2008), pp. 87-125.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-03-17T14:58:15-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Theory and Society</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>87</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>125</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>durkheim</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>socmeth</prism:category>
    <prism:category>weber</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/Wyn/article/896313">
    <title>Genocidal Archives: The African Context-Genocide in Rwanda</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/Wyn/article/896313</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;pp. 105-121.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When looking at international criminal justice archival theory and practice, it is difficult to find many examples. There are the two current ad-hoc international criminal tribunals dealing with the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and Rwanda (ICTR) in The Hague, Netherlands and Arusha, Tanzania, respectively. Prior to 1993 one has to go back to the late 1940's and the Nuremberg and Tokyo War Crimes Trials. This article asks whether there is such a thing as international criminal justice archival theory and details several of the unique aspects of record-keeping practice in an international organisation that deals with genocide and other crimes against humanity. Much valuable and innovative work has been carried out by the staff of the records and archives unit of ICTR since 1998 and the continuation of these approaches will be vital to future similar organisations. In light of current developments to deal with the former Iraqi regime in a hybrid internatioinal and/or domestic Iraqi court, valuable lessons can be learnt from the experience of the ICTY and the ICTR.</description>
    <dc:title>Genocidal Archives: The African Context-Genocide in Rwanda</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Tom Adami</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>pp. 105-121.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-10-14T11:00:15-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:startingPage>105</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>121</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>unit1</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/Wyn/article/695102">
    <title>Record-keeping as an ethical imperative</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/Wyn/article/695102</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journal of the Society of Archivists, Vol. 27, No. 1. (April 2006), pp. 17-27.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Record-keeping as an ethical imperative</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Gale</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1080/00039810600691221</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Journal of the Society of Archivists, Vol. 27, No. 1. (April 2006), pp. 17-27.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-06-13T18:15:06-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journal of the Society of Archivists</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0037-9816</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>27</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Routledge, part of the Taylor &#38; Francis Group</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>core</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/Wyn/article/695103">
    <title>Professional ethics and practice in archives and records management in a human rights context *</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/Wyn/article/695103</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journal of the Society of Archivists, Vol. 27, No. 1. (April 2006), pp. 1-15.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Professional ethics and practice in archives and records management in a human rights context *</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Cook</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1080/00039810600691205</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Journal of the Society of Archivists, Vol. 27, No. 1. (April 2006), pp. 1-15.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-06-13T18:15:06-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journal of the Society of Archivists</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0037-9816</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>15</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Routledge, part of the Taylor &#38; Francis Group</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>core</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wujastyk/article/1167902">
    <title>On the Morality of the Veda</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wujastyk/article/1167902</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>On the Morality of the Veda</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Rudolph Roth</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>William Whitney</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-03-16T19:07:30-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>india</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/willwade/article/225032">
    <title>Impact of therapeutic research on informed consent and the ethics of clinical trials: a medical oncology perspective.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/willwade/article/225032</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;J Clin Oncol, Vol. 17, No. 5. (May 1999), pp. 1601-1617.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PURPOSE: To create a more meaningful understanding of the informed consent process as it has come to be practiced and regulated in clinical trials, this discussion uses the experience gained from the conduct of therapeutic research that involves cancer patients. DESIGN: After an introduction of the ethical tenets of the consent process in clinical research that involves potentially vulnerable patients as research subjects, background that details the use of written consent documents and of the term &#34;informed consent&#34; is provided. Studies from the cancer setting that examine the inadequacies of written consent documents, and the outcome of the consent process itself, are reviewed. Two ethically challenging areas of cancer clinical research, the phase I trial and the randomized controlled trial, are discussed briefly as a means of highlighting many dilemmas present in clinical trials. Before concluding, areas for future research are discussed. RESULTS: Through an exclusive cancer research perspective, many current deficiencies in the informed consent process for therapeutic clinical trials can be critically examined. Also, new directions for improvements and areas of further research can be outlined and discussed objectively. The goals of such improvements and research should be prevention of further misguided or ineffective efforts to regulate the informed consent process. CONCLUSION: To ignore this rich and interesting perspective potentially contributes to continued misunderstanding and apathy toward fulfilling the regulatory and ethically obligatory requirements involved in an essential communication process between a clinician-investigator and a potentially vulnerable patient who is considering clinical trial participation.</description>
    <dc:title>Impact of therapeutic research on informed consent and the ethics of clinical trials: a medical oncology perspective.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>CK Daugherty</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>J Clin Oncol, Vol. 17, No. 5. (May 1999), pp. 1601-1617.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-06-10T11:18:56-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1999</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>J Clin Oncol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0732-183X</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>17</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1601</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1617</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>informed-consent</prism:category>
    <prism:category>procedures</prism:category>
    <prism:category>research</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/williamdwalker/article/2635416">
    <title>Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy and Public Policy</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/williamdwalker/article/2635416</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(20 March 2006)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This book shows through accessible argument and numerous examples how understanding moral philosophy can improve economic analysis, how moral philosophy can benefit from economists' analytical tools, and how economic analysis and moral philosophy together can inform public policy. Part I explores rationality and its connections to morality. It argues that in defending their model of rationality, mainstream economists implicitly espouse contestable moral principles. Part II concerns welfare, utilitarianism and standard welfare economics, while Part III considers important moral notions that are left out of standard welfare economics, such as freedom, rights, equality, and justice. Part III also emphasizes the variety of moral considerations that are relevant to evaluating policies. Part IV then introduces technical work in social choice theory and game theory that is guided by ethical concepts and relevant to moral theorizing. Chapters include recommended readings and the book includes a glossary of relevant terms.</description>
    <dc:title>Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy and Public Policy</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Daniel Hausman</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Mcpherson</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(20 March 2006)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-06T20:24:19-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publisher>Cambridge University Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>economics-methodology</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>policy</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/1567">
    <title>Digital music and online sharing: software piracy 2.0?</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/1567</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Commun. ACM, Vol. 46, No. 7. (July 2003), pp. 107-111.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Digital music and online sharing: software piracy 2.0?</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Sudip Bhattacharjee</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ram Gopal</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Lawrence Sanders</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/792704.792707</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Commun. ACM, Vol. 46, No. 7. (July 2003), pp. 107-111.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2004-12-03T17:48:24-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2003</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Commun. ACM</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0001-0782</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>46</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>7</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>107</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>111</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>electronic_media</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>music</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/1551">
    <title>On the Intrinsic Value of Information Objects and the Infosphere</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/1551</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What is the most general common set of attributes that characterises something as intrinsically valuable and hence as subject to some moral respect, and without which something would rightly be considered intrinsically worthless or even positively unworthy and therefore rightly to be disrespected in itself? This paper develops and supports the thesis that the minimal condition of possibility of an entity's least intrinsic value is to be identified with its ontological status as an information...</description>
    <dc:title>On the Intrinsic Value of Information Objects and the Infosphere</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Luciano Faculty</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-12-03T14:24:39-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/1548">
    <title>Artificial evil and the foundation of computer ethics</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/1548</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Ethics and Information Technology, Vol. 3, No. 1. (2001), pp. 55-66.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Moral reasoning traditionally distinguishes two types of evil: moral (ME) and natural (NE). The standard view is that ME is the product of human agency and so includes phenomena such as war, torture and psychological cruelty; that NE is the product of nonhuman agency, and so includes natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, disease and famine; and finally, that more complex cases are appropriately analysed as a combination of ME and NE. Recently, as a result of developments in autonomous...</description>
    <dc:title>Artificial evil and the foundation of computer ethics</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>L Floridi</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>J Sanders</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Ethics and Information Technology, Vol. 3, No. 1. (2001), pp. 55-66.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2004-12-03T14:23:20-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Ethics and Information Technology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>55</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>66</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/4115">
    <title>Ethical theory, codes of ethics and IS practice</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/4115</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Information Systems Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1. (1996), pp. 69-81.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Ethical theory, codes of ethics and IS practice</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>G Walsham</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Information Systems Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1. (1996), pp. 69-81.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2004-12-17T04:16:45-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1996</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Information Systems Journal</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1350-1917</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>69</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>81</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/1549">
    <title>Computer Ethics: Mapping the Foundationalist Debate</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/1549</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The paper provides a critical analysis of the debate on the foundations of Computer Ethics (CE). Starting from a discussion of Moor's classic interpretation of the need for CE caused by a policy and conceptual vacuum, five positions in the literature are identified and discussed: the &#34;no resolution approach&#34;, according to which CE can have no foundation; the professional approach, according to which CE is solely a professional ethics; the radical approach, according to which CE deals with...</description>
    <dc:title>Computer Ethics: Mapping the Foundationalist Debate</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Luciano Floridi</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>JW Sanders</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-12-03T14:23:57-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/84906">
    <title>Ethical theory in communications research</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/84906</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journalism Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1. (February 2005), 3.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This essay posits that media ethics must respond to both rapid globalization of communications and the reassertion of local identities. The major issues to be resolved are relativism, theories of universalism and three philosophical problems: theories of knowledge, the status of values, and whether the world is one or many. For media professionals to achieve international communication ethics, they must look outside Western canonicity.</description>
    <dc:title>Ethical theory in communications research</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Clifford Christians</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1080/1461670052000328168</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Journalism Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1. (February 2005), 3.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-01-28T11:59:42-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journalism Studies</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1461-670X</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Routledge, part of the Taylor &#38; Francis Group</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>electronic_media</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/20737">
    <title>Concerning technology: thinking with Heidegger</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/20737</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Nursing Philosophy, Vol. 5, No. 3., 242.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Concerning technology: thinking with Heidegger</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Hilde Zitzelsberger</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1111/j.1466-769X.2004.00183.x</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Nursing Philosophy, Vol. 5, No. 3., 242.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2004-12-28T16:17:09-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>Nursing Philosophy</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1466-7681</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>242</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Blackwell Publishing</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/409350">
    <title>Disclosive computer ethics</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/whitenoise/article/409350</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;SIGCAS Comput. Soc., Vol. 30, No. 4. (December 2000), pp. 10-16.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This essay provides a critique of mainstream computer ethics and argues for the importance of a complementary approach called disclosive computer ethics, which is concerned with the moral deciphering of embedded values and norms in computer systems, applications and practices. Also, four key values are proposed as starting points for disclosive studies in computer ethics: justice, autonomy, democracy and privacy. Finally, it is argued that research in disclosive computer ethics should be multi-level and interdisciplinary, distinguishing between a disclosure level, a theoretical level, and an an application level.</description>
    <dc:title>Disclosive computer ethics</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Philip Brey</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/572260.572264</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>SIGCAS Comput. Soc., Vol. 30, No. 4. (December 2000), pp. 10-16.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-11-26T17:22:06-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2000</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>SIGCAS Comput. Soc.</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0095-2737</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>30</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>16</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wgasman/article/2465872">
    <title>Practising Applied Ethics with philosophical integrity: the case of Business Ethics</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wgasman/article/2465872</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Business Ethics, A European Review, Vol. 17, No. 2. (April 2008), pp. 161-170.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Practising Applied Ethics with philosophical integrity: the case of Business Ethics</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Rossouw</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Deon</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2008.00529.x</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Business Ethics, A European Review, Vol. 17, No. 2. (April 2008), pp. 161-170.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-03-04T17:07:44-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Business Ethics, A European Review</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0962-8770</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>17</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>161</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>170</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Blackwell Publishing</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>business</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1168621">
    <title>Regulating Toxic Substances: A Philosophy of Science and the Law (Environmental Ethics and Science Policy Series)</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1168621</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(01 August 1997)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The proliferation of chemical substances in commerce poses scientific and philosophical problems. The scientific challenge is to develop data, methodologies, and techniques for identifying and assessing toxic substances before they cause harm to human beings and the environment. The philosophical problem is how much scientific information we should demand for this task consistent with other social goals we might have. In this book, Cranor utilizes material from ethics, philosophy of law, epidemiology, tort law, regulatory law, and risk assessment, to argue that the scientific evidential standards used in tort law and administrative law to control toxics ought to be evaluated with the purposes of the law in mind. Demanding too much for this purpose will slow the evaluation and lead to an excess of toxic substances left unidentified and unassessed, thus leaving the public at risk. Demanding too little may impose other costs. An appropriate balance between these social concerns must be found. Justice requires we use evidentiary standards more appropriate to the legal institutions in question and resist the temptation to demand the most intensive scientific evaluation of each substance subject to legal action.</description>
    <dc:title>Regulating Toxic Substances: A Philosophy of Science and the Law (Environmental Ethics and Science Policy Series)</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Carl Cranor</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(01 August 1997)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-03-17T13:16:44-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1997</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publisher>Oxford University Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>animal_studies</prism:category>
    <prism:category>causality</prism:category>
    <prism:category>epistemology</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>evidence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>justification</prism:category>
    <prism:category>regulation</prism:category>
    <prism:category>risk_assessment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>risk_management</prism:category>
    <prism:category>uncertainty</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1097904">
    <title>Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved (The University Center for Human Values Series)</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1097904</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(05 September 2006)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#60;p&#62;&#34;It's the animal in us,&#34; we often hear when we've been bad. But why not when we're good? &#60;i&#62;Primates and Philosophers&#60;/i&#62; tackles this question by exploring the biological foundations of one of humanity's most valued traits: morality.&#60;/p&#62;&#60;p&#62; In this provocative book, primatologist Frans de Waal argues that modern-day evolutionary biology takes far too dim a view of the natural world, emphasizing our &#34;selfish&#34; genes. Science has thus exacerbated our reciprocal habits of blaming nature when we act badly and labeling the good things we do as &#34;humane.&#34; Seeking the origin of human morality not in evolution but in human culture, science insists that we are moral by choice, not by nature.&#60;/p&#62;&#60;p&#62; Citing remarkable evidence based on his extensive research of primate behavior, de Waal attacks &#34;Veneer Theory,&#34; which posits morality as a thin overlay on an otherwise nasty nature. He explains how we evolved from a long line of animals that care for the weak and build cooperation with reciprocal transactions. Drawing on both Darwin and recent scientific advances, de Waal demonstrates a strong continuity between human and animal behavior. In the process, he also probes issues such as anthropomorphism and human responsibilities toward animals.&#60;/p&#62;&#60;p&#62; Based on the Tanner Lectures de Waal delivered at Princeton University's Center for Human Values in 2004, &#60;i&#62;Primates and Philosophers&#60;/i&#62; includes responses by the philosophers Peter Singer, Christine M. Korsgaard, and Philip Kitcher and the science writer Robert Wright. They press de Waal to clarify the differences between humans and other animals, yielding a lively debate that will fascinate all those who wonder about the origins and reach of human goodness.&#60;/p&#62;</description>
    <dc:title>Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved (The University Center for Human Values Series)</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Frans de Waal</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(05 September 2006)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-02-10T08:43:05-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publisher>Princeton University Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>basis_of_normativity</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>metaethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>normativity</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/2229217">
    <title>Morally Serious Critics of Moral Intuitions</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/2229217</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Ratio, Vol. 12, No. 1. (1999), pp. 54-79.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I characterize moral intuitionism as the methodological claim that one may legitimately appeal to moral judgments in the course of moral reasoning even when those judgments are not supported by inference from other judgments. I describe two patterns of criticism of this method: 'morally unserious' criticisms, which hold that 'morality is bunk', so appeals to moral intuitions are bunk as well; and 'morally serious' criticisms, which hold that morality is not bunk, but that appeals to moral intuition are nonetheless misguided. I consider morally serious criticisms of Kantian and Aristotelian provenance, but defend the intuitionist method from both.</description>
    <dc:title>Morally Serious Critics of Moral Intuitions</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Mark Nelson</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1111/1467-9329.00077</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Ratio, Vol. 12, No. 1. (1999), pp. 54-79.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-14T07:33:49-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1999</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Ratio</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>54</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>79</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>intuition</prism:category>
    <prism:category>moral_realism</prism:category>
    <prism:category>reflective_equilibrium</prism:category>
    <prism:category>relativism</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938262">
    <title>Some Moral Issues in Risk Assessment</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938262</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Ethics, Vol. 101, No. 1. (1990), pp. 123-143.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Some Moral Issues in Risk Assessment</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Carl Cranor</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Ethics, Vol. 101, No. 1. (1990), pp. 123-143.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T19:54:40-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1990</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Ethics</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>101</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>123</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>143</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>risk_assessment</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938255">
    <title>Ethics For Toxicologists: An Examination of Conscience</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938255</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;pp. 390-392.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Ethics For Toxicologists: An Examination of Conscience</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>JJ Saady</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>pp. 390-392.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T19:48:38-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:startingPage>390</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>392</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>toxicology</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/2207651">
    <title>Consequential Evaluation and Practical Reason</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/2207651</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 97, No. 9. (2000), pp. 477-502.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Consequential Evaluation and Practical Reason</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Amartya Sen</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 97, No. 9. (2000), pp. 477-502.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-08T12:57:47-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2000</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>The Journal of Philosophy</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>97</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>9</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>477</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>502</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>consequentialism</prism:category>
    <prism:category>deontology</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1123255">
    <title>CONSEQUENTIALIZING MORAL THEORIES</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1123255</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 88, No. 1. (2007), pp. 39-73.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To consequentialize a non-consequentialist theory, take whatever considerations that the non-consequentialist theory holds to be relevant to determining the deontic statuses of actions and insist that those considerations are relevant to determining the proper ranking of outcomes. In this way, the consequentialist can produce an ordering of outcomes that when combined with her criterion of rightness yields the same set of deontic verdicts that the non-consequentialist theory yields. In this paper, I argue that any plausible non-consequentialist theory can be consequentialized. I explain the motivation for the consequentializing project and defend it against recent criticisms by Mark Schroeder and others.</description>
    <dc:title>CONSEQUENTIALIZING MORAL THEORIES</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Douglas Portmore</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1111/j.1468-0114.2007.00280.x</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 88, No. 1. (2007), pp. 39-73.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-02-26T17:55:45-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Pacific Philosophical Quarterly</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>39</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>73</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>consequentialism</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/2207434">
    <title>One Consequence of Consequentialism: Morality and Overdetermination</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/2207434</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Erkenntnis, Vol. 55, No. 2. (2001), pp. 155-168.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>One Consequence of Consequentialism: Morality and Overdetermination</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>T Zamir</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1023/A:1012930600391</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Erkenntnis, Vol. 55, No. 2. (2001), pp. 155-168.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-08T11:38:05-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Erkenntnis</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>155</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>168</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>consequentialism</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>intuition</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/937925">
    <title>Normative all the way down</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/937925</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Vol. 36, No. 2. (June 2005), pp. 419-429.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Normative all the way down</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Stephen Turner</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.04.007</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Vol. 36, No. 2. (June 2005), pp. 419-429.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T15:24:22-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>36</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>419</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>429</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>basis_of_normativity</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/waghsk/article/2442994">
    <title>Toward guidelines for the ethical reanalysis and reinterpretation of another's research.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/waghsk/article/2442994</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Epidemiology, Vol. 17, No. 3. (May 2006), pp. 335-338.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reanalysis and reinterpretation occur when a person other than the original investigator obtains an epidemiologic data set and conducts analyses to evaluate the quality, reliability or validity of the dataset, methods, results or conclusions reported by the original investigator. We propose ethical guidelines with regard to the duty of original investigators to cooperate with competent impartial reanalysis and for the sponsors of reanalysis and reinterpretation and the epidemiologists who carry it out. The rights and interests of these parties and of the public interest need to be protected.</description>
    <dc:title>Toward guidelines for the ethical reanalysis and reinterpretation of another's research.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>RR Neutra</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>A Cohen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>T Fletcher</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>D Michaels</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>ED Richter</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>CL Soskolne</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000209464.97895.bf</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Epidemiology, Vol. 17, No. 3. (May 2006), pp. 335-338.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-28T10:44:51-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Epidemiology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1044-3983</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>17</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>335</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>338</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>deidentified</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>hippa</prism:category>
    <prism:category>mdds</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/vera/article/226179">
    <title>Journalism Ethics from the Public's Point of View</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/vera/article/226179</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journalism Studies, Vol. 6, No. 3. (August 2005), pp. 315-330.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Journalism Ethics from the Public's Point of View</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Stephen Ward</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1080/14616700500131901</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Journalism Studies, Vol. 6, No. 3. (August 2005), pp. 315-330.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-06-11T22:54:33-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journalism Studies</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1461-670X</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>315</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>330</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Routledge, part of the Taylor &#38; Francis Group</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>journalism</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/ucladrea/article/239262">
    <title>Nursing Ethics: Across the Curriculum and Into Practice</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/ucladrea/article/239262</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(10 June 2005)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This text provides foundational knowledge about ethics and decision-making strategies to prepare nurses for the moral issues they experience daily.</description>
    <dc:title>Nursing Ethics: Across the Curriculum and Into Practice</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Janie Butts</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Karen Rich</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(10 June 2005)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-06-28T00:35:49-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publisher>Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc.</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>books</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>nursing</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tystl/article/748235">
    <title>Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education, Second Edition, with a New Preface</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/tystl/article/748235</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(02 June 2003)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What is at the basis of moral action? An altruism acquired by the application of rule and principle? Or, as Noddings asserts, caring and the memory of being cared for? With numerous examples to supplement her rich theoretical discussion, Noddings builds a compelling philosophical argument for an ethics based on natural caring, as in the care of a mother for her child. The ethical behavior that grows out of natural caring, and has as its core care-filled receptivity to those involved in any moral situation, leaves behind the rigidity of rule and principle to focus on what is particular and unique in human relations. &#60;br&#62;Noddings's discussion is wide-ranging, as she considers whether organizations, which operate at a remove from the caring relationship, can truly be called ethical. She discusses the extent to which we may truly care for plants, animals, or ideas. Finally, she proposes a realignment of education to encourage and reward not just rationality and trained intelligence, but also enhanced sensitivity in moral matters.</description>
    <dc:title>Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education, Second Edition, with a New Preface</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Nel Noddings</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(02 June 2003)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-07-09T06:13:49-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2003</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publisher>University of California Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>education</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>feminism</prism:category>
    <prism:category>morality</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tsuomela/article/1194392">
    <title>Maintaining the reversibility of foldings: Making the ethics (politics) of information technology visible</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/tsuomela/article/1194392</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Ethics and Information Technology, Vol. 9, No. 1. (March 2007), pp. 11-25.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Maintaining the reversibility of foldings: Making the ethics (politics) of information technology visible</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Introna</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/s10676-006-9133-z</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Ethics and Information Technology, Vol. 9, No. 1. (March 2007), pp. 11-25.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-03-29T07:54:14-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Ethics and Information Technology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1388-1957</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>25</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Springer</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>philosophy</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sts</prism:category>
    <prism:category>technology</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tsuomela/article/435835">
    <title>The Tragedy of the Commons</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/tsuomela/article/435835</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Science, Vol. 162, No. 3859. (13 December 1968), pp. 1243-1248.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>The Tragedy of the Commons</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Garrett Hardin</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Science, Vol. 162, No. 3859. (13 December 1968), pp. 1243-1248.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-12-12T12:42:45-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1968</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>162</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3859</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1243</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1248</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>altruism</prism:category>
    <prism:category>commons</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ecology</prism:category>
    <prism:category>economics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tpoff/article/1725620">
    <title>The Primacy of God's Will in Christian Ethics</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/tpoff/article/1725620</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 6 (1992), pp. 493-513.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>The Primacy of God's Will in Christian Ethics</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Philip Quinn</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 6 (1992), pp. 493-513.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-10-04T03:45:00-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1992</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Philosophical Perspectives</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
    <prism:startingPage>493</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>513</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>philosophy</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tomisc/article/2924589">
    <title>Dualism and sustainability</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/tomisc/article/2924589</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Ecological Economics, Vol. 42, No. 1-2. (August 2002), pp. 89-99.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This paper argues that there are two forms of knowledge, intuitive and rational. Duality refers to the separation of the two and the trivialisation of intuitive knowledge, the form that has historically governed the inner relationship of humans to the natural world. The scientific-industrial revolution saw not only the banishment of intuitive knowledge but the elevation of a particular form of rationality, instrumental rationality, the form that provides the basis for modern economics. The transition from participating to non-participating consciousness heralded a new mode of self-awareness, an isolated ego existing [`]inside' the body, and an acute psychological loss. The consciousness of non-participation meant that the natural world was now seen as essentially dead. It could therefore be exploited for the material benefit of humans. While recognising the value of reason, the well-spring of environmentalism is intuitive knowledge. Environmentalism seeks to transcend duality, reassert the cosmic unity and breathe life back into Nature.</description>
    <dc:title>Dualism and sustainability</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Clive Hamilton</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00051-4</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Ecological Economics, Vol. 42, No. 1-2. (August 2002), pp. 89-99.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-24T22:49:56-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2002</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Ecological Economics</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1-2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>89</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>99</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>consciousness</prism:category>
    <prism:category>dualism</prism:category>
    <prism:category>environmentalism</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>intuition</prism:category>
    <prism:category>philsci</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/3036654">
    <title>Legal issues surrounding monitoring during network research</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/3036654</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2007), pp. 141-148.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Legal issues surrounding monitoring during network research</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Douglas Sicker</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Paul Ohm</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Dirk Grunwald</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1298306.1298307</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2007), pp. 141-148.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-07-23T11:01:18-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>141</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>148</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>legal</prism:category>
    <prism:category>network-measurement</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/2998642">
    <title>Issues and etiquette concerning use of shared measurement data</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/2998642</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2007), pp. 135-140.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Issues and etiquette concerning use of shared measurement data</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Mark Alllman</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Vern Paxson</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1298306.1298327</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2007), pp. 135-140.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-07-14T11:27:35-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>135</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>140</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>network-measurement</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/1932001">
    <title>Challenges in mining social network data: processes, privacy, and paradoxes</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/1932001</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2007), pp. 4-5.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Challenges in mining social network data: processes, privacy, and paradoxes</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Jon Kleinberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1281192.1281195</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2007), pp. 4-5.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-11-18T03:20:04-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>5</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>privacy</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pvnets</prism:category>
    <prism:category>social-networks</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/3032564">
    <title>A research note on ethics in the emerging age of überveillance</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/3032564</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Computer Communications, Vol. 31, No. 6. (18 April 2008), pp. 1192-1199.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Advanced location-based services (A-LBS) for humancentric tracking and monitoring are now emerging as operators and service providers begin to leverage their existing infrastructure and invest in new technologies, toward increasingly innovative location application solutions. We can now point to humancentric tracking and monitoring services where the person (i.e. subject) has become an active node in the network. For example, in health applications through the use of embedded technologies such as radio-frequency identification (RFID) or in campus applications through the use of electronic monitoring techniques in the form of global positioning systems (GPS). These technologies, for the greater part, have been introduced into society at large, without the commensurate assessment of what they will mean in terms of socio-ethical implications. Of particular concern is the potential for these innovative solutions to be applied in government-to-citizen mandated services, increasing the ability of the state to collect targeted data and conduct covert surveillance on any given individual, described herein as überveillance. This paper aims to define, describe, and interpret the current socio-ethical landscape of advanced location-based services for humans in order to promote discourse among researchers and practitioners to better direct telecommunications policy.</description>
    <dc:title>A research note on ethics in the emerging age of überveillance</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>MG Michael</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Sarah Fusco</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Katina Michael</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2008.01.023</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Computer Communications, Vol. 31, No. 6. (18 April 2008), pp. 1192-1199.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-07-22T11:30:49-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Computer Communications</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>6</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1192</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1199</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>location-based-services</prism:category>
    <prism:category>privacy</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pvnets</prism:category>
    <prism:category>surveillance</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/3036497">
    <title>Who benefits from network analysis: ethics of social network research</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/3036497</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Social Networks, Vol. 27, No. 2. (May 2005), pp. 139-153.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The success of social network research (SNR) has led to expectations that in addition to academic research, SNR can introduce people to one another, solve organizational problems, map the epidemiology of AIDS, and catch criminals and terrorists. Since SNR requires that names of both respondents and their contacts be collected and used in most analyses, Institutional Review Boards become very concerned. Experiences of the author, participants in the 2003 Sun Belt Conference and the Social Network List Serve illustrate ethical issues. Proper handling of the data and the analysis, including complete control by the investigator can virtually eliminate harm to respondents and those they nominate, though perhaps not to the satisfaction of IRBs. On the benefit side, academic researchers always benefit, organizations, society and science may benefit, but individual respondents rarely do.</description>
    <dc:title>Who benefits from network analysis: ethics of social network research</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Charles Kadushin</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2005.01.005</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Social Networks, Vol. 27, No. 2. (May 2005), pp. 139-153.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-07-23T09:30:05-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Social Networks</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>139</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>153</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>social-networks</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/2191921">
    <title>Research Ethics in the MySpace Era.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/2191921</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Pediatrics, Vol. 121, No. 1. (January 2008), pp. 157-161.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Social networking web sites are popular among adolescents and may represent a new venue for conducting adolescent health research. Conducting research by using social networking web sites raises several concerns, including the social value of this research, fair subject selection, confidentiality, privacy, and informed consent. Addressing each of these concerns, we offer an ethical framework to promote informed and appropriate decisions.</description>
    <dc:title>Research Ethics in the MySpace Era.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>MA Moreno</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>NC Fost</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>DA Christakis</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1542/peds.2007-3015</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Pediatrics, Vol. 121, No. 1. (January 2008), pp. 157-161.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-03T18:01:52-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Pediatrics</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1098-4275</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>121</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>157</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>161</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>research</prism:category>
    <prism:category>social-networks</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/2862276">
    <title>Understanding individual human mobility patterns</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/tnhh/article/2862276</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Nature, Vol. 453, No. 7196. (5 June 2008), pp. 779-782.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Understanding individual human mobility patterns</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Marta Gonzalez</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Cesar Hidalgo</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Albert Barabasi</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/nature06958</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Nature, Vol. 453, No. 7196. (5 June 2008), pp. 779-782.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-04T19:02:19-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Nature</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>453</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>7196</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>779</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>782</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Nature Publishing Group</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>mobile-phones</prism:category>
    <prism:category>mobility</prism:category>
    <prism:category>privacy</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pvnets</prism:category>
    <prism:category>surveillance</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tracking</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tmarjeff/article/27441">
    <title>Understanding Moral Obligation in the Face of Moral Pluralism</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/tmarjeff/article/27441</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;The Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol. 37, No. 4., 471.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Understanding Moral Obligation in the Face of Moral Pluralism</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>A Iltis</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1023/B:INQU.0000019029.55832.41</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>The Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol. 37, No. 4., 471.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2004-12-28T16:36:13-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>The Journal of Value Inquiry</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0022-5363</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>471</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/TJ/article/2354320">
    <title>Ethical and Strategic Issues in Organizational Social Network Analysis</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/TJ/article/2354320</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 39, No. 3. (1 September 2003), pp. 337-349.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In addition to all the usual ethical problems that can arise with any kind of inquiry, network analyses, by their very nature, introduce special ethical problems that should be recognized. This paper delineates some of these problems, distinguishing between problems that arise in purely academic studies and those that arise in managerial practice settings. In addition, the paper raises the long-term question of whether the use of network analysis for making managerial decisions will make collecting valid network data impossible in the future, seriously harming the academic field of social network research. The paper concludes with a short set of principles intended to form the basis for a set of guidelines designed to safeguard participants in social network studies and protect the long term viability of the network research enterprise. 10.1177/0021886303258111</description>
    <dc:title>Ethical and Strategic Issues in Organizational Social Network Analysis</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Stephen Borgatti</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jose Molina</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1177/0021886303258111</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 39, No. 3. (1 September 2003), pp. 337-349.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-08T17:46:55-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2003</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journal of Applied Behavioral Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>337</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>349</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>networking</prism:category>
    <prism:category>social</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/timothee/article/222982">
    <title>Scientists behaving badly</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/timothee/article/222982</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Nature, Vol. 435, No. 7043. (08 June 2005), pp. 737-738.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Scientists behaving badly</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Brian Martinson</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Melissa Anderson</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Raymond de Vries</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/435737a</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Nature, Vol. 435, No. 7043. (08 June 2005), pp. 737-738.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-06-08T20:26:40-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Nature</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0028-0836</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>435</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>7043</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>737</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>738</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Nature Publishing Group</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>fraud</prism:category>
    <prism:category>publication</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tela1031/article/2602738">
    <title>Marriage and Family Counseling: Ethics in Context</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/tela1031/article/2602738</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;The Family Journal, Vol. 13, No. 4. (1 October 2005), pp. 459-466.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Codes of ethics typically provide rules and guidelines for best practices in marriage and family counseling. An emerging model for ethical decision making emphasizes the ethics of virtues and aspirations. Exploring fundamental models of helping, as well as contemporary issues in community systems, affords context for examining the professional development of marriage and family counseling. Dialectical reasoning, professional discourse, and case study present means by which 21st-century marriage and family counselors can resolve ethical dilemmas. 10.1177/1066480705278688</description>
    <dc:title>Marriage and Family Counseling: Ethics in Context</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Stephen Southern</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Robert Smith</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Marvarene Oliver</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1177/1066480705278688</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>The Family Journal, Vol. 13, No. 4. (1 October 2005), pp. 459-466.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-03-27T17:20:37-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>The Family Journal</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>13</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>459</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>466</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>and</prism:category>
    <prism:category>context</prism:category>
    <prism:category>counseling</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>family</prism:category>
    <prism:category>in</prism:category>
    <prism:category>marriage</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/teenie0128/article/1238479">
    <title>Ethics and access to teaching materials in the medical library: the case of the Pernkopf atlas.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/teenie0128/article/1238479</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Bull Med Libr Assoc, Vol. 89, No. 1. (January 2001), pp. 51-58.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conflicts can occur between the principle of freedom of information treasured by librarians and ethical standards of scientific research involving the propriety of using data derived from immoral or dishonorable experimentation. A prime example of this conflict was brought to the attention of the medical and library communities in 1995 when articles claiming that the subjects of the illustrations in the classic anatomy atlas, Eduard Pernkopf's Topographische Anatomie des Menschen, were victims of the Nazi holocaust. While few have disputed the accuracy, artistic, or educational value of the Pernkopf atlas, some have argued that the use of such subjects violates standards of medical ethics involving inhuman and degrading treatment of subjects or disrespect of a human corpse. Efforts were made to remove the book from medical libraries. In this article, the history of the Pernkopf atlas and the controversy surrounding it are reviewed. The results of a survey of academic medical libraries concerning their treatment of the Pernkopf atlas are reported, and the ethical implications of these issues as they affect the responsibilities of librarians is discussed.</description>
    <dc:title>Ethics and access to teaching materials in the medical library: the case of the Pernkopf atlas.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>MC Atlas</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Bull Med Libr Assoc, Vol. 89, No. 1. (January 2001), pp. 51-58.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-04-20T09:39:38-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Bull Med Libr Assoc</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0025-7338</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>89</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>51</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>58</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>ethics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>library</prism:category>
    <prism:category>teaching</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

