<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:29:31 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: Tag value</title>
	<description>CiteULike: Tag value</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/tag/value</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wynsculley/article/2616688"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wigelius/article/1302114"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wigelius/article/832176"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wigelius/article/315629"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wigelius/article/1415341"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/waxd01/article/282020"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938271"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938266"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938264"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938263"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1418647"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938240"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938238"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938233"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938232"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938219"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938216"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938201"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938200"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938199"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938197"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1419477"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166230"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1419473"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166222"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1419464"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166186"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166182"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166178"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166177"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/237183"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1180593"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1180545"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1108219"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/988650"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/988646"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1029738"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/937916"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1199687"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1448669"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1419164"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/2141550"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938283"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1112876"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1362824"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1338508"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1158182"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/ttaga/article/2245717"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tomchen/article/1047836"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/thiede/article/2213841"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wynsculley/article/2616688">
    <title>Objectivity, Value Spheres, and &#34;Inherent Laws&#34;: On some Suggestive Isomorphisms between Weber, Bourdieu, and Luhmann</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wynsculley/article/2616688</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 38, No. 1. (1 March 2008), pp. 97-120.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I give an account of Max Weber's views concerning the basis of the objectivity of the cultural sciences. In this connection, I offer a critical discussion of his distinction between different &#34;value spheres,&#34; each with its own &#34;intrinsic logic.&#34; I then consider parallels between Weber's &#34;value spheres&#34; and central elements of Bourdieu's field theory and Luhmann's systems theory, and try to show to what extent Bourdieu's and Luhmann's problems, and the solutions they suggest, can be seen as similar to Weber's. I conclude by a general consideration of Weber's, Bourdieu's, and Luhmann's approach to the problem of objectivity. 10.1177/0048393107311144</description>
    <dc:title>Objectivity, Value Spheres, and &#34;Inherent Laws&#34;: On some Suggestive Isomorphisms between Weber, Bourdieu, and Luhmann</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Hans Bruun</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1177/0048393107311144</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 38, No. 1. (1 March 2008), pp. 97-120.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-03-31T15:54:35-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Philosophy of the Social Sciences</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>38</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>97</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>120</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>bourdieu</prism:category>
    <prism:category>differentiation</prism:category>
    <prism:category>field</prism:category>
    <prism:category>inherent</prism:category>
    <prism:category>logic</prism:category>
    <prism:category>luhmann</prism:category>
    <prism:category>max</prism:category>
    <prism:category>niklas</prism:category>
    <prism:category>objectivity</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pierre</prism:category>
    <prism:category>social</prism:category>
    <prism:category>spheres</prism:category>
    <prism:category>systems</prism:category>
    <prism:category>theory</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
    <prism:category>weber</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wigelius/article/1302114">
    <title>A development framework for value-centred design</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wigelius/article/1302114</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2005), pp. 1292-1295.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>A development framework for value-centred design</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Gilbert Cockton</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1056808.1056899</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2005), pp. 1292-1295.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-05-17T12:58:28-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>1292</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1295</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>framework</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wigelius/article/832176">
    <title>From quality in use to value in the world</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wigelius/article/832176</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2004), pp. 1287-1290.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>From quality in use to value in the world</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Gilbert Cockton</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/985921.986045</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2004), pp. 1287-1290.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-09-06T10:12:22-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>1287</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1290</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>quality</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wigelius/article/315629">
    <title>Value-centred HCI</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wigelius/article/315629</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2004), pp. 149-160.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Value-centred HCI</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Gilbert Cockton</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1028014.1028038</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2004), pp. 149-160.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-09-11T06:03:23-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>149</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>160</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>hci</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wigelius/article/1415341">
    <title>Using Conceptual Modeling and Value Analysis to Identify Sustainable m&#62;Business Models in Industrial Services</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wigelius/article/1415341</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Mobile Business, 2006. ICMB '06. International Conference on (2006), pp. 7-7.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The industrial products and service industry is a product oriented industry, where traditional business models based on value chain optimization have been refined over many years. However, in order to increase business value, innovative industrial product companies are increasingly looking for new m- Business services related to their core business. With the emergence of such virtual markets (services, information, knowledge, life-style support, security) we need a new paradigm for understanding and predicting business performance. The concept &#34;value constellation&#34; replaces the value chain. A m-Business model is not sustainable if it lacks a sound economic value proposition to the end-user. In order to analyze and validate value creation in m- Business systems we suggest using a conceptual modeling methodology with proper value ontology. We will demonstrate how such a methodology will allow us to de-compose value offerings with the aim of identifying new stakeholders and new value constellations.</description>
    <dc:title>Using Conceptual Modeling and Value Analysis to Identify Sustainable m&#62;Business Models in Industrial Services</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Jesper Thestrup</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Trine Sorensen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mauro De Bona</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Mobile Business, 2006. ICMB '06. International Conference on (2006), pp. 7-7.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-06-27T09:00:31-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Mobile Business, 2006. ICMB '06. International Conference on</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>7</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>business</prism:category>
    <prism:category>mobile</prism:category>
    <prism:category>model</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/waxd01/article/282020">
    <title>Beads and Money: Notes toward a Theory of Wealth and Power</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/waxd01/article/282020</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;American Ethnologist, Vol. 23, No. 1. (1996), pp. 4-24.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why have so many societies adopted beads or other objects of adornment as currencies of trade? The question opens up a series of other questions about the nature of exchange, visibility and invisibility, and the relation of exchange both to conceptions of the human person and ways of exercising power over others. [money, exchange theory, theories of magic, fetishism, the person, gender, agency and royal power, Madagascar]</description>
    <dc:title>Beads and Money: Notes toward a Theory of Wealth and Power</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>David Graeber</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>American Ethnologist, Vol. 23, No. 1. (1996), pp. 4-24.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-08-15T07:18:41-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1996</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>American Ethnologist</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>23</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>24</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>anarchism</prism:category>
    <prism:category>anthropology</prism:category>
    <prism:category>savageminds</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938271">
    <title>The Interplay of Science and Values in Assessing and Regulating Environmental Risks</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938271</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Science, Technology, &#38; Human Values, Vol. 11, No. 2. (1986), pp. 40-50.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>The Interplay of Science and Values in Assessing and Regulating Environmental Risks</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Frances Lynn</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Science, Technology, &#38; Human Values, Vol. 11, No. 2. (1986), pp. 40-50.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T20:03:48-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1986</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Science, Technology, &#38; Human Values</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>40</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>50</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>bias</prism:category>
    <prism:category>risk_assessment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938266">
    <title>Increasing Public Participation in Controversies Involving Hazards: The Value of Metastatistical Rules</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938266</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Science, Technology, &#38; Human Values, Vol. 10, No. 4. (1985), pp. 55-68.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Increasing Public Participation in Controversies Involving Hazards: The Value of Metastatistical Rules</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Deborah Mayo</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Science, Technology, &#38; Human Values, Vol. 10, No. 4. (1985), pp. 55-68.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T19:57:50-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1985</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Science, Technology, &#38; Human Values</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>55</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>68</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>risk_assessment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>statistics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938264">
    <title>Bridging the Two Cultures of Risk Analysis1,2</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938264</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Risk Analysis, Vol. 13, No. 2. (1993), pp. 123-129.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Bridging the Two Cultures of Risk Analysis1,2</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Sheila Jasanoff</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01057.x</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Risk Analysis, Vol. 13, No. 2. (1993), pp. 123-129.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T19:56:49-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1993</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Risk Analysis</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>13</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>123</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>129</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>risk_assessment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938263">
    <title>Science and values in risk assessment: The case of deliberate release of genetically engineered organisms</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938263</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Vol. V9, No. 1. (7 March 1996), pp. 42-60.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Science and values in risk assessment: The case of deliberate release of genetically engineered organisms</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Soemini Kasanmoentalib</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/BF01965669</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Vol. V9, No. 1. (7 March 1996), pp. 42-60.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T19:55:24-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1996</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>V9</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>42</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>60</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>gmo</prism:category>
    <prism:category>longino</prism:category>
    <prism:category>risk_assessment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1418647">
    <title>The values of science: Empiricism from a feminist perspective</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1418647</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Synthese, Vol. 104, No. 3. (1995), pp. 441-461.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This essay delineates the contributions of feminist critiques of science to contemporary reconstructions of empiricism. I argue that three central tenets arise from feminist attention to the dynamics of gender and oppression in the theories and methods of science: 1) a rejection of the science/politics dichotomy; 2) an acknowledgement of the epistemic import of subjective components of knowledge; and 3) a reconfiguration of the subject of knowledge. These three tenets are illustrated and supported through examples from the history of science.</description>
    <dc:title>The values of science: Empiricism from a feminist perspective</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Nancy Tuana</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/BF01064509</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Synthese, Vol. 104, No. 3. (1995), pp. 441-461.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-06-28T09:09:15-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1995</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Synthese</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>441</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>461</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>empiricism</prism:category>
    <prism:category>feminism</prism:category>
    <prism:category>science</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938240">
    <title>Science, reason and value</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938240</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Theory and Decision, Vol. V1, No. 2. (1 December 1970), pp. 121-137.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Science, reason and value</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Andrew Mclaughlin</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/BF00154002</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Theory and Decision, Vol. V1, No. 2. (1 December 1970), pp. 121-137.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T19:29:20-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1970</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Theory and Decision</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>V1</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>121</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>137</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>philosophy_of_science</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938238">
    <title>Inductive inconsistencies</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938238</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Synthese, Vol. V12, No. 4. (1 December 1960), pp. 439-469.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Inductive inconsistencies</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Carl Hempel</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/BF00485428</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Synthese, Vol. V12, No. 4. (1 December 1960), pp. 439-469.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T19:27:21-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1960</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Synthese</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>V12</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>439</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>469</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>epistemic_normativity</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938233">
    <title>Epistemic Desiderata</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938233</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 53, No. 3. (1993), pp. 527-551.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Epistemic Desiderata</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>William Alston</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 53, No. 3. (1993), pp. 527-551.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T19:21:32-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1993</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Philosophy and Phenomenological Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>53</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>527</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>551</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>epistemic_normativity</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938232">
    <title>Epistemic normativity</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938232</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Synthese, Vol. V94, No. 3. (1 March 1993), pp. 357-376.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Epistemic normativity</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Hilary Kornblith</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/BF01064485</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Synthese, Vol. V94, No. 3. (1 March 1993), pp. 357-376.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T19:20:21-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1993</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Synthese</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>V94</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>357</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>376</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>epistemic_normativity</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938219">
    <title>Values in Science</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938219</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This paper argues that the appraisal of theory is in important respects closer in structure to value-judgement than it is to the rule-governed inference that the classical tradition in philosophy of science took for granted.</description>
    <dc:title>Values in Science</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Ernan Mcmullin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T19:19:16-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:category>philosophy_of_science</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value_judgment</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938216">
    <title>On Values in Science: Is the Epistemic/Non-Epistemic Distinction Useful?</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938216</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The debate about the rational and the social in science has sometimes been developed in the context of a distinction between epistemic and non-epistemic values. Paying particular attention to two important discussion in the last decade, by Longino and by McMullin, I argue that a fuller understanding of values in science ultimately requires abandoning the distinction itself. This is argued directly in terms of an analysis of the lack of clarity concerning what epistemic values are. I also argue that the philosophical import of much of the feminist work in philosophy of science is restricted by any kind of strict adherence to the distinction.</description>
    <dc:title>On Values in Science: Is the Epistemic/Non-Epistemic Distinction Useful?</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Phyllis Rooney</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T19:18:15-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:category>philosophy_of_science</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938201">
    <title>Science, Values and Objectivity</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938201</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Science &#38; Education, Vol. V11, No. 2. (1 March 2002), pp. 191-202.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Science, Values and Objectivity</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Peter Davson-Galle</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1023/A:1014412500803 </dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Science &#38; Education, Vol. V11, No. 2. (1 March 2002), pp. 191-202.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T18:49:05-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2002</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Science &#38; Education</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>V11</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>191</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>202</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>bias</prism:category>
    <prism:category>objectivity</prism:category>
    <prism:category>philosophy_of_science</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938200">
    <title>How values are in science</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938200</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Critical Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 2. (1998), pp. 29-43.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>How values are in science</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Peter Machamer</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Heather Douglas</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1111/1467-8705.00153</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Critical Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 2. (1998), pp. 29-43.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T18:47:50-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1998</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Critical Quarterly</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>40</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>29</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>43</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>philosophy</prism:category>
    <prism:category>philosophy_of_science</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938199">
    <title>Inductive Risk and Values in Science</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938199</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Philosophy of Science, Vol. 67, No. 4. (2000), pp. 559-579.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Although epistemic values have become widely accepted as part of scientific reasoning, non-epistemic values have been largely relegated to the &#34;external&#34; parts of science (the selection of hypotheses, restrictions on methodologies, and the use of scientific technologies). I argue that because of inductive risk, or the risk of error, non-epistemic values are required in science wherever non-epistemic consequences of error should be considered. I use examples from dioxin studies to illustrate how non-epistemic consequences of error can and should be considered in the internal stages of science: choice of methodology, characterization of data, and interpretation of results.</description>
    <dc:title>Inductive Risk and Values in Science</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Heather Douglas</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Philosophy of Science, Vol. 67, No. 4. (2000), pp. 559-579.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T18:45:56-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2000</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Philosophy of Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>559</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>579</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>false_negative</prism:category>
    <prism:category>false_positivefalse_negative</prism:category>
    <prism:category>histopathology</prism:category>
    <prism:category>judgment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>risk</prism:category>
    <prism:category>risk_assessment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>threshold</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938197">
    <title>On Cognitive and Social Values: A Reply to My Critics</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938197</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Science &#38; Education, Vol. V8, No. 1. (1 January 1999), pp. 89-103.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>On Cognitive and Social Values: A Reply to My Critics</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Hugh Lacey</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1023/A:1008660400494 </dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Science &#38; Education, Vol. V8, No. 1. (1 January 1999), pp. 89-103.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T18:42:51-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1999</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Science &#38; Education</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>V8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>89</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>103</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1419477">
    <title>How Wide Is the Gap Between Facts and Values?</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1419477</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>How Wide Is the Gap Between Facts and Values?</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Nicholas Rescher</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-06-28T12:32:19-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:category>fact</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166230">
    <title>The Fate of Knowledge.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166230</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(01 December 2001)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#60;p&#62;Helen Longino seeks to break the current deadlock in the ongoing wars between philosophers of science and sociologists of science--academic battles founded on disagreement about the role of social forces in constructing scientific knowledge. While many philosophers of science downplay social forces, claiming that scientific knowledge is best considered as a product of cognitive processes, sociologists tend to argue that numerous noncognitive factors influence what scientists learn, how they package it, and how readily it is accepted. Underlying this disagreement, however, is a common assumption that social forces are a source of bias and irrationality. Longino challenges this assumption, arguing that social interaction actually assists us in securing firm, rationally based knowledge. This important insight allows her to develop a durable and novel account of scientific knowledge that integrates the social and cognitive.&#60;/p&#62;&#60;p&#62;Longino begins with a detailed discussion of a wide range of contemporary thinkers who write on scientific knowledge, clarifying the philosophical points at issue. She then critically analyzes the dichotomous understanding of the rational and the social that characterizes both sides of the science studies stalemate and the social account that she sees as necessary for an epistemology of science that includes the full spectrum of cognitive processes. Throughout, her account is responsive both to the normative uses of the term knowledge and to the social conditions in which scientific knowledge is produced.&#60;/p&#62;&#60;p&#62; Building on ideas first advanced in her influential book &#60;i&#62;Science as Social Knowledge&#60;/i&#62;, Longino brings her account into dialogue with current work in social epistemology and science studies and shows how her critical social approach can help solve a variety of stubborn problems. While the book focuses on epistemological concerns related to the sociality of inquiry, Longino also takes up its implications for scientific pluralism. The social approach, she concludes, best allows us to retain a meaningful concept of knowledge in the face of theoretical plurality and uncertainty.&#60;/p&#62;</description>
    <dc:title>The Fate of Knowledge.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Helen Longino</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(01 December 2001)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-03-15T23:15:31-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publisher>Princeton University Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>epistemic_values</prism:category>
    <prism:category>epistemology</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1419473">
    <title>Is Reasoning about Values Viciously Circular?</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1419473</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;The Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol. 35, No. 1. (1 March 2001), pp. 5-12.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Is Reasoning about Values Viciously Circular?</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Nicholas Rescher</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1023/A:1010301913273</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>The Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol. 35, No. 1. (1 March 2001), pp. 5-12.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-06-28T12:31:10-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>The Journal of Value Inquiry</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>12</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166222">
    <title>Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate (Lane Studies in Regional Government)</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166222</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(16 January 2004)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Laudan constructs a fresh approach to a longtime problem for the philosopher of science: how to explain the simultaneous and widespread presence of both agreement and disagreement in science. Laudan critiques the logical empiricists and the post-positivists as he stresses the need for centrality and values and the interdependence of values, methods, and facts as prerequisites to solving the problems of consensus and dissent in science.</description>
    <dc:title>Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate (Lane Studies in Regional Government)</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Larry Laudan</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(16 January 2004)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-03-15T23:13:30-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publisher>University of California Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>scientific_aim</prism:category>
    <prism:category>scientific_controversy</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1419464">
    <title>On the import and rationale of value attribution</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1419464</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Mind &#38; Society, Vol. 4, No. 1. (1 June 2005), pp. 115-127.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The article urges a negative answer to the question if values merely lie ‘‘in the eyes of the beholder’’. It argues the objectivity of values via their status as tertiary properties that are neither on dispositionally inherent in their objects nor yet affective (dispositionally evoked in the interaction between objects and sense–observers), but rather reflective in being dispositionally evoked in suitably competent minds considering the matters involved.</description>
    <dc:title>On the import and rationale of value attribution</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Nicholas Rescher</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/s11299-005-0007-6</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Mind &#38; Society, Vol. 4, No. 1. (1 June 2005), pp. 115-127.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-06-28T12:23:59-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Mind &#38; Society</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>115</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>127</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166186">
    <title>Truth, Value, and Consolation</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166186</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;The Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol. V36, No. 4. (1 December 2002), pp. 413-424.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Truth, Value, and Consolation</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Damian Cox</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1023/A:1021993622962</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>The Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol. V36, No. 4. (1 December 2002), pp. 413-424.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-03-15T22:57:00-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2002</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>The Journal of Value Inquiry</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>V36</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>413</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>424</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>intrinsic_value</prism:category>
    <prism:category>truth</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166182">
    <title>Value Assumptions in Risk Assessment: A Case Study of the Alachlor Controversy</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166182</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(01 January 1991)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Selected by Choice as one of the outstanding publications for 1991.</description>
    <dc:title>Value Assumptions in Risk Assessment: A Case Study of the Alachlor Controversy</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Lawrence Haworth</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Conrad Brunk</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Brenda Lee</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(01 January 1991)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-03-15T22:54:15-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1991</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publisher>Wilfrid Laurier University Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>controversy</prism:category>
    <prism:category>risk_assessment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166178">
    <title>Is Intrinsic Value Conditional?</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166178</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Philosophical Studies, Vol. V107, No. 1. (1 January 2002), pp. 23-44.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Is Intrinsic Value Conditional?</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Ben Bradley</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1023/A:1013165112545</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Philosophical Studies, Vol. V107, No. 1. (1 January 2002), pp. 23-44.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-03-15T22:51:47-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2002</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Philosophical Studies</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>V107</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>44</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>intrinsic_value</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166177">
    <title>Intrinsic Value</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1166177</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Philosophical Studies, Vol. V102, No. 3. (1 February 2001), pp. 329-343.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Intrinsic Value</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>M Bernstein</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1023/A:1010384106310</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Philosophical Studies, Vol. V102, No. 3. (1 February 2001), pp. 329-343.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-03-15T22:50:26-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Philosophical Studies</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>V102</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>329</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>343</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>intrinsic_value</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/237183">
    <title>Consequences, Ethical Obligations, IRIS, NAS Reviews and Perchlorate in Drinking Water</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/237183</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, Vol. 11, No. 3. (June 2005), pp. 477-482.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Consequences, Ethical Obligations, IRIS, NAS Reviews and Perchlorate in Drinking Water</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>David Brown</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1080/10807030590968932</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, Vol. 11, No. 3. (June 2005), pp. 477-482.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-06-25T10:30:49-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Human and Ecological Risk Assessment</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1080-7039</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>477</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>482</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Taylor and Francis Ltd</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>exposure</prism:category>
    <prism:category>iris</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value_judgment</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1180593">
    <title>Values in science and risk assessment.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1180593</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Toxicol Lett, Vol. 152, No. 3. (25 September 2004), pp. 265-272.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is a widely accepted claim that scientific practice contains value judgments, i.e. decisions made on the basis of values. This paper clarifies the concepts involved in this claim and explains its implications for risk assessment. It is explained why values are necessarily a part of science and of risk assessment. A certain type of values that contribute to the aim of science, so-called epistemic values, are identified as rationally justified as basis for judgment in science. It is argued that the aims of pure science and risk assessment differ in some aspects and that consequently pure science's epistemic values are not sufficient for risk assessment. I suggest how the epistemic values may be supplemented in order to align better with the aim of risk assessment. It is concluded that since risk assessment is no less value-laden than pure science, it is important (a) that risk assessors become aware of what values they are (often implicitly) relying on, (b) that the values are justifiable, and (c) that transparency is ensured, i.e. that the values and value-based assumptions applied in particular risk assessments are explicitly acknowledged.</description>
    <dc:title>Values in science and risk assessment.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>B Wandall</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.05.010</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Toxicol Lett, Vol. 152, No. 3. (25 September 2004), pp. 265-272.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-03-22T12:47:21-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Toxicol Lett</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0378-4274</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>152</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>265</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>272</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1180545">
    <title>Cognitive and Social Values</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1180545</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Science &#38; Education, Vol. 8, No. 1. (1 January 1999), pp. 45-54.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Cognitive and Social Values</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Peter Machamer</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Heather Douglas</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1023/A:1008664519150</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Science &#38; Education, Vol. 8, No. 1. (1 January 1999), pp. 45-54.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-03-22T11:30:02-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1999</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Science &#38; Education</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>45</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>54</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>epistemic_values</prism:category>
    <prism:category>goal</prism:category>
    <prism:category>social_value</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value_judgment</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1108219">
    <title>Some Public Policy Problems with the Science of Carcinogen Risk Assessment</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1108219</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Government agencies and private risk assessors use (quasi) scientific risk assessment procedures to try to estimate or predict risk to human health or the environment that might result from exposure to toxic substances in order to take steps to prevent such risks from arising or to eliminate the risks if they already exist. In this paper I discuss several ways in which the &#34;science&#34; of carcinogen risk assessment differs from ordinary scientific enterprises. I also consider several ways in which normative policy considerations infect this regulatory science. Scientists, philosophers of science, moral philosophers and policy makers should address these issues forthrightly in order to serve better the aims of science and regulation.</description>
    <dc:title>Some Public Policy Problems with the Science of Carcinogen Risk Assessment</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Carl Cranor</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-02-15T09:36:51-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:category>carcinogen</prism:category>
    <prism:category>epidemiology</prism:category>
    <prism:category>false_positivefalse_negative</prism:category>
    <prism:category>policy</prism:category>
    <prism:category>risk_assessment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>risk_management</prism:category>
    <prism:category>statistics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/988650">
    <title>Violence risk prediction in practice</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/988650</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Br J Psychiatry, Vol. 178, No. 1. (1 January 2001), pp. 84-85.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;10.1192/bjp.178.1.84</description>
    <dc:title>Violence risk prediction in practice</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>G Szmukler</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Br J Psychiatry, Vol. 178, No. 1. (1 January 2001), pp. 84-85.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-12-11T14:31:29-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Br J Psychiatry</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>178</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>84</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>85</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>false_positivefalse_negative</prism:category>
    <prism:category>risk_assessment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>uncertainty</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/988646">
    <title>Risk assessment: 'numbers' and 'values'</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/988646</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Psychiatr Bull, Vol. 27, No. 6. (1 June 2003), pp. 205-207.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;10.1192/pb.27.6.205</description>
    <dc:title>Risk assessment: 'numbers' and 'values'</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>George Szmukler</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Psychiatr Bull, Vol. 27, No. 6. (1 June 2003), pp. 205-207.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-12-11T14:26:46-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2003</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Psychiatr Bull</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>6</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>205</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>207</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>false_positivefalse_negative</prism:category>
    <prism:category>risk_assessment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1029738">
    <title>PURE VERSUS PRACTICAL EPISTEMIC JUSTIFICATION</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1029738</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Metaphilosophy, Vol. 38, No. 1. (January 2007), pp. 71-87.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>PURE VERSUS PRACTICAL EPISTEMIC JUSTIFICATION</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>James Montmarquet</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00468.x</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Metaphilosophy, Vol. 38, No. 1. (January 2007), pp. 71-87.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-01-08T06:26:34-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Metaphilosophy</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0026-1068</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>38</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>71</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>87</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Blackwell Publishing</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>epistemic_values</prism:category>
    <prism:category>justification</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/937916">
    <title>The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/937916</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Philosophy of Science, Vol. 20, No. 1. (1953), pp. 1-6.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Richard Rudner</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Philosophy of Science, Vol. 20, No. 1. (1953), pp. 1-6.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T15:17:02-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1953</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Philosophy of Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>6</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>philosophy</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value_judgment</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1199687">
    <title>Natural Reasons: Personality and Polity</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1199687</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(01 August 1992)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hurley here revives a classical idea about rationality in a modern framework, by developing analogies between the structure of personality and the structure of society in the context of contemporary work in philosophy of mind, ethics, decision theory and social choice theory. The book examines the rationality of decisions and actions, and illustrates the continuity of philosophy of mind on the one hand, and ethics and jurisprudence on the other. A major thesis of the book is that arguments drawn from the philosophy of mind may be used to undermine widely-held subjectivist positions in ethics and politico-economic theory. The work is inspired by the philosophies of Wittgenstein and Davidson, but goes on to connect their arguments about interpretation with formal work in decision theory and social choice theory, and with the theory of adjudication.</description>
    <dc:title>Natural Reasons: Personality and Polity</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>SL Hurley</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(01 August 1992)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-03-31T13:14:48-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1992</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publisher>Oxford University Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>judgement</prism:category>
    <prism:category>judgment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value_judgment</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1448669">
    <title>Food supplements and European regulation within a precautionary context: a critique and implications for nutritional, toxicological and regulatory consistency.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1448669</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, Vol. 47, No. 3. (2007), pp. 267-285.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this paper, we review European legislation in the field of micronutrient food supplements and find it wanting. It is shown that the precautionary principle, embedded in European food legislation, pre-empts innovative developments in this field. In view of the scientific advances in micronutrients research, we subsequently critique the precautionary perspective and propose a novel outlook on micronutrients food supplements regulation. However, this requires a transition from the &#34;survival&#34; approach of the current deficiency-related RDAs to a &#34;health-optimization&#34; approach of a n(ew)-RDA. Genomic integrity is central in this envisioned transition.</description>
    <dc:title>Food supplements and European regulation within a precautionary context: a critique and implications for nutritional, toxicological and regulatory consistency.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>JC Hanekamp</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>A Bast</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1080/10408390600737748</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, Vol. 47, No. 3. (2007), pp. 267-285.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-07-11T12:58:09-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1040-8398</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>47</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>267</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>285</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>false_positivefalse_negative</prism:category>
    <prism:category>precaution</prism:category>
    <prism:category>regulation</prism:category>
    <prism:category>toxicology</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1419164">
    <title>[An Introduction to Value Theory (Nicholas Rescher)]</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1419164</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;The Accounting Review, Vol. 45, No. 3. (1970), pp. 619-622.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>[An Introduction to Value Theory (Nicholas Rescher)]</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>WP Birkett</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>The Accounting Review, Vol. 45, No. 3. (1970), pp. 619-622.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-06-28T11:09:03-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1970</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>The Accounting Review</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>45</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>619</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>622</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/2141550">
    <title>Must the Scientist Make Value Judgments?</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/2141550</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 57, No. 11. (1960), pp. 345-357.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Must the Scientist Make Value Judgments?</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Isaac Levi</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 57, No. 11. (1960), pp. 345-357.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-12-18T16:33:17-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1960</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>The Journal of Philosophy</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>57</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>11</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>345</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>357</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value_judgment</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938283">
    <title>Science and Values: Are Value Judgments Always Irrelevant to the Justification of Scientific Claims?</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/938283</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Several feminist theorists have claimed that feminist values ought to influence theory choice. Susan Haack has argued that this is implausible because normative claims about what ought to be the case can never provide justification for descriptive claims. I argue against one of the premises of Haack's argument. Furthermore, I attempt to show that the most promising defense of this premise would cast doubt on a second premise of Haack's argument. My aim is to open up the possibility that value judgments can play a legitimate role in theory choice.</description>
    <dc:title>Science and Values: Are Value Judgments Always Irrelevant to the Justification of Scientific Claims?</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Kristen Intemann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-11-09T20:15:42-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:category>scientific_practice</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value_judgment</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1112876">
    <title>Assessing the assessments: Pharmaceuticals in the environment</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1112876</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. In Press, Corrected Proof&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The relatively new issue of pharmaceutical contamination of the environment offers the opportunity to explore the application of values to the construction, communication and management of risk. The still-developing regulatory policies regarding environmental contamination with pharmaceuticals provide fertile ground for the introduction of values into the definition and management of risk. In this report, we summarize the current knowledge regarding pharmaceutical contamination of the environment and discuss specific attributes of pharmaceuticals that require special consideration. We then present an analysis showing that if values are incorporated into assessing, characterizing and managing risk, the results of risk assessments will more accurately reflect the needs of various stakeholders. Originating from an acknowledgement of the inherent uncertainty and value-laden nature of risk assessment, the precautionary principle (and later, the multi-criteria, integrated risk assessment), provides a direction for further research and policy development.</description>
    <dc:title>Assessing the assessments: Pharmaceuticals in the environment</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>OV Enick</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>MM Moore</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2007.01.001</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. In Press, Corrected Proof</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-02-19T14:56:31-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>Environmental Impact Assessment Review</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>In Press, Corrected Proof</prism:volume>
    <prism:category>risk_assessment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1362824">
    <title>Scientific Values and Civic Virtues</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1362824</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(09 July 2005)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This volume of contributed essays, a follow-up to Noretta Koertge's successful book on the science wars, A House Built on Sand, takes an affirming, positive view of the relationship between the values embodied in science, and the nature of a civil society. It argues that recent attacks on the probity of science undermine the possibility of rational discourse in the political arena. While science has traditionally been viewed as incorporating intellectual virtues like honesty and precision of language, the contributors to this volume point to additional benefits, examining the idea that science can serve as a source of, and inspiration for, civic virtues--in the need to be well-informed about the way the world works, in tolerating the viewpoints of others, and in functioning as a fully global enterprise dedicated to the public good. The contributors--who include philosophers, political scientists, physicists, biologists and engineers--look at examples of scientific virtues in action and how they might be used as inspirations and practical resources for improving civic society. The volume will appeal to a similarly broad audience interested in the relationship between science and society.</description>
    <dc:title>Scientific Values and Civic Virtues</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Noretta Koertge</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(09 July 2005)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-06-04T13:52:21-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publisher>Oxford University Press, USA</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>scientific_method</prism:category>
    <prism:category>scientific_norms</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1338508">
    <title>Value-Judgements, Prescriptive Language, and Imperatives</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1338508</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 92. (1973), pp. 253-257.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Value-Judgements, Prescriptive Language, and Imperatives</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Winston Nesbitt</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 92. (1973), pp. 253-257.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-05-28T10:55:51-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1973</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>The Philosophical Quarterly</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>23</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>92</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>253</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>257</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>hare</prism:category>
    <prism:category>prescription</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value_judgment</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1158182">
    <title>What Collapse, Exactly?</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/article/1158182</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 1. (1 March 2007), pp. 74-84.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hilary Putnam makes two related points in his recent collection of essays: (1) Values can be rational, and their inescapable intrusion into every kind of discourse is welcome. (2) Ignoring or suppressing this fact is common yet irrational. This is of course true; yet the intrusion in question can be trivial, and it can be problematic. Putnam ignores this here. The book is pleasant to read; it is infused with friendly and appreciative personal anecdotes and observations. It is almost entirely critical and almost always in a friendly way. Yet it is often unclear. In almost every discussion here, the author announces one item and discusses another almost identical with it but one much easier to discuss. 10.1177/0048393106296570</description>
    <dc:title>What Collapse, Exactly?</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Joseph Agassi</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1177/0048393106296570</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 1. (1 March 2007), pp. 74-84.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-03-13T10:57:58-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Philosophy of the Social Sciences</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>74</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>84</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>factvalue</prism:category>
    <prism:category>putnam</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/ttaga/article/2245717">
    <title>An investigation of the patterns of self-efficacy, outcome expectation, outcome value, and performance across trials</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/ttaga/article/2245717</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Cognitive Therapy and Research, Vol. 16, No. 3. (1 June 1992), pp. 329-348.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Self-efficacy, Bandura's concept of a central cognitive mediating belief, has been widely researched and found to play an important role in the initiation, persistence, and achievement of a variety of behaviors. Self-efficacy can be viewed as one aspect of expectancy-value theory, but little research has been conducted to identify the relationship between measures of self-efficacy and outcome expectation across performance trials. This paper illustrates the importance of multiple trials in the investigation of self-efficacy, outcome expectation, outcome value, and performance. Using an item-writing task, subjects' self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and outcome value ratings were measured across a 10-week period. While self-efficacy was initially related to performance, in later trials it was past behavior that accounted for most of the explained variance in item-writing performance. It appears that investigating these variables across multiple trials is essential if a comprehensive view of the relationship between self-efficacy, outcome expectation, outcome value, and behavior is to be gained. Results and alterative explanations are discussed in light of both self-efficacy theory and cognitive information process.</description>
    <dc:title>An investigation of the patterns of self-efficacy, outcome expectation, outcome value, and performance across trials</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Thomas Sexton</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Bruce Tuckman</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Kevin Crehan</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/BF01183285</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Cognitive Therapy and Research, Vol. 16, No. 3. (1 June 1992), pp. 329-348.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-17T15:27:54-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1992</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Cognitive Therapy and Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>329</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>348</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>expectation</prism:category>
    <prism:category>multiple</prism:category>
    <prism:category>outcome</prism:category>
    <prism:category>performance</prism:category>
    <prism:category>self-efficacy</prism:category>
    <prism:category>trials</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/tomchen/article/1047836">
    <title>A qualitative exploration of a consumer's value-based e-trust building process: A framework development</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/tomchen/article/1047836</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1. (2007), pp. 28-47.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>A qualitative exploration of a consumer's value-based e-trust building process: A framework development</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Pennanen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Kyasti</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Tiainen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Tarja</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Luomala</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>T Harri</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1108/13522750710720387</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1. (2007), pp. 28-47.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-01-17T22:47:34-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1352-2752</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>28</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>47</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>example</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tam</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/thiede/article/2213841">
    <title>HandWerk</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/thiede/article/2213841</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>HandWerk</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Richard Sennett</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-01-10T09:51:53-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publisher>Berlin Verlag</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>handcraft</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

