Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:50:55 BST CiteULike: acslab's tagging http://www.citeulike.org/user/acslab/tag/tagging CiteULike.org en-gb Copyright © 2004-2008 citeulike.org http://www.citeulike.org/user/acslab/article/2854840 <i>(2008), pp. 1041-1044.</i> Social tagging roles: publishers, evangelists, leaders Jennifer Thom-Santelli Michael Muller David Millen doi:10.1145/1357054.1357215 (2008), pp. 1041-1044. 2008-06-01T13:57:07-00:00 2008 1041 1044 ACM tagging http://www.citeulike.org/user/acslab/article/965343 <i>(2006), pp. 191-194.</i> What goes around comes around: an analysis of del.icio.us as social space Kathy Lee doi:10.1145/1180875.1180905 (2006), pp. 191-194. 2006-11-28T15:11:46-00:00 2006 191 194 ACM Press socialpresence tagging http://www.citeulike.org/user/acslab/article/1101188 <i>Commun. ACM, Vol. 50, No. 2. (February 2007), pp. 68-73.</i> Encouraging participation in virtual communities Joon Koh Young-Gul Kim Brian Butler Gee-Woo Bock doi:10.1145/1216016.1216023 Commun. ACM, Vol. 50, No. 2. (February 2007), pp. 68-73. 2007-02-11T23:29:12-00:00 2007 Commun. ACM 0001-0782 50 2 68 73 ACM Press socialpresence tagging http://www.citeulike.org/user/acslab/article/1279898 <i>(2007), pp. 971-980.</i> Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media Morgan Ames Mor Naaman doi:10.1145/1240624.1240772 (2007), pp. 971-980. 2007-05-05T19:33:04-00:00 2007 971 980 ACM Press tagging http://www.citeulike.org/user/acslab/article/2686476 <i>(2008), pp. 1097-1100.</i> What drives content tagging: the case of photos on Flickr Oded Nov Mor Naaman Chen Ye doi:10.1145/1357054.1357225 (2008), pp. 1097-1100. 2008-04-18T05:46:10-00:00 2008 1097 1100 ACM socialpresence tagging http://www.citeulike.org/user/acslab/article/950399 <i>Dlib Magazine, Vol. 12, No. 11. (November 2006)</i> Beneath the Metadata: Some Philosophical Problems with Folksonomy Elaine Peterson Dlib Magazine, Vol. 12, No. 11. (November 2006) 2006-11-17T18:08:57-00:00 2006 Dlib Magazine 12 11 tagging http://www.citeulike.org/user/acslab/article/361498 <i>(23 Sep 2005)</i><br /><br />Folksonomy is an emerging technology that works to classify the information over WWW through tagging the bookmarks, photos or other web-based contents. It is understood to be organized by every user while not limited to the authors of the contents and the professional editors. This study surveyed the folksonomy as a complex network. The result indicates that the network, which is composed of the tags from the folksonomy, displays both properties of small world and scale-free. However, the statistics only shows a local and static slice of the vast body of folksonomy which is still evolving. Folksonomy as a Complex Network Kaikai Shen Lide Wu (23 Sep 2005) 2005-10-22T10:31:18-00:00 2005 folksonomy tagging http://www.citeulike.org/user/acslab/article/965334 <i>Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2006, CSCW '06. 20th anniversary Conference on (2006), pp. 181-190.</i><br /><br />A tagging community's vocabulary of tags forms the basis for social navigation and shared expression.We present a user-centric model of vocabulary evolution in tagging communities based on community influence and personal tendency. We evaluate our model in an emergent tagging system by introducing tagging features into the MovieLens recommender system.We explore four tag selection algorithms for displaying tags applied by other community members. We analyze the algorithms 'effect on vocabulary evolution, tag utility, tag adoption, and user satisfaction. Tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution Shilad Sen Shyong Lam Al Rashid Dan Cosley Dan Frankowski Jeremy Osterhouse Maxwell Harper John Riedl doi:10.1145/1180875.1180904 Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2006, CSCW '06. 20th anniversary Conference on (2006), pp. 181-190. 2006-11-28T14:55:38-00:00 2006 Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2006, CSCW '06. 20th anniversary Conference on 181 190 ACM Press recommender-system tagging http://www.citeulike.org/user/acslab/article/2620836 <i>Eur. Phys. J. C, Vol. 46, No. s02. (2006), pp. 33-37.</i><br /><br />A distributed classification paradigm known as collaborative tagging has been successfully deployed in large-scale web applications designed to manage and share diverse online resources. Users of these applications organize resources by associating with them freely chosen text labels, or tags. Here we regard tags as basic dynamical entities and study the semiotic dynamics underlying collaborative tagging. We collect data from a popular system and focus on tags associated with a given resource. We find that the frequencies of tags obey to a generalized Zipf's law and show that a Yule-Simon process with memory can be used to explain the observed frequency distributions in terms of a simple model of user behavior Semiotic dynamics in online social communities Ciro Cattuto doi:10.1140/epjcd/s2006-03-004-4 Eur. Phys. J. C, Vol. 46, No. s02. (2006), pp. 33-37. 2008-04-01T19:22:15-00:00 2006 Eur. Phys. J. C 46 s02 33 37 tagging http://www.citeulike.org/user/acslab/article/305755 <i>(18 Aug 2005)</i><br /><br />Collaborative tagging describes the process by which many users add metadata in the form of keywords to shared content. Recently, collaborative tagging has grown in popularity on the web, on sites that allow users to tag bookmarks, photographs and other content. In this paper we analyze the structure of collaborative tagging systems as well as their dynamical aspects. Specifically, we discovered regularities in user activity, tag frequencies, kinds of tags used, bursts of popularity in bookmarking and a remarkable stability in the relative proportions of tags within a given url. We also present a dynamical model of collaborative tagging that predicts these stable patterns and relates them to imitation and shared knowledge. The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems Scott Golder Bernardo Huberman (18 Aug 2005) 2005-08-27T17:06:09-00:00 2005 tagging http://www.citeulike.org/user/acslab/article/1842810 <i>ECSCW 2007 (2007), pp. 21-40.</i><br /><br />In this paper, we explore various search tasks that are supported by a social bookmarking service. These bookmarking services hold great potential to powerfully combine personal tagging of information sources with interactive browsing, resulting in better social navigation. While there has been considerable interest in social tagging systems in recent years, little is known about their actual usage. In this paper, we present the results of a field study of a social bookmarking service that has been deployed in a large enterprise. We present new qualitative and quantitative data on how a corporate social tagging system was used, through both event logs (click level analysis) and interviews. We observed three types of search activities: community browsing, personal search, and explicit search. Community browsing was the most frequently used, and confirms the value of the social aspects of the system. We conclude that social bookmarking services support various kinds of exploratory search, and provide better personal bookmark management and enhance social navigation. Social bookmarking and exploratory search David Millen Meng Yang Steven Whittaker Jonathan Feinberg doi:10.1007/978-1-84800-031-5_2 ECSCW 2007 (2007), pp. 21-40. 2007-10-30T17:03:06-00:00 2007 ECSCW 2007 21 40 exploratory-search tagging http://www.citeulike.org/user/acslab/article/2552589 <i>(2007), pp. 341-350.</i> Comparing tagging vocabularies among four enterprise tag-based services Michael Muller doi:10.1145/1316624.1316676 (2007), pp. 341-350. 2008-03-18T19:37:06-00:00 2007 341 350 ACM tagging