Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:38:23 BST CiteULike: amarois's recherche http://www.citeulike.org/user/amarois/tag/recherche CiteULike.org en-gb Copyright © 2004-2008 citeulike.org http://www.citeulike.org/user/amarois/article/2716917 <i>(07 February 2008)</i> Conservation et valorisation du patrimoine des organismes de recherche Frédoc 2006 Christine Cazenave Françoise Girard Collectif (07 February 2008) 2008-04-25T07:16:22-00:00 2008 PU Saint-Etienne archive preservation recherche http://www.citeulike.org/user/amarois/article/566083 <i>Ariadne, No. 35. (13 April 2003)</i><br /><br />Being the only country with a national research assessment exercise [1], the UK is today in a unique position to make a small change that will confer some large benefits. The Funding Councils should mandate that in order to be eligible for Research Assessment and funding, all UK research-active university staff must maintain (I) a standardised online RAE-CV, including all designated RAE performance indicators, chief among them being (II) the full text of every refereed research paper, publicly self-archived in the university's online Eprint Archive and linked to the CV for online harvesting, scientometric analysis and assessment. This will (i) give the UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) far richer, more sensitive and more predictive measures of research productivity and impact, for far less cost and effort (both to the RAE and to the universities preparing their RAE submissions), (ii) increase the uptake and impact of UK research output, by increasing its visibility, accessibility and usage, and (iii) set an example for the rest of the world that will almost certainly be emulated, in both respects: research assessment and research access. Mandated online RAE CVs linked to university eprint archives: Enhancing UK research impact and assessment Stevan Harnad Les Carr Tim Brody Charles Oppenheim Ariadne, No. 35. (13 April 2003) 2006-03-27T17:09:12-00:00 2003 Ariadne 35 bibliometrie openaccess recherche http://www.citeulike.org/user/amarois/article/1165498 <i>archivesic. (26 October 2006)</i><br /><br />Les différentes modalités d'évaluation, «classiques» et en émergence, des publications scientifiques: les modalités traditionnelles de l'évaluation des revues : «facteur d'impact» du JCR, associé à l'évaluation individuelle du SCI (Science Citation Index)... ; mécanismes, acteurs, importance, enjeux... de l'évaluation standard de la littérature scientifique. les nouvelles modalités d'évaluation de l'impact des revues et publications : par les moteurs de recherche (Google Scholar), sur les entrepôts en Open Access (CiteBase et autres statistiques sur les archives ouvertes, revues en ligne...), les enquêtes et autres recensements disciplinaires (CNRS, Faculty of 1000) etc. ; les figures, les modalités, les enjeux, mais aussi les problèmes posés par ces nouvelles formes d'évaluation et par la généralisation de «l'indice de notoriété» comme critère dominant de l'évaluation L'évaluation des publications scientifiques : du facteur d'impact à l'indice de notoriété M Durand-Barthez archivesic. (26 October 2006) 2007-03-15T14:12:43-00:00 2006 archivesic. ccsd citation evaluation recherche http://www.citeulike.org/user/amarois/article/395799 <i>PNAS, Vol. 102, No. 46. (15 November 2005), pp. 16569-16572.</i><br /><br />I propose the index h, defined as the number of papers with citation number [≥]h, as a useful index to characterize the scientific output of a researcher. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output JE Hirsch doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 PNAS, Vol. 102, No. 46. (15 November 2005), pp. 16569-16572. 2005-11-16T00:34:42-00:00 2005 PNAS 102 46 16569 16572 evaluation recherche