<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:33:15 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: aprasad's phylogenetics</title>
	<description>CiteULike: aprasad's phylogenetics</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/tag/phylogenetics</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/3115802"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2961447"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2937879"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2932130"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2924282"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2908876"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2908606"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2745339"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2388124"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2600818"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2767125"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2765664"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2739092"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2721749"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2721681"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2678848"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2103853"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/875123"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2103820"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2575070"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2542526"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2489340"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/1696587"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2447805"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/1603618"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2350871"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/146681"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2446531"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2446517"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2445440"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2445431"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/1065337"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/1464719"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2419956"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2417923"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2417902"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2417888"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2417884"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2417863"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2375365"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2363871"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2360044"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/524240"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/248193"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2316885"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2293570"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2288308"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2034557"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2286251"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2285251"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/3115802">
    <title>Subdivision in an ancestral species creates asymmetry in gene trees.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/3115802</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Molecular biology and evolution (9 August 2008)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We consider gene trees in three species for which the species tree is known. We show that population subdivision in ancestral species can lead to asymmetry in the frequencies of the two gene trees not concordant with the species tree and, if subdivision is extreme, cause the one of the non-concordant gene trees to be more probable than the concordant gene tree. Although published data for the human-chimp-gorilla clade and for 3 species of Drosophila show asymmetry consistent with our model, sequencing error could also account for observed patterns. We show that substantial levels of persistent ancestral subdivision are needed to account for the observed levels of asymmetry found in these two studies.</description>
    <dc:title>Subdivision in an ancestral species creates asymmetry in gene trees.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Montgomery Slatkin</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Joshua L Pollack</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1093/molbev/msn172</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Molecular biology and evolution (9 August 2008)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-08-13T15:42:50-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Molecular biology and evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1537-1719</prism:issn>
    <prism:category>horizontal_gene_transfer</prism:category>
    <prism:category>incongruence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>model</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2961447">
    <title>Phylogenetic Signal in the Eukaryotic Tree of Life</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2961447</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Science, Vol. 321, No. 5885. (4 July 2008), pp. 121-123.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Molecular sequence data have been sampled from 10% of all species known to science. Although it is not yet feasible to assemble these data into a single phylogenetic tree of life, it is possible to quantify how much phylogenetic signal is present. Analysis of 14,289 phylogenies built from 2.6 million sequences in GenBank suggests that signal is strong in vertebrates and specific groups of nonvertebrate model organisms. Across eukaryotes, however, although phylogenetic evidence is very broadly distributed, for the average species in the database it is equivalent to less than one well-supported gene tree. This analysis shows that a stronger sampling effort aimed at genomic depth, in addition to taxonomic breadth, will be required to build high-resolution phylogenetic trees at this scale. 10.1126/science.1154449</description>
    <dc:title>Phylogenetic Signal in the Eukaryotic Tree of Life</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Michael Sanderson</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1126/science.1154449</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Science, Vol. 321, No. 5885. (4 July 2008), pp. 121-123.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-07-03T22:12:58-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>321</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5885</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>121</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>123</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetic_signal</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenomics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2937879">
    <title>Phylogenetic incongruence in the Drosophila melanogaster species group.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2937879</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, Vol. 43, No. 3. (June 2007), pp. 1138-1150.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Drosophila melanogaster and its close relatives are used extensively in comparative biology. Despite the importance of phylogenetic information for such studies, relationships between some melanogaster species group members are unclear due to conflicting phylogenetic signals at different loci. In this study, we use twelve nuclear loci (eleven coding and one non-coding) to assess the degree of phylogenetic incongruence in this model system. We focus on two nodes: (1) the node joining the Drosophila erecta-Drosophila orena, Drosophila melanogaster-Drosophila simulans, and Drosophila yakuba-Drosophila teissieri lineages, and (2) the node joining the lineages leading to the melanogaster, takahashii, and eugracilis subgroups. We find limited evidence for incongruence at the first node; our data, as well as those of several previous studies, strongly support monophyly of a clade consisting of D. erecta-D. orena and D. yakuba-D. teissieri. By contrast, using likelihood based tests of congruence, we find robust evidence for topological incongruence at the second node. Different loci support different relationships among the melanogaster, takahashii, and eugracilis subgroups, and the observed incongruence is not easily attributable to homoplasy, non-equilibrium base composition, or positive selection on a subset of loci. We argue that lineage sorting in the common ancestor of these three subgroups is the most plausible explanation for our observations. Such lineage sorting may lead to biased estimation of tree topology and evolutionary rates, and may confound inferences of positive selection.</description>
    <dc:title>Phylogenetic incongruence in the Drosophila melanogaster species group.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>A Wong</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>JD Jensen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>JE Pool</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>CF Aquadro</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.09.002</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, Vol. 43, No. 3. (June 2007), pp. 1138-1150.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-27T18:23:27-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Molecular phylogenetics and evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1055-7903</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>43</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1138</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1150</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>incongruence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2932130">
    <title>A Mixed Branch Length Model of Heterotachy Improves Phylogenetic Accuracy</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2932130</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Mol Biol Evol, Vol. 25, No. 6. (1 June 2008), pp. 1054-1066.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Evolutionary relationships are typically inferred from molecular sequence data using a statistical model of the evolutionary process. When the model accurately reflects the underlying process, probabilistic phylogenetic methods recover the correct relationships with high accuracy. There is ample evidence, however, that models commonly used today do not adequately reflect real-world evolutionary dynamics. Virtually all contemporary models assume that relatively fast-evolving sites are fast across the entire tree, whereas slower sites always evolve at relatively slower rates. Many molecular sequences, however, exhibit site-specific changes in evolutionary rates, called &#34;heterotachy.&#34; Here we examine the accuracy of 2 phylogenetic methods for incorporating heterotachy, the mixed branch length model--which incorporates site-specific rate changes by summing likelihoods over multiple sets of branch lengths on the same tree--and the covarion model, which uses a hidden Markov process to allow sites to switch between variable and invariable as they evolve. Under a variety of simple heterogeneous simulation conditions, the mixed model was dramatically more accurate than homotachous models, which were subject to topological biases as well as biases in branch length estimates. When data were simulated with strong versions of the types of heterotachy observed in real molecular sequences, the mixed branch length model was more accurate than homotachous techniques. Analyses of empirical data sets confirmed that the mixed branch length model can improve phylogenetic accuracy under conditions that cause homotachous models to fail. In contrast, the covarion model did not improve phylogenetic accuracy compared with homotachous models and was sometimes substantially less accurate. We conclude that a mixed branch length approach, although not the solution to all phylogenetic errors, is a valuable strategy for improving the accuracy of inferred trees. 10.1093/molbev/msn042</description>
    <dc:title>A Mixed Branch Length Model of Heterotachy Improves Phylogenetic Accuracy</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Bryan Kolaczkowski</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Joseph Thornton</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1093/molbev/msn042</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Mol Biol Evol, Vol. 25, No. 6. (1 June 2008), pp. 1054-1066.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-26T20:38:53-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Mol Biol Evol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>6</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1054</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1066</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>evolution</prism:category>
    <prism:category>model</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>simulation</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2924282">
    <title>Morphology and Placental Mammal Phylogeny</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2924282</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Systematic Biology, Vol. 57, No. 3. (2008), pp. 499-503.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Morphology and Placental Mammal Phylogeny</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Mark Springer</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Robert Meredith</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Eduardo Eizirik</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Emma Teeling</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>William Murphy</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1080/10635150802164504</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Systematic Biology, Vol. 57, No. 3. (2008), pp. 499-503.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-24T20:17:30-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Systematic Biology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>57</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>499</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>503</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Taylor &#38; Francis</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>mammal</prism:category>
    <prism:category>morphology</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2908876">
    <title>A mobile element based phylogeny of Old World monkeys</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2908876</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 37, No. 3. (December 2005), pp. 872-880.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;SINEs (Short INterspersed Elements) are a class of non-autonomous mobile elements that are &#60;500 bp in length and have no open reading frames. Individual SINE elements are essentially homoplasy free with known ancestral states, making them useful genetic systems for phylogenetic studies. Alu elements are the most successful SINE in primate genomes and have been utilized for resolving primate phylogenetic relationships and human population genetics. However, no Alu based phylogenetic analysis has yet been performed to resolve relationships among Old World monkeys. Using both a computational approach and polymerase chain reaction display methodology, we identified 285 new Alu insertions from sixteen Old World monkey taxa that were informative at various levels of catarrhine phylogeny. We have utilized these elements along with 12 previously reported loci to construct a phylogenetic tree of the selected taxa. Relationships among all major clades are in general agreement with other molecular and morphological data sets but have stronger statistical support.</description>
    <dc:title>A mobile element based phylogeny of Old World monkeys</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Jinchuan Xing</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hui Wang</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Kyudong Han</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>David Ray</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Cheney Huang</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Leona Chemnick</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Caro-Beth Stewart</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Todd Disotell</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Oliver Ryder</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mark Batzer</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2005.04.015</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 37, No. 3. (December 2005), pp. 872-880.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-19T21:19:02-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>872</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>880</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>catarrhini</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>rare_genomic_characters</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2908606">
    <title>More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2908606</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Molecular biology and evolution, Vol. 22, No. 5. (May 2005), pp. 1337-1344.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The relative contribution of taxon number and gene number to accuracy in phylogenetic inference is a major issue in phylogenetics and of central importance to the choice of experimental strategies for the successful reconstruction of a broad sketch of the tree of life. Maximization of the number of taxa sampled is the strategy favored by most phylogeneticists, although its necessity remains the subject of debate. Vast increases in gene number are now possible due to advances in genomics, but large numbers of genes will be available for only modest numbers of taxa, raising the question of whether such genome-scale phylogenies will be robust to the addition of taxa. To examine the relative benefit of increasing taxon number or gene number to phylogenetic accuracy, we have developed an assay that utilizes the symmetric difference tree distance as a measure of phylogenetic accuracy. We have applied this assay to a genome-scale data matrix containing 106 genes from 14 yeast species. Our results show that increasing taxon number correlates with a slight decrease in phylogenetic accuracy. In contrast, increasing gene number has a significant positive effect on phylogenetic accuracy. Analyses of an additional taxon-rich data matrix from the same yeast clade show that taxon number does not have a significant effect on phylogenetic accuracy. The positive effect of gene number and the lack of effect of taxon number on phylogenetic accuracy are also corroborated by analyses of two data matrices from mammals and angiosperm plants, respectively. We conclude that, for typical data sets, the number of genes utilized may be a more important determinant of phylogenetic accuracy than taxon number.</description>
    <dc:title>More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>A Rokas</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>SB Carroll</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Molecular biology and evolution, Vol. 22, No. 5. (May 2005), pp. 1337-1344.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-19T20:48:15-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Molecular biology and evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0737-4038</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>22</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1337</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1344</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>phylogenetic_accuracy</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenomics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>taxon_sampling</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2745339">
    <title>Flying lemurs - the &#34;flying tree shrews&#34;? Molecular cytogenetic evidence for a Scandentia-Dermoptera sister clade</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2745339</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;BMC Biology, Vol. 6 (01 May 2008), 18.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Flying lemurs - the &#34;flying tree shrews&#34;? Molecular cytogenetic evidence for a Scandentia-Dermoptera sister clade</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Wenhui Nie</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Beiyuan Fu</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Patricia O'Brien</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jinhuan Wang</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Weiting Su</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Alongklod Tanomtong</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Vitaly Volobouev</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Malcolm Ferguson-Smith</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Fengtang Yang</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1741-7007-6-18</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>BMC Biology, Vol. 6 (01 May 2008), 18.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-02T11:15:21-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>BMC Biology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1741-7007</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
    <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:category>cytogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>primate</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2388124">
    <title>Widespread Discordance of Gene Trees with Species Tree in Drosophila: Evidence for Incomplete Lineage Sorting</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2388124</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;PLoS Genetics, Vol. 2, No. 10. (1 October 2006), e173.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The phylogenetic relationship of the now fully sequenced species Drosophila erecta and D. yakuba with respect to the D. melanogaster species complex has been a subject of controversy. All three possible groupings of the species have been reported in the past, though recent multi-gene studies suggest that D. erecta and D. yakuba are sister species. Using the whole genomes of each of these species as well as the four other fully sequenced species in the subgenus Sophophora, we set out to investigate the placement of D. erecta and D. yakuba in the D. melanogaster species group and to understand the cause of the past incongruence. Though we find that the phylogeny grouping D. erecta and D. yakuba together is the best supported, we also find widespread incongruence in nucleotide and amino acid substitutions, insertions and deletions, and gene trees. The time inferred to span the two key speciation events is short enough that under the coalescent model, the incongruence could be the result of incomplete lineage sorting. Consistent with the lineage-sorting hypothesis, substitutions supporting the same tree were spatially clustered. Support for the different trees was found to be linked to recombination such that adjacent genes support the same tree most often in regions of low recombination and substitutions supporting the same tree are most enriched roughly on the same scale as linkage disequilibrium, also consistent with lineage sorting. The incongruence was found to be statistically significant and robust to model and species choice. No systematic biases were found. We conclude that phylogenetic incongruence in the D. melanogaster species complex is the result, at least in part, of incomplete lineage sorting. Incomplete lineage sorting will likely cause phylogenetic incongruence in many comparative genomics datasets. Methods to infer the correct species tree, the history of every base in the genome, and comparative methods that control for and/or utilize this information will be valuable advancements for the field of comparative genomics.</description>
    <dc:title>Widespread Discordance of Gene Trees with Species Tree in Drosophila: Evidence for Incomplete Lineage Sorting</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Daniel Pollard</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Venky Iyer</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Alan Moses</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Eisen</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020173</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>PLoS Genetics, Vol. 2, No. 10. (1 October 2006), e173.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-16T07:37:25-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>PLoS Genetics</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>10</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>e173</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:category>drosophila</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lineage_sorting</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2600818">
    <title>Using ESTs for phylogenomics: can one accurately infer a phylogenetic tree from a gappy alignment?</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2600818</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;BMC Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 8 (26 March 2008), 95.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Using ESTs for phylogenomics: can one accurately infer a phylogenetic tree from a gappy alignment?</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Stefanie Hartmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Todd Vision</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-95</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>BMC Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 8 (26 March 2008), 95.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-03-27T06:01:33-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>BMC Evolutionary Biology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1471-2148</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:startingPage>95</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:category>alignment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>est</prism:category>
    <prism:category>indel</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenomics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2767125">
    <title>Incorporating gaps as phylogenetic characters across eight DNA regions: ramifications for North American Psoraleeae (Leguminosae).</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2767125</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, Vol. 46, No. 2. (February 2008), pp. 532-546.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The impact of including insertion/deletion events as phylogenetic characters was explored within North American Psoraleeae (Leguminosae). This comprehensive analysis of the impact of gap character incorporation spanned four different indel coding schemes, gaps coded as missing characters, simple binary characters, multi-state characters, and as a 5th state, across two optimality criteria: maximum parsimony and Bayesian Inference. Two nuclear (ITS and Waxy) and six chloroplast (trnS/G, trnL/F, trnK, matK, trnD/T, and rpoB-trnC) DNA regions were sequenced from 43 species of North American Psoraleeae as the foundation of the study. Our results suggest that gaps can provide a substantial percentage of informative characters and can increase phylogenetic resolution and nodal branch support. Phylogenetic signal within indels was higher in chloroplast regions relative to nuclear regions, demonstrating their inclusion as especially important in chloroplast-based phylogenetic studies. Phylogenetic analysis of generic relationships within Psoraleeae is largely congruent with that proposed by Grimes (1990) with a few exceptions. New World species are supported as a monophyletic group. Our analyses suggest that Otholobium may need to be split into two genera and that Psoralidium is polyphyletic and will require movement of Psoralidium tenuiflorum to Pediomelum.</description>
    <dc:title>Incorporating gaps as phylogenetic characters across eight DNA regions: ramifications for North American Psoraleeae (Leguminosae).</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>AN Egan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>KA Crandall</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2007.10.006</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, Vol. 46, No. 2. (February 2008), pp. 532-546.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-07T18:30:08-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Molecular phylogenetics and evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1055-7903</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>46</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>532</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>546</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>indel</prism:category>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>review</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2765664">
    <title>Confirming the Phylogeny of Mammals by Use of Large Comparative Sequence Datasets.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2765664</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Molecular biology and evolution (2 May 2008)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ongoing generation of prodigious amounts of genomic sequence data from myriad vertebrates is providing unparalleled opportunities for establishing definitive phylogenetic relationships among species. The size and complexities of such comparative sequence datasets allow smaller and more-difficult branches to be resolved, but also present unique challenges, including large computational requirements and the negative consequences of systematic biases. To explore these issues and to clarify the phylogenetic relationships among mammals, we have analyzed a large dataset of over 60 megabase pairs (Mb) of high-quality genomic sequence, which we generated from 41 mammals and 3 other vertebrates. All sequences are orthologous to a 1.9-Mb region of the human genome that encompasses the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR). To understand the characteristics and challenges associated with phylogenetic analyses of such a large dataset, we partitioned the sequence data in several ways, and utilized maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and neighbor joining algorithms, implemented in parallel on Linux clusters. These studies yielded well-supported phylogenetic trees, largely confirming other recent molecular phylogenetic analyses. Our results provide support for rooting the placental mammal tree between Atlantogenata (Xenarthra and Afrotheria) and Boreoeutheria (Euarchontoglires and Laurasiatheria), illustrate the difficulty in resolving some branches even with large amounts of data (e.g., in the case of Laurasiatheria), and demonstrate the valuable role that very large comparative sequence datasets can play in refining our understanding of the evolutionary relationships of vertebrates.</description>
    <dc:title>Confirming the Phylogeny of Mammals by Use of Large Comparative Sequence Datasets.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Arjun Prasad</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Marc Allard</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Eric Green</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1093/molbev/msn104</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Molecular biology and evolution (2 May 2008)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-07T12:34:11-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Molecular biology and evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1537-1719</prism:issn>
    <prism:category>atlantogenata</prism:category>
    <prism:category>mammal</prism:category>
    <prism:category>nisc</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenomics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>placental</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2739092">
    <title>Phylogenetic Mixture Models Can Reduce Node-Density Artifacts</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2739092</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Systematic Biology, Vol. 57, No. 2. (2008), pp. 286-293.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We investigate the performance of phylogenetic mixture models in reducing a well-known and pervasive artifact of phylogenetic inference known as the node-density effect, comparing them to partitioned analyses of the same data. The node-density effect refers to the tendency for the amount of evolutionary change in longer branches of phylogenies to be underestimated compared to that in regions of the tree where there are more nodes and thus branches are typically shorter. Mixture models allow more than one model of sequence evolution to describe the sites in an alignment without prior knowledge of the evolutionary processes that characterize the data or how they correspond to different sites. If multiple evolutionary patterns are common in sequence evolution, mixture models may be capable of reducing node-density effects by characterizing the evolutionary processes more accurately. In gene-sequence alignments simulated to have heterogeneous patterns of evolution, we find that mixture models can reduce node-density effects to negligible levels or remove them altogether, performing as well as partitioned analyses based on the known simulated patterns. The mixture models achieve this without knowledge of the patterns that generated the data and even in some cases without specifying the full or true model of sequence evolution known to underlie the data. The latter result is especially important in real applications, as the true model of evolution is seldom known. We find the same patterns of results for two real data sets with evidence of complex patterns of sequence evolution: mixture models substantially reduced node-density effects and returned better likelihoods compared to partitioning models specifically fitted to these data. We suggest that the presence of more than one pattern of evolution in the data is a common source of error in phylogenetic inference and that mixture models can often detect these patterns even without prior knowledge of their presence in the data. Routine use of mixture models alongside other approaches to phylogenetic inference may often reveal hidden or unexpected patterns of sequence evolution and can improve phylogenetic inference.</description>
    <dc:title>Phylogenetic Mixture Models Can Reduce Node-Density Artifacts</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Chris Venditti</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Meade</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mark Pagel</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1080/10635150802044045</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Systematic Biology, Vol. 57, No. 2. (2008), pp. 286-293.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-30T16:16:11-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Systematic Biology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>57</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>286</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>293</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Taylor &#38; Francis</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>likelihood</prism:category>
    <prism:category>long_branch_attraction</prism:category>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>mixture_models</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>simulation</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2721749">
    <title>Gene conversion and the evolution of euryarchaeal chaperonins: a maximum likelihood-based method for detecting conflicting phylogenetic signals.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2721749</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journal of molecular evolution, Vol. 55, No. 2. (August 2002), pp. 232-245.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Recombination is well known as a complicating factor in the interpretation of molecular phylogenies. Here we describe a maximum likelihood sliding window method based on a likelihood ratio test for scanning DNA sequence alignments for regions of incongruent phylogenetic signals, such as those influenced by recombination. Using this method, we identify several instances of gene conversion between paralogous chaperonin genes in euryarchaeote Archaea, many of which are not detected by two other widely used methods. In the Thermococcus/Pyrococcus lineage, where a gene duplication producing a and b paralogues predates the divergence of Thermococcus strains KS-1 and KS-8, gene conversion has homogenized portions of the a and b genes in KS-8 since the divergence of these two strains. A region near the 3' end of the a and b paralogues in the methanogen Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum also appears to have undergone gene conversion. We apply the method to two additional test data sets, the argF gene of Neisseria and a set of actin paralogues in maize, and show that it successfully identifies all the recombinant regions that were previously detected with other methods. Our approach is relatively insensitive to the presence of divergent sequences in the alignment, making it ideal for detecting recombination between both closely and distantly related genes.</description>
    <dc:title>Gene conversion and the evolution of euryarchaeal chaperonins: a maximum likelihood-based method for detecting conflicting phylogenetic signals.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>JM Archibald</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>AJ Roger</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/s00239-002-2321-5</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Journal of molecular evolution, Vol. 55, No. 2. (August 2002), pp. 232-245.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-26T13:18:44-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2002</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journal of molecular evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0022-2844</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>232</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>245</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>congruence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>likelihood</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lrt</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2721681">
    <title>Influence Function for Robust Phylogenetic Reconstructions</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2721681</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Mol Biol Evol, Vol. 25, No. 5. (1 May 2008), pp. 869-873.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Based on the computation of the influence function, a tool to measure the impact of each piece of sampled data on the statistical inference of a parameter, we propose to analyze the support of the maximum-likelihood (ML) tree for each site. We provide a new tool for filtering data sets (nucleotides, amino acids, and others) in the context of ML phylogenetic reconstructions. Because different sites support different phylogenic topologies in different ways, outlier sites, that is, sites with a very negative influence value, are important: they can drastically change the topology resulting from the statistical inference. Therefore, these outlier sites must be clearly identified and their effects accounted for before drawing biological conclusions from the inferred tree. A matrix containing 158 fungal terminals all belonging to Chytridiomycota, Zygomycota, and Glomeromycota is analyzed. We show that removing the strongest outlier from the analysis strikingly modifies the ML topology, with a loss of as many as 20% of the internal nodes. As a result, estimating the topology on the filtered data set results in a topology with enhanced bootstrap support. From this analysis, the polyphyletic status of the fungal phyla Chytridiomycota and Zygomycota is reinforced, suggesting the necessity of revisiting the systematics of these fungal groups. We show the ability of influence function to produce new evolution hypotheses. 10.1093/molbev/msn030</description>
    <dc:title>Influence Function for Robust Phylogenetic Reconstructions</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Avner Bar-Hen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mahendra Mariadassou</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Marie-Anne Poursat</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1093/molbev/msn030</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Mol Biol Evol, Vol. 25, No. 5. (1 May 2008), pp. 869-873.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-26T12:55:00-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Mol Biol Evol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>869</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>873</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>congruence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>likelihood</prism:category>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2678848">
    <title>Sources of Incongruence among Mammalian Mitochondrial Sequences: COII, COIII, and ND6 Genes Are Main Contributors</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2678848</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 21, No. 1. (October 2001), pp. 43-54.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To investigate the origins of incongruence among mammalian mitochondrial protein-coding genes, we compiled a matrix that included 13 protein-coding-genes for 41 mammals from 14 different orders. This matrix was examined for congruence using different partitioning strategies. The incongruence length difference test showed significant incongruence among the 13 gene partitions used simultaneously, and the result was not affected by third codon or transversion weighting. In the pair-wise comparisons, significant incongruence was detected between NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit 6 gene (ND6), cytochrome oxidase subunit II (COII), or cytochrome oxidase subunit III (COIII) gene partitioned individually against the rest of the genes. Omission of any of the 14 mammalian orders alone or in combinations from the matrix did not result in a statistically significant improvement of congruence, suggesting that taxonomic sampling will not improve congruence among the data sets. However, omission of the ND6, COII, and COIII significantly improved congruence in our data matrix. Possible origins of unusual phylogenetic properties of the three genes are discussed.</description>
    <dc:title>Sources of Incongruence among Mammalian Mitochondrial Sequences: COII, COIII, and ND6 Genes Are Main Contributors</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Nikolai Shevchuk</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Marc Allard</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1006/mpev.2001.0989</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 21, No. 1. (October 2001), pp. 43-54.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-16T19:58:00-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>43</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>54</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>congruence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ild</prism:category>
    <prism:category>mitochondria</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2103853">
    <title>Increasing the Efficiency of Searches for the Maximum Likelihood Tree in a Phylogenetic Analysis of up to 150 Nucleotide Sequences.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2103853</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Syst Biol, Vol. 56, No. 6. (December 2007), pp. 988-1010.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even when the maximum likelihood (ML) tree is a better estimate of the true phylogenetic tree than those produced by other methods, the result of a poor ML search may be no better than that of a more thorough search under some faster criterion. The ability to find the globally optimal ML tree is therefore important. Here, I compare a range of heuristic search strategies (and their associated computer programs) in terms of their success at locating the ML tree for 20 empirical data sets with 14 to 158 sequences and 411 to 120,762 aligned nucleotides. Three distinct topics are discussed: the success of the search strategies in relation to certain features of the data, the generation of starting trees for the search, and the exploration of multiple islands of trees. As a starting tree, there was little difference among the neighbor-joining tree based on absolute differences (including the BioNJ tree), the stepwise-addition parsimony tree (with or without nearest-neighbor-interchange (NNI) branch swapping), and the stepwise-addition ML tree. The latter produced the best ML score on average but was orders of magnitude slower than the alternatives. The BioNJ tree was second best on average. As search strategies, star decomposition and quartet puzzling were the slowest and produced the worst ML scores. The DPRml, IQPNNI, MultiPhyl, PhyML, PhyNav, and TreeFinder programs with default options produced qualitatively similar results, each locating a single tree that tended to be in an NNI suboptimum (rather than the global optimum) when the data set had low phylogenetic information. For such data sets, there were multiple tree islands with very similar ML scores. The likelihood surface only became relatively simple for data sets that contained approximately 500 aligned nucleotides for 50 sequences and 3,000 nucleotides for 100 sequences. The RAxML and GARLI programs allowed multiple islands to be explored easily, but both programs also tended to find NNI suboptima. A newly developed version of the likelihood ratchet using PAUP* successfully found the peaks of multiple islands, but its speed needs to be improved.</description>
    <dc:title>Increasing the Efficiency of Searches for the Maximum Likelihood Tree in a Phylogenetic Analysis of up to 150 Nucleotide Sequences.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>DA Morrison</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1080/10635150701779808</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Syst Biol, Vol. 56, No. 6. (December 2007), pp. 988-1010.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-12-13T12:48:08-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Syst Biol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1063-5157</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>6</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>988</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1010</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>likelihood</prism:category>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tools</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/875123">
    <title>Is There a Star Tree Paradox?</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/875123</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol. 23, No. 10. (15 October 2006), pp. 1819-1823.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Is There a Star Tree Paradox?</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Kolaczkowski</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Thornton</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>W Joseph</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1093/molbev/msl059</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol. 23, No. 10. (15 October 2006), pp. 1819-1823.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-09-27T06:22:06-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Molecular Biology and Evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0737-4038</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>23</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>10</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1819</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1823</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Oxford University Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>bayesian</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>star_paradox</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2103820">
    <title>Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2103820</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Syst Biol, Vol. 56, No. 3. (June 2007), pp. 504-514.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The desire to infer the evolutionary history of a group of species should be more viable now that a considerable amount of multilocus molecular data is available. However, the current molecular phylogenetic paradigm still reconstructs gene trees to represent the species tree. Further, commonly used methods of combining data, such as the concatenation method, are known to be inconsistent in some circumstances. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian hierarchical model to estimate the phylogeny of a group of species using multiple estimated gene tree distributions, such as those that arise in a Bayesian analysis of DNA sequence data. Our model employs substitution models used in traditional phylogenetics but also uses coalescent theory to explain genealogical signals from species trees to gene trees and from gene trees to sequence data, thereby forming a complete stochastic model to estimate gene trees, species trees, ancestral population sizes, and species divergence times simultaneously. Our model is founded on the assumption that gene trees, even of unlinked loci, are correlated due to being derived from a single species tree and therefore should be estimated jointly. We apply the method to two multilocus data sets of DNA sequences. The estimates of the species tree topology and divergence times appear to be robust to the prior of the population size, whereas the estimates of effective population sizes are sensitive to the prior used in the analysis. These analyses also suggest that the model is superior to the concatenation method in fitting these data sets and thus provides a more realistic assessment of the variability in the distribution of the species tree that may have produced the molecular information at hand. Future improvements of our model and algorithm should include consideration of other factors that can cause discordance of gene trees and species trees, such as horizontal transfer or gene duplication.</description>
    <dc:title>Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>L Liu</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>DK Pearl</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1080/10635150701429982</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Syst Biol, Vol. 56, No. 3. (June 2007), pp. 504-514.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-12-13T12:39:38-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Syst Biol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1063-5157</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>504</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>514</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>bayesian</prism:category>
    <prism:category>congruence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>consensus</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenomics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2575070">
    <title>Phylogenetic relationships of Cyprinidae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) inferred from the partial S6K1 gene sequences and implication of indel sites in intron 1.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2575070</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Sci China C Life Sci, Vol. 50, No. 6. (December 2007), pp. 780-788.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The family Cyprinidae is widely distributed in East Asia, and has the important phylogenetic significance in the fish evolution. In this study, the 5' end partial sequences (containing exon 1, exon 2 and indel 1) of S6K1 gene were obtained from 30 representative species in Cyprinidae and outgroup using PCR amplification and sequencing. The phylogenetic relationships of Cyprinidae were reconstructed with neighbor joining (NJ), maximum parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML), and Bayesian methods. Myxocyprinus asiaticus (Catostomidae) was assigned to the outgroup taxon. Similar phylogenetic relationships within the family Cyprinidae were achieved with the four analyses. Leuciscini and Barbini were monophyletic lineages respectively with the high nodal supports. Leuciscini comprises Hypophthalmichthyinae, Xenocyprinae, Cultrinae, Gobioninae, Acheilognathinae and East Asian species of Leuciscinae and Danioninae. Monophyly of East Asian clade was supported with high nodal support. Barbini comprises Schizothoracinae, Barbinae, Cyprininae and Labeoninae. The monophyletic lineage consisting of Danio rerio, D. myersi, and Rasbora trilineata was basal in the tree. In addition, the large fragment indels in intron 1 were analyzed to improve the understanding of Cyprinidae relationships. The results showed that the large fragment indels were correlated with the relations among species. Some conserved regions in intron 1 were thought to be involved in the functional regulation. However, no correlation was found between sequence variations and species characteristic size.</description>
    <dc:title>Phylogenetic relationships of Cyprinidae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) inferred from the partial S6K1 gene sequences and implication of indel sites in intron 1.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>X Kong</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>X Wang</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>X Gan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>J Li</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>S He</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/s11427-007-0076-3</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Sci China C Life Sci, Vol. 50, No. 6. (December 2007), pp. 780-788.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-03-23T16:07:24-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Sci China C Life Sci</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1006-9305</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>50</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>6</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>780</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>788</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>fish</prism:category>
    <prism:category>indel</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2542526">
    <title>From phylogenetics to phylogenomics: the evolutionary relationships of insect endosymbiotic gamma-Proteobacteria as a test case.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2542526</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Syst Biol, Vol. 56, No. 1. (February 2007), pp. 1-16.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The increasing availability of complete genome sequences and the development of new, faster methods for phylogenetic reconstruction allow the exploration of the set of evolutionary trees for each gene in the genome of any species. This has led to the development of new phylogenomic methods. Here, we have compared different phylogenetic and phylogenomic methods in the analysis of the monophyletic origin of insect endosymbionts from the gamma-Proteobacteria, a hotly debated issue with several recent, conflicting reports. We have obtained the phylogenetic tree for each of the 579 identified protein-coding genes in the genome of the primary endosymbiont of carpenter ants, Blochmannia floridanus, after determining their presumed orthologs in 20 additional Proteobacteria genomes. A reference phylogeny reflecting the monophyletic origin of insect endosymbionts was further confirmed with different approaches, which led us to consider it as the presumed species tree. Remarkably, only 43 individual genes produced exactly the same topology as this presumed species tree. Most discrepancies between this tree and those obtained from individual genes or by concatenation of different genes were due to the grouping of Xanthomonadales with beta-Proteobacteria and not to uncertainties over the monophyly of insect endosymbionts. As previously noted, operational genes were more prone to reject the presumed species tree than those included in information-processing categories, but caution should be exerted when selecting genes for phylogenetic inference on the basis of their functional category assignment. We have obtained strong evidence in support of the monophyletic origin of gamma-Proteobacteria insect endosymbionts by a combination of phylogenetic and phylogenomic methods. In our analysis, the use of concatenated genes has shown to be a valuable tool for analyzing primary phylogenetic signals coded in the genomes. Nevertheless, other phylogenomic methods such as supertree approaches were useful in revealing alternative phylogenetic signals and should be included in comprehensive phylogenomic studies.</description>
    <dc:title>From phylogenetics to phylogenomics: the evolutionary relationships of insect endosymbiotic gamma-Proteobacteria as a test case.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>I Comas</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>A Moya</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>F González-Candelas</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1080/10635150601109759</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Syst Biol, Vol. 56, No. 1. (February 2007), pp. 1-16.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-03-16T21:01:09-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Syst Biol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1063-5157</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>16</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>bacteria</prism:category>
    <prism:category>congruence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenomics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2489340">
    <title>Mammalian evolution and biomedicine: new views from phylogeny.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2489340</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc, Vol. 82, No. 3. (August 2007), pp. 375-392.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Recent progress resolving the phylogenetic relationships of the major lineages of mammals has had a broad impact in evolutionary biology, comparative genomics and the biomedical sciences. Novel insights into the timing and historical biogeography of early mammalian diversification have resulted from a new molecular tree for placental mammals coupled with dating approaches that relax the assumption of the molecular clock. We highlight the numerous applications to come from a well-resolved phylogeny and genomic prospecting in multiple lineages of mammals, from identifying regulatory elements in mammalian genomes to assessing the functional consequences of mutations in human disease loci and those driving adaptive evolution.</description>
    <dc:title>Mammalian evolution and biomedicine: new views from phylogeny.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>MS Springer</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>WJ Murphy</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00016.x</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc, Vol. 82, No. 3. (August 2007), pp. 375-392.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-03-08T12:10:51-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1464-7931</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>82</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>375</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>392</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>mammal</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>review</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/1696587">
    <title>Molecular phylogenetics: state-of-the-art methods for looking into the past.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/1696587</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Trends Genet, Vol. 17, No. 5. (May 2001), pp. 262-272.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As the amount of molecular sequence data in the public domain grows, so does the range of biological topics that it influences through evolutionary considerations. In recent years, a number of developments have enabled molecular phylogenetic methodology to keep pace. Likelihood-based inferential techniques, although controversial in the past, lie at the heart of these new methods and are producing the promised advances in the understanding of sequence evolution. They allow both a wide variety of phylogenetic inferences from sequence data and robust statistical assessment of all results. It cannot remain acceptable to use outdated data analysis techniques when superior alternatives exist. Here, we discuss the most important and exciting methods currently available to the molecular phylogeneticist.</description>
    <dc:title>Molecular phylogenetics: state-of-the-art methods for looking into the past.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>S Whelan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>P Liò</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>N Goldman</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Trends Genet, Vol. 17, No. 5. (May 2001), pp. 262-272.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-09-26T08:50:14-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Trends Genet</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0168-9525</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>17</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>262</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>272</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>model_selection</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>review</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2447805">
    <title>Review of the monotreme fossil record and comparison of palaeontological and molecular data</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2447805</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - Part A: Molecular &#38; Integrative Physiology, Vol. 136, No. 4. (December 2003), pp. 927-942.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Monotremes have traditionally been considered a remnant group of mammals descended from archaic Mesozoic stock, surviving to the present day on the relatively isolated Australian continent. Challenges to this orthodoxy have been spurred by discoveries of `advanced' Cretaceous monotremes (Steropodon galmani, Archer, M., et al., 1985. First Mesozoic mammal from Australia--an Early Cretaceous monotreme, Nature. 318, 363-366) as well as by results from molecular data linking monotremes to therian mammals (specifically to marsupials in some studies). This paper reviews the monotreme fossil record and briefly discusses significant new information from additional Cretaceous Australian material. Mesozoic monotremes (including S. galmani) were a diverse group as evidenced by new material from the Early Cretaceous of New South Wales and Victoria currently under study. Although most of these new finds are edentulous jaws (limiting dental comparisons and determination of dietary niches), a range of sizes and forms has been determined. Some of these Cretaceous jaws exhibit archaic features--in particular evidence for the presence of a splenial bone in S. galmani--not seen in therian mammals or in post-Mesozoic (Tertiary and Quaternary) monotreme taxa. Tertiary monotremes were either archaic ornithorhynchids (toothed platypuses in the genera Monotrematum and Obdurodon) or tachyglossids (large echidnas in the genera Megalibgwilia and Zaglossus). Quaternary ornithorhynchid material is referable to the sole living platypus species Ornithorhynchus anatinus. Quaternary echidnas, however, were moderately diverse and several forms are known (Megalibgwilia species; `Zaglossus' hacketti; Zaglossus species and Tachyglossus aculeatus).</description>
    <dc:title>Review of the monotreme fossil record and comparison of palaeontological and molecular data</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>AM Musser</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/S1095-6433(03)00275-7</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - Part A: Molecular &#38; Integrative Physiology, Vol. 136, No. 4. (December 2003), pp. 927-942.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-29T14:27:21-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2003</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - Part A: Molecular &#38; Integrative Physiology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>136</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>927</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>942</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>fossil</prism:category>
    <prism:category>monotreme</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/1603618">
    <title>Visualizing differences in phylogenetic information content of alignments and distinction of three classes of long-branch effects</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/1603618</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;BMC Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 7 (28 August 2007), 147.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Visualizing differences in phylogenetic information content of alignments and distinction of three classes of long-branch effects</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Johann Waegele</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Christoph Mayer</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-147</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>BMC Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 7 (28 August 2007), 147.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-08-29T05:42:07-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>BMC Evolutionary Biology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1471-2148</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
    <prism:startingPage>147</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:category>long_branch_attraction</prism:category>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>signal</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2350871">
    <title>Phylogenetic analysis of 1.5 Mbp and platypus EST data refute the Marsupionta hypothesis and unequivocally support Monotremata as sister group to Marsupialia/Placentalia</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2350871</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Zoologica Scripta, Vol. 37, No. 2. (March 2008), pp. 115-127.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The extant mammalian groups Monotremata, Marsupialia and Placentalia are, according to the ‘Theria’ hypothesis, traditionally classified into two subclasses. The subclass Prototheria includes the monotremes and subclass Theria marsupials and placental mammals. Based on some morphological and molecular data, an alternative proposition, the Marsupionta hypothesis, favours a sister group relationship between monotremes and marsupials to the exclusion of placental mammals. Phylogenetic analyses of single genes and even multiple gene alignments have not yet been able to conclusively resolve this basal mammalian divergence. We have examined this problem using one data set composed of expressed sequence tags (EST) and another containing 1 510 509 nucleotide (nt) sites from 1358 inferred cDNA genomic sequences. All analyses of the concatenated sequences unambiguously supported the Theria hypothesis. The Marsupionta hypothesis was rejected with high statistical confidence from both data sets. In spite of the strong support for Theria, a non-negligible number of single genes supported either of the two alternative hypotheses. The divergence between monotremes and therian mammals was estimated to have taken place 168–178 Mya, a dating compatible with the fossil record. Considering the long common evolutionary branch of therians, it is surprising that sequence data from many thousand amino acid sites were needed to conclusively resolve their relationship to monotremes. This finding draws attention to other mammalian divergences that have been taken as unequivocally settled based on much smaller alignments. EST data provide a comprehensive random sample of protein coding sequences and an economic way to produce large amounts of data for phylogenetic analysis of species for which genomic sequences are not yet available.</description>
    <dc:title>Phylogenetic analysis of 1.5 Mbp and platypus EST data refute the Marsupionta hypothesis and unequivocally support Monotremata as sister group to Marsupialia/Placentalia</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Kullberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Morgan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hallstrom</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>M Bjorn</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Arnason</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ulfur</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Janke</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Axel</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.2007.00319.x</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Zoologica Scripta, Vol. 37, No. 2. (March 2008), pp. 115-127.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-08T00:42:31-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Zoologica Scripta</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0300-3256</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>115</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>127</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Blackwell Publishing</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>mammal</prism:category>
    <prism:category>marsupionta</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>root</prism:category>
    <prism:category>theria</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/146681">
    <title>Visualizing Conflicting Evolutionary Hypotheses in Large Collections of Trees: Using Consensus Networks to Study the Origins of Placentals and Hexapods</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/146681</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Systematic Biology, Vol. 54, No. 1. (February 2005), pp. 66-76.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Visualizing Conflicting Evolutionary Hypotheses in Large Collections of Trees: Using Consensus Networks to Study the Origins of Placentals and Hexapods</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Barbara Holland</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Frederic Delsuc</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Vincent Moulton</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1080/10635150590906055</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Systematic Biology, Vol. 54, No. 1. (February 2005), pp. 66-76.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-04-02T04:39:50-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Systematic Biology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1063-5157</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>54</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>66</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>76</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Taylor and Francis Ltd</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>consensus</prism:category>
    <prism:category>mammal</prism:category>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>root</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2446531">
    <title>Mitochondrial Versus Nuclear Gene Sequences in Deep-Level Mammalian Phylogeny Reconstruction</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2446531</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Mol Biol Evol, Vol. 18, No. 2. (1 February 2001), pp. 132-143.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Both mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences have been employed in efforts to reconstruct deep-level phylogenetic relationships. A fundamental question in molecular systematics concerns the efficacy of different types of sequences in recovering clades at different taxonomic levels. We compared the performance of four mitochondrial data sets (cytochrome b, cytochrome oxidase II, NADH dehydrogenase subunit I, 12S rRNA-tRNA-16S rRNA) and eight nuclear data sets (exonic regions of alpha-2B adrenergic receptor, aquaporin, beta-casein, gamma-fibrinogen, interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein, kappa-casein, protamine, von Willebrand Factor) in recovering deep-level mammalian clades. We employed parsimony and minimum-evolution with a variety of distance corrections for superimposed substitutions. In 32 different pairwise comparisons between these mitochondrial and nuclear data sets, we used the maximum set of overlapping taxa. In each case, the variable-length bootstrap was used to resample at the size of the smaller data set. The nuclear exons consistently performed better than mitochondrial protein and rRNA-tRNA coding genes on a per-residue basis in recovering benchmark clades. We also concatenated nuclear genes for overlapping taxa and made comparisons with concatenated mitochondrial protein-coding genes from complete mitochondrial genomes. The variable-length bootstrap was used to score the recovery of benchmark clades as a function of the number of resampled base pairs. In every case, the nuclear concatenations were more efficient than the mitochondrial concatenations in recovering benchmark clades. Among genes included in our study, the nuclear genes were much less affected by superimposed substitutions. Nuclear genes having appropriate rates of substitution should receive strong consideration in efforts to reconstruct deep-level phylogenetic relationships.</description>
    <dc:title>Mitochondrial Versus Nuclear Gene Sequences in Deep-Level Mammalian Phylogeny Reconstruction</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Mark Springer</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ronald Debry</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Christophe Douady</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Heather Amrine</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ole Madsen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Wilfried de Jong</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Stanhope</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Mol Biol Evol, Vol. 18, No. 2. (1 February 2001), pp. 132-143.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-29T04:38:56-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Mol Biol Evol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>132</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>143</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>mammal</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>theria</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2446517">
    <title>A platypus' eye view of the mammalian genome</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2446517</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Current Opinion in Genetics &#38; Development, Vol. 14, No. 6. (December 2004), pp. 642-649.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The genome of monotremes, like the animals themselves, is unique and strange. The importance of monotremes to genomics depends on their position as the earliest offshoot of the mammalian lineage. Although there has been controversy in the literature over the phylogenetic position of monotremes, this traditional interpretation is now confirmed by recent sequence comparisons. Characterizing the monotreme genome will therefore be important for studying the evolution and organization of the mammalian genome, and the proposal to sequence the platypus genome has been received enthusiastically by the genomics community. Recent investigations of X-chromosome inactivation, genomic imprinting and sex chromosome evolution provide good examples of the power of the monotreme genome to inform us about mammalian genome organization and evolution.</description>
    <dc:title>A platypus' eye view of the mammalian genome</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Frank Grutzner</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Graves</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.gde.2004.09.006</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Current Opinion in Genetics &#38; Development, Vol. 14, No. 6. (December 2004), pp. 642-649.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-29T04:33:40-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Current Opinion in Genetics &#38; Development</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>6</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>642</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>649</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>monotreme</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>review</prism:category>
    <prism:category>theria</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2445440">
    <title>The relative performance of indel-coding methods in simulations</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2445440</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 44, No. 2. (August 2007), pp. 724-740.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We used simulations to compare the performance of 10 approaches that have been used for treating unambiguously aligned gaps in phylogenetic analyses. We examined how these approaches perform under the ideal conditions of correct alignments, as well as how robust they are to errors caused by use of inferred alignments. Our results indicate that 5th-state coding dramatically outperformed all other coding methods, which in turn all outperformed treating gaps as missing data or excluding gapped positions. Simple indel coding (SIC) and modified complex indel coding (MCIC) performed about the same, and generally outperformed the other indel-coding methods. The high performance of 5th-state coding was largely found to be a weighting artifact. We suggest that MCIC-coded gap characters be scored for all unambiguously aligned gaps in parsimony-based molecular phylogenetic analyses. When the number of terminals sampled precludes the use of MCIC, SIC may be used as an effective substitute.</description>
    <dc:title>The relative performance of indel-coding methods in simulations</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Mark Simmons</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Kai Muller</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Norton</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2007.04.001</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 44, No. 2. (August 2007), pp. 724-740.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-28T23:09:22-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>44</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>724</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>740</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>indel</prism:category>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2445431">
    <title>The effect of branch lengths on phylogeny: An empirical study using highly conserved orthologs from mammalian genomes</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2445431</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 45, No. 1. (October 2007), pp. 81-88.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Phylogenetic analyses were applied to 269 families of putative orthologs represented by a single member in the genomes of human, mouse, dog, and chicken. Five methods were used: maximum parsimony (NP), neighbor-joining (NJ) with Poisson and Gamma distances; and maximum likelihood (ML) with JTT and JTT + gamma models. When applied to the concatenated sequence of all families, all methods strongly supported a tree in which mouse branched before human and dog. In analyses of individual families, the same topology was supported more than any other. Although there was evidence of an increased rate of amino acid replacement in the mouse lineage in comparison to the other two mammals, there was no evidence that support for the mouse's basal position was due to long-branch attraction; rather, this topology was seen in the families with the lowest rate variation among the three mammalian branches. In families with highly divergent mouse sequences, ML with both JTT and JTT + gamma and NJ with the gamma distance tended to support a topology in which the dog, rather than the mouse, branched first. Thus, in these data, a tendency of long and short branches to cluster together (&#34;opposite-branch attraction&#34;) seemed to be more of a problem than long-branch attraction.</description>
    <dc:title>The effect of branch lengths on phylogeny: An empirical study using highly conserved orthologs from mammalian genomes</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Austin Hughes</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Robert Friedman</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2007.04.022</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 45, No. 1. (October 2007), pp. 81-88.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-28T23:06:54-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>45</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>81</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>88</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>mammal</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenomics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/1065337">
    <title>Model use in phylogenetics: nine key questions</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/1065337</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Trends in Ecology &#38; Evolution, Vol. 22, No. 2. (February 2007), pp. 87-94.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Models of character evolution underpin all phylogeny estimations, thus model adequacy remains a crucial issue for phylogenetics and its many applications. Although progress has been made in selecting appropriate models for phylogeny estimation, there is still concern about their purpose and proper use. How do we interpret models in a phylogenetic context? What are their effects on phylogeny estimation? How can we improve confidence in the models that we choose? That the phylogenetics community is asking such questions denotes an important stage in the use of explicit models. Here, we examine these and other common questions and draw conclusions about how the community is using and choosing models, and where this process will take us next.</description>
    <dc:title>Model use in phylogenetics: nine key questions</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Scot Kelchner</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.004</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Trends in Ecology &#38; Evolution, Vol. 22, No. 2. (February 2007), pp. 87-94.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-01-24T13:56:04-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Trends in Ecology &#38; Evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>22</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>87</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>94</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>model_choice</prism:category>
    <prism:category>model_selection</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>review</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/1464719">
    <title>Rocks and clocks: calibrating the Tree of Life using fossils and molecules</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/1464719</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Trends in Ecology &#38; Evolution, Vol. 22, No. 8. (August 2007), pp. 424-431.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A great tradition in macroevolution and systematics has been the ritual squabbling between palaeontologists and molecular biologists. But, because both sides were talking past each other, they could never agree. Practitioners in both fields should play to their strengths and work together: palaeontologists can provide minimum constraints on branching points in the Tree of Life with considerable precision, and estimate the extent of unrecorded prehistory. Molecular tree analysts have remarkable modelling tools in their armoury to convert multiple minimum age constraints into meaningful dated trees. As we discuss here, work should now focus on establishing reasonable, dated trees that satisfy rigorous assessment of the available fossils and careful consideration of molecular tree methods: rocks and clocks together are an unbeatable combination. Reliably dated trees provide, for the first time, the opportunity to explore wider questions in macroevolution.</description>
    <dc:title>Rocks and clocks: calibrating the Tree of Life using fossils and molecules</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Philip Donoghue</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Benton</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.05.005</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Trends in Ecology &#38; Evolution, Vol. 22, No. 8. (August 2007), pp. 424-431.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-07-18T11:12:52-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Trends in Ecology &#38; Evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>22</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>8</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>424</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>431</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>review</prism:category>
    <prism:category>time</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2419956">
    <title>Update on the Phylogenetic Systematics of New World Monkeys: Further DNA Evidence for Placing the Pygmy Marmoset (Cebuella) within the Genus Callithrix</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2419956</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;International Journal of Primatology, Vol. 18, No. 4. (1997), pp. 651-674.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We determined DNA sequences spanning the 1.8-kb long intron 1 of the interstitial retinol-binding protein nuclear gene (IRBP) for Callithrix geoffroyi, Callithrix humeralifer, and Callithrix argentata. With the 22 previously determined IRBP intron 1 sequences—21 from the 16 currently recognized genera of New World monkeys—the enlarged IRBP data represent for the marmoset genus Callithrix both its argentata and its jacchus species groups. Maximum-parsimony and neighbor-joining trees, constructed for the 25 aligned IRBP intron 1 sequences, support a provisional phylogenetic classification with three families: Atelidae, containing subfamily Atelinae; Pitheciidae, containing subfamily Pitheciinae; and Cebidae, containing subfamilies Cebinae, Aotinae, and Callitrichinae. In order to have taxa at the same hierarchical rank at equivalent age, this classification has all living callitrichines in a single tribe, Callitrichini, with four subtribes: Saguinina (Saguinus), Callimiconina (Callimico), Leontopithecina (Leontopithecus), and Callitrichina (Callithrix with the pygmy marmoset, Cebuella pygmaea, merged into it). The DNA evidence shows not only that Callithrix must include C. pygmaea to be monophyletic but also that the times of separation of pygmaea and the argentata and jacchus species groups from one another are to be expected ( Saguinus in one clade and the ancestral population of Leontopithecus and Callimico–Callithrix (or Leontopithecus–Callimico and Callithrix) in another clade. The proto-lion tamarins migrated south and eastward, where they were isolated in refugia, becoming the genus Leontopithecus. The stock remaining in Amazonia gave rise to present-day Callimico and Callithrix. The latter genus occupied a vast geographic area, giving rise to the argentata and pygmaea groups in Amazonia and to the jacchus group in central and eastern Brazil.</description>
    <dc:title>Update on the Phylogenetic Systematics of New World Monkeys: Further DNA Evidence for Placing the Pygmy Marmoset (Cebuella) within the Genus Callithrix</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>CML Barroso</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>H Schneider</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>MPC Schneider</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>I Sampaio</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>ML Harada</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>J Czelusniak</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>M Goodman</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1023/A:1026371408379</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>International Journal of Primatology, Vol. 18, No. 4. (1997), pp. 651-674.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-23T23:14:29-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1997</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>International Journal of Primatology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>651</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>674</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>platyrrhini</prism:category>
    <prism:category>primate</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2417923">
    <title>New World monkey phylogeny based on X-linked G6PD DNA sequences</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2417923</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 27, No. 1. (April 2003), pp. 121-130.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Platyrrhini, or New World monkeys, are an infraorder of Primates comprised of 16 genera. Molecular phylogenetic analyses have consistently sorted these genera into three groups: the Pitheciidae (e.g., saki and titi monkeys), Atelidae (e.g., spider and howler monkeys), and Cebidae (e.g., night monkeys, squirrel monkeys, and tamarins). No consensus has emerged on the relationships among the three groups or within the Cebidae. Here, ~0.8 kb of newly generated intronic DNA sequence data from the X-linked glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) locus have been collected from nine New World monkey taxa to examine these relationships. These data are added to 1.3 kb of previously generated G6PD intronic DNA sequence data [Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 11 (1999) 459]. Using distance and parsimony-based techniques, G6PD sequences provide support for an initial bifurcation between the Pitheciidae and the remaining platyrrhines, linking Atelidae and Cebidae as sister taxa. Bayesian methods provided a conflicting phylogeny with Atelidae as outgroup. Within the Cebidae, a sister relation between Aotus and the Cebus/Saimiri clade is favored by parsimony analysis, but not by other analyses. Potential reasons for the difficulty in resolving family level New World monkey phylogenetics are discussed.</description>
    <dc:title>New World monkey phylogeny based on X-linked G6PD DNA sequences</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Michael Steiper</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Maryellen Ruvolo</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00375-5</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 27, No. 1. (April 2003), pp. 121-130.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-23T08:37:34-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2003</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>121</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>130</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>platyrrhini</prism:category>
    <prism:category>primte</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2417902">
    <title>Molecular Phylogeny of New World Primates (Platyrrhini) Based on [beta]2-Microglobulin DNA Sequences</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2417902</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 12, No. 1. (June 1999), pp. 74-82.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Neotropical primates, traditionally grouped in the infraorder Platyrrhini, comprise 16 extant genera. Cladistic analyses based on morphological characteristics and molecular data resulted in topologic arrangements depicting disparate phylogenetic relationships, indicating that the evolution of gross morphological characteristics and molecular traits is not necessarily congruent. Here we present a phylogenetic arrangement for all neotropical primate genera obtained from DNA sequence analyses of the [beta]2-microglobulin gene. Parsimony, distance, and maximum likelihood analyses favored two families, Atelidae and Cebidae, each containing 8 genera. Atelids were resolved into atelines and pitheciines. The well-supported ateline clade branched into alouattine (Alouatta) and ateline (Ateles, Lagothrix, Brachyteles) clades. In turn, within the Ateline clade,LagothrixandBrachyteleswere well-supported sister groups. The pitheciines branched into well-supported callicebine (Callicebus) and pitheciine (Pithecia, Cacajao, Chiropotes) clades. In turn, within the pitheciine clade,CacajaoandChiropoteswere well-supported sister groups. The cebids branched into callitrichine (Saguinus, Leontopithecus, Callimico, Callithrix-Cebuella), cebine (Cebus, Saimiri), and aotine (Aotus) clades. While the callitrichine clade and the groupings of species and genera within this clade were all well supported, the cebine clade received only modest support, and the position ofAotuscould not be clearly established. Cladistic analyses favored the proposition of 15 rather than 16 extant genera by includingCebuella pygmaeain the genusCallithrixas the sister group of theCallithrix argentataspecies group. These analyses also favored the sister grouping ofCallimicowithCallithrixand then ofLeontopithecuswith theCallithrix-Callimicoclade.</description>
    <dc:title>Molecular Phylogeny of New World Primates (Platyrrhini) Based on [beta]2-Microglobulin DNA Sequences</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Flavio Canavez</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Miguel Moreira</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>John Ladasky</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Alcides Pissinatti</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Peter Parham</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hector Seuanez</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1006/mpev.1998.0589</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 12, No. 1. (June 1999), pp. 74-82.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-23T08:25:14-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1999</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>74</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>82</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>platyrrhini</prism:category>
    <prism:category>primate</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2417888">
    <title>Can molecular data place each neotropical monkey in its own branch?</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2417888</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Chromosoma, Vol. 109, No. 8. (23 February 2001), pp. 515-523.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Four different DNA datasets, representative of all extant neotropical primate genera, were tandemly aligned, comprising some 6,763 base pairs (bp) with 2,086 variable characters and 674 informative sites. Maximum Parsimony, Maximum Likelihood and Neighbor-Joining analyses suggested three monophyletic families (Atelidae, Pitheciidae and Cebidae) that emerged almost at the same time during primate radiation. Combined molecular data showed congruent branching inside the atelid clade, placing Alouatta as the most basal lineage followed by Ateles and a more derived branch including Brachyteles and Lagothrix as sister groups. In the Pitheciidae, Callicebus was the most basal lineage with respect to Pithecia and to the more derived sister groups (Cacajao and Chiropotes). Conjoint analysis strongly supported the monophyly of the Cebidae, grouping Aotus, Cebus and Saimiri with the small callitrichines. Within callitrichines, Cebuella merged with Callithrix, Callimico appeared as a sister group of Callithrix/Cebuella, Leontopitecus as a sister group of the previous clade, and Saguinus was the earliest callitrichine offshoot. Two major points remained to be clarified in platyrrhine phylogeny: (i) the exact branching pattern of Aotus, Cebus, Saimiri and the callitrichines, and (ii), which two of these three families (Atelidae, Pitheciidae and Cebidae) are more closely related to one another.</description>
    <dc:title>Can molecular data place each neotropical monkey in its own branch?</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Horácio Schneider</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Flávio Canavez</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Iracilda Sampaio</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Miguel Moreira</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Claudia Tagliaro</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Héctor Seuánez</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/s004120000106</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Chromosoma, Vol. 109, No. 8. (23 February 2001), pp. 515-523.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-23T08:18:46-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Chromosoma</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>109</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>8</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>515</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>523</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>platyrrhini</prism:category>
    <prism:category>primate</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2417884">
    <title>Molecular cladistic markers in New World monkey phylogeny (Platyrrhini, Primates)</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2417884</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 26, No. 3. (March 2003), pp. 490-501.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Transpositions of primate-specific Alu elements were applied as molecular cladistic markers in a phylogenetic analysis of South American primates. Seventy-four human and platyrrhine loci containing intronic Alu elements were PCR screened in various New World monkeys and the human outgroup to detect the presence of orthologous retrotransposons informative of New World monkey phylogeny. Six loci revealed size polymorphism in the amplification pattern, indicating a shared derived character state due to the presence of orthologous Alu elements confirmed by subsequent sequencing. Three markers corroborate (1) New World monkey monophyly and one marker supports each of the following callitrichine relationships: (2) Callithrix and Cebuella are more closely related to each other than to any other callitrichine, (3) the callitrichines form a monophyletic clade including Callimico, and (4) the next living relatives to the callitrichines are Cebus, Saimiri, and Aotus.</description>
    <dc:title>Molecular cladistic markers in New World monkey phylogeny (Platyrrhini, Primates)</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Silke Singer</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jurgen Schmitz</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Claudia Schwiegk</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hans Zischler</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00312-3</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 26, No. 3. (March 2003), pp. 490-501.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-23T08:15:07-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2003</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>26</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>490</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>501</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>platyrrhini</prism:category>
    <prism:category>primate</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2417863">
    <title>Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times among New World monkeys (Platyrrhini, Primates)</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2417863</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 40, No. 1. (July 2006), pp. 274-280.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Orthologous sequences of six nuclear genes were obtained for all recognized genera of New World monkeys (Primates: Platyrrhini) and outgroups to evaluate the phylogenetic relationships and to estimate divergence times. Phylogenetic relationships were reconstructed by maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. All methods resolved with 100% branch support genus-level relationships, except for the grouping of Aotus as a sister taxa of Cebus and Saimiri, which was supported by low bootstrap percentages and posterior probability. All approaches depict three monophyletic New World monkey families: Atelidae, Cebidae, and Pitheciidae; also within each family, all approaches depict the same branching topology. However, the approaches differ in depicting the relationships of the three families to one another. Maximum parsimony depicts the Atelidae and Cebidae as sister families next joined by the Pitheciidae. Conversely, likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic trees group families Atelidae and Pitheciidae together to the exclusion of Cebidae. Divergence time estimations using both local molecular clock and Bayesian approaches suggest the families diverged from one another over a short period of geological time in the late Oligocene-early Miocene.</description>
    <dc:title>Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times among New World monkeys (Platyrrhini, Primates)</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Juan Opazo</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Derek Wildman</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Tom Prychitko</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Robert Johnson</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Morris Goodman</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2005.11.015</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 40, No. 1. (July 2006), pp. 274-280.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-23T08:04:46-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>40</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>274</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>280</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>platyrrhini</prism:category>
    <prism:category>primate</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2375365">
    <title>Tracking genome organization in rodents by Zoo-FISH.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2375365</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Chromosome Res (11 February 2008)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The number of rodent species examined by modern comparative genomic approaches, particularly chromosome painting, is limited. The use of human whole-chromosome painting probes to detect regions of homology in the karyotypes of the rodent index species, the mouse and rat, has been hindered by the highly rearranged nature of their genomes. In contrast, recent studies have demonstrated that non-murid rodents display more conserved genomes, underscoring their suitability for comparative genomic and higher-order systematic studies. Here we provide the first comparative chromosome maps between human and representative rodents of three major rodent lineages Castoridae, Pedetidae and Dipodidae. A comprehensive analysis of these data and those published for Sciuridae show (1) that Castoridae, Pedetidae and Dipodidae form a monophyletic group, and (2) that the European beaver Castor fiber (Castoridae) and the birch mouse Sicista betulina (Dipodidae) are sister species to the exclusion of the springhare Pedetes capensis (Pedetidae), thus resolving an enduring trifurcation in rodent higher-level systematics. Our results together with published data on the Sciuridae allow the formulation of a putative rodent ancestral karyotype (2n = 50) that is thought to comprise the following 26 human chromosomal segments and/or segmental associations: HSA1pq, 1q/10p, 2pq, 2q, 3a, 3b/19p, 3c/21, 4b, 5, 6, 7a, 7b/16p, 8p/4a/8p, 8q, 9/11, 10q, 12a/22a, 12b/22b, 13, 14/15, 16q/19q, 17, 18, 20, X and Y. These findings provide insights into the likely composition of the ancestral rodent karyotype and an improved understanding of placental genome evolution.</description>
    <dc:title>Tracking genome organization in rodents by Zoo-FISH.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Alexander Graphodatsky</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Fengtang Yang</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Gauthier Dobigny</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Svetlana Romanenko</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Larisa Biltueva</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Polina Perelman</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Violetta Beklemisheva</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Elena Alkalaeva</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Natalya Serdukova</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Malcolm Ferguson-Smith</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>William Murphy</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Terence Robinson</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/s10577-007-1191-5</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Chromosome Res (11 February 2008)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-14T16:33:00-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Chromosome Res</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0967-3849</prism:issn>
    <prism:category>cytogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>rodent</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2363871">
    <title>Primate Phylogeny: Morphological vs Molecular Results</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2363871</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 5, No. 1. (February 1996), pp. 102-154.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Our comparative study of morphological (our data on selected living primates) and molecular characters (from the literature) confirms that, overall, phylogenetic reconstructions of Primates, and consequently their classifications, are more similar than dissimilar. When data from fossil Primates are incorporated, there may be several possible relationships among living Primates; the difference between most of them hinges mainly on the position ofTarsius.In one hypothesis, tarsiers are closely related to lemurs and lorises, and thus Primates is divided into Prosimii [lorises, lemurs, and tarsiers] and Anthropoidea [Platyrrhini and Catarrhini, i.e., monkeys, apes, and humans]. Two additional alternatives are thatTarsiusis a sister group to the clade embracing lorises + lemurs and Anthropoidea and that in which all three lineages (Tarsius,lorises + lemurs, and Anthropoidea) form a polychotomy. In another hypothesis, tarsiers are closely related to anthropoids, giving these two branches: Strepsirhini [lemurs, lorises] and Haplorhini [tarsiers and Anthropoidea (Platyrrhini, the New World monkeys, and Catarrhini, Old World monkeys and Hominoidea)]. The first three alternatives gain some support from the fossil record, and the fourth from morphology of the livingTarsiusand molecular data. It is emphasized that the morphological characters employed in this study forTarsiusare based on the only surviving genus of once-diverse tarsiiform primates known from the Eocene, and, although considered a &#34;living fossil,&#34; it cannot represent all of them. Furthermore,Tarsiusembodies derived features of its own which may affect its systematic position, but not necessarily the position of Tarsiiformes. Although the early Tertiary adapoids might have more nearly resembled anthropoids in their biochemistry and placental developments, this hypothesis is not testable from fossils, and any inferred relationships here must be based on characters of skeletal anatomy. Alternatively, anthropoids may be derived from certain omomyids or from some as yet undiscovered Eocene African taxon. Close relationships amongHomo, Pan,andGorillahave been confirmed during recent decades;Pongois the sister group to this trichotomy. With increasing molecular data,HomoandPanappear to be closer to each other than to any other living hominid taxon.Gorillais a sister group to theHomo-Panclade andPongois a sister group to all of them. Morphologists have given limited evidence for such a dichotomous grouping. In this study, we support theHomo-Panclade, although with characters not as strong as for other clades.</description>
    <dc:title>Primate Phylogeny: Morphological vs Molecular Results</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Jeheskel Shoshani</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Colin Groves</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Elwyn Simons</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Gregg Gunnell</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1006/mpev.1996.0009</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Vol. 5, No. 1. (February 1996), pp. 102-154.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-11T21:25:03-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1996</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>102</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>154</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>primate</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2360044">
    <title>Tracking Alu evolution in New World primates</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2360044</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;BMC Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 5, No. 1. (2005)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;BACKGROUND:Alu elements are Short INterspersed Elements (SINEs) in primate genomes that have proven useful as markers for studying genome evolution, population biology and phylogenetics. Most of these applications, however, have been limited to humans and their nearest relatives, chimpanzees. In an effort to expand our understanding of Alu sequence evolution and to increase the applicability of these markers to non-human primate biology, we have analyzed available Alu sequences for loci specific to platyrrhine (New World) primates.RESULTS:Branching patterns along an Alu sequence phylogeny indicate three major classes of platyrrhine-specific Alu sequences. Sequence comparisons further reveal at least three New World monkey-specific subfamilies; AluTa7, AluTa10, and AluTa15. Two of these subfamilies appear to be derived from a gene conversion event that has produced a recently active fusion of AluSc- and AluSp-type elements. This is a novel mode of origin for new Alu subfamilies.CONCLUSION:The use of Alu elements as genetic markers in studies of genome evolution, phylogenetics, and population biology has been very productive when applied to humans. The characterization of these three new Alu subfamilies not only increases our understanding of Alu sequence evolution in primates, but also opens the door to the application of these genetic markers outside the hominid lineage.</description>
    <dc:title>Tracking Alu evolution in New World primates</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>David Ray</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mark Batzer</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2148-5-51</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>BMC Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 5, No. 1. (2005)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-10T18:02:20-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>BMC Evolutionary Biology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>primate</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sine</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/524240">
    <title>Paloverde: an OpenGL 3-D phylogeny browser.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/524240</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Bioinformatics (24 February 2006)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;SUMMARY: Paloverde is a new program designed to help visualize the phylogenetic structure of moderately large trees--trees on the scale of 100-2500 leaf nodes. The program embeds the user in an interactive virtual 3-D world in which a large tree presented in various layouts can be manipulated through a mouse interface. The program implements radial 2-D layouts, and true 3-D spiral, conical, and hemispherical (i.e., truly &#34;tree&#34;-like) layouts. Subclades can be defined in the input file (using standard node-based definitions) and displayed collapsed as new leaf nodes, or left intact but annotated with names around the periphery of the tree. A search tool lets the user zoom to any selected leaf node. Paloverde is an open source project written in ANSI C using the OpenGL library for 3-D visualization. AVAILABILITY: Source code, makefiles for Mac OS X and Linux, and a compiled binary for Mac OS X are available at http://ginger.ucdavis.edu/paloverde/paloverde.html, along with a sample data set.</description>
    <dc:title>Paloverde: an OpenGL 3-D phylogeny browser.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Michael J Sanderson</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl044</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Bioinformatics (24 February 2006)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-02-28T15:45:39-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Bioinformatics</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1367-4803</prism:issn>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tools</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree_visualization</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/248193">
    <title>Analysis and Visualization of Tree Space</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/248193</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Systematic Biology, Vol. 54, No. 3. (June 2005), pp. 471-482.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Analysis and Visualization of Tree Space</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>David Hillis</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Tracy Heath</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Katherine John</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1080/10635150590946961</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Systematic Biology, Vol. 54, No. 3. (June 2005), pp. 471-482.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-07-06T22:38:25-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Systematic Biology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1063-5157</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>54</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>471</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>482</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Taylor and Francis Ltd</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tools</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree_visualization</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2316885">
    <title>Using novel phylogenetic methods to evaluate mammalian mtDNA, including amino acid-invariant sites-LogDet plus site stripping, to detect internal conflicts in the data, with special reference to the positions of hedgehog, armadillo, and elephant.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2316885</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Syst Biol, Vol. 48, No. 1. (March 1999), pp. 31-53.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We look at the higher-order phylogeny of mammals, analyzing in detail the complete mtDNA sequences of more than 40 species. We test the support for several proposed superordinal relationships. To this end, we apply a number of recently programmed methods and approaches, plus better-established methods. New pairwise tests show highly significant evidence that amino acid frequencies are changing among nearly all the genomes studied when unvaried sites are ignored. LogDet amino acid distances, with modifications to take into account invariant sites, are combined with bootstrapping and the Neighbor Joining algorithm to account for these violations of standard models. To weight the more slowly evolving sites, we exclude the more rapidly evolving sites from the data by using &#34;site stripping&#34;. This leads to changing optimal trees with nearly all methods. The bootstrap support for many hypotheses varies widely between methods, and few hypotheses can claim unanimous support from these data. Rather, we uncover good evidence that many of the earlier branching patterns in the placental subtree could be incorrect, including the placement of the root. The tRNA genes, for example, favor a split between the group hedgehog, rodents, and primates versus all other sequenced placentals. Such a grouping is not ruled out by the amino acid sequence data. A grouping of all rodents plus rabbit, the old Glires hypothesis, is also feasible with stripped amino acid data, and rodent monophyly is also common. The elephant sequence allows confident rejection of the older taxon Ferungulata (Simpson, 1945). In its place, the new taxa Scrotifera and Fereuungulata are defined. A new likelihood ratio test is used to detect differences between the optimal tree for tRNA versus that for amino acids. While not clearly significant as made, some results indicate the test is tending towards significance with more general models of evolution. Individual placement tests suggest alternative positions for hedgehog and elephant. Congruence arguments to support elephant and armadillo together are striking, suggesting a superordinal group composed of Xenarthra and African endemic mammals, which in turn may be near the root of the placental subtree. Thus, while casting doubt on some recent conclusions, the analyses are also unveiling some interesting new possibilities.</description>
    <dc:title>Using novel phylogenetic methods to evaluate mammalian mtDNA, including amino acid-invariant sites-LogDet plus site stripping, to detect internal conflicts in the data, with special reference to the positions of hedgehog, armadillo, and elephant.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>PJ Waddell</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Y Cao</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>J Hauf</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>M Hasegawa</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Syst Biol, Vol. 48, No. 1. (March 1999), pp. 31-53.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-31T23:54:43-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1999</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Syst Biol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1063-5157</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>48</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>31</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>53</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>mammal</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2293570">
    <title>Parallel adaptive radiations in two major clades of placental mammals.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2293570</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Nature, Vol. 409, No. 6820. (1 February 2001), pp. 610-614.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Higher level relationships among placental mammals, as well as the historical biogeography and morphological diversification of this group, remain unclear. Here we analyse independent molecular data sets, having aligned lengths of DNA of 5,708 and 2,947 base pairs, respectively, for all orders of placental mammals. Phylogenetic analyses resolve placental orders into four groups: Xenarthra, Afrotheria, Laurasiatheria, and Euarchonta plus Glires. The first three groups are consistently monophyletic with different methods of analysis. Euarchonta plus Glires is monophyletic or paraphyletic depending on the phylogenetic method. A unique nine-base-pair deletion in exon 11 of the BRCA1 gene provides additional support for the monophyly of Afrotheria, which includes proboscideans, sirenians, hyracoids, tubulidentates, macroscelideans, chrysochlorids and tenrecids. Laurasiatheria contains cetartiodactyls, perissodactyls, carnivores, pangolins, bats and eulipotyphlan insectivores. Parallel adaptive radiations have occurred within Laurasiatheria and Afrotheria. In each group, there are aquatic, ungulate and insectivore-like forms.</description>
    <dc:title>Parallel adaptive radiations in two major clades of placental mammals.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>O Madsen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>M Scally</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>CJ Douady</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>DJ Kao</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>RW DeBry</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>R Adkins</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>HM Amrine</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>MJ Stanhope</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>WW de Jong</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>MS Springer</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/35054544</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Nature, Vol. 409, No. 6820. (1 February 2001), pp. 610-614.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-26T18:23:45-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Nature</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0028-0836</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>409</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>6820</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>610</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>614</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>mammal</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tree</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2288308">
    <title>Alignment Uncertainty and Genomic Analysis</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2288308</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Science, Vol. 319, No. 5862. (25 January 2008), pp. 473-476.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The statistical methods applied to the analysis of genomic data do not account for uncertainty in the sequence alignment. Indeed, the alignment is treated as an observation, and all of the subsequent inferences depend on the alignment being correct. This may not have been too problematic for many phylogenetic studies, in which the gene is carefully chosen for, among other things, ease of alignment. However, in a comparative genomics study, the same statistical methods are applied repeatedly on thousands of genes, many of which will be difficult to align. Using genomic data from seven yeast species, we show that uncertainty in the alignment can lead to several problems, including different alignment methods resulting in different conclusions. 10.1126/science.1151532</description>
    <dc:title>Alignment Uncertainty and Genomic Analysis</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Karen Wong</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Marc Suchard</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>John Huelsenbeck</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1126/science.1151532</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Science, Vol. 319, No. 5862. (25 January 2008), pp. 473-476.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-25T07:09:02-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>319</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5862</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>473</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>476</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>alignment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>genomics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2034557">
    <title>OrthoMaM: A database of orthologous genomic markers for placental mammal phylogenetics</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2034557</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;BMC Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 7 (30 November 2007), 241.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>OrthoMaM: A database of orthologous genomic markers for placental mammal phylogenetics</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Vincent Ranwez</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Frederic Delsuc</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Sylvie Ranwez</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Khalid Belkir</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Marie-Ka Tilak</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Emmanuel Douzery</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-241</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>BMC Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 7 (30 November 2007), 241.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-12-01T02:47:25-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>BMC Evolutionary Biology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1471-2148</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
    <prism:startingPage>241</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:category>database</prism:category>
    <prism:category>mammalian</prism:category>
    <prism:category>phylogenetics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tools</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2286251">
    <title>A comprehensive analysis of mammalian mitochondrial genome base composition and improved phylogenetic methods.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/article/2286251</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Mol Biol Evol, Vol. 22, No. 2. (February 2005), pp. 251-264.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Phylogenetic analysis of mammalian species using mitochondrial protein genes has proved to be problematic in many previous studies. The high mutation rate of mitochondrial DNA and unusual base composition of several species has prompted us to conduct a detailed study of the composition of 69 mammalian mitochondrial genomes. Most major changes in base composition between lineages can be attributed to shifts between the proportions of C and T on the L-strand. These changes are significant at all codon positions and are shown to affect amino acid composition. Correlated changes in the base composition of the RNA loops and stems are also observed. Following up from previous studies, we investigate changes in the base composition of all 12 H-strand proteins and find that variability in proportions of C and T is correlated with location on the genome. Variation in base composition across genes and species is known to adversely affect the performance of phylogenetic inference methods. We have, therefore, developed a customized three-state general time-reversible DNA substitut