<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:46:38 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: as3171's library [41 articles]</title>
	<description>CiteULike: as3171's library [41 articles]</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/90416"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/406452"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2877086"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2373389"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2763424"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2856350"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2844657"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2837511"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/90442"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/615903"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2799580"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2680019"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2461067"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2738840"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2735607"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2447209"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2547218"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/196274"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2523192"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/447367"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/335441"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2285145"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2194444"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2053169"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/611619"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1885381"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/816402"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1851641"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1575143"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1580797"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1522936"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/949311"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/949310"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1303897"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1469921"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/482991"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/500306"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1430960"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1066957"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1391621"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1197981"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/90416">
    <title>Temporal structure in neuronal activity during working memory in macaque parietal cortex.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/90416</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Nat Neurosci, Vol. 5, No. 8. (August 2002), pp. 805-811.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many cortical structures have elevated firing rates during working memory, but it is not known how the activity is maintained. To investigate whether reverberating activity is important, we studied the temporal structure of local field potential (LFP) activity and spiking from area LIP in two awake macaques during a memory-saccade task. Using spectral analysis, we found spatially tuned elevated power in the gamma band (25-90 Hz) in LFP and spiking activity during the memory period. Spiking and LFP activity were also coherent in the gamma band but not at lower frequencies. Finally, we decoded LFP activity on a single-trial basis and found that LFP activity in parietal cortex discriminated between preferred and anti-preferred direction with approximately the same accuracy as the spike rate and predicted the time of a planned movement with better accuracy than the spike rate. This finding could accelerate the development of a cortical neural prosthesis.</description>
    <dc:title>Temporal structure in neuronal activity during working memory in macaque parietal cortex.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>B Pesaran</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>JS Pezaris</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>M Sahani</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>PP Mitra</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>RA Andersen</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/nn890</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Nat Neurosci, Vol. 5, No. 8. (August 2002), pp. 805-811.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-02-08T16:23:57-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2002</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Nat Neurosci</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1097-6256</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>8</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>805</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>811</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>lfp</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lip</prism:category>
    <prism:category>spike_field_coherence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>working_memory</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/406452">
    <title>Analysis of dynamic brain imaging data.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/406452</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Biophys J, Vol. 76, No. 2. (February 1999), pp. 691-708.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Modern imaging techniques for probing brain function, including functional magnetic resonance imaging, intrinsic and extrinsic contrast optical imaging, and magnetoencephalography, generate large data sets with complex content. In this paper we develop appropriate techniques for analysis and visualization of such imaging data to separate the signal from the noise and characterize the signal. The techniques developed fall into the general category of multivariate time series analysis, and in particular we extensively use the multitaper framework of spectral analysis. We develop specific protocols for the analysis of fMRI, optical imaging, and MEG data, and illustrate the techniques by applications to real data sets generated by these imaging modalities. In general, the analysis protocols involve two distinct stages: &#34;noise&#34; characterization and suppression, and &#34;signal&#34; characterization and visualization. An important general conclusion of our study is the utility of a frequency-based representation, with short, moving analysis windows to account for nonstationarity in the data. Of particular note are 1) the development of a decomposition technique (space-frequency singular value decomposition) that is shown to be a useful means of characterizing the image data, and 2) the development of an algorithm, based on multitaper methods, for the removal of approximately periodic physiological artifacts arising from cardiac and respiratory sources.</description>
    <dc:title>Analysis of dynamic brain imaging data.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>PP Mitra</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>B Pesaran</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Biophys J, Vol. 76, No. 2. (February 1999), pp. 691-708.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-11-23T18:04:55-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1999</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Biophys J</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0006-3495</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>76</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>691</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>708</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>lfp</prism:category>
    <prism:category>multitaper</prism:category>
    <prism:category>techniques</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2877086">
    <title>Local field potential reflects perceptual suppression in monkey visual cortex.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2877086</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 103, No. 46. (14 November 2006), pp. 17507-17512.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Neurophysiological and functional imaging experiments remain in apparent disagreement on the role played by the earliest stages of the visual cortex in supporting a visual percept. Here, we report electrophysiological findings that shed light on this issue. We monitored neural activity in the visual cortex of monkeys as they reported their perception of a high-contrast visual stimulus that was induced to vanish completely from perception on a subset of trials. We found that the spiking of neurons in cortical areas V1 and V2 was uncorrelated with the perceptual visibility of the target, whereas that in area V4 showed significant perception-related changes. In contrast, power changes in the lower frequency bands (particularly 9-30 Hz) of the local field potential (LFP), collected on the same trials, showed consistent and sustained perceptual modulation in all three areas. In addition, for the gamma frequency range (30-50 Hz), the responses during perceptual suppression of the target were correlated significantly with the responses to its physical removal in all areas, although the modulation magnitude was considerably higher in area V4 than in V1 and V2. These results, taken together, suggest that low-frequency LFP power in early cortical processing is more closely related to the representation of stimulus visibility than is spiking or higher frequency LFP activity.</description>
    <dc:title>Local field potential reflects perceptual suppression in monkey visual cortex.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>M Wilke</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>NK Logothetis</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>DA Leopold</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1073/pnas.0604673103</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 103, No. 46. (14 November 2006), pp. 17507-17512.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-09T15:00:22-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0027-8424</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>46</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>17507</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>17512</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>lfp</prism:category>
    <prism:category>perception</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sua</prism:category>
    <prism:category>v1</prism:category>
    <prism:category>v2</prism:category>
    <prism:category>v4</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2373389">
    <title>The prefontral cortex and cognitive control</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2373389</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Nat Rev Neurosci, Vol. 1, No. 1. (October 2000), pp. 59-65.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>The prefontral cortex and cognitive control</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Earl Miller</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/35036228</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Nat Rev Neurosci, Vol. 1, No. 1. (October 2000), pp. 59-65.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-14T11:01:29-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2000</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Nat Rev Neurosci</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>59</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>65</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>pfc</prism:category>
    <prism:category>prefrontal_control</prism:category>
    <prism:category>review</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2763424">
    <title>Neurophysiology of the BOLD fMRI Signal in Awake Monkeys.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2763424</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Current biology : CB (23 April 2008)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;BACKGROUND: Simultaneous intracortical recordings of neural activity and blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in primary visual cortex of anesthetized monkeys demonstrated varying degrees of correlation between fMRI signals and the different types of neural activity, such as local field potentials (LFPs), multiple-unit activity (MUA), and single-unit activity (SUA). One important question raised by the aforementioned investigation is whether the reported correlations also apply to alert subjects. RESULTS: Monkeys were trained to perform a fixation task while stimuli within the receptive field of each recording site were used to elicit neural responses followed by a BOLD response. We show - also in alert behaving monkeys - that although both LFP and MUA make significant contributions to the BOLD response, LFPs are better and more reliable predictors of the BOLD signal. Moreover, when MUA responses adapt but LFP remains unaffected, the BOLD signal remains unaltered. CONCLUSIONS: The persistent coupling of the BOLD signal to the field potential when LFP and MUA have different time evolutions suggests that BOLD is primarily determined by the local processing of inputs in a given cortical area. In the alert animal the largest portion of the BOLD signal's variance is explained by an LFP range (20-60 Hz) that is most likely related to neuromodulation. Finally, the similarity of the results in alert and anesthetized subjects indicates that at least in V1 anesthesia is not a confounding factor. This enables the comparison of human fMRI results with a plethora of electrophysiological results obtained in alert or anesthetized animals.</description>
    <dc:title>Neurophysiology of the BOLD fMRI Signal in Awake Monkeys.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Jozien B M Goense</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Nikos K Logothetis</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.054</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Current biology : CB (23 April 2008)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-07T01:47:32-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Current biology : CB</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0960-9822</prism:issn>
    <prism:category>bold</prism:category>
    <prism:category>fmri</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lfp</prism:category>
    <prism:category>mua</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sua</prism:category>
    <prism:category>v1</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2856350">
    <title>Low-Frequency Local Field Potentials and Spikes in Primary Visual Cortex Convey Independent Visual Information</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2856350</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;J. Neurosci., Vol. 28, No. 22. (28 May 2008), pp. 5696-5709.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Local field potentials (LFPs) reflect subthreshold integrative processes that complement spike train measures. However, little is yet known about the differences between how LFPs and spikes encode rich naturalistic sensory stimuli. We addressed this question by recording LFPs and spikes from the primary visual cortex of anesthetized macaques while presenting a color movie. We then determined how the power of LFPs and spikes at different frequencies represents the visual features in the movie. We found that the most informative LFP frequency ranges were 1-8 and 60-100 Hz. LFPs in the range of 12-40 Hz carried little information about the stimulus, and may primarily reflect neuromodulatory inputs. Spike power was informative only at frequencies &#60;12 Hz. We further quantified &#34;signal correlations&#34; (correlations in the trial-averaged power response to different stimuli) and &#34;noise correlations&#34; (trial-by-trial correlations in the fluctuations around the average) of LFPs and spikes recorded from the same electrode. We found positive signal correlation between high-gamma LFPs (60-100 Hz) and spikes, as well as strong positive signal correlation within high-gamma LFPs, suggesting that high-gamma LFPs and spikes are generated within the same network. LFPs &#60;24 Hz shared strong positive noise correlations, indicating that they are influenced by a common source, such as a diffuse neuromodulatory input. LFPs &#60;40 Hz showed very little signal and noise correlations with LFPs &#62;40 Hz and with spikes, suggesting that low-frequency LFPs reflect neural processes that in natural conditions are fully decoupled from those giving rise to spikes and to high-gamma LFPs. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0009-08.2008</description>
    <dc:title>Low-Frequency Local Field Potentials and Spikes in Primary Visual Cortex Convey Independent Visual Information</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Andrei Belitski</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Arthur Gretton</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Cesare Magri</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Yusuke Murayama</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Marcelo Montemurro</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Nikos Logothetis</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Stefano Panzeri</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0009-08.2008</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>J. Neurosci., Vol. 28, No. 22. (28 May 2008), pp. 5696-5709.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-02T10:17:41-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>J. Neurosci.</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>22</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>5696</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>5709</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>lfp</prism:category>
    <prism:category>multiunit_activity</prism:category>
    <prism:category>neural_coding</prism:category>
    <prism:category>v1</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2844657">
    <title>Dissociating the Role of the Orbitofrontal Cortex and the Striatum in the Computation of Goal Values and Prediction Errors</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2844657</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;J. Neurosci., Vol. 28, No. 22. (28 May 2008), pp. 5623-5630.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To make sound economic decisions, the brain needs to compute several different value-related signals. These include goal values that measure the predicted reward that results from the outcome generated by each of the actions under consideration, decision values that measure the net value of taking the different actions, and prediction errors that measure deviations from individuals' previous reward expectations. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and a novel decision-making paradigm to dissociate the neural basis of these three computations. Our results show that they are supported by different neural substrates: goal values are correlated with activity in the medial orbitofrontal cortex, decision values are correlated with activity in the central orbitofrontal cortex, and prediction errors are correlated with activity in the ventral striatum. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1309-08.2008</description>
    <dc:title>Dissociating the Role of the Orbitofrontal Cortex and the Striatum in the Computation of Goal Values and Prediction Errors</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Todd Hare</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Colin Camerer</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Wolfram Schultz</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Antonio Rangel</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1309-08.2008</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>J. Neurosci., Vol. 28, No. 22. (28 May 2008), pp. 5623-5630.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-29T14:39:09-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>J. Neurosci.</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>22</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>5623</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>5630</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>decision_making</prism:category>
    <prism:category>fmri</prism:category>
    <prism:category>goal</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ofc</prism:category>
    <prism:category>prediction_errors</prism:category>
    <prism:category>striatum</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2837511">
    <title>Reward prediction based on stimulus categorization in primate lateral prefrontal cortex</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2837511</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Nat Neurosci, Vol. 11, No. 6. (June 2008), pp. 703-712.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Reward prediction based on stimulus categorization in primate lateral prefrontal cortex</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Xiaochuan Pan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Kosuke Sawa</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ichiro Tsuda</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Minoru Tsukada</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Masamichi Sakagami</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/nn.2128</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Nat Neurosci, Vol. 11, No. 6. (June 2008), pp. 703-712.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-27T13:41:33-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Nat Neurosci</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>6</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>703</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>712</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Nature Publishing Group</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>pfc</prism:category>
    <prism:category>reward</prism:category>
    <prism:category>reward_prediction</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/90442">
    <title>Change in motor plan, without a change in the spatial locus of attention, modulates activity in posterior parietal cortex.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/90442</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;J Neurophysiol, Vol. 79, No. 5. (May 1998), pp. 2814-2819.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The lateral intraparietal area (LIP) of macaque monkey, and a parietal reach region (PRR) medial and posterior to LIP, code the intention to make visually guided eye and arm movements, respectively. We studied the effect of changing the motor plan, without changing the locus of attention, on single neurons in these two areas. A central target was fixated while one or two sequential flashes occurred in the periphery. The first appeared either within the response field of the neuron being recorded or else on the opposite side of the fixation point. Animals planned a saccade (red flash) or reach (green flash) to the flash location. In some trials, a second flash 750 ms later could change the motor plan but never shifted attention: second flashes always occurred at the same location as the preceding first flash. Responses in LIP were larger when a saccade was instructed (n = 20 cells), whereas responses in PRR were larger when a reach was instructed (n = 17). This motor preference was observed for both first flashes and second flashes. In addition, the response to a second flash depended on whether it affirmed or countermanded the first flash; second flash responses were diminished only in the former case. Control experiments indicated that this differential effect was not due to stimulus novelty. These findings support a role for posterior parietal cortex in coding specific motor intention and are consistent with a possible role in the nonspatial shifting of motor intention.</description>
    <dc:title>Change in motor plan, without a change in the spatial locus of attention, modulates activity in posterior parietal cortex.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>LH Snyder</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>AP Batista</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>RA Andersen</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>J Neurophysiol, Vol. 79, No. 5. (May 1998), pp. 2814-2819.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-02-08T21:19:20-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1998</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>J Neurophysiol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0022-3077</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>79</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>2814</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>2819</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>arm_movement</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lip</prism:category>
    <prism:category>movement_planning</prism:category>
    <prism:category>parietal_cortex</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ppc</prism:category>
    <prism:category>prr</prism:category>
    <prism:category>saccade</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/615903">
    <title>Saccade-related activity in the parietal reach region.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/615903</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;J Neurophysiol, Vol. 83, No. 2. (February 2000), pp. 1099-1102.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In previous experiments, we showed that cells in the parietal reach region (PRR) in monkey posterior parietal cortex code intended reaching movements in an eye-centered frame of reference. These cells are more active when an arm compared with an eye movement is being planned. Despite this clear preference for arm movements, we now report that PRR neurons also fire around the time of a saccade. Of 206 cells tested, 29% had perisaccadic activity in a delayed-saccade task. Two findings indicate that saccade-related activity does not reflect saccade planning or execution. First, activity is often peri- or postsaccadic but seldom presaccadic. Second, cells with saccade-related activity were no more likely to show strong saccadic delay period activity than cells without saccade-related activity. These findings indicate that PRR cells do not take part in saccade planning. Instead, the saccade-related activity in PRR may reflect cross-coupling between reach and saccade pathways that may be used to facilitate eye-hand coordination. Alternatively, saccade-related activity may reflect eye position information that could be used to maintain an eye-centered representation of intended reach targets across eye movements.</description>
    <dc:title>Saccade-related activity in the parietal reach region.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>LH Snyder</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>AP Batista</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>RA Andersen</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>J Neurophysiol, Vol. 83, No. 2. (February 2000), pp. 1099-1102.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-05-07T02:05:25-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2000</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>J Neurophysiol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0022-3077</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>83</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1099</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1102</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>prr</prism:category>
    <prism:category>saccade</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2799580">
    <title>Reward-Dependent Modulation of Neuronal Activity in the Primate Dorsal Raphe Nucleus</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2799580</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;J. Neurosci., Vol. 28, No. 20. (14 May 2008), pp. 5331-5343.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The dopamine system has been thought to play a central role in guiding behavior based on rewards. Recent pharmacological studies suggest that another monoamine neurotransmitter, serotonin, is also involved in reward processing. To elucidate the functional relationship between serotonin neurons and dopamine neurons, we performed single-unit recording in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN), a major source of serotonin, and the substantia nigra pars compacta, a major source of dopamine, while monkeys performed saccade tasks in which the position of the target indicated the size of an upcoming reward. After target onset, but before reward delivery, the activity of many DRN neurons was modulated tonically by the expected reward size with either large- or small-reward preference, whereas putative dopamine neurons had phasic responses and only preferred large rewards. After reward delivery, the activity of DRN neurons was modulated tonically by the received reward size with either large- or small-reward preference, whereas the activity of dopamine neurons was not modulated except after the unexpected reversal of the position-reward contingency. Thus, DRN neurons encode the expected and received rewards, whereas dopamine neurons encode the difference between the expected and received rewards. These results suggest that the DRN, probably including serotonin neurons, signals the reward value associated with the current behavior. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0021-08.2008</description>
    <dc:title>Reward-Dependent Modulation of Neuronal Activity in the Primate Dorsal Raphe Nucleus</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Kae Nakamura</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Masayuki Matsumoto</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Okihide Hikosaka</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0021-08.2008</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>J. Neurosci., Vol. 28, No. 20. (14 May 2008), pp. 5331-5343.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-14T17:09:11-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>J. Neurosci.</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>20</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>5331</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>5343</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>dopamine</prism:category>
    <prism:category>dopamine_neurons</prism:category>
    <prism:category>drn</prism:category>
    <prism:category>raphe</prism:category>
    <prism:category>reward</prism:category>
    <prism:category>serotonin</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2680019">
    <title>Free choice activates a decision circuit between frontal and parietal cortex</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2680019</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Nature (16 April 2008)&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Free choice activates a decision circuit between frontal and parietal cortex</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Bijan Pesaran</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Matthew Nelson</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Richard Andersen</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/nature06849</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Nature (16 April 2008)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-17T05:20:02-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Nature</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0028-0836</prism:issn>
    <prism:publisher>Nature Publishing Group</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>decision_making</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lfp</prism:category>
    <prism:category>parietal_cortex</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pmd</prism:category>
    <prism:category>prr</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sfc</prism:category>
    <prism:category>simultanous_recording</prism:category>
    <prism:category>spike_field_coherence</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2461067">
    <title>Measurements of Simultaneously Recorded Spiking Activity and Local Field Potentials Suggest that Spatial Selection Emerges in the Frontal Eye Field.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2461067</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Neuron, Vol. 57, No. 4. (28 February 2008), pp. 614-625.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The frontal eye field (FEF) participates in selecting the location of behaviorally relevant stimuli for guiding attention and eye movements. We simultaneously recorded local field potentials (LFPs) and spiking activity in the FEF of monkeys performing memory-guided saccade and covert visual search tasks. We compared visual latencies and the time course of spatially selective responses in LFPs and spiking activity. Consistent with the view that LFPs represent synaptic input, visual responses appeared first in the LFPs followed by visual responses in the spiking activity. However, spatially selective activity identifying the location of the target in the visual search array appeared in the spikes about 30 ms before it appeared in the LFPs. Because LFPs reflect dendritic input and spikes measure neuronal output in a local brain region, this temporal relationship suggests that spatial selection necessary for attention and eye movements is computed locally in FEF from spatially nonselective inputs.</description>
    <dc:title>Measurements of Simultaneously Recorded Spiking Activity and Local Field Potentials Suggest that Spatial Selection Emerges in the Frontal Eye Field.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>IE Monosov</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>JC Trageser</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>KG Thompson</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.12.030</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Neuron, Vol. 57, No. 4. (28 February 2008), pp. 614-625.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-03-03T15:48:38-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Neuron</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0896-6273</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>57</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>614</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>625</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>fef</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lfp</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2738840">
    <title>Processing of Social and Monetary Rewards in the Human Striatum</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2738840</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Neuron, Vol. 58, No. 2. (24 April 2008), pp. 284-294.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Summary Despite an increasing focus on the neural basis of human decision making in neuroscience, relatively little attention has been paid to decision making in social settings. Moreover, although human social decision making has been explored in a social psychology context, few neural explanations for the observed findings have been considered. To bridge this gap and improve models of human social decision making, we investigated whether acquiring a good reputation, which is an important incentive in human social behaviors, activates the same reward circuitry as monetary rewards. In total, 19 subjects participated in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments involving monetary and social rewards. The acquisition of one's good reputation robustly activated reward-related brain areas, notably the striatum, and these overlapped with the areas activated by monetary rewards. Our findings support the idea of a &#34;common neural currency&#34; for rewards and represent an important first step toward a neural explanation for complex human social behaviors.</description>
    <dc:title>Processing of Social and Monetary Rewards in the Human Striatum</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Keise Izuma</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Daisuke Saito</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Norihiro Sadato</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.020</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Neuron, Vol. 58, No. 2. (24 April 2008), pp. 284-294.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-30T14:48:07-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Neuron</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>284</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>294</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>fmri</prism:category>
    <prism:category>reward</prism:category>
    <prism:category>striatum</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2735607">
    <title>Perception of emotional expressions is independent of face selectivity in monkey inferior temporal cortex</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2735607</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 105, No. 14. (8 April 2008), pp. 5591-5596.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ability to perceive and differentiate facial expressions is vital for social communication. Numerous functional MRI (fMRI) studies in humans have shown enhanced responses to faces with different emotional valence, in both the amygdala and the visual cortex. However, relatively few studies have examined how valence influences neural responses in monkeys, thereby limiting the ability to draw comparisons across species and thus understand the underlying neural mechanisms. Here we tested the effects of macaque facial expressions on neural activation within these two regions using fMRI in three awake, behaving monkeys. Monkeys maintained central fixation while blocks of different monkey facial expressions were presented. Four different facial expressions were tested: (i) neutral, (ii) aggressive (open-mouthed threat), (iii) fearful (fear grin), and (iv) submissive (lip smack). Our results confirmed that both the amygdala and the inferior temporal cortex in monkeys are modulated by facial expressions. As in human fMRI, fearful expressions evoked the greatest response in monkeys--even though fearful expressions are physically dissimilar in humans and macaques. Furthermore, we found that valence effects were not uniformly distributed over the inferior temporal cortex. Surprisingly, these valence maps were independent of two related functional maps: (i) the map of &#34;face-selective&#34; regions (faces versus non-face objects) and (ii) the map of &#34;face-responsive&#34; regions (faces versus scrambled images). Thus, the neural mechanisms underlying face perception and valence perception appear to be distinct. 10.1073/pnas.0800489105</description>
    <dc:title>Perception of emotional expressions is independent of face selectivity in monkey inferior temporal cortex</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Fadila Hadj-Bouziane</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Bell</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Tamara Knusten</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Leslie Ungerleider</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Roger Tootell</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1073/pnas.0800489105</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 105, No. 14. (8 April 2008), pp. 5591-5596.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-29T22:47:03-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>105</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>14</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>5591</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>5596</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>amygdala</prism:category>
    <prism:category>face_recognition</prism:category>
    <prism:category>fmri</prism:category>
    <prism:category>temporal_cortex</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2447209">
    <title>BOLD Responses Reflecting Dopaminergic Signals in the Human Ventral Tegmental Area</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2447209</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Science, Vol. 319, No. 5867. (29 February 2008), pp. 1264-1267.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Current theories hypothesize that dopamine neuronal firing encodes reward prediction errors. Although studies in nonhuman species provide direct support for this theory, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies in humans have focused on brain areas targeted by dopamine neurons [ventral striatum (VStr)] rather than on brainstem dopaminergic nuclei [ventral tegmental area (VTA) and substantia nigra]. We used fMRI tailored to directly image the brainstem. When primary rewards were used in an experiment, the VTA blood oxygen leveldependent (BOLD) response reflected a positive reward prediction error, whereas the VStr encoded positive and negative reward prediction errors. When monetary gains and losses were used, VTA BOLD responses reflected positive reward prediction errors modulated by the probability of winning. We detected no significant VTA BOLD response to nonrewarding events. 10.1126/science.1150605</description>
    <dc:title>BOLD Responses Reflecting Dopaminergic Signals in the Human Ventral Tegmental Area</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Kimberlee D'Ardenne</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Samuel Mcclure</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Leigh Nystrom</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jonathan Cohen</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1126/science.1150605</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Science, Vol. 319, No. 5867. (29 February 2008), pp. 1264-1267.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-29T10:21:12-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>319</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5867</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1264</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1267</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>dopamine_neurons</prism:category>
    <prism:category>fmri</prism:category>
    <prism:category>prediction_errors</prism:category>
    <prism:category>vta</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2547218">
    <title>Neural correlates of perceptual learning in a sensory-motor, but not a sensory, cortical area.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2547218</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Nat Neurosci (9 March 2008)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This study aimed to identify neural mechanisms that underlie perceptual learning in a visual-discrimination task. We trained two monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to determine the direction of visual motion while we recorded from their middle temporal area (MT), which in trained monkeys represents motion information that is used to solve the task, and lateral intraparietal area (LIP), which represents the transformation of motion information into a saccadic choice. During training, improved behavioral sensitivity to weak motion signals was accompanied by changes in motion-driven responses of neurons in LIP, but not in MT. The time course and magnitude of the changes in LIP correlated with the changes in behavioral sensitivity throughout training. Thus, for this task, perceptual learning does not appear to involve improvements in how sensory information is represented in the brain, but rather how the sensory representation is interpreted to form the decision that guides behavior.</description>
    <dc:title>Neural correlates of perceptual learning in a sensory-motor, but not a sensory, cortical area.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Chi-Tat Law</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Joshua I Gold</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/nn2070</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Nat Neurosci (9 March 2008)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-03-17T17:04:07-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Nat Neurosci</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1097-6256</prism:issn>
    <prism:category>lip</prism:category>
    <prism:category>mt</prism:category>
    <prism:category>parietal_cortex</prism:category>
    <prism:category>perceptual_learning</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/196274">
    <title>Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/196274</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Science, Vol. 308, No. 5721. (22 April 2005), pp. 529-534.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To find a target object in a crowded scene, a face in a crowd for example, the visual system might turn the neural representation of each object on and off in a serial fashion, testing each representation against a template of the target item. Alternatively, it might allow the processing of all objects in parallel but bias activity in favor of those neurons that represent critical features of the target, until the target emerges from the background. To test these possibilities, we recorded neurons in area V4 of monkeys freely scanning a complex array to find a target defined by color, shape, or both. Throughout the period of searching, neurons gave enhanced responses and synchronized their activity in the gamma range whenever a preferred stimulus in their receptive field matched a feature of the target, as predicted by parallel models. Neurons also gave enhanced responses to candidate targets that were selected for saccades, or foveation, reflecting a serial component of visual search. Thus, serial and parallel mechanisms of response enhancement and neural synchrony work together to identify objects in a scene. To find a target object in a crowded scene, a face in a crowd for example, the visual system might turn the neural representation of each object on and off in a serial fashion, testing each representation against a template of the target item. Alternatively, it might allow the processing of all objects in parallel but bias activity in favor of those neurons that represent critical features of the target, until the target emerges from the background. To test these possibilities, we recorded neurons in area V4 of monkeys freely scanning a complex array to find a target defined by color, shape, or both. Throughout the period of searching, neurons gave enhanced responses and synchronized their activity in the gamma range whenever a preferred stimulus in their receptive field matched a feature of the target, as predicted by parallel models. Neurons also gave enhanced responses to candidate targets that were selected for saccades, or foveation, reflecting a serial component of visual search. Thus, serial and parallel mechanisms of response enhancement and neural synchrony work together to identify objects in a scene.</description>
    <dc:title>Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>NP Bichot</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>AF Rossi</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>R Desimone</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1126/science.1109676</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Science, Vol. 308, No. 5721. (22 April 2005), pp. 529-534.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-05-11T13:54:34-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1095-9203</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>308</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5721</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>529</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>534</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>attention</prism:category>
    <prism:category>coherence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lfp</prism:category>
    <prism:category>v4</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2523192">
    <title>Unique Properties of Mesoprefrontal Neurons within a Dual Mesocorticolimbic Dopamine System</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2523192</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Neuron, Vol. 57, No. 5. (13 March 2008), pp. 760-773.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Summary The mesocorticolimbic dopamine system is essential for cognitive and emotive brain functions and is thus an important target in major brain diseases like schizophrenia, drug addiction, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. However, the cellular basis for the diversity in behavioral functions and associated dopamine-release pattern within the mesocorticolimbic system has remained unclear. Here, we report the identification of a type of dopaminergic neuron within the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system with unconventional fast-firing properties and small DAT/TH mRNA expression ratios that selectively projects to prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens core and medial shell as well as to basolateral amygdala. In contrast, well-described conventional slow-firing dopamine midbrain neurons only project to the lateral shell of the nucleus accumbens and the dorsolateral striatum. Among this dual dopamine midbrain system defined in this study by converging anatomical, electrophysiological, and molecular properties, mesoprefrontal dopaminergic neurons are unique, as only they do not possess functional somatodendritic Girk2-coupled dopamine D2 autoreceptors.</description>
    <dc:title>Unique Properties of Mesoprefrontal Neurons within a Dual Mesocorticolimbic Dopamine System</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Stephan Lammel</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Andrea Hetzel</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Olga Hackel</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ian Jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Birgit Liss</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jochen Roeper</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.022</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Neuron, Vol. 57, No. 5. (13 March 2008), pp. 760-773.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-03-13T00:38:04-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Neuron</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>57</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>760</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>773</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>dopamine_neurons</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/447367">
    <title>Gamma-band synchronization in visual cortex predicts speed of change detection</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/447367</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Nature (21 December 2005)&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Gamma-band synchronization in visual cortex predicts speed of change detection</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Thilo Womelsdorf</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Pascal Fries</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Partha Mitra</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Robert Desimone</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/nature04258</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Nature (21 December 2005)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-12-22T22:43:36-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Nature</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0028-0836</prism:issn>
    <prism:publisher>Nature Publishing Group</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>attention</prism:category>
    <prism:category>coherence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lfp</prism:category>
    <prism:category>v4</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/335441">
    <title>Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/335441</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Nature, Vol. 412, No. 6843. (12 July 2001), pp. 150-157.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is widely used to study the operational organization of the human brain, but the exact relationship between the measured fMRI signal and the underlying neural activity is unclear. Here we present simultaneous intracortical recordings of neural signals and fMRI responses. We compared local field potentials (LFPs), single- and multi-unit spiking activity with highly spatio-temporally resolved blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI responses from the visual cortex of monkeys. The largest magnitude changes were observed in LFPs, which at recording sites characterized by transient responses were the only signal that significantly correlated with the haemodynamic response. Linear systems analysis on a trial-by-trial basis showed that the impulse response of the neurovascular system is both animal- and site-specific, and that LFPs yield a better estimate of BOLD responses than the multi-unit responses. These findings suggest that the BOLD contrast mechanism reflects the input and intracortical processing of a given area rather than its spiking output.</description>
    <dc:title>Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>NK Logothetis</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>J Pauls</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>M Augath</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>T Trinath</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>A Oeltermann</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/35084005</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Nature, Vol. 412, No. 6843. (12 July 2001), pp. 150-157.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-09-29T20:08:57-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Nature</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0028-0836</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>412</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>6843</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>150</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>157</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>fmri</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lfp</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2285145">
    <title>Behavioral Shifts and Action Valuation in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2285145</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Neuron, Vol. 57, No. 2. (24 January 2008), pp. 314-325.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Summary Rapid optimization of behavior requires decisions about when to explore and when to exploit discovered resources. The mechanisms that lead to fast adaptations and their interaction with action valuation are a central issue. We show here that the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) encodes multiple feedbacks devoted to exploration and its immediate termination. In a task that alternates exploration and exploitation periods, the ACC monitored negative and positive outcomes relevant for different adaptations. In particular, it produced signals specific of the first reward, i.e., the end of exploration. Those signals disappeared in exploitation periods but immediately transferred to the initiation of trials--a transfer comparable to learning phenomena observed for dopaminergic neurons. Importantly, these were also observed for high gamma oscillations of local field potentials shown to correlate with brain imaging signal. Thus, mechanisms of action valuation and monitoring of events/actions are combined for rapid behavioral regulation.</description>
    <dc:title>Behavioral Shifts and Action Valuation in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Rene Quilodran</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Marie Rothe</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Emmanuel Procyk</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.11.031</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Neuron, Vol. 57, No. 2. (24 January 2008), pp. 314-325.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-24T15:58:11-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Neuron</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>57</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>314</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>325</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>acc</prism:category>
    <prism:category>learning</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lfp</prism:category>
    <prism:category>value</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2194444">
    <title>Single neurons in prefrontal cortex encode abstract rules</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2194444</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Nature, Vol. 411, No. 6840. (21 June 2001), pp. 953-956.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Single neurons in prefrontal cortex encode abstract rules</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Jonathan Wallis</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Kathleen Anderson</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Earl Miller</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/35082081</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Nature, Vol. 411, No. 6840. (21 June 2001), pp. 953-956.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-04T12:19:07-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Nature</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>411</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>6840</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>953</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>956</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>context_dependent</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pfc</prism:category>
    <prism:category>rule_encoding</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2053169">
    <title>Combining Independent Chi-Squared Tests</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/2053169</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 73, No. 364. (1978), pp. 753-763.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Combining Independent Chi-Squared Tests</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>James Koziol</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Perlman</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 73, No. 364. (1978), pp. 753-763.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-12-03T23:14:33-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1978</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Statistical Association</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>73</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>364</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>753</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>763</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>statistical_tests</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/611619">
    <title>Combining Independent Statistical Tests</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/611619</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the present study two well-known combination methods, Fisher's and Tippett's, are compared according to their power. The calculations are made for normally and chi-square distributed test statistics. None of the two procedures is uniformly better than the other according to the power but sometimes the power curves cross each other. The calculated power-graphs give guidelines for when to use Fisher's method and when to use Tippett's.</description>
    <dc:title>Combining Independent Statistical Tests</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Margareta Westberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-05-02T18:39:07-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>statistical_tests</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1885381">
    <title>Differential Effects of Long-Term Potentiation Evoked at the CA3 CA1 Synapse before, during, and after the Acquisition of Classical Eyeblink Conditioning in Behaving Mice</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1885381</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;J. Neurosci., Vol. 27, No. 45. (7 November 2007), pp. 12139-12146.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Experimentally induced long-term potentiation (LTP) is a persistent increase in synaptic strength that decays across time. In contrast, changes in synaptic strength during actual learning are gradual processes that increase with training. We have studied here the effects of LTP evoked before, during, and after the acquisition of a well known associative learning paradigm: the classical eyeblink conditioning. We used a trace paradigm, with a tone as the conditioned stimulus (CS) and an electric shock presented to the supraorbital nerve as the unconditioned stimulus (US). A single electrical pulse was presented to the Schaffer collateral-commissural pathway to evoke field EPSPs (fEPSPs) during the CSUS interval. LTP induced by high-frequency stimulation of the Schaffer collaterals lasted for 610 d. When LTP was evoked before conditioning, animals were unable to acquire conditioned eyeblinks if the training started 8 d after LTP disappearance, and no change was detected in fEPSP evoked at the CA3CA1 synapse during conditioning. In contrast, LTP-induced animals learned as did controls when the conditioning test was presented 20 d after LTP had decayed to baseline, and presented a normal increase in fEPSP slopes across conditioning. When evoked during the first two conditioning sessions, LTP prevented both eyeblink conditioning and fEPSP increase. Finally, LTP did not disrupt the normal performance of a recall test of a previously acquired eyeblink conditioning. In this latter experiment, both the LTP-induced potentiation of fEPSPs and their physiological potentiation decayed across time with a similar time constant, with no apparent effect on memory recall. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3397-07.2007</description>
    <dc:title>Differential Effects of Long-Term Potentiation Evoked at the CA3 CA1 Synapse before, during, and after the Acquisition of Classical Eyeblink Conditioning in Behaving Mice</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Noelia Madronal</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jose Delgado-Garcia</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Agnes Gruart</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3397-07.2007</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>J. Neurosci., Vol. 27, No. 45. (7 November 2007), pp. 12139-12146.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-11-08T17:07:17-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>J. Neurosci.</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>45</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>12139</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>12146</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>hippocampus</prism:category>
    <prism:category>learning</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ltp</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/816402">
    <title>Learning Induces Long-Term Potentiation in the Hippocampus</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/816402</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Science, Vol. 313, No. 5790. (25 August 2006), pp. 1093-1097.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Years of intensive investigation have yielded a sophisticated understanding of long-term potentiation (LTP) induced in hippocampal area CA1 by high-frequency stimulation (HFS). These efforts have been motivated by the belief that similar synaptic modifications occur during memory formation, but it has never been shown that learning actually induces LTP in CA1. We found that one-trial inhibitory avoidance learning in rats produced the same changes in hippocampal glutamate receptors as induction of LTP with HFS and caused a spatially restricted increase in the amplitude of evoked synaptic transmission in CA1 in vivo. Because the learning-induced synaptic potentiation occluded HFS-induced LTP, we conclude that inhibitory avoidance training induces LTP in CA1. 10.1126/science.1128134</description>
    <dc:title>Learning Induces Long-Term Potentiation in the Hippocampus</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Jonathan Whitlock</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Arnold Heynen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Marshall Shuler</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mark Bear</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1126/science.1128134</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Science, Vol. 313, No. 5790. (25 August 2006), pp. 1093-1097.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-08-25T08:26:21-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>313</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5790</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1093</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1097</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>hippocampus</prism:category>
    <prism:category>learning</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ltp</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1851641">
    <title>Testing for short- and long-run causality: A frequency-domain approach</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1851641</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 132, No. 2. (June 2006), pp. 363-378.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The framework of Geweke (1982. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77, 304-324.) and Hosoya (1991. Probability Theory and Related Fields 88, 429-444.) is adopted to construct a simple test for causality in the frequency domain. This test can also be applied to cointegrated systems. To study the large sample properties of the test, we analyze the power against a sequence of local alternatives. The finite sample properties are investigated by means of Monte Carlo simulations. Our methodology is applied to investigate the predictive content of the yield spread for future output growth. Using quarterly US data we observe reasonable leading indicator properties at frequencies around one year and typical business cycle frequencies.</description>
    <dc:title>Testing for short- and long-run causality: A frequency-domain approach</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Jorg Breitung</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Bertrand Candelon</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.004</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 132, No. 2. (June 2006), pp. 363-378.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-11-01T16:18:29-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journal of Econometrics</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>132</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>363</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>378</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>granger_causality</prism:category>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1575143">
    <title>Changes in Functional Connectivity in Orbitofrontal Cortex and Basolateral Amygdala during Learning and Reversal Training</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1575143</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;J. Neurosci., Vol. 20, No. 13. (1 July 2000), pp. 5179-5189.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interconnections between orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and basolateral amygdala (ABL) are critical for encoding and using associative information about the motivational significance of stimuli. Previously, we reported that neurons in OFC and ABL fired selectively to cues during odor discrimination learning and reversal training. Here we conducted an analysis of correlated firing in the cell pairs recorded in the previous study. Correlated firing during the intertrial intervals was compared across task phases during different phases of acquisition and reversal learning. Changes in correlated activity during initial learning and subsequent accurate performance on the discrimination problems closely resembled the changes in odor selectivity in OFC and ABL reported earlier. Increased correlated firing was most pronounced in OFC during accurate go, no-go performance in the postcriterion phase of performance, whereas correlated firing in ABL increased primarily during an earlier phase of learning. In contrast, findings during subsequent reversal training diverged from our earlier report in which odor selectivity diminished in OFC and reversed in ABL. When the reinforcement contingencies of the odors were reversed after the rat had learned the original associations, correlated firing further increased significantly in OFC but remained stable in ABL. This evidence that associative encoding increments with reversal learning in OFC suggests that the original associations, although not expressed as stimulus driven activity, may be maintained within the network as new associations are acquired.</description>
    <dc:title>Changes in Functional Connectivity in Orbitofrontal Cortex and Basolateral Amygdala during Learning and Reversal Training</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Geoffrey Schoenbaum</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Andrea Chiba</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michela Gallagher</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>J. Neurosci., Vol. 20, No. 13. (1 July 2000), pp. 5179-5189.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-08-19T12:51:16-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2000</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>J. Neurosci.</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>13</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>5179</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>5189</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>amygdala</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ofc</prism:category>
    <prism:category>simultanous_recording</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1580797">
    <title>Neuron -- Hampton et al.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1580797</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Neuron -- Hampton et al.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>JP O'Doherty</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-21T20:04:10-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:category>amygdala</prism:category>
    <prism:category>fmri</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pfc</prism:category>
    <prism:category>reward</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1522936">
    <title>Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1522936</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Biological Cybernetics, Vol. 85, No. 2. (2001), pp. 145-157.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We consider the question of evaluating causal relations among neurobiological signals. In particular, we study the relation between the directed transfer function (DTF) and the well-accepted Granger causality, and show that DTF can be interpreted within the framework of Granger causality. In addition, we propose a method to assess the significance of causality measures. Finally, we demonstrate the applications of these measures to simulated data and actual neurobiological recordings.</description>
    <dc:title>Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Maciej Kamiński</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mingzhou Ding</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Wilson Truccolo</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Steven Bressler</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/s004220000235</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Biological Cybernetics, Vol. 85, No. 2. (2001), pp. 145-157.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-07-30T19:35:27-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Biological Cybernetics</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>85</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>145</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>157</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>granger_causality</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/949311">
    <title>Measures of Conditional Linear Dependence and Feedback Between Time Series</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/949311</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 79, No. 388. (1984), pp. 907-915.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Measures of linear dependence and feedback for two multiple time series conditional on a third are defined. The measure of conditional linear dependence is the sum of linear feedback from the first to the second conditional on the third, linear feedback from the second to the first conditional on the third, and instantaneous linear feedback between the first and second series conditional on the third. The measures are non-negative and may be expressed in terms of measures of unconditional feedback between various combinations of the three series. The measures of conditional linear feedback can be additively decomposed by frequency. Estimates of these measures are straightforward to compute, and their distribution can be routinely approximated by bootstrap methods. An empirical example involving real output, money, and interest rates is presented.</description>
    <dc:title>Measures of Conditional Linear Dependence and Feedback Between Time Series</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>John Geweke</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 79, No. 388. (1984), pp. 907-915.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-16T18:00:48-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1984</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Statistical Association</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>79</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>388</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>907</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>915</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>granger_causality</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/949310">
    <title>Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback Between Multiple Time Series</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/949310</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 77, No. 378. (1982), pp. 304-313.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Measures of linear dependence and feedback for multiple time series are defined. The measure of linear dependence is the sum of the measure of linear feedback from the first series to the second, linear feedback from the second to the first, and instantaneous linear feedback. The measures are nonnegative, and zero only when feedback (causality) of the relevant type is absent. The measures of linear feedback from one series to another can be additively decomposed by frequency. A readily usable theory of inference for all of these measures and their decompositions is described; the computations involved are modest.</description>
    <dc:title>Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback Between Multiple Time Series</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>John Geweke</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 77, No. 378. (1982), pp. 304-313.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-11-16T17:58:51-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1982</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Statistical Association</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>77</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>378</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>304</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>313</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>granger_causality</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1303897">
    <title>Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1303897</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Econometrica, Vol. 37, No. 3. (1969), pp. 424-438.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There occurs on some occasions a difficulty in deciding the direction of causality between two related variables and also whether or not feedback is occurring. Testable definitions of causality and feedback are proposed and illustrated by use of simple two-variable models. The important problem of apparent instantaneous causality is discussed and it is suggested that the problem often arises due to slowness in recording information or because a sufficiently wide class of possible causal variables has not been used. It can be shown that the cross spectrum between two variables can be decomposed into two parts, each relating to a single causal arm of a feedback situation. Measures of causal lag and causal strength can then be constructed. A generalisation of this result with the partial cross spectrum is suggested.</description>
    <dc:title>Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>CWJ Granger</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Econometrica, Vol. 37, No. 3. (1969), pp. 424-438.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-05-17T18:01:02-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1969</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Econometrica</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>424</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>438</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>granger_causality</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1469921">
    <title>Linear and nonlinear causality between signals: methods, examples and neurophysiological applications</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1469921</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Biological Cybernetics, Vol. 95, No. 4. (29 October 2006), pp. 349-369.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Abstract&#160;&#160;In this paper, we will present and review the most usual methods to detect linear and nonlinear causality between signals: linear Granger causality test (Geweke in J Am Stat Assoc 77:304–313, 1982) extended to direct causality in multivariate case (LGC), directed coherence (DCOH, Saito and Harashima in Recent advances in EEG and EMG data processing, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1981), partial directed coherence (PDC, Sameshima and Baccala 1999) and nonlinear Granger causality test of Baek and Brock (in Working Paper University of Iowa, 1992) extended to direct causality in multivariate case (partial nonlinear Granger causality, PNGC). All these methods are tested and compared on several ARX, Poisson and nonlinear models, and on neurophysiological data (depth EEG). The results show that LGC, DCOH and PDC are not very robust in relation to nonlinear linkages but they seem to correctly find linear linkages if only the autoregressive parts are nonlinear. PNGC is extremely dependent on the choice of parameters. Moreover, LGC and PNGC may give misleading results in the case of causality on a spectral band, which is illustrated by our neurophysiological database.</description>
    <dc:title>Linear and nonlinear causality between signals: methods, examples and neurophysiological applications</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Boris Gourévitch</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Régine Bouquin-Jeannès</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Gérard Faucon</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/s00422-006-0098-0</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Biological Cybernetics, Vol. 95, No. 4. (29 October 2006), pp. 349-369.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-07-20T16:07:21-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Biological Cybernetics</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>95</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>349</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>369</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>granger_causality</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/482991">
    <title>Frequency decomposition of conditional Granger causality and application to multivariate neural field potential data</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/482991</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 150, No. 2. (30 January 2006), pp. 228-237.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is often useful in multivariate time series analysis to determine statistical causal relations between different time series. Granger causality is a fundamental measure for this purpose. Yet the traditional pairwise approach to Granger causality analysis may not clearly distinguish between direct causal influences from one time series to another and indirect ones acting through a third time series. In order to differentiate direct from indirect Granger causality, a conditional Granger causality measure in the frequency domain is derived based on a partition matrix technique. Simulations and an application to neural field potential time series are demonstrated to validate the method.</description>
    <dc:title>Frequency decomposition of conditional Granger causality and application to multivariate neural field potential data</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Yonghong Chen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Steven Bressler</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mingzhou Ding</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.06.011</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 150, No. 2. (30 January 2006), pp. 228-237.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-01-27T16:32:00-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journal of Neuroscience Methods</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>150</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>228</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>237</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>granger_causality</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lfp</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/500306">
    <title>Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/500306</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, Vol. 101, No. 26. (29 June 2004), pp. 9849-9854.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Previous studies have shown that synchronized beta frequency (14-30 Hz) oscillations in the primary motor cortex are involved in maintaining steady contractions of contralateral arm and hand muscles. However, little is known about the role of postcentral cortical areas in motor maintenance and their patterns of interaction with motor cortex. We investigated the functional relations of beta-synchronized neuronal assemblies in pre- and postcentral areas of two monkeys as they pressed a hand lever during the wait period of a visual discrimination task. By using power and coherence spectral analysis, we identified a beta-synchronized large-scale network linking pre- and postcentral areas. We then used Granger causality spectra to measure directional influences among recording sites. In both monkeys, strong Granger causal influences were observed from primary somatosensory cortex to both motor cortex and inferior posterior parietal cortex, with the latter area also exerting Granger causal influences on motor cortex. Granger causal influences from motor cortex to postcentral sites, however, were weak in one monkey and not observed in the other. These results are the first, to our knowledge, to demonstrate in awake monkeys that synchronized beta oscillations bind multiple sensorimotor areas into a large-scale network during motor maintenance behavior and carry Granger causal influences from primary somatosensory and inferior posterior parietal cortices to motor cortex.</description>
    <dc:title>Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>A Brovelli</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>M Ding</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>A Ledberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Y Chen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>R Nakamura</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>SL Bressler</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1073/pnas.0308538101</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, Vol. 101, No. 26. (29 June 2004), pp. 9849-9854.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-02-09T21:36:02-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0027-8424</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>101</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>26</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>9849</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>9854</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>granger_causality</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lfp</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1430960">
    <title>Learning-related coordination of striatal and hippocampal theta rhythms during acquisition of a procedural maze task</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1430960</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;PNAS, Vol. 104, No. 13. (27 March 2007), pp. 5644-5649.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The striatum and hippocampus are conventionally viewed as complementary learning and memory systems, with the hippocampus specialized for fact-based episodic memory and the striatum for procedural learning and memory. Here we directly tested whether these two systems exhibit independent or coordinated activity patterns during procedural learning. We trained rats on a conditional T-maze task requiring navigational and cue-based associative learning. We recorded local field potential (LFP) activity with tetrodes chronically implanted in the caudoputamen and the CA1 field of the dorsal hippocampus during 6-25 days of training. We show that simultaneously recorded striatal and hippocampal theta rhythms are modulated differently as the rats learned to perform the T-maze task but nevertheless become highly coherent during the choice period of the maze runs in rats that successfully learned the task. Moreover, in the rats that acquired the task, the phase of the striatal-hippocampal theta coherence was modified toward a consistent antiphase relationship, and these changes occurred in proportion to the levels of learning achieved. We suggest that rhythmic oscillations, including theta-band activity, could influence not only neural processing in cortico-basal ganglia circuits but also dynamic interactions between basal ganglia-based and hippocampus-based forebrain circuits during the acquisition and performance of learned behaviors. Experience-dependent changes in coordination of oscillatory activity across brain structures thus may parallel the well known plasticity of spike activity that occurs as a function of experience. 10.1073/pnas.0700818104</description>
    <dc:title>Learning-related coordination of striatal and hippocampal theta rhythms during acquisition of a procedural maze task</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>William Decoteau</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Catherine Thorn</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Gibson</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Richard Courtemanche</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Partha Mitra</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Yasuo Kubota</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ann Graybiel</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1073/pnas.0700818104</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>PNAS, Vol. 104, No. 13. (27 March 2007), pp. 5644-5649.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-07-03T15:11:01-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>PNAS</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>13</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>5644</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>5649</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>coherence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>hippocampus</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lfp</prism:category>
    <prism:category>simultanous_recording</prism:category>
    <prism:category>striatum</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1066957">
    <title>Comparing spectra and coherences for groups of unequal size</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1066957</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 159, No. 2. (30 January 2007), pp. 337-345.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Spectra and coherences are standard measures of association within and between time series. These measures have several advantages over their time-domain counterparts, not the least of which is the ability to derive and estimate confidence intervals. However, comparing spectra and coherences between two groups of observation is a problem that has not received much attention. This problem is important in neuroscience since it is often of great interest to determine whether the estimates differ between distinct experimental/behavioral conditions. Here we propose one approach to this problem. Based on the known distributional properties of spectral and coherence estimates, we derive a test for equality of two spectral or coherence estimates. The test is applicable to unequal sample sizes. We also derive jackknifed estimates of the variance of the proposed test statistic. We suggest that comparing the estimates obtained from the jackknife procedure with the theoretical estimates provides a robust means of determining whether the data in question shows non-Gaussian or non-stationary behavior. Finally, we present applications of the method to simulated and real data.</description>
    <dc:title>Comparing spectra and coherences for groups of unequal size</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Hemant Bokil</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Keith Purpura</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>David Thomson</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Partha Mitra</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.07.011</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 159, No. 2. (30 January 2007), pp. 337-345.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-01-25T14:04:00-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journal of Neuroscience Methods</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>159</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>337</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>345</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>coherence</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1391621">
    <title>Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention: How Top-Down Feedback Highlights Relevant Locations</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1391621</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Science, Vol. 316, No. 5831. (15 June 2007), pp. 1612-1615.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Attention helps us process potentially important objects by selectively increasing the activity of sensory neurons that represent the relevant locations and features of our environment. This selection process requires top-down feedback about what is important in our environment. We investigated how parietal cortical output influences neural activity in early sensory areas. Neural recordings were made simultaneously from the posterior parietal cortex and an earlier area in the visual pathway, the medial temporal area, of macaques performing a visual matching task. When the monkey selectively attended to a location, the timing of activities in the two regions became synchronized, with the parietal cortex leading the medial temporal area. Parietal neurons may thus selectively increase activity in earlier sensory areas to enable focused spatial attention. 10.1126/science.1139140</description>
    <dc:title>Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention: How Top-Down Feedback Highlights Relevant Locations</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Yuri Saalmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ivan Pigarev</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Trichur Vidyasagar</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1126/science.1139140</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Science, Vol. 316, No. 5831. (15 June 2007), pp. 1612-1615.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-06-15T08:59:06-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>316</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5831</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1612</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1615</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>attention</prism:category>
    <prism:category>coherence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lfp</prism:category>
    <prism:category>mt</prism:category>
    <prism:category>parietal_cortex</prism:category>
    <prism:category>simultanous_recording</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1197981">
    <title>Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Control of Attention in the Prefrontal and Posterior Parietal Cortices</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/as3171/article/1197981</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Science, Vol. 315, No. 5820. (30 March 2007), pp. 1860-1862.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Attention can be focused volitionally by &#34;top-down&#34; signals derived from task demands and automatically by &#34;bottom-up&#34; signals from salient stimuli. The frontal and parietal cortices are involved, but their neural activity has not been directly compared. Therefore, we recorded from them simultaneously in monkeys. Prefrontal neurons reflected the target location first during top-down attention, whereas parietal neurons signaled it earlier during bottom-up attention. Synchrony between frontal and parietal areas was stronger in lower frequencies during top-down attention and in higher frequencies during bottom-up attention. This result indicates that top-down and bottom-up signals arise from the frontal and sensory cortex, respectively, and different modes of attention may emphasize synchrony at different frequencies. 10.1126/science.1138071</description>
    <dc:title>Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Control of Attention in the Prefrontal and Posterior Parietal Cortices</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Timothy Buschman</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Earl Miller</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1126/science.1138071</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Science, Vol. 315, No. 5820. (30 March 2007), pp. 1860-1862.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-03-30T13:28:45-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>315</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5820</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1860</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1862</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>attention</prism:category>
    <prism:category>coherence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lfp</prism:category>
    <prism:category>parietal_cortex</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pfc</prism:category>
    <prism:category>simultanous_recording</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

