<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:51:27 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: briordan's Creel</title>
	<description>CiteULike: briordan's Creel</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/author/Creel</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2271020"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2271020">
    <title>Heeding the voice of experience: The role of talker variation in lexical access</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2271020</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Cognition, Vol. 106, No. 2. (February 2008), pp. 633-664.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Two experiments used the head-mounted eye-tracking methodology to examine the time course of lexical activation in the face of a non-phonemic cue, talker variation. We found that lexical competition was attenuated by consistent talker differences between words that would otherwise be lexical competitors. In Experiment 1, some English cohort word-pairs were consistently spoken by a single talker (male couch, male cows), while other word-pairs were spoken by different talkers (male sheep, female sheet). After repeated instances of talker-word pairings, words from different-talker pairs showed smaller proportions of competitor fixations than words from same-talker pairs. In Experiment 2, participants learned to identify black-and-white shapes from novel labels spoken by one of two talkers. All of the 16 novel labels were VCVCV word-forms atypical of, but not phonologically illegal in, English. Again, a word was consistently spoken by one talker, and its cohort or rhyme competitor was consistently spoken either by that same talker (same-talker competitor) or the other talker (different-talker competitor). Targets with different-talker cohorts received greater fixation proportions than targets with same-talker cohorts, while the reverse was true for fixations to cohort competitors; there were fewer erroneous selections of competitor referents for different-talker competitors than same-talker competitors. Overall, these results support a view of the lexicon in which entries contain extra-phonemic information. Extensions of the artificial lexicon paradigm and developmental implications are discussed.</description>
    <dc:title>Heeding the voice of experience: The role of talker variation in lexical access</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Sarah Creel</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Richard Aslin</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Tanenhaus</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.013</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Cognition, Vol. 106, No. 2. (February 2008), pp. 633-664.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-22T02:03:20-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Cognition</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>106</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>633</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>664</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>eye-movements</prism:category>
    <prism:category>visual-world-paradigm</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

