<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:19:45 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: briordan's semantic-association</title>
	<description>CiteULike: briordan's semantic-association</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/tag/semantic-association</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2343195"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2324683"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2180547"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2180541"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2125775"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/1946888"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/1946869"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/1876130"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/1875997"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/683754"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/770964"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/98891"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/1816228"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2343195">
    <title>Names, concepts, features and the living/nonliving things dissociation</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2343195</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Cognition, Vol. 85, No. 3. (October 2002), pp. 251-275.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The present paper evaluates different hypotheses for explaining the living/nonliving things dissociation phenomenon in terms of feature type, considering the role of this dimension in the organization of conceptual semantic representations and in the activation of name representations. For this purpose we used Sloman and associates' (Memory and Cognition 27(3) (1999) 526; Cognitive Science 22(2) (1998) 189) name centrality and conceptual centrality tasks and asked subjects to judge functional and perceptual/visual features of living and nonliving items. Conceptual centrality results are more in accordance with a &#34;single feature-domain connection hypothesis&#34; where visual features are more important than functional features for the representation of living things and no feature type advantage is found for nonliving things. Name centrality results show that functional features are more important than sensory/visual features overall, a result that is not predicted by any of the hypotheses considered. The fact that the two judgments diverge emphasizes their importance for evaluating the role of feature type in the living/nonliving dissociation. Implications for explaining this phenomenon are also discussed.</description>
    <dc:title>Names, concepts, features and the living/nonliving things dissociation</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Frederico Marques</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00123-3</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Cognition, Vol. 85, No. 3. (October 2002), pp. 251-275.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-06T19:45:20-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2002</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Cognition</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>85</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>251</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>275</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>semantic-association</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-features</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-measures</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-organization</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2324683">
    <title>Neural Responses to Structural Incongruencies in Language and Statistical Learning Point to Similar Underlying Mechanisms</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2324683</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2007), pp. 173-178.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Neural Responses to Structural Incongruencies in Language and Statistical Learning Point to Similar Underlying Mechanisms</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Morten Christiansen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Christopher Conway</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Luca Onnis</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(2007), pp. 173-178.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-03T03:10:08-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>173</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>178</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>artificial-grammars</prism:category>
    <prism:category>cross-situational</prism:category>
    <prism:category>erps</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-association</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2180547">
    <title>Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence from priming</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2180547</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 21, No. 4. (1995), pp. 863-883.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence from priming</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Helen Moss</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ruth Ostrin</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Lorraine Tyler</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>William Marslen-Wilson</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 21, No. 4. (1995), pp. 863-883.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-12-29T19:57:51-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1995</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>863</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>883</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>semantic-association</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-organization</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-priming</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2180541">
    <title>Activating event knowledge</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2180541</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;??? (submitted)&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Activating event knowledge</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Hare</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>??? (submitted)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-12-29T19:52:30-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>???</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:category>semantic-association</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-features</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-measures</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-organization</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-priming</prism:category>
    <prism:category>word-association</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2125775">
    <title>Word associations are formed incidentally during sentential semantic integration</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2125775</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Acta Psychologica, Vol. 127, No. 1. (January 2008), pp. 57-71.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sentential context facilitates the incidental formation of word associations (e.g., Prior, A., &#38; Bentin, S. (2003). Incidental formation of episodic associations: the importance of sentential context. Memory and Cognition, 31(2), 306-316). The present study explored the mechanism of this effect. In two experiments, unrelated word pairs were embedded in coherent or semantically anomalous sentences. Anomalous sentences included either a local or a global anomaly. During an incidental study phase, participants performed a sentence categorization task. The strength of the incidental associations formed between two nouns jointly appearing in a sentence was probed by gauging their influence on subsequent paired-associate learning and cued recall in Experiment 1, and by assessing their associative priming effect in a subsequent unexpected explicit recognition test for single words in Experiment 2. In both experiments, significant associative memory was found for noun pairs studied in coherent sentences but not for those appearing in anomalous sentences, regardless of anomaly type. In a sentence rating task, global anomalies yielded less plausible sentences than local anomalies, however both types of anomalies were equally detrimental to the sentence integration process. We suggest that sentence constituents are incidentally associated during sentence processing, particularly as a result of sentence integration and the consolidation of a mental model.</description>
    <dc:title>Word associations are formed incidentally during sentential semantic integration</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Anat Prior</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Shlomo Bentin</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.01.002</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Acta Psychologica, Vol. 127, No. 1. (January 2008), pp. 57-71.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-12-15T23:59:46-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Acta Psychologica</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>127</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>57</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>71</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>semantic-association</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/1946888">
    <title>Is automatic priming semantic?</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/1946888</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 2. (June 1996), pp. 113-162.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Is automatic priming semantic?</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>John Williams</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 2. (June 1996), pp. 113-162.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-11-20T19:33:43-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1996</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>European Journal of Cognitive Psychology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>113</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>162</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>semantic-association</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-priming</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/1946869">
    <title>Associative judgments block semantic processing</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/1946869</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Associative judgments block semantic processing</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Erin Buchanan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>William Maki</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Melissa Patton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-11-20T19:26:24-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:category>semantic-association</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-features</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-measures</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-organization</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-priming</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/1876130">
    <title>Be Wary of What Your Computer Reads: The Effects of Corpus Selection on Measuring Semantic Relatedness</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/1876130</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2007), pp. 279-284.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Be Wary of What Your Computer Reads: The Effects of Corpus Selection on Measuring Semantic Relatedness</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Robert Lindsey</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Vladislav Veksler</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Alex Grintsvayg</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Wayne Gray</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(2007), pp. 279-284.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-11-07T03:24:25-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>279</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>284</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Taylor &#38; Francis/Psychology Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>computational-linguistics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>distributional-similarity</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-association</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/1875997">
    <title>Vector Generation of an Explicitly-defined Multidimensional Semantic Space</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/1875997</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;pp. 231-232.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Vector Generation of an Explicitly-defined Multidimensional Semantic Space</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Alex Grintsvayg</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Vladislav Veksler</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Robert Lindsey</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Wayne Gray</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>pp. 231-232.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-11-07T02:22:24-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:startingPage>231</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>232</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Taylor &#38; Francis/Psychology Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>distributional-similarity</prism:category>
    <prism:category>models</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-association</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/683754">
    <title>An efficient method for estimating semantic similarity based on feature overlap: Reliability and validity of semantic feature ratings</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/683754</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 38, No. 1. (February 2006), pp. 153-157.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>An efficient method for estimating semantic similarity based on feature overlap: Reliability and validity of semantic feature ratings</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Maki</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>S William</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Krimsky</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Marissa</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Munoz</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Sol</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 38, No. 1. (February 2006), pp. 153-157.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-06-04T13:32:36-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Behavior Research Methods</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1554-351X</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>38</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>153</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>157</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Psychonomic Society Publications</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>distributional-similarity</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-association</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-features</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-measures</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-organization</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/770964">
    <title>Concept empiricism: A methodological critique</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/770964</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Cognition, Vol. 104, No. 1. (July 2007), pp. 19-46.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks to Barsalou's, Damasio's, Glenberg's, Prinz' and others' work, neo-empiricism is gaining a deserved recognition in the psychology and philosophy of concepts. I argue, however, that neo-empiricists have underestimated the difficulty of providing evidence against the amodal approach to concepts and higher cognition. I highlight three key problems: the difficulty of sorting out amodal predictions from neo-empiricist predictions, the difficulty of finding experimental tasks that are not best solved by imagery and the difficulty of generalizing findings concerning a given cognitive process in a given context to other cognitive processes or other contexts. Finally, solutions to these three problems are considered.</description>
    <dc:title>Concept empiricism: A methodological critique</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Edouard Machery</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.002</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Cognition, Vol. 104, No. 1. (July 2007), pp. 19-46.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-07-24T10:20:38-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Cognition</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>46</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>distributional-similarity</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-association</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-features</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-measures</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-organization</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/98891">
    <title>Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/98891</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Brain, Vol. 128, No. 3. (March 2005), pp. 615-627.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Sebastian Crutch</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Elizabeth Warrington</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1093/brain/awh349</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Brain, Vol. 128, No. 3. (March 2005), pp. 615-627.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-02-18T19:25:28-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Brain</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0006-8950</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>128</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>615</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>627</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Oxford University Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>concrete-abstract</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-association</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-features</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-organization</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/1816228">
    <title>Symmetries in human brain language pathways correlate with verbal recall</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/1816228</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 104, No. 43. (23 October 2007), pp. 17163-17168.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lateralization of language to the left hemisphere is considered a key aspect of human brain organization. We used diffusion tensor MRI to perform in vivo virtual dissection of language pathways to assess the relationship between brain asymmetry and cognitive performance in the normal population. Our findings suggest interhemispheric differences in direct connections between Broca's and Wernicke's territories, with extreme leftward lateralization in more than half of the subjects and bilateral symmetrical distribution in only 17.5% of the subjects. Importantly, individuals with more symmetric patterns of connections are better overall at remembering words using semantic association. Moreover, preliminary analysis suggests females are more likely to have a symmetrical pattern of connections. These findings suggest that the degree of lateralization of perisylvian pathways is heterogeneous in the normal population and, paradoxically, bilateral representation, not extreme lateralization, might ultimately be advantageous for specific cognitive functions. 10.1073/pnas.0702116104</description>
    <dc:title>Symmetries in human brain language pathways correlate with verbal recall</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Marco Catani</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Matthew Allin</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Masud Husain</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Luca Pugliese</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Marsel Mesulam</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Robin Murray</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Derek Jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1073/pnas.0702116104</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 104, No. 43. (23 October 2007), pp. 17163-17168.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-10-24T17:13:20-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>43</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>17163</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>17168</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>fmri</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-association</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-measures</prism:category>
    <prism:category>semantic-organization</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

