<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:15:05 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: briordan's sentence-comprehension</title>
	<description>CiteULike: briordan's sentence-comprehension</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/tag/sentence-comprehension</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2923362"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2923360"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2894633"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2667554"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2838442"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2834982"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/239108"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/406701"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/296023"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/296025"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2827900"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/257422"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2923362">
    <title>Mismatching Meanings in Brain and Behavior</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2923362</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Language and Linguistics Compass, Vol. 0, No. 0. (0), pp. ???-???.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Abstract Natural language interpretation is generally thought to be compositional, that is, the meanings of expressions are a function of the meanings of their parts and of the way the parts are syntactically combined. Theories of the syntax-semantics interface aim to articulate the details of this function. This article discusses a new research program in which psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic experiments on so-called syntax-semantics mismatches are used to elucidate the mechanisms that mediate between structure and meaning.</description>
    <dc:title>Mismatching Meanings in Brain and Behavior</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Liina Pylkkanen</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00073.x</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Language and Linguistics Compass, Vol. 0, No. 0. (0), pp. ???-???.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-24T11:09:37-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>Language and Linguistics Compass</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>0</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>0</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>???</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>???</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>lexical-processing</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sentence-comprehension</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2923360">
    <title>The Neurocognition of Referential Ambiguity in Language Comprehension</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2923360</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Language and Linguistics Compass, Vol. 0, No. 0. (0), pp. ???-???.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Abstract Referential ambiguity arises whenever readers or listeners are unable to select a unique referent for a linguistic expression out of multiple candidates. In the current article, we review a series of neurocognitive experiments from our laboratory that examine the neural correlates of referential ambiguity, and that employ the brain signature of referential ambiguity to derive functional properties of the language comprehension system. The results of our experiments converge to show that referential ambiguity resolution involves making an inference to evaluate the referential candidates. These inferences only take place when both referential candidates are, at least initially, equally plausible antecedents. Whether comprehenders make these anaphoric inferences is strongly context dependent and co-determined by characteristics of the reader. In addition, readers appear to disregard referential ambiguity when the competing candidates are each semantically incoherent, suggesting that, under certain circumstances, semantic analysis can proceed even when referential analysis has not yielded a unique antecedent. Finally, results from a functional neuroimaging study suggest that whereas the neural systems that deal with referential ambiguity partially overlap with those that deal with referential failure, they show an inverse coupling with the neural systems associated with semantic processing, possibly reflecting the relative contributions of semantic and episodic processing to re-establish semantic and referential coherence, respectively.</description>
    <dc:title>The Neurocognition of Referential Ambiguity in Language Comprehension</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Mante Nieuwland</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jos Van Berkum</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00070.x</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Language and Linguistics Compass, Vol. 0, No. 0. (0), pp. ???-???.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-24T11:08:34-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>Language and Linguistics Compass</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>0</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>0</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>???</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>???</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>fmri</prism:category>
    <prism:category>general-psycholinguistics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lexical-processing</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sentence-comprehension</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2894633">
    <title>Preschoolers’ sensitivity to referential ambiguity: evidence for a dissociation between implicit understanding and explicit behavior</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2894633</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Developmental Science, Vol. 11, No. 4. (2008), pp. 556-562.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Abstract Four-year-olds were asked to assess an adult listener's knowledge of the location of a hidden sticker after the listener was provided an ambiguous or unambiguous description of the sticker location. When preschoolers possessed private knowledge about the sticker location, the location they chose indicated that they judged a description to be unambiguous even when the message was ambiguous from the listener's perspective. However, measures of implicit awareness (response latencies and eye movement measures) demonstrated that even when preschoolers had private knowledge about the sticker location, ambiguous messages led to more consideration of an alternative location and longer response latencies than unambiguous messages. The findings demonstrate that children show sensitivity to linguistic ambiguity earlier than previously thought and, further, that they can detect linguistic ambiguity in language directed to others even when their own knowledge clarifies the intended meaning.</description>
    <dc:title>Preschoolers’ sensitivity to referential ambiguity: evidence for a dissociation between implicit understanding and explicit behavior</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Elizabeth Nilsen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Susan Graham</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Shannon Smith</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Craig Chambers</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00701.x</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Developmental Science, Vol. 11, No. 4. (2008), pp. 556-562.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-14T11:35:29-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Developmental Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>556</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>562</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>sentence-comprehension</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2667554">
    <title>Perception and presupposition in real-time language comprehension: Insights from anticipatory processing</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2667554</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Cognition, Vol. In Press, Corrected Proof&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Recent studies have shown that listeners use verbs and other predicate terms to anticipate reference to semantic entities during real-time language comprehension. This process involves evaluating the denoted action against relevant properties of potential referents. The current study explored whether action-relevant properties are readily available to comprehension systems as a result of the embodied nature of linguistic and conceptual representations. In three experiments, eye movements were monitored as listeners followed instructions to move depicted objects on a computer screen. Critical instructions contained the verb return (e.g., Now return the block to area 3), which presupposes the previous displacement of its complement object - a property that is not reflected in perceptible or stable characteristics of objects. Experiment 1 demonstrated that predictions for previously displaced objects are generated upon hearing return, ruling out the possibility that anticipatory effects draw directly on static affordances in perceptual symbols. Experiment 2 used a referential communication task to evaluate how communicative relevance constrains the use of perceptually derived information. Results showed that listeners anticipate previously displaced objects as candidates upon hearing return only when their displacement was known to the speaker. Experiment 3 showed that the outcome of the original act of displacement further modulates referential predictions. The results show that the use of perceptually grounded information in language interpretation is subject to communicative constraints, even when language denotes physical actions performed on concrete objects.</description>
    <dc:title>Perception and presupposition in real-time language comprehension: Insights from anticipatory processing</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Craig Chambers</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Valerie Juan</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.009</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Cognition, Vol. In Press, Corrected Proof</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-14T12:32:44-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>Cognition</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>In Press, Corrected Proof</prism:volume>
    <prism:category>eye-movements</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sentence-comprehension</prism:category>
    <prism:category>visual-world-paradigm</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2838442">
    <title>Spoken language comprehension: insights from eye movements</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2838442</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2007), pp. 309-326.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Spoken language comprehension: insights from eye movements</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Michael Tanenhaus</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(2007), pp. 309-326.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-27T23:40:03-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>309</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>326</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Oxford University Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>eye-movements</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sentence-comprehension</prism:category>
    <prism:category>spoken-word-recognition</prism:category>
    <prism:category>visual-world-paradigm</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2834982">
    <title>The Coordinated Interplay of Scene, Utterance, and World Knowledge: Evidence From Eye Tracking</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2834982</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol. 30, No. 3. (2006), pp. 481-529.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Two studies investigated the interaction between utterance and scene processing by monitoring eye movements in agentactionpatient events, while participants listened to related utterances. The aim of Experiment 1 was to determine if and when depicted events are used for thematic role assignment and structural disambiguation of temporarily ambiguous English sentences. Shortly after the verb identified relevant depicted actions, eye movements in the event scenes revealed disambiguation. Experiment 2 investigated the relative importance of linguistic/world knowledge and scene information. When the verb identified either only the stereotypical agent of a (nondepicted) action, or the (nonstereotypical) agent of a depicted action as relevant, verb-based thematic knowledge and depicted action each rapidly influenced comprehension. In contrast, when the verb identified both of these agents as relevant, the gaze pattern suggested a preferred reliance of comprehension on depicted events over stereotypical thematic knowledge for thematic interpretation. We relate our findings to language comprehension and acquisition theories.</description>
    <dc:title>The Coordinated Interplay of Scene, Utterance, and World Knowledge: Evidence From Eye Tracking</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Pia Knoeferle</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Matthew Crocker</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_65</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol. 30, No. 3. (2006), pp. 481-529.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-26T16:00:00-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>30</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>481</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>529</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Psychology Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>eye-movements</prism:category>
    <prism:category>models</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sentence-comprehension</prism:category>
    <prism:category>visual-world-paradigm</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/239108">
    <title>Linguistically Mediated Visual Search: The Critical Role of Speech Rate</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/239108</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review, Vol. 12, No. 2. (April 2005), pp. 276-281.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Linguistically Mediated Visual Search: The Critical Role of Speech Rate</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Bradley Gibson</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Kathleen Eberhard</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ted Bryant</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review, Vol. 12, No. 2. (April 2005), pp. 276-281.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-06-27T21:17:18-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1069-9384</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>276</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>281</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Psychonomic Society Publications</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>grammatical-number</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sentence-comprehension</prism:category>
    <prism:category>spoken-word-recognition</prism:category>
    <prism:category>visual-world-paradigm</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/406701">
    <title>Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/406701</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Cognition, Vol. 71, No. 2. (22 June 1999), pp. 109-147.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While much work has been done investigating the role of context in the incremental processing of syntactic indeterminacies, relatively little is known about online semantic interpretation. The experiments in this article made use of the eye-tracking paradigm with spoken language and visual contexts in order to examine how, and when listeners make use of contextually-defined contrast in interpreting simple prenominal adjectives. Experiment 1 focused on intersective adjectives. Experiment 1A provided further evidence that intersective adjectives are processed incrementally. Experiment 1B compared response times to follow instructions such as &#8216;Pick up the blue comb' under conditions where there were two blue objects (e.g. a blue pen and a blue comb), but only one of these objects had a contrasting member in the display. Responses were faster to objects with a contrasting member, establishing that the listeners initially assume a contrastive interpretation for intersective adjectives. Experiments 2 and 3 focused on vague scalar adjectives examining the time course with which listeners establish contrast for scalar adjectives such as tall using information provided by the head noun (e.g. glass) and information provided by the visual context. Use of head-based information was examined by manipulating the typicality of the target object (e.g. whether it was a good or poor example of a tall glass. Use of context-dependent contrast was examined by either having only a single glass in the display (the no contrast condition) or a contrasting object (e.g. a smaller glass). The pattern of results indicated that listeners interpreted the scalar adjective incrementally taking into account context-specific contrast prior to encountering the head. Moreover, the presence of a contrasting object, sharply reduced, and in some conditions completely eliminated, typicality effects. The results suggest a language processing system in which semantic interpretation, as well as syntactic processing, is conducted incrementally, with early integration of contextual information.</description>
    <dc:title>Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Julie Sedivy</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Tanenhaus</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Craig Chambers</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Gregory Carlson</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00025-6</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Cognition, Vol. 71, No. 2. (22 June 1999), pp. 109-147.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-11-23T21:19:03-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1999</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Cognition</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>71</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>109</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>147</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>eye-movements</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sentence-comprehension</prism:category>
    <prism:category>visual-world-paradigm</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/296023">
    <title>Moving hand reveals dynamics of thought.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/296023</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, Vol. 102, No. 29. (19 July 2005), pp. 9995-9996.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Moving hand reveals dynamics of thought.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>JS Magnuson</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1073/pnas.0504413102</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, Vol. 102, No. 29. (19 July 2005), pp. 9995-9996.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-08-17T09:06:31-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0027-8424</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>29</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>9995</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>9996</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>eye-movements</prism:category>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sentence-comprehension</prism:category>
    <prism:category>spoken-word-recognition</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/296025">
    <title>Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/296025</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, Vol. 102, No. 29. (19 July 2005), pp. 10393-10398.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Certain models of spoken-language processing, like those for many other perceptual and cognitive processes, posit continuous uptake of sensory input and dynamic competition between simultaneously active representations. Here, we provide compelling evidence for this continuity assumption by using a continuous response, hand movements, to track the temporal dynamics of lexical activations during real-time spoken-word recognition in a visual context. By recording the streaming x, y coordinates of continuous goal-directed hand movement in a spoken-language task, online accrual of acoustic-phonetic input and competition between partially active lexical representations are revealed in the shape of the movement trajectories. This hand-movement paradigm allows one to project the internal processing of spoken-word recognition onto a two-dimensional layout of continuous motor output, providing a concrete visualization of the attractor dynamics involved in language processing.</description>
    <dc:title>Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>MJ Spivey</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>M Grosjean</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>G Knoblich</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1073/pnas.0503903102</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, Vol. 102, No. 29. (19 July 2005), pp. 10393-10398.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-08-17T09:08:52-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0027-8424</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>29</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>10393</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>10398</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>eye-movements</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sentence-comprehension</prism:category>
    <prism:category>spoken-word-recognition</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2827900">
    <title>Visual arguments</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/2827900</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Cognition, Vol. 95, No. 3. (April 2005), pp. 237-274.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Three experiments investigated the use of verb argument structure by tracking participants' eye movements across a set of related pictures as they listened to sentences. The assumption was that listeners would naturally look at relevant pictures as they were mentioned or implied. The primary hypothesis was that a verb would implicitly introduce relevant entities (linguistic arguments) that had not yet been mentioned, and thus a picture corresponding to such an entity would draw anticipatory looks. For example, upon hearing ...mother suggested..., participants would look at a potential recipient of the suggestion. The only explicit task was responding to comprehension questions. Experiments 1 and 2 manipulated both the argument structure of the verb and the typicality/co-occurrence frequency of the target argument/adjunct, in order to distinguish between anticipatory looks to arguments specifically and anticipatory looks to pictures that were strongly associated with the verb, but did not have the linguistic status of argument. Experiment 3 manipulated argument status alone. In Experiments 1 and 3, there were more anticipatory looks to potential arguments than to potential adjuncts, beginning about 500 ms after the acoustic onset of the verb. Experiment 2 revealed a main effect of typicality. These findings indicate that both real world knowledge and argument structure guide visual attention within this paradigm, but that argument structure has a privileged status in focusing listener attention on relevant aspects of a visual scene.</description>
    <dc:title>Visual arguments</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Julie Boland</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.008</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Cognition, Vol. 95, No. 3. (April 2005), pp. 237-274.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-24T15:20:40-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Cognition</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>95</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>237</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>274</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>eye-movements</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sentence-comprehension</prism:category>
    <prism:category>visual-world-paradigm</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/257422">
    <title>Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/briordan/article/257422</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 38, No. 3. (April 1998), pp. 283-312.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The time-course with which readers use event-specific world knowledge (thematic fit) to resolve structural ambiguity was explored through experiments and implementation of constraint-based and two-stage models. In a norming study, subjects completed fragments that ended in the ambiguous region of a reduced relative clause (The crook arrested/by/the/detective). Completion proportions up to and includingthewere influenced by thematic fit. The results were simulated using a competition model in which independently quantified syntactic and semantic constraints simultaneously influenced interpretation. Predictions were then generated for a self-paced reading task using model parameter values established by the off-line simulations. The pattern of reading times matched the predictions of the constraint-based version of the model but differed substantially from a one-region delay garden-path version. In addition, a garden-path model with a very short delay simulated the data better than the one-region delay model, but not as closely as the constraint-based version. The experiment and modeling illustrate that thematic fit is computed and used immediately in on-line sentence comprehension. Furthermore, the modeling highlighted the difficulty of interpreting sentence comprehension experiments without both quantifying the relevant constraints and implementing the mechanisms involved.</description>
    <dc:title>Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Ken Mcrae</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Spivey-Knowlton</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Tanenhaus</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2543</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 38, No. 3. (April 1998), pp. 283-312.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-07-16T00:49:21-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1998</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journal of Memory and Language</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>38</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>283</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>312</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>models</prism:category>
    <prism:category>plausibility-judgments</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sentence-comprehension</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

