<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 05:47:16 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: brusilovsky's Pan</title>
	<description>CiteULike: brusilovsky's Pan</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/brusilovsky/author/Pan</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/brusilovsky/article/2195687"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/brusilovsky/article/343045"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/brusilovsky/article/1086212"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/brusilovsky/article/379395"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/brusilovsky/article/2195687">
    <title>Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in Web search</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/brusilovsky/article/2195687</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., Vol. 25, No. 2. (April 2007)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This article examines the reliability of implicit feedback generated from clickthrough data and query reformulations in World Wide Web (WWW) search. Analyzing the users' decision process using eyetracking and comparing implicit feedback against manual relevance judgments, we conclude that clicks are informative but biased. While this makes the interpretation of clicks as absolute relevance judgments difficult, we show that relative preferences derived from clicks are reasonably accurate on average. We find that such relative preferences are accurate not only between results from an individual query, but across multiple sets of results within chains of query reformulations.</description>
    <dc:title>Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in Web search</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Thorsten Joachims</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Laura Granka</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Bing Pan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Helene Hembrooke</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Filip Radlinski</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Geri Gay</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1229179.1229181</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., Vol. 25, No. 2. (April 2007)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-04T21:39:32-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1046-8188</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>25</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:publisher>ACM</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>en</prism:category>
    <prism:category>implicit-feedback</prism:category>
    <prism:category>information-retrieval</prism:category>
    <prism:category>www-search</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/brusilovsky/article/343045">
    <title>The determinants of web page viewing behavior: an eye-tracking study</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/brusilovsky/article/343045</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2004), pp. 147-154.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>The determinants of web page viewing behavior: an eye-tracking study</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Bing Pan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Helene Hembrooke</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Geri Gay</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Laura Granka</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Matthew Feusner</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jill Newman</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/968363.968391</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2004), pp. 147-154.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-10-06T23:46:11-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>147</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>154</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>eye-tracking</prism:category>
    <prism:category>www</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/brusilovsky/article/1086212">
    <title>The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using Google</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/brusilovsky/article/1086212</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Inf. Process. Manage., Vol. 42, No. 4. (July 2006), pp. 1123-1131.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using Google</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Lori Lorigo</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Bing Pan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Helene Hembrooke</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Thorsten Joachims</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Laura Granka</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Geri Gay</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2005.10.001</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Inf. Process. Manage., Vol. 42, No. 4. (July 2006), pp. 1123-1131.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-02-03T17:01:18-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Inf. Process. Manage.</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0306-4573</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>42</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1123</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1131</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Pergamon Press, Inc.</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>eye-tracking</prism:category>
    <prism:category>information-retrieval</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/brusilovsky/article/379395">
    <title>Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/brusilovsky/article/379395</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(2005), pp. 154-161.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This paper examines the reliability of implicit feedback generated from clickthrough data in WWW search. Analyzing the users' decision process using eyetracking and comparing implicit feedback against manual relevance judgments, we conclude that clicks are informative but biased. While this makes the interpretation of clicks as absolute relevance judgments difficult, we show that relative preferences derived from clicks are reasonably accurate on average.</description>
    <dc:title>Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Thorsten Joachims</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Laura Granka</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Bing Pan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Helene Hembrooke</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Geri Gay</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1145/1076034.1076063</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>(2005), pp. 154-161.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-11-03T14:08:57-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:startingPage>154</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>161</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>ACM Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>eye-tracking</prism:category>
    <prism:category>implicit-feedback</prism:category>
    <prism:category>information-retrieval</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

