<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:16:48 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: emptyhb's pattern_formation</title>
	<description>CiteULike: emptyhb's pattern_formation</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/tag/pattern_formation</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/2816721"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/2444408"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/1021802"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/2264102"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/1021805"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/1667622"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/2816721">
    <title>Genes that control dorsoventral polarity affect gene expression along the anteroposterior axis of the Drosophila embryo.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/2816721</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Development (Cambridge, England), Vol. 99, No. 3. (March 1987), pp. 327-332.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At least 13 genes control the establishment of dorsoventral polarity in the Drosophila embryo and more than 30 genes control the anteroposterior pattern of body segments. Each group of genes is thought to control pattern formation along one body axis, independently of the other group. We have used the expression of the fushi tarazu (ftz) segmentation gene as a positional marker to investigate the relationship between the dorsoventral and anteroposterior axes. The ftz gene is normally expressed in seven transverse stripes. Changes in the striped pattern in embryos mutant for other genes (or progeny of females homozygous for maternal-effect mutations) can reveal alterations of cell fate resulting from such mutations. We show that in the absence of any of ten maternal-effect dorsoventral polarity gene functions, the characteristic stripes of ftz protein are altered. Normally there is a difference between ftz stripe spacing on the dorsal and ventral sides of the embryo; in dorsalized mutant embryos the ftz stripes appear to be altered so that dorsal-type spacing occurs on all sides of the embryo. These results indicate that cells respond to dorsoventral positional information in establishing early patterns of gene expression along the anteroposterior axis and that there may be more significant interactions between the different axes of positional information than previously determined.</description>
    <dc:title>Genes that control dorsoventral polarity affect gene expression along the anteroposterior axis of the Drosophila embryo.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>SB Carroll</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>GM Winslow</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>VJ Twombly</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>MP Scott</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Development (Cambridge, England), Vol. 99, No. 3. (March 1987), pp. 327-332.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-20T14:48:09-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1987</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Development (Cambridge, England)</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0950-1991</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>99</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>327</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>332</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>cis_regulatory_elements</prism:category>
    <prism:category>drosophila</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pattern_formation</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/2444408">
    <title>Short-range repression permits multiple enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/2444408</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Genes Dev., Vol. 8, No. 15. (1 August 1994), pp. 1829-1838.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Transcriptional repressors play a key role in establishing localized patterns of gene expression in the early Drosophila embryo. Several different modes of repression have been implicated in previous studies, including competition and direct interference with the transcription complex. Here, we present evidence for &#34;quenching,&#34; whereby activators and repressors co-occupy neighboring sites in a target promoter, but the repressor blocks the ability of the activator to contact the transcription complex. This study centers on a zinc finger repressor, snail (sna), which represses the expression of neuroectodermal regulatory genes in the presumptive mesoderm. We show that sna can mediate efficient repression when bound 50-100 bp from upstream activator sites. Repression does not depend on proximity of sna-binding sites to the transcription initiation site. sna is not a dedicated repressor but, instead, appears to block disparate activators. We discuss the importance of quenching as a means of permitting separate enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter. 10.1101/gad.8.15.1829</description>
    <dc:title>Short-range repression permits multiple enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>S Gray</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>P Szymanski</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>M Levine</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1101/gad.8.15.1829</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Genes Dev., Vol. 8, No. 15. (1 August 1994), pp. 1829-1838.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-28T17:41:30-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1994</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Genes Dev.</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>15</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1829</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1838</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>dna-protein_interaction</prism:category>
    <prism:category>drosophila</prism:category>
    <prism:category>even-skipped_enhancer</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pattern_formation</prism:category>
    <prism:category>transcriptional_regulation</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/1021802">
    <title>The role of binding site cluster strength in Bicoid-dependent patterning in Drosophila.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/1021802</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, Vol. 102, No. 14. (5 April 2005), pp. 4960-4965.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The maternal morphogen Bicoid (Bcd) is distributed in an embryonic gradient that is critical for patterning the anterior-posterior (AP) body plan in Drosophila. Previous work identified several target genes that respond directly to Bcd-dependent activation. Positioning of these targets along the AP axis is thought to be controlled by cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) that contain clusters of Bcd-binding sites of different &#34;strengths.&#34; Here we use a combination of Bcd-site cluster analysis and evolutionary conservation to predict Bcd-dependent CRMs. We tested 14 predicted CRMs by in vivo reporter gene assays; 11 show Bcd-dependent activation, which brings the total number of known Bcd target elements to 21. Some CRMs drive expression patterns that are restricted to the most anterior part of the embryo, whereas others extend into middle and posterior regions. However, we do not detect a strong correlation between AP position of target gene expression and the strength of Bcd site clusters alone. Rather, we find that binding sites for other activators, including Hunchback and Caudal correlate with CRM expression in middle and posterior body regions. Also, many Bcd-dependent CRMs contain clusters of sites for the gap protein Kruppel, which may limit the posterior extent of activation by the Bcd gradient. We propose that the key design principle in AP patterning is the differential integration of positive and negative transcriptional information at the level of individual CRMs for each target gene.</description>
    <dc:title>The role of binding site cluster strength in Bicoid-dependent patterning in Drosophila.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>A Ochoa-Espinosa</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>G Yucel</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>L Kaplan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>A Pare</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>N Pura</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>A Oberstein</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>D Papatsenko</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>S Small</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1073/pnas.0500373102</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, Vol. 102, No. 14. (5 April 2005), pp. 4960-4965.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-01-01T19:48:50-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0027-8424</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>14</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>4960</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>4965</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>cis_regulatory_elements</prism:category>
    <prism:category>cooperative_binding</prism:category>
    <prism:category>drosophila</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pattern_formation</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/2264102">
    <title>Microevolutionary divergence pattern of the segmentation gene hunchback in Drosophila.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/2264102</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Mol Biol Evol, Vol. 15, No. 11. (November 1998), pp. 1403-1411.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To study the microevolutionary processes shaping the evolution of the segmentation gene hunchback (hb) from Drosophila melanogaster, we cloned and sequenced the gene from 12 isofemale lines representing wild-type populations of D. melanogaster, as well as from the closely related species Drosophila sechellia, Drosophila orena, and Drosophila yakuba. We find a relatively low degree of sequence variation in D. melanogaster (theta = 0.0017), which is, however, consistent with its chromosomal location in a region of low recombination. Tests of neutrality do not reject a neutral-evolution model for the whole region. However, pairwise tests with different subregions indicate that there is a relative excess of polymorphic sites in the leader and the intron. Codon usage pattern analysis shows a particularly biased codon usage in the highly conserved regions, which is in line with the hypothesis that selection on translational accuracy is the driving force behind such a bias. A comparison of the expression pattern of hb in different sibling species of D. melanogaster reveals some regulatory changes in D. yakuba, which could be interpreted as changes in the timing of secondary expression domains.</description>
    <dc:title>Microevolutionary divergence pattern of the segmentation gene hunchback in Drosophila.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>D Tautz</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>L Nigro</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Mol Biol Evol, Vol. 15, No. 11. (November 1998), pp. 1403-1411.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-20T21:38:27-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1998</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Mol Biol Evol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0737-4038</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>11</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1403</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1411</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>drosophila</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pattern_formation</prism:category>
    <prism:category>species_divergence</prism:category>
    <prism:category>trans_elements</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/1021805">
    <title>Transcriptional Control in the Segmentation Gene Network of Drosophila</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/1021805</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;PLoS Biology, Vol. 2, No. 9. (1 September 2004), e271.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The segmentation gene network of Drosophila consists of maternal and zygotic factors that generate, by transcriptional (cross-) regulation, expression patterns of increasing complexity along the anterior-posterior axis of the embryo. Using known binding site information for maternal and zygotic gap transcription factors, the computer algorithm Ahab recovers known segmentation control elements (modules) with excellent success and predicts many novel modules within the network and genome-wide. We show that novel module predictions are highly enriched in the network and typically clustered proximal to the promoter, not only upstream, but also in intronic space and downstream. When placed upstream of a reporter gene, they consistently drive patterned blastoderm expression, in most cases faithfully producing one or more pattern elements of the endogenous gene. Moreover, we demonstrate for the entire set of known and newly validated modules that Ahab&#39;s prediction of binding sites correlates well with the expression patterns produced by the modules, revealing basic rules governing their composition. Specifically, we show that maternal factors consistently act as activators and that gap factors act as repressors, except for the bimodal factor Hunchback. Our data suggest a simple context-dependent rule for its switch from repressive to activating function. Overall, the composition of modules appears well fitted to the spatiotemporal distribution of their positive and negative input factors. Finally, by comparing Ahab predictions with different categories of transcription factor input, we confirm the global regulatory structure of the segmentation gene network, but find odd skipped behaving like a primary pair-rule gene. The study expands our knowledge of the segmentation gene network by increasing the number of experimentally tested modules by 50&#37;. For the first time, the entire set of validated modules is analyzed for binding site composition under a uniform set of criteria, permitting the definition of basic composition rules. The study demonstrates that computational methods are a powerful complement to experimental approaches in the analysis of transcription networks.</description>
    <dc:title>Transcriptional Control in the Segmentation Gene Network of Drosophila</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Mark Schroeder</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Pearce</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>John Fak</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hongqing Fan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ulrich Unnerstall</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Eldon Emberly</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Nikolaus Rajewsky</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Eric Siggia</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ulrike Gaul</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020271</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>PLoS Biology, Vol. 2, No. 9. (1 September 2004), e271.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-01-01T19:51:52-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>PLoS Biology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>9</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>e271</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:category>cis_regulatory_elements</prism:category>
    <prism:category>drosophila</prism:category>
    <prism:category>motif_searching</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pattern_formation</prism:category>
    <prism:category>transcriptional_regulation</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/1667622">
    <title>Comprehensive identification of Drosophila dorsal-ventral patterning genes using a whole-genome tiling array</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/1667622</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 103, No. 34. (22 August 2006), pp. 12763-12768.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dorsal-ventral (DV) patterning of the Drosophila embryo is initiated by Dorsal, a sequence-specific transcription factor distributed in a broad nuclear gradient in the precellular embryo. Previous studies have identified as many as 70 protein-coding genes and one microRNA (miRNA) gene that are directly or indirectly regulated by this gradient. A gene regulation network, or circuit diagram, including the functional interconnections among 40 Dorsal target genes and 20 associated tissue-specific enhancers, has been determined for the initial stages of gastrulation. Here, we attempt to extend this analysis by identifying additional DV patterning genes using a recently developed whole-genome tiling array. This analysis led to the identification of another 30 protein-coding genes, including the Drosophila homolog of Idax, an inhibitor of Wnt signaling. In addition, remote 5' exons were identified for at least 10 of the approx100 protein-coding genes that were missed in earlier annotations. As many as nine intergenic uncharacterized transcription units were identified, including two that contain known microRNAs, miR-1 and -9a. We discuss the potential functions of these recently identified genes and suggest that intronic enhancers are a common feature of the DV gene network. 10.1073/pnas.0604484103</description>
    <dc:title>Comprehensive identification of Drosophila dorsal-ventral patterning genes using a whole-genome tiling array</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Frederic Biemar</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>David Nix</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jessica Piel</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Brant Peterson</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Matthew Ronshaugen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Victor Sementchenko</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ian Bell</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Robert Manak</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Levine</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1073/pnas.0604484103</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 103, No. 34. (22 August 2006), pp. 12763-12768.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-09-18T00:01:30-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>34</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>12763</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>12768</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>cis_regulatory_elements</prism:category>
    <prism:category>drosophila</prism:category>
    <prism:category>mirna</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pattern_formation</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

