<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:59:37 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: jimmithy's drosophila</title>
	<description>CiteULike: jimmithy's drosophila</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/jimmithy/tag/drosophila</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/jimmithy/article/916979"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/jimmithy/article/910403"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/jimmithy/article/916979">
    <title>Sexual size dimorphism in a Drosophila clade, the D. obscura group</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/jimmithy/article/916979</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Zoology, Vol. 109, No. 4. (14 November 2006), pp. 318-330.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Drosophila obscura clade consists of about 41 species, of which 20 were used for analyses of wing and thorax length. Our primary goal was to investigate the magnitude of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) of these traits within this clade and to test Rensch's Rule [when females are larger than males, SSD (e.g., female/male ratio) should decrease with body size]. Our secondary goal was methodological and involved evaluating for these flies alternative measures of SSD (female/male ratio, female/male absolute difference, female/male relative difference), developing a bootstrap method to estimate the magnitude of intraspecific variation in SSD, and applying a new method of estimating allometric relationships that is phylogenetically based and incorporates error variance in both traits. All indices of SSD were strongly correlated for both size traits. Nevertheless, female/male ratio is the best index here: it is easily interpretable and essentially independent of size. For both traits, SSD (F/M) varied interspecifically, showed a strong phylogenetic signal, but did not differ for the main phylogenetic subgroups or correlate with latitude. Factors underlying variation in SSD in this clade are elusive and might include genetic drift. SSD (wing) tended to decrease with increasing size, as predicted by Rensch's Rule, though not consistently so. SSD (thorax) was unrelated to size. However, analysis of published data for thorax length of Drosophila spp. (N=42) with a larger size range showed that SSD decreased significantly with increasing size (consistent with Rensch's Rule), suggesting our ability to detect SSD-size relations in the D. obscura data may be limited by low statistical power.</description>
    <dc:title>Sexual size dimorphism in a Drosophila clade, the D. obscura group</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Raymond Huey</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Brigitte Moreteau</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jean-Claude Moreteau</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Patricia Gibert</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>George Gilchrist</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Anthony Ives</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jr Garland</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jean David</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.zool.2006.04.003</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Zoology, Vol. 109, No. 4. (14 November 2006), pp. 318-330.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-10-29T23:09:56-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Zoology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>109</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>318</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>330</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>drosophila</prism:category>
    <prism:category>insects</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/jimmithy/article/910403">
    <title>Analysis of the hypoxia-sensing pathway in Drosophila melanogaster.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/jimmithy/article/910403</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Biochem J, Vol. 393, No. Pt 2. (15 January 2006), pp. 471-480.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The mechanism by which hypoxia induces gene transcription involves the inhibition of HIF-1alpha (hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha subunit) PHD (prolyl hydroxylase) activity, which prevents the VHL (von Hippel-Lindau)-dependent targeting of HIF-1alpha to the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. HIF-1alpha thus accumulates and promotes gene transcription. In the present study, first we provide direct biochemical evidence for the presence of a conserved hypoxic signalling pathway in Drosophila melanogaster. An assay for 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases was developed using Drosophila embryonic and larval homogenates as a source of enzyme. Drosophila PHD has a low substrate specificity and hydroxylates key proline residues in the ODD (oxygen-dependent degradation) domains of human HIF-1alpha and Similar, the Drosophila homologue of HIF-1alpha. The enzyme promotes human and Drosophila [(35)S]VHL binding to GST (glutathione S-transferase)-ODD-domain fusion protein. Hydroxylation is enhanced by proteasomal inhibitors and was ascertained using an anti-hydroxyproline antibody. Secondly, by using transgenic flies expressing a fusion protein that combined an ODD domain and the green fluorescent protein (ODD-GFP), we analysed the hypoxic cascade in different embryonic and larval tissues. Hypoxic accumulation of the reporter protein was observed in the whole tracheal tree, but not in the ectoderm. Hypoxic stabilization of ODD-GFP in the ectoderm was restored by inducing VHL expression in these cells. These results show that Drosophila tissues exhibit different sensitivities to hypoxia.</description>
    <dc:title>Analysis of the hypoxia-sensing pathway in Drosophila melanogaster.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>N Arquier</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>P Vigne</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>E Duplan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>T Hsu</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>PP Therond</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>C Frelin</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>G D'Angelo</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1042/BJ20050675</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Biochem J, Vol. 393, No. Pt 2. (15 January 2006), pp. 471-480.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-10-23T20:07:10-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Biochem J</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1470-8728</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>393</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>Pt 2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>471</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>480</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>drosophila</prism:category>
    <prism:category>imaging</prism:category>
    <prism:category>trachea</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

