Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:04:16 BST CiteULike: mgallagher's landscape http://www.citeulike.org/user/mgallagher/tag/landscape CiteULike.org en-gb Copyright © 2004-2008 citeulike.org http://www.citeulike.org/user/mgallagher/article/33943 <i>Journal of Historical Geography, Vol. 28, No. 4. (October 2002), pp. 589-608.</i> Landscape, ideology, and religion: a geography of Ocean Grove, New Jersey K Schmelzkopf doi:10.1006/jhge.2002.0412 Journal of Historical Geography, Vol. 28, No. 4. (October 2002), pp. 589-608. 2004-12-28T16:55:28-00:00 2002 Journal of Historical Geography 0305-7488 28 4 589 608 Academic Press geography landscape religion http://www.citeulike.org/user/mgallagher/article/2783757 <i>Prog Hum Geogr, Vol. 20, No. 2. (1 June 1996), pp. 215-221.</i><br /><br />10.1177/030913259602000206 Place and region 2 Nicholas Entrikin Prog Hum Geogr, Vol. 20, No. 2. (1 June 1996), pp. 215-221. 2008-05-11T04:55:15-00:00 1996 Prog Hum Geogr 20 2 215 221 identity landscape place http://www.citeulike.org/user/mgallagher/article/2782072 <i>Journal of Historical Geography, Vol. 8, No. 2. (April 1982), pp. 145-169.</i><br /><br />John Ruskin's Stones of Venice criticized the Victorian city and Victorian society in the light of a reconstruction of medieval Venice. But Ruskin's reconstruction embodied elements of a long-standing myth propagated by Venetians themselves and inscribed in their organization of urban space and urban landscape. The geographical dimensions of the myth, its changing character through time, its iconographic expressions and its significance for English attitudes to Venice are described and explained. Ruskin used the myth to support his ideology, constructing a homology between architectural development and social structure. But the appeal of Venice transcends historical contingency and may, in part, be understood by reference to psychoanalytic categories, specifically sexual symbolism. The myth and the stones of Venice: an historical geography of a symbolic landscape Denis Cosgrove doi:10.1016/0305-7488(82)90004-4 Journal of Historical Geography, Vol. 8, No. 2. (April 1982), pp. 145-169. 2008-05-10T00:03:53-00:00 1982 Journal of Historical Geography 8 2 145 169 geography landscape monuments http://www.citeulike.org/user/mgallagher/article/2782001 <i>Landscape Research, Vol. 23, No. 2. (1998), pp. 119-132.</i><br /><br /><i>This paper argues that the</i> ephemeral <i>components of the landscape have a significant, but hitherto unrecognized, effect upon the way in which it is perceived and evaluated. These ephemeral components, or landscape ephemera, are those which change with the weather, the seasons, the growth and decay of plants, the choice of farm crop, and so on. Their nature is explored, and they are contrasted with the more permanent components of the landscape, such as hedges, trees, buildings, etc. The importance of these changes is discussed in relation to landscape preference theories and the work of artists in various media. It is argued that landscape regulation and the landscape literature have largely ignored such changes, and it is tentatively suggested that further research and discussion on the topic might have some interesting results for landscape evaluation and planning.</i> On the unrecognized significance of the ephemeral landscape Paul Brassley doi:10.1080/01426399808706531 Landscape Research, Vol. 23, No. 2. (1998), pp. 119-132. 2008-05-09T23:42:01-00:00 1998 Landscape Research 23 2 119 132 Routledge environmental landscape place http://www.citeulike.org/user/mgallagher/article/2781995 <i>Prog Hum Geogr, Vol. 16, No. 2. (1 June 1992), pp. 157-170.</i><br /><br />10.1177/030913259201600201 Gender symbols and urban landscapes Liz Bondi Prog Hum Geogr, Vol. 16, No. 2. (1 June 1992), pp. 157-170. 2008-05-09T23:31:53-00:00 1992 Prog Hum Geogr 16 2 157 170 gender landscape place studies urban