<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:12:49 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: neteler's Mörner</title>
	<description>CiteULike: neteler's Mörner</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/neteler/author/Mörner</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/neteler/article/2194474"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/neteler/article/381409"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/neteler/article/2194474">
    <title>Surveillance and monitoring of wildlife diseases.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/neteler/article/2194474</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Rev Sci Tech, Vol. 21, No. 1. (April 2002), pp. 67-76.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is now recognised that those countries which conduct disease surveillance of their wild animal populations are more likely to detect the presence of infectious and zoonotic diseases and to swiftly adopt counter measures. The surveillance and monitoring of disease outbreaks in wildlife populations are particularly relevant in these days of rapid human and animal translocation, when the contact between wild and domestic animals is close and the threat of a bioterrorist attack is very real. The authors describe the problems inherent in wildlife disease surveillance and stress the importance of the establishment of national strategies for disease detection. The various sampling methods employed for monitoring outbreaks of disease and mortality in wildlife populations are discussed and their strengths and weaknesses described. A major advantage of an efficient disease monitoring programme for wildlife is the early detection of new and 'emerging' diseases, some of which may have serious zoonotic and economic implications. The authors conclude that wildlife disease monitoring programmes that are integrated within national animal health surveillance infrastructures should have the capacity to respond promptly to the detection of unusual wildlife mortality and to institute epizootiological research into new and emerging wildlife diseases.</description>
    <dc:title>Surveillance and monitoring of wildlife diseases.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>T Mörner</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>DL Obendorf</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>M Artois</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>MH Woodford</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Rev Sci Tech, Vol. 21, No. 1. (April 2002), pp. 67-76.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-04T12:31:30-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2002</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Rev Sci Tech</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0253-1933</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>67</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>76</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>disease</prism:category>
    <prism:category>gis</prism:category>
    <prism:category>surveillance</prism:category>
    <prism:category>wildlife</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/neteler/article/381409">
    <title>The role of wildlife in emerging and re-emerging zoonoses.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/neteler/article/381409</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Rev Sci Tech, Vol. 23, No. 2. (August 2004), pp. 497-511.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are huge numbers of wild animals distributed throughout the world and the diversity of wildlife species is immense. Each landscape and habitat has a kaleidoscope of niches supporting an enormous variety of vertebrate and invertebrate species, and each species or taxon supports an even more impressive array of macro- and micro-parasites. Infectious pathogens that originate in wild animals have become increasingly important throughout the world in recent decades, as they have had substantial impacts on human health, agricultural production, wildlife-based economies and wildlife conservation. The emergence of these pathogens as significant health issues is associated with a range of causal factors, most of them linked to the sharp and exponential rise of global human activity. Among these causal factors are the burgeoning human population, the increased frequency and speed of local and international travel, the increase in human-assisted movement of animals and animal products, changing agricultural practices that favour the transfer of pathogens between wild and domestic animals, and a range of environmental changes that alter the distribution of wild hosts and vectors and thus facilitate the transmission of infectious agents. Two different patterns of transmission of pathogens from wild animals to humans are evident among these emerging zoonotic diseases. In one pattern, actual transmission of the pathogen to humans is a rare event but, once it has occurred, human-to-human transmission maintains the infection for some period of time or permanently. Some examples of pathogens with this pattern of transmission are human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome, influenza A, Ebola virus and severe acute respiratory syndrome. In the second pattern, direct or vector-mediated animal-to-human transmission is the usual source of human infection. Wild animal populations are the principal reservoirs of the pathogen and human-to-human disease transmission is rare. Examples of pathogens with this pattern of transmission include rabies and other lyssaviruses, Nipah virus, West Nile virus, Hantavirus, and the agents of Lyme borreliosis, plague, tularemia, leptospirosis and ehrlichiosis. These zoonotic diseases from wild animal sources all have trends that are rising sharply upwards. In this paper, the authors discuss the causal factors associated with the emergence or re-emergence of these zoonoses, and highlight a selection to provide a composite view of their range, variety and origins. However, most of these diseases are covered in more detail in dedicated papers elsewhere in this Review.</description>
    <dc:title>The role of wildlife in emerging and re-emerging zoonoses.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>RG Bengis</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>FA Leighton</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>JR Fischer</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>M Artois</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>T Mörner</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>CM Tate</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Rev Sci Tech, Vol. 23, No. 2. (August 2004), pp. 497-511.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-11-05T08:37:16-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Rev Sci Tech</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0253-1933</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>23</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>497</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>511</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>anaplasmosis</prism:category>
    <prism:category>disease</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ehrlichiosis</prism:category>
    <prism:category>encephalitis</prism:category>
    <prism:category>hanta</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lyme</prism:category>
    <prism:category>wildlife</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

