CiteULike: neteler's cofeeding

Tick-borne encephalitis virus transmission between ticks cofeeding on specific immune natural rodent hosts.

M Labuda — 2006-07-11T07:33:07-00:00

Virology, Vol. 235, No. 1. (18 August 1997), pp. 138-143.

To determine whether the portion of a vertebrate host population having specific immunity to tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus can participate in the TBE virus transmission cycle, natural hosts immunized against TBE virus were challenged with infected and uninfected ticks. Yellow-necked field mice (Apodemus flavicollis) and bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) were either immunized with TBE virus by subcutaneous inoculation of the virus, or they were exposed to virus-infected Ixodes ricinus ticks. One month later, when serum neutralizing antibody was detectable, the animals were infested with infected (donor) adult female ticks and uninfected (recipient) nymphal ticks; recipients were allowed to feed either in close contact (chamber 1) or physically separated (chamber 2) from the infected donor ticks. Following challenge with infected (and uninfected) ticks, viremia developed in all the control, nonimmune animals, whereas viremia was undetectable in all those animals naturally immunized by previous exposure to infected ticks. Despite the presence of neutralizing antibodies in all the immunized animals, 89% (24/ 27) immune animals supported virus transmission between infected and uninfected cofeeding ticks. Most transmission was localized, occurring within chamber 1; disseminated transmission from chamber 1 to chamber 2 was reduced. Immunization by tick bite was more effective than immunization by syringe inoculation in blocking cofeeding virus transmission. Nevertheless 76% (9/12) animals with "natural" immunity still supported transmission. The results demonstrate that natural hosts having neutralizing antibodies to TBE virus (and no detectable viremia) can still support virus transmission between infected and uninfected ticks feeding closely together on the same animal. These observations have important epidemiological implications relating to the survival of TBE virus in Nature.

Incidence from coincidence: patterns of tick infestations on rodents facilitate transmission of tick-borne encephalitis virus.

SE Randolph — 2006-04-30T22:02:03-00:00

Parasitology, Vol. 118 (February 1999), pp. 177-186.

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus has a highly focal distribution through Eurasia. Endemic cycles appear to depend on the transmission of non-systemic infections between ticks co-feeding on the same rodent hosts. The particular features of seasonal dynamics and infestation patterns of larval and nymphal Ixodes ricinus, but not Dermacentor reticulatus, from 4 regions within TBE foci in Slovakia, are such as to promote TBE virus transmission. The distributions of larvae and nymphs on their principal rodent hosts are highly aggregated and, rather than being independent, the distributions of each stage are coincident so that the same ca. 20% of hosts feed about three-quarters of both larvae and nymphs. This results in twice the number of infectible larvae feeding alongside potentially infected nymphs compared with the null hypothesis of independent distributions. Overall, co-feeding transmission under these circumstances brings the reproductive number (R0) for TBE virus to a level that accounts quantitatively for maintained endemic cycles. Essential for coincident aggregated distributions of larvae and nymphs is their synchronous seasonal activity. Preliminary comparisons support the prediction of a greater degree of coincident seasonality within recorded TBE foci than outside. This identifies the particular climatic factors that permit such patterns of tick seasonal dynamics as the primary predictors for the focal distribution of TBE.

Co-feeding transmission and its contribution to the perpetuation of the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia afzelii.

S Randolph — 2005-07-22T08:54:24-00:00

Emerg Infect Dis, Vol. 9, No. 7. (July 2003)