<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:38:02 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: senioritis's methods</title>
	<description>CiteULike: senioritis's methods</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/senioritis/tag/methods</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/senioritis/article/2420562"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/senioritis/article/1243699"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/senioritis/article/209816"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/senioritis/article/1137734"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/senioritis/article/2420562">
    <title>Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/senioritis/article/2420562</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(11 August 2006)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This practical handbook guides beginning researchers through the stages of planning and implementing case studies. Starting with how to establish a rationale for conducting a systematic case study and identify literature that informs the research effort, this indispensable resource shows students how to determine an appropriate research design and conduct informative interviews, observations, and document analyses. It also describes methods for deriving meaning from data and communicating the results. Finally, the authors delineate the ways to verify the results attained. Students and advisors can use these easy-to-follow steps to shape a thesis, dissertation, or independent project from conceptualization to completion. &#60;P&#62;Book Features: &#60;BR&#62;* A step-by-step approach that speaks directly to the novice investigator. &#60;BR&#62;* Many concrete examples to illustrate key concepts. &#60;BR&#62;* Questions, illustrations, and activities to reinforce what has been learned.</description>
    <dc:title>Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Dawson Hancock</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Robert Algozzine</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(11 August 2006)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-02-24T06:46:39-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publisher>Teachers College Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>research</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/senioritis/article/1243699">
    <title>Poster presentations: Valuing all forms of evidence</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/senioritis/article/1243699</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Nurse Education in Practice, Vol. In Press, Corrected Proof&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Summary This paper aims to assist readers who are considering submitting a poster presentation to a conference to appreciate their true worth and demonstrate the important contribution they can make to nursing scholarship and secondly, to provide new insights to conference reviewers who have the task of selecting appropriate contributions for conferences. The author will argue that the use of poster presentations is an ideal opportunity to disseminate research findings and clinical innovations. It offers a new, interesting, and thought-provoking perspective on poster presentations, which includes appraisal of extant literature and reflections about the significance of poster presentations to nursing scholarship. It highlights the benefits of submitting a poster presentation and concludes with some key points for conference reviewers to consider when deciding to select the suitability of abstracts for poster presentations or concurrent sessions.</description>
    <dc:title>Poster presentations: Valuing all forms of evidence</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Phil Halligan</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Nurse Education in Practice, Vol. In Press, Corrected Proof</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-04-22T15:40:35-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>Nurse Education in Practice</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>In Press, Corrected Proof</prism:volume>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>posters</prism:category>
    <prism:category>presentations</prism:category>
    <prism:category>research</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/senioritis/article/209816">
    <title>Doing a Literature Review : Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/senioritis/article/209816</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(01 March 1999)&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Doing a Literature Review : Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Christopher Hart</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(01 March 1999)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-05-24T21:42:20-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1999</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publisher>SAGE Publications</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>research</prism:category>
    <prism:category>synthesis</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/senioritis/article/1137734">
    <title>Four dimensions of significance: Tradition, method, theory, originality</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/senioritis/article/1137734</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Computers and Composition, Vol. 21, No. 1. (March 2004), pp. 5-13.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this article, I reflect on four dimensions of assessing the significance of research in the computers and composition field: tradition, method, theory, and originality. Considering these four key concepts as topoi will help our community define, explain, and predict how future research will significantly contribute to teaching wisely and to writing well with technology.</description>
    <dc:title>Four dimensions of significance: Tradition, method, theory, originality</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Hugh Burns</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2003.08.002</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Computers and Composition, Vol. 21, No. 1. (March 2004), pp. 5-13.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-03-03T08:04:42-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Computers and Composition</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>13</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>methods</prism:category>
    <prism:category>originality</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

