<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 05:32:00 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: vrich's sscp</title>
	<description>CiteULike: vrich's sscp</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/vrich/tag/sscp</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/vrich/article/2758424"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/vrich/article/2625746"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/vrich/article/2758424">
    <title>Bacterial diversity of soils assessed by DGGE, T-RFLP and SSCP fingerprints of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA gene fragments: Do the different methods provide similar results?</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/vrich/article/2758424</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Journal of Microbiological Methods, Vol. 69, No. 3. (June 2007), pp. 470-479.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bacterial communities of four arable soils - pelosol, gley, para brown soil, and podsol brown soil - were analysed by fingerprinting of 16S rRNA gene fragments amplified from total DNA of four replicate samples for each soil type. Fingerprints were generated in parallel by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP), and single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) to test whether these commonly applied techniques are interchangeable. PCR amplicons could be separated with all three methods resulting in complex ribotype patterns. Although the fragments amplified comprised different variable regions and lengths, DGGE, T-RFLP and SSCP analyses led to similar findings: (a) a clustering of fingerprints which correlated with soil physico-chemical properties, (b) little variability between the four replicates of the same soil, (c) the patterns of the two brown soils were more similar to each other than to those of the other two soils, and (d) the fingerprints of the different soil types revealed significant differences in a permutation test, which was recently developed for this purpose.</description>
    <dc:title>Bacterial diversity of soils assessed by DGGE, T-RFLP and SSCP fingerprints of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA gene fragments: Do the different methods provide similar results?</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Kornelia Smalla</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Miruna Oros-Sichler</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Annett Milling</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Holger Heuer</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Susanne Baumgarte</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Regina Becker</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Gabriele Neuber</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Siegfried Kropf</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Andreas Ulrich</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Christoph Tebbe</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2007.02.014</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Journal of Microbiological Methods, Vol. 69, No. 3. (June 2007), pp. 470-479.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-05T17:08:35-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Journal of Microbiological Methods</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>69</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>470</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>479</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>dgge</prism:category>
    <prism:category>sscp</prism:category>
    <prism:category>trflp</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/vrich/article/2625746">
    <title>A new approach to utilize PCR-single-strand-conformation polymorphism for 16S rRNA gene-based microbial community analysis.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/vrich/article/2625746</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Applied and environmental microbiology, Vol. 64, No. 12. (December 1998), pp. 4870-4876.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Single-strand-conformation polymorphism (SSCP) of DNA, a method widely used in mutation analysis, was adapted to the analysis and differentiation of cultivated pure-culture soil microorganisms and noncultivated rhizosphere microbial communities. A fragment (approximately 400 bp) of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V-4 and V-5 regions) was amplified by PCR with universal primers, with one primer phosphorylated at the 5' end. The phosphorylated strands of the PCR products were selectively digested with lambda exonuclease, and the remaining strands were separated by electrophoresis with an MDE polyacrylamide gel, a matrix specifically optimized for SSCP purposes. By this means, reannealing and heteroduplex formation of DNA strands during electrophoresis could be excluded, and the number of bands per organism was reduced. PCR products from 10 of 11 different bacterial type strains tested could be differentiated from each other. With template mixtures consisting of pure-culture DNAs from 5 and 10 bacterial strains, most of the single strains could be detected from such model communities after PCR and SSCP analyses. Purified bands amplified from pure cultures and model communities extracted from gels could be reamplified by PCR, but by this process, additional products were also generated, as detected by further SSCP analysis. Profiles generated with DNAs of rhizosphere bacterial communities, directly extracted from two different plant species grown in the same field site, could be clearly distinguished. This study demonstrates the potential of the selected PCR-single-stranded DNA approach for microbial community analysis.</description>
    <dc:title>A new approach to utilize PCR-single-strand-conformation polymorphism for 16S rRNA gene-based microbial community analysis.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>F Schwieger</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>CC Tebbe</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Applied and environmental microbiology, Vol. 64, No. 12. (December 1998), pp. 4870-4876.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-04-03T10:52:21-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>1998</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Applied and environmental microbiology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0099-2240</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>64</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>12</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>4870</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>4876</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>sscp</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

