Register | Log in | FAQ      [?] 

Tag systematic_reviews [39 articles]

Recent papers classified by the tag systematic_reviews.
  • Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: A systematic qualitative review of their methodology
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 49, No. 2. (February 1996), pp. 235-243.
    by Alejandro R Jadad, Henry J Mcquay
    posted to meta-analysis researchmethods statisticalanalysis systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-07-11 18:50:55 as **
  • Simplified search strategies were effective in identifying clinical trials of pharmaceuticals and physical modalities
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 58, No. 9. (September 2005), pp. 874.e1-874.e11.
    by Doreen Day, Andrea Furlan, Emma Irvin, Claire Bombardier
    posted to researchmethods systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-07-11 20:04:22 as **
  • Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography.
    Int J Epidemiol, Vol. 36, No. 3. (June 2007), pp. 666-676.
    by S Sanderson, ID Tatt, JP Higgins
    posted to epidemiology meta-analysis periodicals-as-topic-standards publishing-standards quality research-standards systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-06-22 17:23:35 as ** along with 3 people and 1 group jyuh lilith misc8g 801
  • Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts.
    BMC Med, Vol. 1 (24 November 2003)
    by VM Montori, NL Wilczynski, D Morgan, RB Haynes,
    posted to bibliometrics publishing systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-06-01 18:44:17 as ** along with 1 person siro
  • Issues raised in systematic reviews of complex multisectoral and community based interventions
    J Public Health, Vol. 30, No. 2. (1 June 2008), pp. 213-215.
    by Jodie Doyle, Rebecca Armstrong, Elizabeth Waters
    posted to publichealth quality researchmethods systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-05-30 18:20:04 as **
  • Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 61, No. 10. (October 2008), pp. 991-996.
    by Jaime L Peters, Alex J Sutton, David R Jones, Keith R Abrams, Lesley Rushton
    posted to systematic_reviews statisticalanalysis meta-analysis by kharke on 2008-09-04 19:33:08 as read
  • Behavior change intervention research in community settings: how generalizable are the results?
    Health Promot. Int., Vol. 19, No. 2. (1 June 2004), pp. 235-245.
    by David A Dzewaltowski, Paul A Estabrooks, Lisa M Klesges, Sheana Bull, Russell E Glasgow
    posted to cochrane_training systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-08-21 17:23:49 as **
  • An increasing number of qualitative research papers in oncology and palliative care: does it mean a thorough development of the methodology of research?
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol. 2, No. 1. (2004)
    by Claudia Borreani, Guido Miccinesi, Cinzia Brunelli, Micaela Lina
    posted to systematic_reviews shuval qualitative_research publishing by kharke on 2008-09-19 19:59:06 as **
  • Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 61, No. 8. (August 2008), pp. 755-762.
    by Margaret Sampson, Kaveh G Shojania, Jessie Mcgowan, Raymond Daniel, Tamara Rader, Alla E Iansavichene, Jun Ji, Mohammed T Ansari, David Moher
    posted to epidemiology researchmethods systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-04-09 20:38:27 as ** along with 1 person and 1 group cm1acb Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group
  • Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 8 (21 April 2008), 22.
    by Andreas Lundh, Peter C Gotzsche
    posted to quality researchmethods systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-05-19 14:47:16 as *** along with 1 person jyuh
  • On the heuristic value of scientific publications and their design; A citation analysis of some clinical trials
    Scientometrics, Vol. 30, No. 1. (26 May 1994), pp. 175-186.
    by Bluma Peritz
    posted to bibliometrics citation_analysis scientometrics systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-06-29 21:03:56 as **
  • Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots
    BMJ, Vol. 336, No. 7658. (21 June 2008), pp. 1413-1415.
    by John P Ioannidis, Nikolaos A Patsopoulos, Hannah R Rothstein
    posted to meta-analysis statisticalanalysis systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-07-21 22:11:39 as **
  • Interpreting meta-analysis in systematic reviews
    Evid Based Med, Vol. 13, No. 3. (1 June 2008), pp. 67-69.
    by Rafael Perera, Carl Heneghan
    posted to meta-analysis statisticalanalysis systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-07-22 15:19:23 as **
  • No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. In Press, Corrected Proof
    by Margaret Sampson, Jessie Mcgowan, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Elise Cogo, David Moher
    posted to epidemiology publishing quality standards systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-04-09 20:44:58 as **
  • Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 2, No. 1. (2002)
    by Walter Deville, Frank Buntinx, Lex Bouter, Victor Montori, Henrica de Vet, Danielle van der Windt, P Bezemer
    posted to researchmethods systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-06-01 01:50:31 as ** along with 1 person jasoneprior
  • The role of a Prospective Public Health Intervention Study Register in building public health evidence: proposal for content and use
    J Public Health, Vol. 29, No. 3. (1 September 2007), pp. 322-327.
    by Elizabeth Waters, Naomi Priest, Rebecca Armstrong, Sandy Oliver, Philip Baker, David Mcqueen, Carolyn Summerbell, Michael P Kelly, Boyd Swinburn
    posted to evidence-based publichealth researchmethods systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-06-05 04:08:36 as **
  • Sample size determination for bibliographic retrieval studies
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol. 8 (29 September 2008), 43.
    by Xiaomei Yao, Nancy L Wilczynski, Stephen D Walter, Brian R Haynes
    posted to systematic_reviews researchmethods information_retrieval bibliometrics by kharke on 2008-10-06 15:07:29 as **
  • A Brief History of Research Synthesis
    Eval Health Prof, Vol. 25, No. 1. (1 March 2002), pp. 12-37.
    by Iain Chalmers, Larry V Hedges, Harris Cooper
    posted to cochrane_training systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-08-21 19:52:31 as **
  • Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 6 (13 June 2006), 27.
    by Beverley J Shea, Maarten Boers, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Candyce D Hamel, Lex M Bouter
    posted to quality systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-07-11 19:37:13 as **
  • Why Don't We See More Translation of Health Promotion Research to Practice? Rethinking the Efficacy-to-Effectiveness Transition
    Am J Public Health, Vol. 93, No. 8. (1 August 2003), pp. 1261-1267.
    by Russell E Glasgow, Edward Lichtenstein, Alfred C Marcus
    posted to cochrane_training systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-08-21 17:22:23 as **
  • Systematic review of the effectiveness of stage based interventions to promote smoking cessation
    BMJ, Vol. 326, No. 7400. (29 May 2003), pp. 1175-1177.
    by Robert P Riemsma, Jill Pattenden, Christopher Bridle, Amanda J Sowden, Lisa Mather, Ian S Watt, Anne Walker
    posted to cochrane_training systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-08-22 15:50:21 as **
  • Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 61, No. 4. (April 2008), pp. 357.e1-357.e10.
    by Penny Whiting, Marie Westwood, Margaret Burke, Jonathan Sterne, Julie Glanville
    posted to epidemiology researchmethods systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-04-09 20:29:33 as **
  • Effect of Hand Hygiene on Infectious Disease Risk in the Community Setting: A Meta-Analysis
    Am J Public Health, Vol. 98, No. 8. (1 August 2008), pp. 1372-1381.
    by Allison E Aiello, Rebecca M Coulborn, Vanessa Perez, Elaine L Larson
    posted to meta-analysis publichealth systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-08-21 15:10:16 as **
  • Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 61, No. 5. (May 2008), pp. 440-448.
    by Su Golder, Yoon Loke, Heather M Mcintosh
    posted to lis quality researchmethods systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-06-22 02:47:58 as ** along with 2 people and 1 group hpiwowar benedebleau Academic Writing, Literacies and Discourse
  • A new approach to outliers in meta-analysis
    Health Care Management Science, Vol. 11, No. 2. (30 June 2008), pp. 121-131.
    by Rose Baker, Dan Jackson
    posted to meta-analysis statisticalanalysis systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-07-21 22:08:45 as **
  • A comparison of the quality of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in paper-based journals.
    Eval Health Prof, Vol. 25, No. 1. (March 2002), pp. 116-129.
    by B Shea, D Moher, I Graham, B Pham, P Tugwell
    posted to cochrane_training evidence-based systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-08-22 16:56:29 as ** along with 1 person and 1 group jeanhee mgh-lcs
  • Interventions to reduce unintended pregnancies among adolescents: systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    BMJ, Vol. 324, No. 7351. (15 June 2002), 1426.
    by Alba Dicenso, Gordon Guyatt, A Willan, L Griffith
    posted to cochrane_training publichealth systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-08-21 17:41:08 as **
  • The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process?
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol. 8 (21 May 2008), 19.
    by Ian Shrier, Jean-Francois Boivin, Robert W Platt, Russell J Steele, James M Brophy, Franco Carnevale, Mark J Eisenberg, Andrea Furlan, Ritsuko Kakuma, Mary E Macdonald, Louise Pilote, Michel Rossignol
    posted to meta-analysis researchmethods systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-06-09 16:20:40 as ** along with 1 person and 1 group cm1acb Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group
  • Bringing evidence to practice: a team approach to teaching skills required for an informationist role in evidence-based clinical and public health practice.
    Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, Vol. 96, No. 1. (January 2008), pp. 50-57.
    by KB Oliver, P Dalrymple, HP Lehmann, DA McClellan, KA Robinson, C Twose
    posted to evidence-based publichealthlibrarianship systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-06-11 16:28:24 as ** along with 2 people lgh jodorsch
  • A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews.
    J Clin Epidemiol, Vol. 60, No. 11. (November 2007), pp. 1095-1104.
    by D Moher, A Tsertsvadze, AC Tricco, M Eccles, J Grimshaw, M Sampson, N Barrowman
    posted to systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-06-11 16:34:17 as ** along with 1 person jyuh
  • A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews
    CMAJ, Vol. 156, No. 10. (15 May 1997), pp. 1411-1416.
    by AR Jadad, DJ Cook, GP Browman
    posted to researchmethods systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-07-11 18:49:26 as **
  • Systematic reviews need systematic searchers.
    J Med Libr Assoc, Vol. 93, No. 1. (January 2005), pp. 74-80.
    by J McGowan, M Sampson
    posted to librarianship researchmethods standards systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-06-11 16:31:43 as ** along with 2 people and 1 group msampson misc8g Academic Writing, Literacies and Discourse
  • Reporting Methods of Blinding in Randomized Trials Assessing Nonpharmacological Treatments
    PLoS Medicine, Vol. 4, No. 2. (1 February 2007), e61.
    by Isabelle Boutron, Lydia Guittet, Candice Estellat, David Moher, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Philippe Ravaud
    posted to quality_assessment systematic_reviews by danielhind to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-12-20 10:41:11 as **
  • Do health technology assessments comply with QUOROM diagram guidance? : an empirical study
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 7 (20 November 2007), 49.
    by Daniel Hind, Andrew Booth
    posted to reporting systematic_reviews by danielhind to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-12-20 11:33:07 as ** along with 1 person cm1acb
  • Systematic reviewers neglect bias that results from trials stopped early for benefit
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 60, No. 9. (September 2007), pp. 869-873.
    by Dirk Bassler, Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez, Matthias Briel, Deborah J Cook, PJ Devereaux, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Haresh Kirpalani, Maureen O Meade, Victor M Montori, Anna Rozenberg, Holger J Schunemann, Gordon H Guyatt
    posted to early_stopping internal_validity systematic_reviews by danielhind to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-12-20 11:30:50 as **
  • Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 7 (15 February 2007), 10.
    by Beverley J Shea, Jeremy M Grimshaw, George A Wells, Maarten Boers, Neil Andersson, Candyce Hamel, Ashley C Porter, Peter Tugwell, David Moher, Lex M Bouter
    posted to quality_assessment systematic_reviews by danielhind to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-12-20 10:30:32 as read along with 3 people cm1acb sbunker kusjasherb
  • Methods of Blinding in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Pharmacologic Treatments: A Systematic Review
    PLoS Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 10. (1 October 2006), e425.
    by Isabelle Boutron, Candice Estellat, Lydia Guittet, Agnes Dechartres, David L Sackett, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Philippe Ravaud
    posted to internal_validity systematic_reviews trial_design by danielhind on 2007-12-20 10:42:09 as read
  • notes Assessing harmful effects in systematic Reviews
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 4, No. 1. (2004)
    by Heather Mcintosh, Nerys Woolacott, Anne M Bagnall
    posted to adverse_events systematic_reviews by danielhind on 2008-01-03 11:57:06 as read
  • notes Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 7 (05 July 2007), 32.
    by Yoon K Loke, Deirdre Price, Andrew Herxheimer
    posted to adverse_events systematic_reviews by danielhind on 2008-01-03 11:55:52 as read
    • Note: You may cite this page as: http://www.citeulike.org/tag/systematic_reviews

    RIS BibTeX
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.