CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Smoothed profile method for particulate flows: Error analysis and simulations Export

Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 228, No. 5. (20 March 2009), pp. 1750-1769.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


6rheology's tags for this article

colloid numerical_simulation

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

We re-formulate and analyze a new method for particulate flows, the so-called “smoothed profile” method (SPM) first proposed in [Y. Nakayama, R. Yamamoto, Simulation method to resolve hydrodynamic interactions in colloidal dispersions, Phys. Rev. E 71 (2005) 036707], which uses a fixed computational mesh without conformation to the geometry of the particles. The method represents the particles by certain smoothed profiles to construct a body force term added into the Navier–Stokes equations. SPM imposes accurately and efficiently the proper conditions at the particle–fluid interface. In particular, while the original method employs a fully-explicit time-integration scheme we develop a high-order semi-implicit splitting scheme, which we implement in the context of spectral/ hp element discretization. First, we show that the modeling error of SPM has a non-monotonic dependence on the time step size Δ t ; it is a function of inlMMLBox , where ν is the kinematic viscosity of fluid and ξ is the interface thickness of the smoothed profile. Subsequently, we present several steady and unsteady simulations, including flow past 3D complex-shaped particles, and compare against direct numerical simulations and the force coupling method (FCM).


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.